Financial Services
›
Capital Markets & Investment Management
›
Institutional Asset Management
Pension Fund Management
High-stakes financial decisions requiring trust, structured diligence, and coordinated stakeholders.
Example organizations in this space:
CalPERS
TIAA
Vanguard
Fidelity
This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.
Inside this journey
-
Pre-Sales
Qualify and diagnose before investing in a full evaluation cycle.
-
Qualification
Confirm plan type, decision timeline, consultant involvement, and basic fit before investing in a full discovery.
Qualification Questions
Plan type & profile
- Which type of retirement plan are you evaluating this solution for?
- Roughly, what are the plan's asset size and current funded status?
Consultant involvement & decision makers
- Is an external investment consultant involved in the manager selection process?
- Who are the primary decision makers or final approvers for a mandate like this?
Basic fit & investment priorities
- Which of these objectives is the primary priority for this mandate?
- Do you currently use an LDI or glide-path approach, or would this be a new capability for the plan?
Budget, timeline, and compliance
- Is there an allocated budget or target fee range for a third-party manager at this scale?
- What is your decision timeline or target date for selecting a manager?
- Are there procurement, governance, or data/security requirements that will affect contracting or onboarding?
-
Outcome Discovery
Map funded status objectives, actuarial constraints, stakeholder decision-makers, and measurable success signals.
Discovery Questions
Quick Context: Your plan at a glance
- Briefly describe your plan type, approximate assets under management, and the primary actuarial discount rate you use.
- Which plan category best fits your fund?
- How many full-time staff manage investments and how many are dedicated to operations and reporting?
- When was your last actuarial valuation completed, and do you run interim assumption checks?
- Who on your team ultimately signs off on manager selection and who drafts the board materials?
- Is your plan currently in a manager search or RFP stage, and if so, what is the decision window?
What funded-status improvement would actually change your priorities?
- If improving funded status by 5 percentage points within three years were achievable, would that change your willingness to select an outsourced manager now?
- Walk me through the metrics you treat as primary indicators of funded-status improvement and why each matters to trustees and the actuary.
- Estimate the funded-status target your board expects to reach in five years, and how flexible is that target?
- What single actuarial assumption, if changed by 0.5 percentage points, would alter your return or contribution planning the most?
- Which contribution or policy levers would you realistically consider adjusting in the next 12 months to support funding objectives?
- What would have to be true about projected funded-status improvement from a pilot before your board would approve proceeding to a commercial contract?
Where volatility actually hits your plan's balance sheet
- When a market shock hits, which cost or consequence shows up first for your plan or plan sponsor?
- Describe the last stress scenario that prompted trustee-level action, and what change resulted.
- How often do you run stochastic scenario analysis versus single-scenario stress tests for funded-status planning?
- Point to the asset classes or mandates that contribute most to funded-status swings in your current portfolio.
- If you had to reduce funded-status volatility by half over the next 12 months, what is the single operational blocker that would prevent you from doing so?
Who's actually enabled to change course
- Name the decision-makers whose vote or influence can stop a manager selection or mandate change in its tracks.
- Walk me through the last trustee meeting where allocation or manager structure was debated, who pushed back and why?
- How do your consultant and internal team split responsibility for diligence, RFP scoring, and preparing trustee materials?
- Who would have the authority to pause a transition if custodial access or data delivery proved incomplete?
- Estimate the typical calendar window between a final recommendation and board ratification for manager changes at your organization.
Operational readiness, the practical 'can we do this' check
- If custodian connectivity, trade settlement, and cashflow forecasts are not in place, how soon would that force you to delay onboarding?
- List the third-party systems that must integrate for reporting and trade execution and indicate who owns each connection.
- Do you have named owners for daily cash management, trade reconciliation, and performance reporting?
- Select the data feeds currently automated into your systems
- What single integration failure during a pilot would cause you to halt further work?
Risks that will pull this up to committee
- Point to the governance or regulatory risk that worries you more than a market drawdown.
- Describe a past situation where a compliance, legal, or audit review delayed or blocked an investment decision and what remedial steps were required.
- How many external audits, legal signoffs, or compliance reviews are required before changing a manager or mandate?
