Health, Education & Government
›
Government & Public Sector
›
Government IT & Digital Services
Government Case Management Systems
Multi-agency, multi-stakeholder programs where procurement, compliance, and mission alignment determine success.
Tyler Technologies
Oracle
Microsoft
Deloitte
Inside this journey
-
Pre-Discovery
Align stakeholders on compliance requirements, procurement timelines, and decision criteria before deeper discovery.
-
Stakeholder Alignment
Confirm decision roles (CISO, program owner, procurement), timelines, and what ‘good’ looks like for each stakeholder.
Alignment Questions
Starting Small: Tell Us About Your Program
- What is the program name, office, or team we should reference for this engagement?
- Which core mission do you own today (select the single best fit)?
- What prompted you to consider a new platform now—an audit, legislative change, system end‑of‑life, performance decline, or something else?
- How many internal users and external stakeholders (approximate) will use this system day-to-day?
- Can you describe one recent day or week that best represents your current workload and why it felt unmanageable or risky?
Are You Comfortable With 'Good Enough'?
- If the current process stayed exactly the same for two more years, what is the single worst outcome that could happen?
- How often do audits, FOIA requests, or oversight inquiries expose issues with your current data or workflow controls?
- When an audit or oversight call happens, who is typically expected to produce evidence or narrative about system controls and data integrity?
- Describe a recent scrutiny or mandate that made leadership ask tough questions about security, reporting, or continuity—what was most uncomfortable about that moment?
- What gaps, if any, have you been quietly patching with manual workarounds or spreadsheets to avoid scope or cost increases?
Where Work Actually Happens (and Where It Breaks Down)
- What parts of your process feel most fragile—where do tasks routinely get stuck, rerouted, or lost?
- Which handoffs or approvals create the most delay (choose up to three)?
- How long does a typical case or request take from intake to final resolution today?
- Tell us about a specific case or request that failed to meet expectations—what went wrong, and what downstream impact did that create?
- Which existing systems or tools do teams rely on daily (core list: case system, email, spreadsheets, legacy DB, ERP, other)?
- How do staff describe their day-to-day experience in one sentence—frustrated, overworked, empowered, or something else?
Data: What's Worth Saving — and What Scares You?
- If migrating your historical data were optional, which datasets would you insist on keeping and why?
- Which types of data in your systems are considered most sensitive (select all that apply)?
- Roughly how many records or documents must be migrated (choose the closest range)?
- What formats and repositories hold your data today (select all that apply)?
- Have you ever attempted a migration or system modernization before—what worked, what failed, and what did you learn?
- If we had to prioritize three data migration goals (e.g., fidelity, speed, audit traceability), which would you choose?
Security and ATO: What Would Keep Your CISO Up at Night?
- What security or authorization requirement, if unmet, would cause your CISO to halt any procurement?
- Which compliance standards are mandatory for your environment (select all that apply)?
- Do you need an Authority to Operate (ATO) at a specific impact level or cloud boundary? Please specify timing constraints if any.
- What security artifacts are most important to you up front (select up to three)?
- Has your agency previously accepted a FedRAMP-authorized solution without additional controls? If yes, what exceptions were required?
- How confident are you in your current identity and access posture to integrate with a new platform (single sign-on, role mapping, least privilege)?
Who Decides — and What 'Win' Looks Like for Them
- When leaders evaluate solutions, what is the number one fear or political risk they want to avoid?
- Who will be the final decision authority for procurement and contract award?
- Which stakeholders must sign off on technical, programmatic, and budgetary aspects (choose all that apply)?
- How will proposals be scored or ranked—what weight is given to security, configurability, migration support, and total cost of ownership?
- Beyond procurement, what would make a project feel like a political or leadership success (e.g., faster outcomes, visible KPIs, cost savings)?
If We Could Snap Our Fingers: What Success Actually Feels Like
- Imagine it is 12 months after go-live—what would you point to as the clearest sign this program succeeded?
- Which measurable KPIs would you expect to improve within the first year (select up to three)?
- What target adoption or usage rate would make you comfortable that the platform is embedded across teams?
- In a successful scenario, what cultural or workflow change would you most want staff to adopt?
- Who outside the immediate program should we see as early supporters or champions to accelerate adoption?
Practical Constraints: Procurement, Budget, and Timelines
- What is your target procurement timeline for award and initial implementation?
- Which procurement vehicle or contract vehicle will you use (if known)?
- Is there a predefined budget range or funding window we should align to?
- Are there fiscal or legal constraints (e.g., end of fiscal year spend, one-time funds, grant restrictions) that will shape scheduling?
- What procurement pain points from past acquisitions would you like to avoid this time?
Next Steps Together: What Small Win Can We Lock In First?
- If we could deliver one tangible outcome in the next 90 days to build momentum, what would be most valuable (POC, data readiness assessment, SSP review, pilot)?
