Start Here: The Opportunity in One Breath

• What is the current legal/control status of the site? Options: Owned outright, Under option/option to purchase, Under contract, Controlling interest via JV, Masterplan or entitlement only, Other
• What is the approximate total development budget you’re planning for (hard + soft costs)? Options: $50M–$100M, $100M–$200M, $200M–$350M, $350M–$500M, >$500M, Undetermined
• What triggered this initiative now—what event or decision put this project on the table? Options: Site acquisition/option, Brand interest/requirement, Lender condition, Market window/opportunity, Partner request, Other
• Who is the primary sponsor or lead owner we should be speaking with (name, role, email/phone)?
• What immediate outcome would make this initial phase feel successful to you? Options: Feasibility confirmed, Term sheet from lender, Brand pre-approval, Entitlement path defined, Clear construction budget, Other

Where the Project Really Lives Today — Tell Us the Whole Story

• If you had to summarize why this project exists in one blunt sentence, what would you say?
• Which of these stages have you completed or commissioned to date? Options: Preliminary site visit, Market study, Prelim. feasibility model, Concept masterplan, Geotech/soils, Environmental review, Zoning/entitlement applications, None of the above
• How recent are the key analyses (market, cost, entitlement) we should review? Options: Within last 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Over 12 months, None available
• What specific warning signs or surprises have surfaced in your work so far (permits, community pushback, utilities, cost estimates)?
• Who on your internal team owns day-to-day delivery and who is the escalation contact for approvals?
• If you had to give today’s overall confidence level in the project moving forward, what would you choose? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neutral/uncertain, Concerned, Not moving forward

What's Quietly Eating Your Returns?

• What single cost, timeline, or market risk keeps you up at night about this deal?
• Which of these risks do you consider the top three threats to projected returns? Options: Entitlement delays, Construction cost escalation, Weak market demand/RevPAR underperformance, Financing withdrawal or higher rates, Brand approval / program creep, Operational readiness failures, Other
• How have you quantified those exposures so far—do you have sensitivity ranges, contingency assumptions, or stress-test scenarios? Options: Detailed sensitivity model, Basic downside scenarios, Rule-of-thumb contingencies, None yet
• How long have these risks been present, and have they been getting materially worse or improving? Options: Weeks, Months, 1–2 years, Longer than 2 years, Not tracked
• Tell us about a past project or example where a similar risk realized—what changed and what could have prevented it?
• How emotionally urgent is mitigation—are you seeking reassurance, a tactical fix, or a full rework of the model? Options: Immediate mitigation required, Near-term tactical actions, Strategic review acceptable, Monitoring only

Who Holds The Keys — Decision-Makers, Gatekeepers, and Influencers

• If this deal were a play, who has the power to greenlight, delay, or kill it—and why?
• Which of these stakeholders must sign-off on commercial terms or material changes? Options: Investment committee, Board/sovereign fund, Lender(s), Brand/Operator, Local government/authority, Major JV partner, Other
• What is the preferred approval cadence and how quickly can each stakeholder respond (typical review times)? Options: <2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 1–3 months, 3+ months, Varies widely
• Are there non-technical stakeholders (community groups, political sponsors, environmental NGOs) whose support is essential? Options: Yes — critical, Yes — advisory, Not at this stage, Unknown
• Who on the sponsor side will be our internal champion and who is most likely to resist changes?
• What governance or reporting structure would make you feel comfortable moving forward (monthly steering, milestone approvals, third‑party oversight)? Options: Monthly steering committee, Quarterly board updates, Milestone-based approvals, Independent third-party oversight, Other

If Everything Went Right — The Story We Want to Tell

• Imagine opening-day headlines—what single metric or story would make you feel this project succeeded? Options: Stabilized RevPAR at target, Occupancy exceeding target, IRR / equity return achieved, EBITDA margins delivered, Exceeded community expectations, Exceptional guest satisfaction scores, Other
• What are the numeric targets you need to hit (RevPAR, occupancy, IRR, EBITDA margin)? Please list figures and horizons.
• By what year or operating milestone do you expect the project to stabilize against those targets? Options: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4+, Not defined
• Which operational metrics beyond RevPAR matter most to you (F&B capture, ancillary revenue per occupied room, ADR mix, average length of stay)? Options: F&B capture, Ancillary revenue per occupied room, ADR mix, Group vs transient mix, Length of stay, Other
• How will you know we are off-track early—what early warning indicators should we watch together?
• If the project outperforms expectations, what upside would you want preserved versus captured by others (upside sharing preferences)? Options: Full owner upside, Shared between partners, Allocated to development team, Reinvest into property, Other