- If an actuarial assumption change forced immediate reallocation, who would need to be persuaded and in what sequence to approve that move?
- What is the non-negotiable governance hurdle that would kill this project immediately?
The other options on the table
- List the alternatives you are actively evaluating, including the incumbent, other managers, pooled solutions, or internal options.
- What would have to be true about your current approach for you to keep it rather than switch to a new manager or solution?
- Identify whether any internal stakeholder is advocating for a do-it-yourself path and what resources or hires they have proposed.
- When you benchmark the incumbent's performance and funded-status impact, where do they fall short relative to your objectives?
- If the incumbent could match your top two acceptance criteria within 30 days, would that end the search?
Defining success, the signals that accelerate approval
- If a 12-month pilot demonstrated measurable funded-status volatility reduction, what outcome or evidence would speed board approval to sign a mandate?
- Name the three metrics you will use to decide whether a pilot is successful for trustees and the actuary.
- At what cadence does your board expect funded-status, attribution, and cashflow reporting for a new mandate?
- What reporting format and level of detail will convince your actuary and trustees that progress is real and contract negotiation can proceed?
- If one required acceptance criterion is unmet at pilot end, will you still proceed to contract negotiation or will you require remediation?
Next steps and timeline constraints
- If the board requires final approval within the next quarter, what must we prove in the next 30 days to make that happen?
- Identify internal calendar constraints or blackout dates that would block key meetings, transitions, or trustee decisions in the next six months.
- Provide the names and roles of the signatories required for commercial and legal approval and indicate who can approve pilots versus full mandates.
- Provide your expected budget range for management fees and one-time transition costs for a new mandate.
- If everything aligns, when could you sign a pilot statement of work?
-
-
Solution Experience
Walk through how portfolio solutions and LDI glide paths address the buyer's funded-status and volatility objectives using their context.
Solution Experience
- Solution Experience: Portfolio & LDI Glide Path Walkthrough
- Confirm your current funded-status and its cost
- You confirm the quantified cost of your current funded-status volatility to contributions or plan risk.
- The seller to deliver a tailored glide-path model with your actuarial assumptions and a three-scenario funded-status sensitivity analysis before the follow-up meeting.
- You validate that the proposed glide-path materially reduces funded-status volatility in the scenarios shown.
- Show the glide-path response to your objectives
- You to provide the latest actuarial valuation and the next three-year cashflow projection.
- You agree on the outstanding evidence and approvals needed before a trustee recommendation.
- Run a short-term stress scenario using your parameters
- The seller to prepare a one-page trustee summary of demonstrated outcomes and recommended next steps for the trustee packet.
- Review operational and governance impacts
- You to confirm the decision-makers and timing for presenting the trustee summary.
- Validate mapping to your needs
- Solution Experience: Portfolio & LDI Glide Path Walkthrough
- Solution Experience Deck
- Solution Brief
- meeting
- slides
- document
-
Due Diligence & Trustee Meetings
Document on-site operational due diligence, consultant Q&A, and board or investment committee presentations.
Meeting Notes
- On-site Operational Due Diligence Fieldwork
- Consultant Technical Q&A and Data Validation
- Board Presentation Finalization and Decision Framing
- Trustee or Investment Committee Meeting
- Post-Meeting Operational Acceptance and Remediation Plan
- Finalize and distribute the board-ready slide deck and handouts.
- Deliver validated sample reports and the provenance of source data for consultant review.
- Confirm deadlines for outstanding evidence submissions and schedule a follow-up validation checkpoint.
- Confirm decision ask and approval thresholds
- Board presentation deck is finalized and ready for distribution.
- Exact decision ask and resolution language are approved and locked.
- Anticipated trustee questions and prepared responses are documented for presenters.
- Chair opens and states the decision request
- Publish the decision resolution wording for inclusion in meeting materials.
- Prepare and distribute a one-page trustee Q&A brief with evidence references.
- Review committee conditions and required evidence
- Remediation plan with a complete task list, acceptance criteria, and timeline is agreed.
- Verification checkpoints and the final sign-off process are documented and scheduled.