- Who should attend a kickoff workshop from your side to make that 90-day outcome possible (names and roles)?
- What data, systems access, or artifacts can you reasonably provide for an initial proof of concept (select all that apply)?
- What would constitute a quick decision to move from discovery to a pilot—who signs, and what evidence do they need?
- How would you prefer we structure check-ins and decision points during discovery (weekly demo, biweekly working session, milestone reviews)?
-
Procurement & Compliance Readiness
Surface RFP constraints, scoring priorities, FedRAMP/FISMA/A2O prerequisites, and audit-driven requirements that will shape the solution.
Compliance & Procurement
Setting the Table: Who’s Driving This Change?
- Which agency stakeholders will be actively making decisions on procurement, security, and program requirements for this purchase?
- What is the target timeline from RFP release (or intent to procure) to contract award?
- Who needs to sign off on Authority to Operate (ATO) and who owns the final acceptance of security artifacts?
- How would you describe each stakeholder’s top success metric for this procurement (e.g., speed to ATO, lowest TCO, maximal configurability)? Please list stakeholder → primary metric.
- Are there pre-existing vendor relationships, incumbent contracts, or policy constraints that will influence shortlist decisions?
If the RFP Could Be a Mirror, What Would It Reveal?
- If your RFP were scored today, what commonly overlooked requirement would knock a vendor out of contention?
- Which RFP elements are absolutely non-negotiable versus merely desirable?
- What scoring weight does compliance (FedRAMP/FISMA/ATO evidence) carry relative to technical fit and cost?
- Are there specific procurement vehicles or clauses (e.g., GSA schedules, cooperative purchasing, FAR clauses) that vendors must be able to use or accept?
- How will vendor questions or clarifications during RFP be handled—single point of contact, Q&A addendum, or oral presentations?
Which Controls Keep You Up at Night?
- Which specific security controls or domains are most critical for your auditors or oversight bodies (e.g., identity, encryption, logging/monitoring)?
- Do you require a Federal or agency-specific authorization level (e.g., FedRAMP Moderate/High, FISMA High) for candidate solutions?
- Tell us about past ATO experiences: what went smoothly, what caused delays, and what evidence was hardest to produce?
- How mature is your agency’s continuous monitoring and incident response process (e.g., automated SIEM, defined playbooks, external reporting)?
- Would you be willing to accept a vendor’s existing FedRAMP package and SSC/SSP with a minor agency-specific POA&M, or must the vendor secure a full agency ATO independently?
What Would Cause the First Audit to Fail?
- If an auditor walked in tomorrow, which missing artifact or control would most likely trigger a finding?
- Which evidence packages are you expecting from vendors during evaluation (select all that apply)?
- How frequently does your audit/oversight body require control evidence refresh—annual, quarterly, continuous monitoring, or on-demand?
- Do you expect vendors to participate directly in audits or to provide complete evidence packages for you to present?
- How do third-party vendor assessments (e.g., external pentest, SOC2) factor into acceptance—are they required, optional, or viewed as supplemental?
Where Are You Comfortable Trading Off?
- If forced to trade between faster ATO vs deeper customization vs lower upfront cost, which would you prioritize?
- Are you open to cloud-hosting constraints (e.g., limited regions, approved CSPs) in exchange for an accelerated compliance package?
- How much custom code (if any) are you willing to accept in the solution before it complicates future audits and upgrades?
- Would you consider a vendor-hosted managed service if it shortened your path to ATO and reduced internal operational burden?
- What would make you feel comfortable signing an initial contract before full ATO—pilot ATO milestone, escrow, liability cap, or other safeguards?
How Will Success Be Scored — And by Whom?
- Who will form the evaluation panel and what perspectives will they represent (security, procurement, programmatic, legal)?
- List the top three evaluation criteria the panel will use and, if available, their relative priority.
- Will you require a live demo, red-team exercise, pilot with live data, or references to validate claims? Select all that apply.
- How will long-term operational cost be evaluated—by upfront license price, 5-year TCO model, or total implementation + O&M?
- Are there specific KPIs or reporting outputs you will require during evaluation (e.g., time-to-case resolution, security incident MTTR, data migration fidelity)?
Migration, Identity, and Integration — What Keeps You From Sleeping?
- Which legacy systems, data stores, or formats must be migrated into the new platform (e.g., SQL DBs, file shares, paper records, spreadsheets)?
- How sensitive is the data to be migrated (PII, regulated data, classified) and are there special handling requirements?
- What identity providers and protocols must the platform support out of the box (SAML, OIDC, LDAP, PIV/CAC)?
- What is your tolerance for migration downtime or cutover risk (zero-downtime, scheduled window, phased coexistence)?
- Which integrations are blockers versus nice-to-have during initial deployment (e.g., identity, reporting, e-signature, RMS, data warehouse)?