Constraints, Windows, and Deal-Breakers — Timing You Can’t Lose

• What single constraint—timeline, permit, financing window, or contractual obligation—would stop the project if missed?
• Which of these critical windows apply and do you have firm dates or soft ranges? Options: Environmental permit deadline, Financing commitment date, Franchise/brand approval cutoff, Construction start window, Tourism seasonality target, Other
• Please provide specific deadline dates or quarters for each critical window you selected above.
• If a critical window slips by one quarter, what is the likely material consequence (cost %, timeline impact, financing fallout)? Options: <5% cost/timing impact, 5–15% impact, 15–30% impact, >30% impact / deal jeopardized, Unknown
• Do you already have contingency plans (alternative financing, phased entitlements, value-engineering packages)? If so, briefly describe.
• What are the non-negotiable deal-breakers we must be aware of before building a recommended plan?

Evidence & Conviction — What Would Make You Sleep Easier?

• What piece of third-party evidence would most increase your confidence—what would make you say, ‘That settles it’? Options: Independent market study, Comparable resort case study with P&Ls, Third‑party construction estimate (QTO/GMP), Pre-commitments from brand/operator, Lender comfort/term sheet, Other
• Which comparable resorts or projects do you view as the most relevant precedents? Please list and explain why.
• Have you previously requested reference calls or visited comparable resorts—what did those conversations reveal? Options: Yes — very helpful, Yes — mixed signals, Attempted but inconclusive, No
• What level of independent assurance do you want from us (peer review, full third‑party audit, periodic monitoring)? Options: Peer review only, Independent audit of key studies, Full third-party oversight, Ongoing monitoring during construction, Other
• Is there an internal or external analyst/team whose endorsement will materially affect the outcome? If so, who?
• What open questions or unknowns would you prioritize answering in the first 30 days together?

What Would Make You Sign Today — Tradeoffs, Terms, and Next Steps

• What single concession, risk allocation, or commercial term would get you to sign a letter of intent or engagement this week?
• Which of these commercial structures best aligns with your current appetite? Options: Fixed-price construction, Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), Phased payments tied to milestones, Development fee + success fee, Equity co-investment by consultant, Revenue share model, Other
• What contingency percentage (of hard construction cost) do you require in the budget today? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–15%, 15–20%, >20%, Not specified
• What governance or decision triggers would accelerate your internal approval (monthly steering, milestone escrow, independent certifier)? Options: Monthly steering committee, Milestone escrow/payments, Independent certifier sign-off, Pre-agreed value-engineering triggers, Other
• If we delivered a scoped proposal and a clear path to close, how soon could you bring a term sheet or approval to your investment committee? Options: Immediately, Within 2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, Longer / unknown
• What would you like our next tangible deliverable to be after this conversation (detailed scope, preliminary budget, site visit, workshop)? Options: Preliminary feasibility memo, Comparable case study pack, High-level cost estimate, On-site workshop, Introductory term sheet, Other

• Current State & Consequence Alignment
• Comparable Resort Case Studies — Proof Mapping
• Model Walkthrough — Target RevPAR & Risk Scenarios
• Phased Delivery & Risk Mitigation Workshop
• Site Walk / Virtual Experience & Final Validation