- First evidence delivery date is set and responsibilities for evidence submission are clear.
- Publish the remediation and acceptance plan with task list, deadlines, and verification steps.
- Deliver the first evidence package by the agreed checkpoint date.
- Schedule the verification test and final sign-off meeting once evidence is submitted.
- Committee records a clear decision to approve, conditionally approve with specified conditions, or decline.
- Conditions for any conditional approval are documented with acceptance criteria and timelines.
- Official meeting minutes and a summarized action item list are produced for distribution.
- Publish official meeting minutes including the resolution and any conditions.
- Issue the summarized action item list with timelines and evidence requirements.
- If approved conditionally, initiate the remediation tracking process per the documented conditions.
- Confirm scope and evidence checklist
- Draft operational due diligence report with documented observations and preliminary risk ratings is produced.
- Prioritized list of operational gaps requiring remediation or further evidence is agreed.
- Specific additional documents and system extracts required to close open items are listed with delivery timelines.
- Publish the draft operational due diligence report and prioritized gap list for review.
- Request and collect the additional documents and system extracts listed during the session.
- Schedule any follow-up on-site or remote tests needed to validate remediations.
- Confirm consultant question list and priority
- Q&A log capturing each question, provided clarification, and any remaining open items is agreed.
- Sample data and report outputs are validated or exceptions documented with required corrective evidence.
- Timeline for delivery of outstanding evidence and model inputs is established.
- Publish the consultant Q&A log including agreed clarifications and open items.
- Recommendation presentation and key findings
- Review presentation slides focused on decision materials
- Define remediation tasks and acceptance criteria
- Walk through investment process and model inputs
- Walk operations end-to-end
- Test sample workflows and controls
- Validate sample reports and data feeds
- Agree timelines and intermediate checkpoints
- Trustee Q&A and discussion
- Run trustee Q&A rehearsal and responses
- Committee vote and record decision
- Agree logistics, handouts, and voting/resolution wording
- Confirm final acceptance sign-off process
- Capture findings and preliminary risk ratings
- Document open items and evidence timeline
- Summarize action items and next steps
-
Solution Scope
Define mandate structure, fees, reporting cadence, responsibilities, and measurable deliverables.
Scope Configuration
- Manage Core Fixed Income Mandate
- Manage Public Equity Mandate
- Manage Real Assets Mandate
- Deploy Liability-Driven Investment Glide Path
- Execute Duration and Cashflow Matching Overlay
- Portfolio Rebalancing and Trade Execution
- Quarterly Performance Attribution Package
- Funded Status Monitoring Report
- Actuarial Scenario Analysis Package
- Board-Ready Investment Committee Presentation
- RFP Response and Consultant Database Submission
- On-Site Due Diligence Visit and Manager Briefing
- Provide Dedicated Portfolio Strategist and Service Team
Scope Questions
Manage Core Fixed Income Mandate
- Do you have an existing investment policy statement (IPS) that defines fixed income duration and credit targets?
- What target duration and benchmark should the fixed income mandate aim to achieve relative to your liabilities?
- Which custodial account numbers and settlement instructions must be used for fixed income trade settlement?
- How frequently should you receive compliance, holdings, and liquidity reports for the mandate (daily T+1, monthly, quarterly)?
- Are there hard constraints in your IPS or actuarial guidance on credit quality, sector concentration, or issuer limits?
Manage Public Equity Mandate
- Who on your team approves equity style, geographic exposure, and passive versus active allocations for the public equity mandate?
- When is your fiscal year-end or actuarial valuation date that equity allocations should be aligned with?
- What format of benchmark and index compositions do you require for equity attribution and reporting?
- Which trading windows, blackout periods, or index reconstitution dates must we observe for equity rebalancing?
- Are there tax sensitivity constraints or country weight limits (for U.S. taxable considerations) that we must enforce?
Manage Real Assets Mandate
- Identify the real asset sectors (for example infrastructure, core real estate, timber, energy) you want included in the mandate.
- List the valuation cadence and reporting documents required for real assets (quarterly NAV, annual appraisal, third-party valuations)?
- Provide the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or property-level covenant thresholds that must be enforced for real asset investments.