Let’s Map Next Steps to ATO Progress
- What are the non-negotiable ATO milestones and dates the vendor must commit to (e.g., SSP delivery, assessment window, remediation period)?
- Who in your organization will own each ATO deliverable (SSP, SAR coordination, POA&M remediation, continuous monitoring)?
- Which deployment environments must be provisioned prior to assessment (dev/test/stage/prod), and who will provide cloud accounts or sponsorship?
- What support level do you expect from the vendor for evidence collection—hands-off documentation, guided workshops, or vendor-run evidence gathering?
- Assuming we align on scope, what would a realistic timeline look like from kickoff to readiness for security assessment?
-
-
Customer Discovery
Clarify operational pain points, legacy risks, data migration scope, and measurable success signals tied to the program’s mandate.
Discovery Questions
Start Here: Your Program in One Breath
- In one sentence, what mission or mandate is driving this modernization effort?
- Which program area best describes the primary use case for this system?
- Who is the program owner and who will be the day-to-day sponsor we should partner with?
- What triggered this initiative (select the single biggest driver)?
- What is your target go-live window?
- Which existing systems, spreadsheets, or paper sources must this platform integrate with or replace? (select all that apply)
- What keeps you awake about this program—what's the single worry you'd most like resolved?
If This Keeps Going, Who Pays the Price?
- If nothing changes over the next 12–24 months, which operational or compliance problem will escalate fastest?
- How often do audit findings or security reviews raise issues tied to this program today?
- Can you share a recent audit finding, risk example, or near-miss that illustrates the danger of status quo?
- Which stakeholders or external parties (oversight, legislators, public) would be most sensitive to continued failures?
- How do you currently quantify the program’s risk exposure (e.g., number of PII records, cases at risk, SLA breaches)?
- What would be the tangible cost—financial, legal, or reputational—if a high-severity incident occurred?
Where Your Data Actually Lives — and How Scary That Is
- How confident are you that legacy records can be fully and accurately migrated without months of manual clean-up?
- List the primary data sources and file formats we would need to access and migrate (include approximate volumes where possible).
- Which types of sensitive data exist in these records?
- Do you have an authoritative data model or canonical schema for case records today?
- How many years of historical records must remain searchable and in-scope for migration?
- Who will own data mapping, cleansing, and final verification during migration?
- What percentage of records do you estimate will require manual remediation after automated migration?
- Are attachments, redaction history, chain-of-custody metadata, or audio/video files required to be migrated intact?
When Security Is Non‑Negotiable: The Hidden Gaps
- What would it take for your CISO to say this platform meets ATO expectations—what single thing is the make-or-break control?
- Which authorization baseline or certification level is required for this program?
- Have you previously accepted vendor-supplied SSPs, SARs, and POA&Ms as part of an ATO? If so, how did that process go?
- What outstanding security gaps (if any) from past assessments must be closed before ATO approval?
- Which monitoring and logging integrations are mandatory (select all that apply)?
- Are there fixed timelines or constraints for remedial actions (e.g., POA&M closure windows) that will shape the project schedule?
- How would a security reviewer typically validate data protections—documentation, hands-on testing, or a third-party assessment?
Workflows That Breathe—or Break
- Which single process in your current workflow causes the most handoffs, rework, or user frustration?
- Walk us through a typical case lifecycle from intake to close—who touches it, what tools they use, and where delays happen?
- Where do exceptions and manual adjudications spike (select all that apply)?
- How many distinct user roles, permission tiers, or specialized profiles must the system support?
- What are the current service-level expectations (SLA) for response or resolution and are you meeting them?
- How do front-line staff and supervisors describe the emotional impact of the current tools (frustration, relief, indifference)?
- What reporting, audit, or case-history views are critical to supervisors but hard to get today?
Success Signals Your Stakeholders Will Care About
- If you had to present this program’s success to oversight in 12 months, what three measurable outcomes would you lead with?
- Which of the following KPIs will determine whether this project is deemed a success?
- For your top KPI, what is the target improvement you expect (baseline → target)?
- What level of adoption would feel unacceptable after 6 months (e.g., % of active users)?
- Who must sign off on final acceptance criteria and what evidence do they require (e.g., test runs, audit artifacts, user metrics)?
- Are there standard dashboards or reports you must produce for leadership or oversight at go‑live?
Decision Landscape: Who Actually Signs the Check?
- Who are the people we must convince internally—name roles and what 'good' looks like to each?
- Which procurement vehicle or acquisition strategy will you use for this purchase?
- What are the key RFP scoring priorities we should map to (select all that apply)?
- What is the expected procurement timeline (release RFP → award → contract signature)?
- Are there mandatory vendor eligibility constraints (e.g., small business set-aside, domestic hosting) we must meet?