• Draft and circulate the phased delivery schedule with owners, milestones, and acceptance criteria for formal sign-off.
• Identify the top 3 scenarios that materially threaten returns and quantify how specific mitigations reduce that threat.
• Agree on target RevPAR/occupancy ranges and contingency thresholds to include in the phased plan.
• Revise the financial model to reflect agreed assumptions and circulate an executive summary of outcomes and sensitivities.
• Produce a mitigation impact matrix showing which levers mitigate which risks and the expected numeric benefit.
• Customer to confirm acceptable downside thresholds for go/no-go decision gates.
• Present Proposed Phased Scope & Timeline
• Agree to a phased delivery plan with named owners, milestone dates, and explicit acceptance criteria tied to success metrics.
• Lock in the entitlement and procurement mitigation strategies that will be executed to protect timeline and cost targets.
• Establish decision gates and the information required at each gate to enable go/no-go decisions.
• Introductions & Meeting Objectives
• Create a live risk register with triggers tied to decision gates and mitigation owners.
• Prepare procurement and cost-control playbook outlining immediate next steps to lock pricing and contractors.
• Pre-walk Objectives & Core Checks
• Validate physical feasibility and ensure site realities are reconciled with the financial model and phased program.
• Capture a list of immediate design or procurement changes that materially reduce cost or entitlement risk.
• Secure customer confirmation to proceed to the Mutual Commit stage with the agreed mitigations and plan.
• Produce a site visit report with annotated photos, redlines, constructability risks, and recommended mitigations.
• Update the model, phased plan, and risk register based on site findings and circulate for sign-off.
• Schedule Mutual Commit kickoff to finalize commercial terms and governance based on validated plan.
• Produce and document one authoritative one-sentence current-state statement agreed by all stakeholders.
• Quantify the financial and timeline consequences of the top 3 project risks to create urgency for mitigation.
• Agree on target success metrics (RevPAR, occupancy, IRR, timeline) that the Solution Experience must demonstrate.
• Confirm required site and financial data to enable the proof-phase modeling.
• Deliver a one-line Current State & Consequence statement and circulate for sign-off.
• Customer to provide site plans, latest budget, target returns, and any prior market/entitlement studies.
• Prepare an initial risk-cost worksheet quantifying impact of entitlement delays, cost escalation, and demand shortfall.
• Recap Agreed Current State & Future-State Metrics
• Demonstrate concrete, real-world examples where resort-first programs protected returns and delivered target operating metrics.
• Obtain customer agreement on which case-study mitigations are applicable and which require adaptation for their site.
• Secure approval to use selected comparable approaches as inputs to the financial model and phased plan.
• Deliver a case-study dossier with annotated parallels to the customer's site and highlight the top 5 transferable mitigations.
• Customer to confirm which comparable(s) they view as closest and note any non-applicable elements.
• Team to prepare inputs for the scenario model incorporating the chosen mitigation levers.
• Assumptions Recap & Validation
• Confirm model assumptions and obtain explicit customer validation for each material input.
• Base Case Pro Forma Walkthrough
• On-site / Virtual Walkthrough: Operational Flow & Constraints
• One-Sentence Current State Confirmation
• Governance, Owners & Decision Gates
• Case Study Presentations (3 comparables)
• Entitlement & Community Mitigation Plan
• Consequence Quantification
• Constructability & Cost Impact Notes
• Stress Tests & Sensitivities
• Map Case Study Actions to Customer Site
• Cost Control, Procurement & Contingency Strategy
• Mitigation Impact Runs
• Site Constraints & Decision Windows
• Operational & Revenue Outcomes
• Validation: Tie Findings to Future-State Outcomes
• Define Future-State Success Metrics
• Validation Exercise: Does the Plan Eliminate the Consequences?
• Validation Checkpoints
• Pre-work & Data Request

• Deliver Conceptual Resort Design Package
• Produce Architectural Schematic Drawings
• Prepare Complete Construction Documents
• Manage Entitlement and Permit Submissions
• Coordinate Environmental Mitigation Implementation
• Administer Contractor Procurement and Bidding
• Provide Onsite Construction Management
• Conduct Quality Control Inspections and Punchlists
• Manage RFI and Change Order Administration
• Control Construction Cost Reporting and Cashflow
• Oversee FF&E Procurement and Installation
• Recruit Hotel Executive Management Team
• Execute Pre-Opening Training and SOP Implementation
• Commission Building Systems and Turnover to Operator

Deliver Conceptual Resort Design Package

• What is the site context and primary constraints we should reflect in the concept package (e.g., topography, coastal setback, access)?
• What is the target development program (approximate rooms, villas, residential units, F&B outlets, amenity types)? Options: Less than 100 rooms, 100-200 rooms, 200-350 rooms, 350+ rooms / mixed-use
• Which guest segments and positioning should the concept prioritize? Options: Luxury resort, Upper-upscale / branded, Lifestyle / boutique, Family-resort, Wellness / spa-focused, Mixed guest segments
• Which deliverables are required in the conceptual package? Options: Site massing and masterplan, Concept sketches and renderings, Preliminary unit mix and program schedule, High-level cost estimate and budget range, Precedent studies and case comparisons
• Are there existing brand standards, franchise constraints, or operator criteria the concept must comply with? Options: Yes, No, Partial / to be determined
• What is the targeted decision milestone for the concept package (date or project milestone)?