- Confirm whether you require third-party custody, pooled vehicle wrappers, or direct ownership documentation for real assets.
- Describe the maximum allocation limit to illiquid real assets as a percentage of plan assets per your IPS.
Deploy Liability-Driven Investment Glide Path
- How many liability scenarios from your actuary should the glide path model (for example base case, downside, severe stress)?
- Which actuarial inputs (discount rate curve, mortality table, inflation assumption) must be referenced from your latest valuation?
- What fee structure or credits do you expect for the glide path implementation (basis points on AUM, fixed fee, performance link)?
- Which reporting templates should accompany the glide path deliverables (cashflow match schedule, duration gap analysis, scenario outputs)?
- What objective acceptance criteria will confirm the glide path meets your funded-status and volatility goals (for example percent funded improvement, duration band, cashflow coverage ratio)?
Execute Duration and Cashflow Matching Overlay
- What integration files does your actuarial or benefits system provide (cashflow CSV, liability ladder, pensioner list) for cashflow matching?
- Which counterparties or clearinghouses must be used for overlay futures and swaps and are there documentation constraints?
- Do you require documented collateral thresholds, margin triggers, and rehypothecation limits for overlay derivatives?
- Who will be the designated contact on your side for daily collateral and margin reconciliations?
- What duration tolerance band in years should the overlay keep relative to the liability duration target?
Portfolio Rebalancing and Trade Execution
- Which execution venues and broker counterparties are permitted for each asset class (for example exchanges, alternative trading systems, approved brokers)?
- How should trade implementation cost, slippage, and implementation shortfall be reported after execution?
- What approvals and governance steps are required for trades above notional thresholds and who provides them?
- Are there existing programmatic rebalancing rules in your custody or accounting system that we must integrate with?
- Which blackout dates (month-end, benefit payment dates) must we avoid for rebalancing events?
Quarterly Performance Attribution Package
- What attribution framework do you prefer for quarterly reporting (for example Brinson-Fachler, multi-factor, custom)?
- What cadence and delivery format do you prefer for attribution packages (quarterly PDF, interactive dashboard, CSV feed)?
- Which reporting fields must be present on each attribution report (gross/net returns, benchmark, sector contributions, fees)?
- Which data feeds should be integrated to populate the attribution engine (custodian position file, trade blotter, pricing source)?
- What reconciliation tolerance between custodian performance and manager attribution is acceptable (for example 5 basis points, 10 basis points)?
Funded Status Monitoring Report
- Do you require the funded status monitoring to reconcile automatically to your actuarial valuation and assumptions?
- What cadence and delivery format do you want for funded status monitoring (monthly dashboard, quarterly board packet)?
- What verification evidence will validate the funded status monitoring report (for example actuarial reconciliation, trustee sign-off, consultant reconciliation)?
- Which actuarial scenarios and discount-rate shocks should be included in the monitoring outputs?
- Which regulatory or pension reporting formats (for example GASB 67/68 fields or state-specific forms) must be included in the monitoring report?
Actuarial Scenario Analysis Package
- Identify the actuarial inputs to use for scenario analysis (mortality table, payroll growth, discount curve)?
- How many forward years of cashflow projection do you require in scenario outputs (for example 10, 20, 30 years)?
- What output deliverables do you need from scenario analysis (probability distribution of funded ratio, contribution path projections, asset-liability tables)?
- Who should receive the actuarial scenario package and in what file formats for trustee and consultant review (PDF slide deck, CSV outputs)?
- Are implementation recommendations (trade-level steps) within the scope of this actuarial scenario package or explicitly out of scope?
Board-Ready Investment Committee Presentation
- List the specific slides and artifacts required for trustee review (funded status dashboard, glide path summary, scenario appendix)?
- What defines acceptance for the board-ready presentation (for example presence of actuarial scenario slides, performance attribution to IPS benchmark, and CIO sign-off)?
- Which presentation templates or brand guidelines must the slide deck follow for trustee materials?
- When do you need the draft deck delivered in advance of the committee meeting for review (for example 7 days prior)?
- Who will present at the trustee or investment committee meeting and who needs to be listed on the attendee sheet?