- What are the absolute deal-breakers procurement has told you to avoid?
Hidden Constraints: Compliance, Integration, and Audit Must‑Haves
- What single contractual or technical constraint, if overlooked, would immediately derail the award or deployment?
- Are there required cloud hosting regions, data residency, or state/agency-approved environments?
- Which identity and authentication standards must the solution support?
- Do you require integration with specific reporting, analytics, or BI tools?
- Are there mandatory accessibility or usability standards to meet (e.g., Section 508, WCAG)?
- List any contractual clauses or breach-notification windows we must accept (e.g., 72-hour notification, vulnerability disclosure).
- Are interagency data-sharing agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other legal artifacts required before integration?
Migration Roadmap: What Would Make Your Team Sleep Better?
- What single migration failure would be catastrophic for your operations and how would you detect it early?
- Do you prefer a big‑bang cutover, phased migration, or parallel coexistence for this program?
- Which validation tests are non-negotiable after migration (select all that apply)?
- Who will own final reconciliation and sign-off on migrated datasets?
- How much read-only time or user-facing downtime is acceptable during migration?
- What acceptance criteria must be met before the agency will consider migration successful?
-
Solution Experience
Walk through agency-specific scenarios that map current failure modes to a secure, configurable future state and confirm outcomes.
Experience Meetings
- Solution Experience — Prework & Current State Alignment
- Scenario Walkthrough — Investigations (Operational Failure Mode)
- Scenario Walkthrough — Licensing/Permitting & Benefits Adjudication
- Security & Compliance Experience — Controls, Evidence, and ATO Responsibilities
- Outcome Confirmation & Acceptance Criteria Sign-off
- Commit to remediation owners and timelines for any gaps discovered during scenario proofs.
- Documented consequence metrics that make the problem urgent (time, cost, risk).
- Introductions & Objectives
- Customer validates acceptance test cases and confirms whether the demonstrated outcome matches their operational need.
- Identify any configuration gaps and owners for remediation before final sign-off.
- Seller: Export the configured workflow and provide a step-by-step runbook for the demonstrated acceptance tests.
- Customer: Provide 2–3 anonymized investigation cases for additional acceptance testing in the sandbox.
- Both: Log any gaps discovered and assign owners with target dates for closure prior to final validation session.
- Read-back of Current-State & Consequences
- Confirm templates and decision logic deliver the defined operational outcomes for high-volume adjudication processes.
- Validate that reporting and audit trails meet agency compliance and RFP scoring expectations.
- Agree integration touchpoints and data ownership for migration and identity syncs.
- Seller: Deliver configured template export and sample reports tied to the validated KPIs.
- Customer: Confirm list of systems for integration and provide sample API or SFTP connection details.
- Both: Define final list of acceptance test cases and schedule execution in sandbox with target sign-off dates.
- One-Sentence Current Compliance State & Consequence
- Validate the platform's control coverage against agency-required controls and produce a concrete list of remaining artifacts.
- Agree on a RACI for ATO responsibilities and milestone dates.
- Customer provides a clear, one-sentence current-state diagnosis for each prioritized scenario.
- Seller: Provide a control-mapping matrix (platform controls → agency control IDs) and sample evidence exports from the sandbox.
- Customer: Assign ATO point-of-contact and supply historical audit findings that need addressing.
- Both: Produce a milestone plan for ATO submission with owners and dates for each artifact delivery.
- Synthesis of Scenario Results
- Customer formally signs off on acceptance criteria for each prioritized scenario or documents remaining blockers.
- Establish measurable success metrics and reporting schedule to track outcomes post-deployment.
- Agree concrete next steps, owners, and dates for moving into Solution Scope / Deployment Enablement.
- Seller: Produce a final acceptance-criteria document with test evidence linked to each scenario for signature.
- Customer: Provide sign-off or an itemized list of outstanding acceptance test failures with expected remediation timelines.
- Both: Schedule the Deployment Enablement kickoff and assign sprint owners for configuration, migration, and security testing.
- Agreement on 1–3 scenarios, one-sentence future-state outcomes, and concrete acceptance criteria for each.
- Checklist of artifacts and sandbox/data needs to prepare for scenario walkthroughs.
- Customer: Provide one-sentence current-state statements, sample cases, incident logs, and audit findings for each selected scenario.
- Seller: Provision sandbox environment and seed with anonymized sample data for prioritized scenarios.
- Seller: Draft acceptance-criteria template (test cases, success thresholds) and share with customer for sign-off.
- All: Confirm schedule and attendees for each scenario walkthrough.
- Recap Current-State Sentence & Consequence
- Prove the future-state workflow stops the identified failure modes using customer data and live configuration.
