Workers Compensation Claims
Complex multi-party engagements where risk, regulation, and claim resolution require coordinated action.
This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.
Inside this journey
-
Claims Outcome Discovery
Map current claim workflows, cost drivers, stakeholder roles, and measurable success criteria tied to injured-worker outcomes and regulatory constraints.
Discovery Questions
Claims in one sentence
- Tell me in a sentence how your team defines a successful workers compensation claim outcome.
- How many open lost time claims does your team manage in a typical month?
- Walk me through the last claim that surprised you with its cost or duration, what specifically stood out?
- Who on your team is the primary decision maker for changes to claim workflows and policy?
- If the seller could shorten your average indemnity duration by 20% tomorrow, what internal barrier would still prevent you from moving forward this quarter?
Where the workflow actually leaks time and money
- Point to the single step in your claim workflow that creates the most delay or cost, and explain why.
- How often do early clinical reviews occur within 72 hours of injury reporting?
- When a claim escalates to litigation, how long is it from injury to counsel involvement on average?
- Which cost drivers currently dominate medical spend for your population?
- Share the typical handoffs between triage, examiner, and nurse case manager, and where breakdowns most often happen.
- Which single operational failure would cause you to stop a pilot immediately?
The people who move claims, and where they get stuck
- Name the role that is first informed when a claim is reported, and how that initial ownership affects claim speed.
- Which roles on your team approve medical authorizations and within what target time do they aim to approve?
- How many dedicated nurse case managers do you assign per 100 active claims?
- Tell me about a recent situation where role ambiguity slowed a return to work, and what the consequence was for cost or duration.
- Suppose your staffing model were reduced by 20%, which function losing headcount would most threaten claim outcomes?
Clinical and pharmacy levers that change outcomes
- How much of your total medical spend last year came from opioids, repeat imaging, or elective surgery?
- Which clinical programs are active on your claims today?
- Explain the most common clinical pathway for a typical sprain or strain claim and where costs tend to escalate.
- How quickly does pharmacy prior authorization for controlled substances typically occur in your environment?
- Which measurable clinical success criteria do you track at the claim level?
- When a clinical intervention could reduce high-cost imaging by about 30%, what would need to change for you to accept it into your standard workflow?
What's stopping faster return to work
- Which barrier most often prevents an injured worker from returning to modified duty within your target window?
- How often do employers provide modified duty within 14 days of injury in your population?
- Share an example of an employer or site where return to work consistently works well, what do they do differently?
- Which internal or external role typically negotiates light duty plans with supervisors at worksites?
- Would securing employer site level buy in remove the biggest blocker to faster return to work for you?
- What single legal or benefit calculation issue could prevent you from implementing a faster return to work program?
Regulatory and reporting pressure points
- Which state specific reporting requirement or benefit calculation regularly forces you to slow claim processing?
- How many jurisdictions do you operate in for workers compensation?
- Which reports must you produce monthly versus quarterly versus annually?
- Describe any recent audits or penalties that materially affected your claims operations or vendor relationships.
- If a regulatory change required an extra data field within 30 days, which internal owner could sign off and deliver it?
- Is there a pending regulation or audit that could stop a vendor deployment within 90 days?
- If you answered yes, please describe which regulation or audit and the likely timeline.
Alternatives on the table and why they might keep your business
- Given your recent claims performance, why are you considering an external partner now instead of keeping the current approach?
- Which of the following options are you actively evaluating right now?
- What would have to be true about your current approach for you to keep it rather than move to a new vendor?
- Has anyone on your team proposed solving this without an outside partner, and if so who and what is their proposed plan?
- What top reasons would let your incumbent retain business even if a new vendor offered a lower price?
- If our proposal matched the incumbent on price and hit your indemnity reduction target, what would still stop a change this quarter?
Can we actually connect to your systems and data
- If you could only integrate with three of your systems during onboarding, which three would be non negotiable?
- Which internal team owns your claims system API and can they commit resources in the next 30 days?
- How clean and accessible is the historical claims data you would share for pilot analysis?
- Which data fields are often missing or poor quality in your claims exports?
- Do you host vendor integrations behind strict firewalls that require VPN or on site access?