Produce Architectural Schematic Drawings

• Which schematic drawings are required for the project phase? Options: Site plan and circulation, Floor plans for all typical levels, Elevations and sections, Preliminary landscape layout, Furniture and FF&E layout for key areas
• What level of detail do you expect from schematics (high-level massing, block plans, partial fit-out, full furniture layouts)? Options: Massing and blocking, Preliminary floor plans with adjacencies, Detailed schematic with furniture layouts, BIM-enabled schematic deliverable
• Are existing site surveys, geotechnical reports, and utility maps available to support schematic development? Options: Full set available, Partial available, None available
• Should schematics be coordinated with preliminary engineering disciplines (structural, MEP, civil) at delivery? Options: Yes, full coordination, Yes, high-level coordination only, No, architectural-only schematic
• Which file formats and model standards are required for schematic deliverables? Options: 2D CAD (DWG), PDF only, BIM (Revit) model, Sketch-up/3D export
• What acceptance criteria or milestone review approvals must schematics meet (owner sign-off, brand review, planning pre-application)?

Prepare Complete Construction Documents

• Which disciplines must be included in the complete construction documents package? Options: Architectural, Structural, MEP, Civil / drainage, Landscape, Kitchen and FF&E schedules
• What level of BIM/LOD is required for construction documents? Options: LOD 200 (conceptual), LOD 300 (construction documentation), LOD 350 (coordination), LOD 400 (fabrication level)
• Do you require separate permit and contractor bid sets or a single consolidated set? Options: Separate permit and bid sets, Single consolidated set, Permit set only initially
• How many formal document review cycles should we budget for (owner, brand, authority reviews)? Options: 1, 2, 3, 3+
• Are there specific product specifications, performance standards, or sustainability certifications to include (e.g., local code, LEED, WELL)?
• Will you require as-built record drawings and O&M documentation as part of the construction document scope or as a separate phase? Options: Included in this phase, Separate phase during commissioning, Not required

Manage Entitlement and Permit Submissions

• What entitlement approvals are known to be required (zoning change, coastal permit, environmental review, conditional use, variances)? Options: Zoning/rezoning, Coastal / shoreline permits, Environmental Impact Assessment, Conditional use / variances, Utility and ROW approvals
• Are baseline studies available to support entitlement (traffic, noise, arborist, cultural heritage, environmental studies)? Options: All available, Some available, None available
• Do you anticipate major community or stakeholder opposition that will require engagement and public hearing support? Options: Yes, high likelihood, Possible / moderate, No significant opposition expected
• What is the target permitting timeline or critical financing/entitlement window we must meet?
• Which deliverables should we prepare for submissions (plans, technical reports, community presentation materials)? Options: Full technical appendix, Summary reports and graphics, Community engagement materials, All of the above
• Do you require ongoing permit tracking and agency correspondence management until certificate of occupancy? Options: Yes, full management, Yes, on request, No, owner will manage

Coordinate Environmental Mitigation Implementation

• Which types of environmental mitigation are expected or required? Options: Habitat restoration, Stormwater management / retention, Erosion control, Wetland mitigation, Noise or visual screening
• Who will be the responsible party for implementing mitigation (owner, environmental consultant, contractor, our firm)? Options: Owner/Developer, Environmental Consultant, General Contractor, Our firm, Not yet defined
• Is a long-term monitoring and maintenance program required for any mitigation measures? Options: Yes, monitoring required, Yes, maintenance only, No long-term monitoring required, Unknown
• Are there permit-linked performance milestones tied to mitigation (e.g., habitat establishment over multiple years)? Options: Yes, No, Unsure
• What budget or allowance has been set aside for mitigation implementation? Options: Under $250k, $250k-$1M, $1M-$5M, Over $5M, Not set
• Do mitigation measures require specialist contractors or seasonal windows for implementation? Options: Yes, specialist and seasonal constraints, Yes, specialist only, No