- One-Sentence Current State (Customer)
- Current Process Walkthrough with Failure Points
- Review & Finalize Acceptance Criteria
- Control Mapping Overview
- Current Process & Pain Points
- Success Metrics & Reporting
- Quantify Consequence
- Live Evidence Generation Demo
- Define Future-State Outcome for Investigations
- Future-State Outcome Statements
- Live Proof: Configured Workflow That Prevents Failure
- Decision & Sign-off
- Select & Prioritize Scenarios for Walkthrough
- Shared Responsibility & RACI for ATO
- Proof: Template & Decision-Logic Demo
- Data Migration & Integrity Mapping
- Reporting & Audit Evidence Demonstration
- Risk & Remediation Path
- Next Steps & Owners
- Define Future-State Outcome Statements
- Tie Each Step Back to the Problem
- Agree Pre-demo Acceptance Criteria & Logistics
- Integration Mapping (IDM, Payment, External Data)
-
Solution Scope
Define modules, pre-built workflow templates, integrations, data migration approach, and clear acceptance criteria.
Scope Configuration
- Provision FedRAMP Cloud Environments
- Migrate Legacy Case and Document Data
- Configure Case Types and No-code Workflows
- Deploy Investigation Case Template
- Deploy Licensing & Permitting Template
- Deploy Benefits Adjudication Template
- Configure RBAC and Separation-of-Duties
- Integrate Agency SSO/Identity (SAML/SCIM)
- Deploy Document Scanning and OCR Ingestion
- Activate Task Routing, SLAs, and Notifications
- Configure FISMA Controls and Audit Logging
- Integrate Reporting and BI Dashboards
- Deliver FedRAMP/Authority-to-Operate Artifacts
- Execute Production Cutover and Go-Live Support
Scope Questions
Provision FedRAMP Cloud Environments
- What FedRAMP impact level does the agency require for this deployment?
- Which cloud tenancy model is preferred or required by the agency?
- Are there mandated cloud regions, data residency, or CJIS/FIPS constraints?
- Does the agency require connectivity to existing VPC/VNet or on-prem networks (e.g., VPN/Direct Connect)?
- Provide any timeline constraints for environment provisioning (dates or milestones).
Migrate Legacy Case and Document Data
- Which data sources must be migrated into the new system?
- Approximately how many case records and documents (total objects and TB) need migration?
- Do legacy records require transformation (field mapping, schema changes), redaction, or PII normalization?
- Are source systems accessible for an ETL or will exports be provided as files?
- Are there audit, chain-of-custody, or legal hold requirements that affect migration timing or sequencing?
Configure Case Types and No-code Workflows
- How many distinct case types/processes should be configured initially?
- Do any case types require conditional branching, parallel approvals, or complex state machines?
- Which roles will author or maintain no-code workflow rules after go-live?
- List required integrations that trigger or are triggered by workflows (e.g., license lookup, payment gateway, background checks).
- Are there SLA/time-to-action requirements or escalation rules that should be enforced by workflows?
Deploy Investigation Case Template
- Which investigation types should the template support (e.g., internal affairs, fraud, compliance)?
- What evidence types need structured capture (documents, interviews, photos, chain-of-custody tags)?
- Are secure evidence handling and chain-of-custody features required out-of-the-box for this template?
- Does the investigation template need to support multi-agency or external partner collaboration with restricted data views?
- Are there reporting or case disposition workflows (e.g., referrals, closures) that must be included?
Deploy Licensing & Permitting Template
- What permitting/licensing programs should be included (e.g., business licenses, construction permits, professional licenses)?
- Do applications require multi-stage reviews, inspections, or fee payments as part of the lifecycle?
- Will public-facing application intake forms be embedded in agency websites or accessed via a portal?
- Are configurable public-facing notifications and permit/license status updates required?
- List any regulatory or inspection reporting outputs the template must produce.
Deploy Benefits Adjudication Template
- Which benefits programs (e.g., SNAP, Medicaid, unemployment, local assistance) should be modeled initially?
- Does adjudication require rules-based eligibility checks, manual eligibility reviews, or both?
- Are integrations to external eligibility data sources required (e.g., SSA, state databases, income verification)?
- Will benefit calculations or award letters need templating and automated generation?
- Are audit trails and adjudicator decision history mandatory for appeals or audits?
Configure RBAC and Separation-of-Duties
- Which user roles and high-level groups should be created at go-live (e.g., admins, adjudicators, auditors, external reviewers)?
- Do you have mandatory separation-of-duty rules that prevent users from performing multiple actions on the same case?
- Will role provisioning be managed via SCIM or manually by agency admins?
- Are custom attribute-based access rules needed (e.g., geographic, program-based filters)?
- List any compliance or auditor roles that require read-only or special audit access.
Integrate Agency SSO/Identity (SAML/SCIM)
- Which identity providers does the agency use (select all that apply)?
- Do you require both SAML for SSO and SCIM for user provisioning?