- Are there contractual or IT approvals that must be signed before an integration can begin?
- If yes, who are the approvers and what is the typical approval lead time?
Measures that will actually define success
- Which single KPI, if improved by the pilot, would make your leadership sign off immediately?
- Which of these KPIs does leadership review monthly?
- What is your current target for average indemnity duration that you would consider acceptable?
- How frequently would you want outcome reviews during a pilot to evaluate success?
- Who must sign the pilot acceptance criteria for you to proceed to full deployment?
Next steps, timing, and decisive gates
- If the pilot proves the outcomes you expect, what internal process would allow you to sign a commercial agreement within 30 days?
- What is your ideal project start date for a pilot?
- Who needs to attend a 60 minute alignment call to approve scope and timeline?
- Which budget cycle or procurement windows could constrain your ability to sign in the next 6 months?
- What outstanding questions or risks would make you pause before committing to a pilot?
-
Solution Experience
Walk through how clinical intervention, utilization review, pharmacy controls, and return-to-work programs will operate against the buyer's real claim scenarios to deliver faster recovery and lower cost.
Solution Experience
- Solution Experience — Clinical & Return-to-Work Walkthrough
- Provide three representative, anonymized claim scenarios with medical timelines, bill totals, and current handling notes for modeling.
- Confirm the current state and its cost to your team
- You confirm that the demonstrated workflows materially reduce the clinical and pharmacy drivers of medical cost for the shown claim scenarios.
- Seller to run the provided scenarios through clinical, utilization review, and pharmacy models and deliver a claim-level impact summary with projected cost delta and expected days-to-return-to-work before the next session.
- You confirm that the demonstrated return-to-work orchestration shortens expected indemnity duration for the shown scenario types.
- Proof step, Scenario A — clinical intervention applied
- You and the seller agree on the remaining evidence and target KPIs required to include these services in a pilot or contract.
- Proof step, Scenario B — utilization review and pharmacy controls
- Jointly define target KPIs and acceptance thresholds for a pilot, including target reduction in medical cost per claim, target reduction in indemnity days, and acceptable litigation rate.
- Proof step, Scenario C — return-to-work orchestration
- Validate the future state explicitly
- Solution Experience — Clinical & Return-to-Work Walkthrough
- Solution Experience Deck
- Solution Brief — Clinical Intervention & Return-to-Work
- meeting
- slides
- document
-
Solution Scope
Define included services, jurisdictional examiner coverage, clinical modules, integrations, reporting, and the measurable acceptance criteria for performance.
Scope Configuration
- 24/7 injury reporting and triage
- Dedicated claims examiner management
- Nurse case management
- Utilization review for medical necessity
- Pharmacy benefit management with opioid controls
- Return-to-work program implementation
- Medical bill review and negotiation
- Provider network access and fee schedule management
- Indemnity payment processing and benefit calculation
- Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) administration
- Subrogation identification and recovery
- Independent medical exam (IME) coordination
- Predictive analytics for claim severity and litigation risk
- Litigation coordination and attorney liaison
Scope Questions
24/7 injury reporting and triage
- Which channels should you enable for 24/7 injury intake (phone hotline, mobile app, employer portal, secure fax)?
- Do you require after-hours nurse triage with clinical documentation posted to your claims system?
- How many after-hours intake events per month should staffing assume based on your historical claim run-rate?
- Provide the exact claim intake fields your current claims system requires (for example: claim number, employer code, date of injury, body part, initial severity).
- Specify any state-specific immediate reporting forms or statutory timelines that the intake workflow must auto-generate (list state codes and forms).
Dedicated claims examiner management
- List the jurisdictions by state code where you require dedicated examiner coverage.
- Select whether you require a named primary examiner per claim, a pooled-assignment model, or a hybrid approach.
- Indicate your target examiner-to-open-claim ratio for steady-state caseload planning.
- Who in your organization approves examiner authority for reserve changes, medical stop-loss, and litigation referrals (title or role)?
- For claims with total incurred over $50,000, should examiners escalate to a centralized specialty clinical or litigation team?