Administer Contractor Procurement and Bidding

• Which procurement method do you prefer for main construction contracts? Options: Competitive lump-sum bid, Negotiated contract, Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), Design-Build, Prime contractors by trade
• Will bidders be prequalified or is an open tender required? Options: Prequalification required, Open tender, Combination (prequal for GC only)
• What contract form will be used or preferred (AIA, FIDIC, bespoke owner contract)? Options: AIA, FIDIC, Owner bespoke, JCT, Other
• Do you require bid-phase services such as addendum management, bidder Q&A, bid tabulation and recommendation? Options: Full bid administration, Limited support (Q&A only), No, owner will manage
• Are there local market constraints we should consider for procurement (limited contractors, import lead times, preferred local partners)?
• Do you want procurement staged (early packages for long-lead items) or single-package bidding? Options: Early packages for long-lead, Single package bidding, Hybrid approach

Provide Onsite Construction Management

• What level of onsite construction management is required? Options: Full-time onsite CM, Part-time/periodic site visits, Remote management with weekly onsite presence
• What authority should the onsite CM hold regarding contractor oversight and approvals? Options: Observation and reporting only, Contract administration and change order recommendation, Authority to approve certain changes within threshold
• Are there mandatory safety, security or community protocols the CM must enforce on site? Options: Yes, detailed safety/security protocols, Standard safety requirements, No special protocols
• What reporting cadence and format do you require from onsite CM (daily logs, weekly progress, monthly dashboards)? Options: Daily logs and photos, Weekly progress reports, Monthly executive dashboard, All of the above
• Do you require our team to coordinate subcontractor scheduling, coordination meetings, and brand inspections? Options: Yes, full coordination, Partial coordination, No
• Will the CM be responsible for safety compliance documentation and toolbox talks? Options: Yes, No, Owner provides safety oversight

Conduct Quality Control Inspections and Punchlists

• What inspection frequency is required during critical phases (foundations, MEP rough-in, finishes)? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Milestone-based, Daily during critical periods
• Do you require third-party QC or testing (materials testing, concrete breaks, independent QA/QC)? Options: Yes, third-party testing required, No, contractor testing only, On-demand testing
• What acceptance criteria should be used for punchlist sign-off (snag-free percentage, rework timeline)?
• Should punchlist management include photo-annotated reports and tracking to closure in a project platform? Options: Yes, platform tracking required, Yes, PDF reports only, No formal tracking required
• Will warranty inspections and post-handover snag rounds be required at 3, 6, 12 months? Options: Yes, 3/6/12 months planned, Yes, select intervals, No
• Are brand or operator sign-offs required at final inspection and punchlist completion? Options: Yes, operator and brand required, Operator only, Owner only / no brand sign-off

Manage RFI and Change Order Administration

• What is the desired turnaround time for RFI responses? Options: 2-3 business days, 5-7 business days, 10+ business days
• Who has approval authority for change orders and at what thresholds? Options: Owner only, Owner + brand, Design team delegated thresholds, Our firm with delegated financial limits
• What format and tracking method should be used for RFIs and COs (project platform, email, contractor system)? Options: Project management platform (e.g., Procore), Email with standardized template, Contractor-submitted system
• Do you want a cost impact estimate and schedule impact analysis included with every proposed change order? Options: Yes, cost and schedule analysis required, Cost only, Schedule only, No, summary approval only
• What is the anticipated volume of RFIs/COs based on project complexity (estimate)? Options: Low (<100), Medium (100-500), High (500+), Unknown
• Should contingency drawdown and change order reporting be included in monthly executive cost reports? Options: Yes, No, Only on request

Control Construction Cost Reporting and Cashflow

• How frequently do you require formal cost reporting and forecasting? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Milestone-based
• Which reporting views are required (SOV progress, committed cost, forecast at completion, variance analysis)? Options: SOV / draw schedule, Committed cost register, Forecast at completion (FAC), Variance and trend analysis
• Are there lender or investor draw schedule requirements and documentation formats to comply with? Options: Yes, lender-specific requirements, Investor reporting only, No external draw constraints
• What retainage and payment terms are planned that the cashflow model must reflect? Options: Standard retainage (5-10%), No retainage, Milestone payments with retainage, Custom terms
• Do you require earned value management, cost-to-complete forecasting, or a simpler cashflow projection? Options: Earned value management, Cost-to-complete forecasting, Simple cashflow projection
• Should the cost reporting include change order logs and contingency vs allowance tracking? Options: Yes, include CO and contingency tracking, Include CO only, Exclude detailed CO tracking