- Are there MFA or conditional access policies that must be enforced via SSO?
- Will federation need to support external partners or PIV/CAC authentication?
- Provide any timing or change-control windows for identity integration (maintenance windows or freeze periods).
Deploy Document Scanning and OCR Ingestion
- What volume and types of paper documents will need scanning (monthly average)?
- Do you require automated OCR with searchable text, extracted metadata, or full document classification?
- Will scanning be performed by agency staff, a contracted scanning vendor, or vendor-managed services?
- Are there redaction, PII masking, or sensitivity labeling requirements during ingestion?
- Do scanned documents require verification workflows for OCR accuracy before being searchable?
Activate Task Routing, SLAs, and Notifications
- What SLA targets should be enforced (e.g., response within X days) for core case types?
- How should task routing be determined (role-based, skill-based, round-robin, workload balancing)?
- Which notification channels are required (email, SMS, in-app, system-to-system webhooks)?
- Do you need escalation paths and automated reminders for overdue tasks?
- Should SLA performance be reported on dashboards and included in periodic reports?
Configure FISMA Controls and Audit Logging
- Which specific FISMA or agency controls must be enabled or demonstrated at go-live?
- What level of audit logging retention is required (days/months/years)?
- Are centralized SIEM integration or log forwarding requirements in place (e.g., Splunk, Azure Sentinel)?
- Do you require role-based access to logs and FISMA evidence for auditors?
- List any agency-specific control implementations or compensating controls that differ from standard FedRAMP/FISMA baselines.
Integrate Reporting and BI Dashboards
- What key KPIs and reports must be available at go-live (e.g., case backlog, time-to-resolution, disposition rates)?
- Will reporting be handled in-product dashboards, exported files, or integrated BI tools (e.g., Power BI, Tableau)?
- Do you need role-specific dashboards (executive, program manager, caseworker, auditor)?
- Are there data latency requirements for reports (real-time, hourly, daily)?
- Are there export, retention, or archival requirements for report data?
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial and legal terms, confirm ATO responsibilities, milestones, and mutual obligations for delivery.
Agreement Modules
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Pricing & Payment Schedule
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Software License & Use Rights
- Data Processing & Security Addendum (DPA/Compliance)
- ATO Responsibilities & Evidence Handover
- Implementation Schedule & Milestones
- Acceptance Criteria & Formal Sign-off
- Change Order Agreement
- Training & Knowledge Transfer Commitment
- Data Migration & Reconciliation Agreement
- Security & Audit Support Agreement
- Termination, Transition & Data Return
- Purchase Order / Contract Award Confirmation
-
Deployment
Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm environments, identity integrations, data migration readiness, and security artifacts needed for ATO progression.
Readiness Questions
Before We Flip the Switch
- Who will be our primary deployment partner on your side (name, title, and day-to-day role)?
- What target go‑live window are you aiming for?
- Which three outcomes would make this deployment an unequivocal success for your program?
- Who are the must‑involved stakeholders we should expect to engage during deployment?
- Have you previously completed an ATO or FedRAMP onboarding in the last 24 months?
Who Really Holds the Keys?
- If you had to bet, will identity and access integrations be straightforward in sprint one—or the area that slows us most?
- Which identity providers and protocols currently govern access to your systems?
- Do you have an established user role model (RBAC) that we can map to, or will roles need to be redesigned?
- How will user provisioning occur for the deployment environment?
- Are there service accounts, API keys, or third‑party trust relationships that require special handling or approval?
Where Your Data's Been Sleeping
- How confident are you that the legacy data we will ingest is discoverable, documented, and migration‑ready?
- Which of the following are source systems we will need to extract from?
- Approximately how many records (cases, files, or rows) do you expect to migrate in the first phase?
- Are there known data quality issues (duplicates, missing identifiers, inconsistent formats) that will require remediation prior to migration?
- Do you have sample extracts or a masked dataset available we can use for mapping and acceptance testing?
The Security Paper Trail
- Would your current security artifacts let a FedRAMP or FISMA assessor say ‘we can proceed’—or would they ask for additional evidence?
- Which security and compliance documents are already prepared and available?
- What baseline impact level or FedRAMP/FISMA profile must we meet for ATO progression?
- Who within your organization owns the Authority to Operate process and will sign off on security artifacts?
- Do you have an established vulnerability scanning and patching cadence we must align with (and can you share recent results)?
What Could Break on Day One?
- What single integration, configuration, or operational dependency do you worry will stop a clean handover?
- Which integrations are mission‑critical for day‑one operations?
- Do you have a sandbox or staging environment that mirrors production for end‑to‑end testing?
- How prepared is your operations team to own day‑to‑day monitoring, incident response, and user support after handover?
- If we had to prioritize three mitigations to reduce launch risk immediately, which would you choose?