Nurse case management
- Which clinical acuity tiers (low, moderate, high, catastrophic) should automatically trigger nurse case management assignment?
- Do you require telephonic-only nursing, in-person nurse visits, or a hybrid nurse case management model?
- Specify the required deliverables from the nurse case manager per claim (for example: initial care plan, weekly progress notes, RTW plan, coordination logs).
- Indicate any state nurse practice act constraints or licensure requirements we must observe by state code for in-person nursing services.
- Are there preferred medical specialties you want nurse case managers to escalate to for IME or specialty referral (for example: orthopedics, occupational medicine)?
Utilization review for medical necessity
- Which utilization review criteria must govern decisions in your jurisdictions (state UR rules, Official Disability Guidelines (ODG), or other named standards)?
- Choose the UR review types you require: prospective, concurrent, retrospective, or a combination.
- Specify required turnaround time thresholds for UR decisions by case type (for example: 24 hours for expedited, 7 days for routine).
- Indicate whether clinical peer-to-peer review with a board-certified specialist is required for denials in your program.
- Provide the integration method so UR dispositions are visible in your claims system (API endpoint, HL7 interface, secure SFTP file drop).
Pharmacy benefit management with opioid controls
- Which opioid utilization controls must be enforced (for example: morphine milligram equivalents limits, prior authorization, step therapy)?
- Do you prefer a closed formulary, a preferred list with utilization controls, or an open formulary with controls?
- Specify the pharmacy claims file fields you will provide for PBM actions (for example: prescriber NPI, patient DOB, NDC, days supply, MME/day).
- Indicate whether real-time Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) checks are required at point of prescribing, batch checks, or not required.
- Are medication-assisted treatment (MAT) referral and coordination services required for opioid dependence cases?
Return-to-work program implementation
- Which return-to-work models do you want enabled (for example: modified duty at employer site, third-party transitional placements, light-duty pool)?
- Do you have existing job descriptions for modified duty tasks to map to physician work restrictions?
- Specify the target timeframe after injury within which you expect modified duty offers to be made (for example: 7 days, 14 days, 30 days).
- Indicate whether your employer network requires a written employer work-release form or whether the treating physician note is sufficient for RTW placement.
- Do you require return-to-work outcomes reported to your claims dashboard including actual return date and hours restored?
Medical bill review and negotiation
- Which baseline should the bill review apply (state fee schedule, Medicare, network-negotiated rates, or a custom schedule)?
- Are line-item level reviews required including CPT/NDC validation and duplicate-service checks?
- Provide the dispute and appeals documentation you require when a provider contests a bill adjustment (for example: itemized bill, medical record cross-reference, peer review).
- Indicate the typical variance between billed charges and your expected allowed amounts you observe (select percentage range).
- Are any provider types exempt from negotiation (for example: centers of excellence, court-ordered specialists)?
Provider network access and fee schedule management
- List the provider network tiers or IDs you require included (for example: in-network panel, centers of excellence, ancillary providers).
- Do you require active credential verification and NPI matching before a provider is added to the panel?
- Specify whether fee schedules should be managed by state, by CPT code, or as bundled case rates.
- Indicate the frequency and delivery method for fee schedule updates (for example: quarterly upload, annual update, push via file).
- Are out-of-network direct-billing exceptions allowed for emergency care and if so should they auto-approve or require prior authorization above a threshold?
Indemnity payment processing and benefit calculation
- Specify the wage basis and replacement ratio your jurisdiction uses for indemnity calculations (for example: gross wages, average weekly wage, statutory percentage).
- Do you require benefits to be calculated and posted automatically into your claims system, delivered as calculation reports, or both?
- Provide the acceptance criteria for payment accuracy you require (for example: 99.5% calculation accuracy against applicable state statute).
- Indicate your preferred payment methods and cadence for indemnity disbursement (for example: ACH weekly, ACH biweekly, paper check).
- Are there special indemnity rules for partial disability or temporary total disability we must encode into calculations?
Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) administration
- Which trigger conditions should prompt MSA assessment in your program (for example: claimant age 65+, settlement value above a threshold, Medicare enrollment)?
- Do you require CMS submission support for MSA approval and conditional payment recovery or only internal MSA documentation?