RFP Response and Consultant Database Submission
- What RFP template or required consultant database fields must we populate for a compliant submission?
- What performance history windows does the consultant database request (for example 3-year, 5-year, since-inception)?
- Do you need standardized fee schedules, model portfolios, and fee illustrations for inclusion in the RFP package?
- Which due diligence documents should be attached to the consultant submission (audited financials, custody confirmations, historic compliance reports)?
- Confirm whether you will authorize final RFP content and any redlines to standard materials prior to submission.
On-Site Due Diligence Visit and Manager Briefing
- Provide the list of topics that must be covered during the on-site briefing (operational controls, trade compliance, disaster recovery)?
- How many days do you typically schedule for an on-site due diligence visit and manager briefing?
- Which documents should be available on-site (service-level agreement, custody agreements, trade blotters, disaster recovery plan)?
- How will you handle virtual meeting backup materials or recorded sessions if requested in lieu of parts of the on-site briefing?
- Who will coordinate logistics and security clearance for visiting managers on your side?
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial and legal terms, service levels, data access, and acceptance criteria for the mandate.
Agreement Modules
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Investment Management Agreement (IMA)
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Fee Schedule & Order Form
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Data Processing & Security Agreement (DPA)
- Custodian & Connectivity Authorization
- Onboarding & Acceptance Certificate
- Public-Sector Procurement & Compliance Rider
-
Deployment
Lock readiness facts and configuration values before execution begins.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm operational readiness facts — custodial connections, cashflow schedules, data feeds, and named owners before transition.
Pre-Deployment Questions
Environment and site access
- Are production custodial connections for the accounts in scope established and tested (so we can schedule API cutovers)?
- Is the buyer's production cashflow schedule (benefit payment dates and expected drawdowns) finalized and assigned to an owner (so we can plan funding windows)?
- Are the production data feeds required for deployment (positions, prices, accounting, actuarial inputs) available with read access for the deployment team?
Data and configuration
- Has the source-of-truth been designated for each required dataset (e.g., accounting system, actuarial file, trading blotter)?
- Are reporting templates, benchmark assignments, and acceptance criteria finalized (so we can pre-configure report generation)?
- Are there any restricted data feeds, special privacy/regulatory constraints, or vendor approvals we should know about? If yes, briefly list the feed categories and the approval owner (helps us triage access).
People and ownership
- Who is the named owner responsible for custodial integrations and credential approvals? (role and name — deployment team will use for signoffs)
- Who is the named owner for cashflow and funding authorizations during transition? (role and name)
- Who will own reporting acceptance, trustee/committee signoff, and the final go/no-go decision for the transition? (role and name)
Timing and constraints
- Are there trustee meetings, fiscal close dates, or regulatory blackout periods that restrict allowable cutover windows? (this prevents scheduling conflicts)
- What is the target transition timing?
- Is legal/commercial approval and data-access authorization in place to begin provisioning integrations?
-
Configuration Details
Capture exact transition and reporting configurations — custodian credentials, trade windows, benchmark settings, and reporting templates.
Configuration Details
ENVIRONMENTS & ENDPOINTS — Production instance and custodian integrations
- Enter the production instance name for this mandate (format: single token, e.g. 'prod-ldimandate-001'; Default: 'production')
- Select the deployment region for the production instance (Default: US-East)
- Choose the custodian integration method that will supply holdings and trade files
- Enter the custodian system identifier to map records (e.g., 'CustodianAcct-12345' or vendor account code)
- Enter the named owner for the custodian credentials (format: 'Full Name / Role / Email') — do NOT paste secrets here
TRADING & EXECUTION — trade windows, settlement rules, and sequencing
- Primary trade execution window (format: 'HH:MM-HH:MM TZ'; Default: '09:30-16:00 Local') — single value the execution engine will use
- Select the primary data/feed method for daily NAVs and trade confirmations
BENCHMARKS & REPORTING — mapping indices and delivery templates
- Select how the mandate benchmark will be sourced
- Enter the exact benchmark identifier or name to use (as it appears in your performance system or index provider)
- Select required reporting deliverables (choose all that apply; Default includes 'Quarterly board slide deck')
- If 'Custom template' selected above, enter the template name or storage path (format examples: 's3://bucket/path' or '/SharedDrive/Folder/Template.pptx'); leave blank if not applicable
DATA FEEDS, MAPPINGS & CREDENTIAL HANDOFF — file patterns, endpoints, and secure exchange
- Enter the expected data feed filename pattern or API endpoint path (example patterns: 'NAV_YYYYMMDD.csv' or '/api/v1/custodian/holdings')
- Select the secure channel that will be used to exchange credential secrets at kickoff (we will NOT collect secrets here)
- If you selected 'Your secrets manager' above, enter the secrets manager name or vault path (format: 'vault-name:/path/to/cred' or 'KeyVaultName/secret-name'); if another channel, enter the contact/hand-off location
-
Transition Execution
Execute the mandate onboarding and asset transitions with clear owners, sequencing, and operational checkpoints.