If This Went Flawlessly
- Imagine zero rework and a clean ATO handoff—what operational change would matter most to your constituents?
- Which metrics should we track to demonstrate deployment success in the first 90 days?
- After launch, what level of vendor involvement do you expect for maintenance and compliance (choose all that apply)?
- Which user groups would you want embedded in sprint testing to guarantee adoption?
- What would make you comfortable signing a mutual commitment to proceed after readiness validation?
Let’s Agree on First Moves
- What is the smallest set of three proof points we can commit to within 30 days to prove deployment readiness?
- Which of these actions can your team commit to completing in the next 14 days?
- Who will be the approval authority for each of the following: identity tests, data migration sample sign‑off, and ATO artifact acceptance? Please list name and title per item.
- On a scale from 1–5, how ready is your agency to begin the first deployment sprint once those proof points are in place?
- Is there any internal governance window, blackout period, or approvals queue we must avoid or plan around before deployment?
-
Deployment Enablement
Schedule sprints, assign owners, and execute configuration, migration, and security testing with embedded agency product owners.
-
Validation Checklist
Verify acceptance tests, security control validation, data integrity, and ATO evidence prior to formal handover.
Validation Questions
A Quick Hello: Who's in the Room?
- Who will be the primary contacts joining this conversation from your agency?
- What is the name and mission of the program or division we're discussing?
- Which of these best describes the primary driver for considering a new case management platform today?
- What's your target decision quarter or milestone for awarding a contract or choosing a vendor?
- How would you describe the tone in leadership about this initiative—urgent, cautious, exploratory, or something else?
If Nothing Changes, What Keeps Breaking?
- What critical failures are you currently tolerating because changing the system feels too risky or expensive?
- How often do these failures lead to measurable consequences (service delays, lost evidence, audit findings, security incidents)?
- Has your agency received any formal findings (audit, inspector general, or oversight) tied to the current system? If so, what was the core issue?
- When these issues occur, who inside the agency bears the most reputational or legal risk?
- Share a recent concrete example of a failure that caused downstream impact—what happened, and who felt it most?
What’s the Hidden Work No One Talks About?
- How much of your casework relies on manual processes, spreadsheets, or shadow systems that live outside official IT controls?
- Estimate the weekly FTE hours spent on manual case routing, status tracking, or reconciliation that could be automated.
- What legacy systems or databases hold critical data we would need to migrate (list names or types)?
- Which of these internal reactions best describes staff sentiment toward current tools—frustrated, resigned, inventive (workarounds), protective of data, or other?
- How long does it typically take to close a standard case today, and where do delays cluster?
Who Really Holds 'Good' in Their Hands?
- Where would the CISO’s definition of success conflict with the program owner’s definition—what are they each unwilling to compromise on?
- Which stakeholders will score your RFP for compliance, and which will score for usability or workflow fit?
- What are the top three non-negotiable requirements each of these stakeholders insists on?
- Who has final sign-off authority for ATO responsibilities versus commercial/contract sign-off?
- If you had to prioritize: which matters most for initial selection—FedRAMP/FISMA posture, configurability without custom code, data migration capability, or TCO over 5 years?
What Would Success Actually Look Like in Practice?
- Imagine this program two years from now—what measurable change would make leadership call it a success?
- Which of these outcome measures would you track to prove value?
- Please specify target values for up to three of the above metrics (e.g., reduce case closure from 90 to 30 days).
- Who will be responsible for those metrics after go-live—where will data for reports live?
- Which user groups must adopt the system first to signal success (inspectors, adjudicators, clerks, supervisors, external partners)?
Where Could a Migration Surprise Us?
- What hidden data quality issues (duplicates, inconsistent schemas, scanned PDFs) have you seen that could derail migration timelines?
- How many distinct data sources or systems would need to be reconciled during migration?
- Which data categories are most sensitive and will require special handling (PII, PHI, classified, evidentiary, sealed records)?
- Are there existing retention or legal hold rules that will constrain migration timing or require phased transfer?
- Who owns source system access and approvals for extraction (name/role)?
Security & ATO: The Real Stakes
- If a security control couldn't be demonstrated during ATO review, what is the realistic outcome—delay, partial ATO, or complete stop?
- Which authorizations or frameworks are mandatory for your program (FedRAMP Moderate/High, FISMA, agency-specific A2O)?
- Which evidence artifacts must be collected and who will own each (SSP, POA&M, system inventory, test evidence)?
- How much lead time does your ATO schedule require for remediation cycles after initial testing?
- Who will act as your Authorizing Official or delegate for final acceptance of residual risk?
Procurement Reality—What Will Block the Buy?
- What contractual or procurement constraints are most likely to sink a vendor even if the product fits the need?
- How do you typically evaluate vendors—point scoring, technical pass/fail, demonstrations, or pilots?