- Provide the documentation you will supply for MSA setup (for example: historical medical records span, future treatment estimates, prescription history).
- Indicate whether you require ongoing post-settlement MSA administration such as periodic reporting and reimbursement tracking.
- Are there state-specific MSA thresholds, local counsel requirements, or statute-driven differences we must follow (list state codes if applicable)?
Subrogation identification and recovery
- Describe the upstream data point you use to identify subrogation potential (for example: third-party liability flag, police report, witness statement).
- Do you require a minimum potential recovery threshold to open a subrogation file (for example: $5,000)?
- Which recovery pathways do you permit for subrogation matters (for example: full recovery pursuit, global settlement offset, lien negotiation)?
- Provide the timeline you expect for initial subrogation assessment from date of incident (for example: 7 days, 14 days, 30 days).
- Indicate whether coordination with outside counsel is required for high-value subrogation matters above a specified threshold.
Independent medical exam (IME) coordination
- Do you require IME scheduling within a specific timeframe after referral (for example: 14 calendar days)?
- Which IME specialties are most commonly required in your caseload (for example: orthopedics, neurology, psychiatry)?
- Specify the report delivery format and required contents for IME reports (for example: structured findings, AMA guides reference, work-capacity opinion).
- Indicate whether you will accept video IMEs or require in-person examinations only.
- Are there state-specific IME regulations, panel requirements, or examiner qualifications we must follow (list state codes if applicable)?
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial terms, SLAs, data-sharing and privacy responsibilities, and regulatory/compliance obligations to enable work to begin.
Agreement Modules
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Commercial Terms / Order Form
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Data Processing Agreement (DPA) and HIPAA Business Associate Addendum (BAA) (conditional)
- Regulatory and Reporting Addendum
- Claims Handling Authority Addendum
- Security and Incident Response Addendum
- Termination and Transition Plan
-
Deployment
Lock readiness facts and configuration values before execution begins.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Capture concrete readiness facts the deployment depends on — claims system access, data feeds, named owners, timelines, and jurisdiction-specific reporting requirements.
Pre-Deployment Questions
Environment and site access
- Which claim and ancillary environments must the seller be able to access to deploy? (select all that apply — this scopes credential and test requests; do not paste endpoints)
- Is the production claims environment available for integration testing? If yes, enter availability as 'now' or YYYY-MM-DD; if not, enter 'procurement needed' (this schedules the credential and test window)
Data and configuration
- Which external data feeds or source systems must be connected for go‑live? (select all that apply — do not paste files/URLs; this determines connector types)
- Who is the authoritative owner of claim and claimant data and who owns field‑mapping decisions? (enter name, role, email and indicate 'field mapping owned by buyer / seller / hybrid') — this defines mapping ownership
People and ownership
- Who is the buyer-side deployment owner authorized to approve go-live (name, role, email)? (This person will receive milestone signoffs and approvals.)
- Which of the following workstreams already have a named owner today? (select all that apply — we will request names for selected items)
Timing and constraints
- Provide the named owner(s) for the workstreams you selected above (format: workstream — name, role, email). If a workstream has no owner yet, write 'TBD'. (This populates the deployment RACI and escalation list.)
- List any procurement, legal, security, or scheduling constraints that must be cleared before technical onboarding — include the gate type (MSA / DPA / security review / PO), expected clearance date or 'TBD', and any blackout windows or pay-cycle constraints (enter dates). (We use this to set milestones and avoid forbidden go-live windows.)
-
Configuration Details
Lock exact configuration values the implementation team will use — integration endpoints, field mappings, pharmacy formulary rules, network selections, and notification workflows.