-
-
Success
Review funded-status progress, performance attribution, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.
Success Reviews
- Go-live Health Check (Week 1-4)
- First Measurement Review (Week 4-10)
- Acceptance Gate Review (Day ~90)
- Quarterly Success Review
- Annual Realization Review (12 months)
Issues & Enhancements
- Publish the quarterly attribution report with variance notes for trustee and consultant review.
- Publish the acceptance decision and rationale, including pass/fail status for each criterion.
- Publish remediation items with resolution dates and expected verification evidence.
- Archive legacy data or confirm the read-only retention plan and document fallback closure steps.
- Quarterly funded-status delta vs Solution Scope targets
- Confirm whether the quarterly funded-status change is consistent with expectations and recorded targets.
- Agree actions to address any persistent performance or operational issues identified by sleeve.
- Ensure the shared channel for issues and enhancements is up to date and specific.
- Re-confirm success criteria and owners
- Update the operational ticket list with resolution dates and expected verification evidence.
- Triage enhancement requests and publish the prioritized backlog to the shared channel.
- 12-month funded-status progress and actuarial scenario review
- Confirm whether the rolling 12-month funded-status improvement meets expectations and is supported by attribution.
- Agree operational adjustments required to sustain the realized outcomes for the next year.
- Close or re-scope long-standing blockers and update the shared channel accordingly.
- Publish the annual realization summary suitable for trustee or investment committee materials.
- Schedule any required actuarial assumption updates or scenario re-runs based on outcomes.
- Close or re-scope long-standing blockers and record the status in the shared channel.
- Confirm all critical operational connections and feeds are live.
- Document and prioritize open issues with remediation timelines.
- Ensure your team and the seller have aligned owners for each success criterion.
- Publish go-live validation summary and list of open issues for async review.
- Confirm data feed health checks run daily until the next review.
- Present first measurements vs Solution Scope targets
- Determine whether plan funded ratio and funded-status volatility are trending toward the targets recorded in Solution Scope.
- Identify root causes for any performance or funded-status gaps and agree corrective actions with dates.
- Confirm timeline and evidence required to proceed to the acceptance gate meeting.
- Document corrective actions, expected impact on the named metrics, and target completion dates.
- Confirm data sources and reconciliation procedures for funded ratio and attribution calculations.
- Update acceptance gate materials with the latest measurement data.
- Restate acceptance criteria and numeric targets
- Produce and document a formal acceptance decision against the targets recorded in Solution Scope.
- List remediation items for any unmet criteria with clear resolution timelines.
- Confirm incumbent decommissioning status or an approved retention plan.
- Present outcome data against each criterion
- Total return attribution versus liability benchmark
- Deployment and data feed validation
- Performance attribution by sleeve and duration-match gap
- Performance attribution versus liability benchmark
- Operational tickets and burn-down
- Operational process checks
- Document pass/fail per criterion and formal acceptance
- Diagnose root causes for any gaps
- Service-level review and operational health
- Early adoption signals
- Remediation items and resolution timeline
- Agree corrective actions and timeline to acceptance gate
- Enhancement requests and shared channel maintenance
- Shared channel health and long-standing blocker closure
- Incumbent manager wind-down and data archiving
- Open issues and remediation plan