• Statement of Work (SOW)
• Master Services Agreement (MSA)
• Commercial Terms & Pricing Schedule
• Payment & Milestone Schedule
• Governance & Decision Rights
• Risk Allocation & Contingency Plan
• Change Order & Variation Procedure
• Permits, Financing & Lender Conditions
• Procurement & Third-Party Appointment Plan
• Insurance, Bonds & Indemnity Schedule
• Performance Guarantees & Acceptance Criteria
• Escrow, Holdback & Security Mechanisms
• Termination, Suspension & Exit Rights
• Execution Confirmation / Letter of Intent
• Data Sharing & Reporting Requirements

• Success Review Kickoff
• Performance vs Feasibility Deep Dive
• Lessons Learned Workshop
• Continuous Improvement & Enhancements Planning
• Shared Channel, Reporting & Ongoing Governance Setup

• Establish governance and reporting mechanisms to track adoption and impact of enhancements.
• Share consolidated performance data request list and deadlines with owners.
• Distribute the template for the performance pack (metrics, data fields, and definitions).
• Schedule the Performance vs Feasibility Deep Dive session and assign facilitators.
• Workshop Framing & Rules
• Capture a comprehensive set of lessons across all project phases with clear context and evidence.
• Prioritize lessons into quick wins and strategic changes to inform process and contractual updates.
• Assign accountable owners and timelines to convert lessons into actionable changes.
• Create a Lessons Learned dossier with context, evidence, recommended change, and owner for each prioritized lesson.
• Update the standard playbook sections (entitlement, procurement, cost control, pre-opening) with approved changes.
• Schedule knowledge-transfer sessions for the delivery and development teams to institutionalize best practices.
• Review Prioritized Lessons & Problem Statements
• Convert lessons into a prioritized, time-bound enhancement backlog with owners and success metrics.
• Define at least one pilot initiative with clear scope, metrics, and resourcing to trial improvements.
• Opening & Metric Definitions
• Publish the prioritized enhancement backlog to the shared channel with owners and due dates.
• Draft pilot charters for top 1–3 initiatives and secure sponsor approval.
• Allocate required budget or internal resources for approved pilots and updates.
• Stakeholder Roles & Audience
• Put a shared, auditable channel in place for tracking issues and enhancements with clear ownership and SLAs.
• Agree on reporting cadence and template so stakeholders receive consistent, actionable updates.
• Ensure all relevant stakeholders are onboarded and know how to use the channel and submit items.
• Create the shared channel/workspace and invite the defined stakeholder list with appropriate permissions.
• Publish issue submission and SLA guidelines and the initial reporting templates to the channel.
• Populate the channel with the initial backlog items and schedule the recurring reporting meetings.
• Identify and quantify the largest variances between feasibility and actual performance.
• Agree on the preliminary root causes for material variances and assign owners for deeper analysis.
• Determine whether performance deviations are acceptable, remediable, or require contract/governance actions.
• Produce a variance register with quantified financial impact and assigned RCA owners.
• Task finance team to model IRR/P&L impacts for top 3 variance scenarios.
• Collect missing validation documents (commissioning logs, vendor claims, entitlement correspondence).
• Welcome & Objectives
• Ensure all stakeholders share a single, explicit set of feasibility assumptions and success metrics.
• Confirm data sources, owners and validation steps to enable reliable performance comparison.
• Agree on review timeline, deliverables, and responsibilities.
• Revenue & Demand Performance
• Project Timeline Retrospective
• Agreed Feasibility & Success Metrics Recap
• Channel Structure & Tools
• Propose Improvement Initiatives
• Issue/Enhancement Lifecycle & SLAs
• Breakout 1 — Entitlement & Market Risks
• Define Pilot Scope & Success Criteria
• Proposed Review Scope & Methodology
• Cost, Schedule & Capex Variance
• Reporting Templates & Cadence
• Prioritization & Resourcing
• Data Ownership & Validation Plan
• Operational KPIs & Guest Experience
• Breakout 2 — Construction & Cost Controls
• Timeline, Outputs & Roles
• Risk Events & Root-Cause Summary
• Breakout 3 — Brand & Operational Readiness
• Onboarding, Access & Next Steps
• Roadmap, Governance & Reporting
• Quantify Financial Impact & Sensitivity
• Synthesis & Prioritization
• Assign Owners & Next Steps
• Confirm Open Questions & Next Steps