- What percentage weight does security/compliance carry in your RFP scoring compared to usability and TCO?
- Are there required contract vehicles or pre-approved vendors lists we must qualify for (e.g., GSA, SEWP, agency IDIQ)?
- What is the expected procurement timeline from RFP release to award?
Who Will Run It After We Walk Away?
- How ready is your operations team to take ownership—do they have capacity, training, and governance in place?
- Would you prefer our team to co-manage operations during an initial support window, or transfer immediately after acceptance?
- Which internal teams must be trained and certified before go-live (admins, power users, helpdesk, auditors)?
- What ongoing SLA, maintenance, or patching expectations will you require post-deployment?
- Who will be the single point of contact for escalations after go-live (role/contact)?
What Would Make You Say Yes This Week?
- What's the single biggest risk we could eliminate in the next 7–14 days that would materially accelerate your timeline?
- Would a short, scoped pilot with embedded agency product owners help de-risk selection—what would success for that pilot look like?
- Which contracting flexibility would be most helpful—pilot PO, time-limited options, performance milestones, or others?
- Who else inside leadership needs to be present for a decisive next step, and can we secure a short alignment session?
- If we deliver a written plan addressing your top three concerns, how quickly could you commit to the next formal step?
-
-
Success
Review outcomes and adoption metrics, maintain shared channels for issues, and prioritize enhancements for continuous compliance.
Success Reviews
- Success Review & Adoption Metrics (Quarterly Business Review)
- Compliance & ATO Sustainment Review
- Enhancement Prioritization Workshop
- Shared Channels & Escalation Cadence Setup
- Operational Handover, Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement
Issues & Enhancements
- Ensure appropriate access and channel ownership are assigned and documented.
- Seller to deliver a packaged set of ATO evidence artifacts for the next internal audit within 7 business days.
- Schedule monthly compliance syncs until all high-risk POA&Ms are closed.
- Context & Scoring Criteria
- Establish a prioritized enhancement backlog aligned to adoption and compliance impact.
- Agree on which enhancements will be included in the next release and confirm owners.
- Document any dependencies, procurement constraints, or additional funding needs.
- Finalize prioritized backlog and publish release plan with owners and acceptance criteria.
- Seller to provide effort estimates for top 5 items within 5 business days.
- Program owner to confirm funding or procurement path for items requiring budget changes.
- Confirm Communication Platforms
- Establish a single source of truth for issue tracking and escalation between agency and seller.
- Agree on SLAs and reporting cadence that meet agency risk tolerance and operational needs.
- Opening & Objectives
- Provision agreed shared channels and invite key stakeholders with role-based access.
- Publish incident workflow and SLA definitions to the shared channel as a pinned document.
- Set up automated weekly SLA and open-issue reports to be delivered to program leadership.
- Deployment Outcomes Recap
- Document and agree on lessons learned and concrete changes to process or configuration.
- Confirm that agency product owners have received necessary knowledge transfer and training materials.
- Define the continuous improvement intake process and schedule the first follow-up checkpoint.
- Deliver final runbooks, admin guides, and training recordings to the agency knowledge repository.
- Create a continuous improvement intake form and triage process; publish to shared channel.
- Schedule a 30-day follow-up to review progress on lessons-learned actions and training adoption.
- Confirm whether the deployment meets the acceptance criteria and program KPIs.
- Identify the top 3 adoption barriers and assign owners for remediation.
- Agree on a timeline for the next set of measurable improvements and the next review cadence.
- Publish the adoption dashboard with drill-downs to program owners and the CISO within 3 business days.
- Owner to create remediation plans for the top 3 adoption issues with milestones and owners.
- Schedule next QBR and distribute pre-read materials one week ahead.
- Opening & Scope
- Ensure all high-impact security controls are validated or have acceptable mitigations.
- Agree on owners and deadlines for outstanding POA&M items to maintain ATO status.
- Confirm the cadence and owners for maintaining ATO evidence and pre-audit readiness.
- Assign owners and target dates for each open POA&M and publish the updated tracker.
- Backlog Review (Top Candidates)
- Lessons Learned
- Incident & Issue Workflow
- Control Status Summary
- Summary of Commitments
- Outstanding POA&M Items
- Adoption Dashboard Review
- Knowledge Transfer & Training Status
- Prioritization Exercise
- SLA Definitions & Measurements
- Roadmap & Resource Alignment
- Operational Outcomes vs Success Criteria
- ATO Evidence & Documentation
- Continuous Improvement Process
- Ownership & Access Controls
- Closeout & Next Checkpoints
- Security & Compliance Snapshot
- Validation & Sign-off
- Upcoming Audit/Inspection Preparation
- Reporting Cadence & Templates
- Change Management & Patch Schedule
- Customer Feedback & Support Trends
- Decisions & Next Steps