Configuration Details
Environments & endpoints — lock the instance we will connect to
- Environment name for the production instance (enter exact environment name the deployment will use; Default: "production")
- Production claims system endpoint URL (format: https://... — enter the full base URL the platform will call)
Integration & authentication — how the platform will authenticate and who will exchange secrets
- Authentication method for API integrations (Default: OAuth2 client_credentials)
- Credential owner and secure channel for secret exchange (format: "Team or Person — secrets manager or secure transfer channel"). Do NOT paste secrets here. Default: "IT Security — your secrets manager"
Field & role mappings — exact field names the build will map verbatim
- Source system field name for claimant identifier (enter the exact field/column name used in the source claims system)
- Target platform field name for claimant identifier (enter the exact platform field name this should map to)
- Default examiner assignment rule (Default: By jurisdiction code — the deployment uses this to auto-assign new claims)
Pharmacy & network rules — the formulary and threshold values we will enforce
- Formulary variant to apply for pharmacy management (Default: "Standard opioid-limited formulary")
- Opioid daily MME threshold that triggers prior-authorization (numeric, enter whole number of MME; Default: 50)
Notifications & workflows — who gets alerted and how fast
- Claim-assignment notification channel (Default: "Platform in-app + email to claim inbox")
- If using a webhook above, enter the webhook URL the platform should post to (format: https://... ). Leave blank if not using webhooks.
- Event latency threshold for claim-assignment notifications in minutes (numeric, Default: 15)
Limits, reporting & retention — exports, schedules, and how long we keep events
- Primary reporting delivery method for operational and outcome exports (Default: API JSON)
- Claim event data retention in days (numeric — Default: 3650 which equals 10 years)
-
Deployment
Coordinate onboarding, examiner assignments, clinical program activation, training, and milestone-driven execution with clear owners and escalation paths.
-
-
Success
Monitor KPIs (cost per claim, indemnity duration, return-to-work rates, litigation rates), run recurring outcome reviews, and maintain a shared backlog for issues and enhancements.
Success Reviews
- Go-live Health Check (Week 1-4)
- First Measurement Review (Week 4-10)
- Acceptance Gate Decision (Around Day 90)
- Quarterly Outcome Review
Issues & Enhancements
- Produce a one-page quarterly outcome summary and publish it to the shared workspace.
- Produce a metric variance report with three case-level examples for each off-target metric.
- Add agreed remediation tasks to the shared backlog with target resolution dates.
- Assemble the evidence package required for the Acceptance Gate as defined in Solution Scope.
- Restate acceptance criteria and targets
- Produce a documented acceptance decision with pass/fail status for each Solution Scope criterion.
- If any criterion failed, agree a remediation and re-test plan with dates.
- Store the acceptance decision and evidence in the shared workspace for traceability.
- Publish the acceptance decision document and supporting evidence to the shared workspace.
- Create remediation tasks for failed criteria with deadlines and re-test dates in the shared backlog.
- Circulate the acceptance decision summary to all stakeholders and confirm next meeting cadence.
- Quarterly trend review
- Confirm whether quarterly trends meet expectations or require escalation.
- Reduce backlog age by closing or re-prioritizing high-impact items.
- Validate closure evidence for previously agreed remediation tasks.
- Update the shared backlog with prioritized items and target delivery quarters.
- Open investigations for any new metric regressions and set completion dates.
- Re-confirm success criteria and owners
- Deployment verified against Solution Scope checklists and owners confirmed.
- Top 3 early blockers identified with remediation dates.
- If applicable, incumbent wind-down plan recorded in the shared workspace.
- Publish the go-live verification checklist and remediation plan to the shared workspace.
- List any missing data feeds or access issues and schedule fixes with target dates.
- If replacing an incumbent, document the decommissioning and data archive status and publish evidence.
- Present first measurement data
- Decide whether early metrics are on track toward Solution Scope targets or require remediation.
- Document root causes for the top 2 metric variances and agree corrective actions.
- Confirm the timeline and evidence required for the Acceptance Gate.
- Present outcome data versus each criterion
- Operational outcomes detailed review
- Deployment and data validation
- Root-cause diagnosis
- Document pass or fail per criterion
- Early adoption and usage signals
- Shared backlog and enhancement prioritization
- Agree corrective actions
- Action tracking and closure evidence
- Capture formal acceptance decision
- Incumbent wind-down confirmation, if replacing an incumbent
- Confirm timeline to Acceptance Gate
- Open issues and blockers
- Agree next quarter priorities and metrics to monitor
- Agree remediation and re-test plan for any failed criteria
- Update shared backlog and owners
- Agree immediate remediation actions and next steps