Clinical Decision Support
Clinical, operational, and financial complexity where patient outcomes, revenue, and compliance all intersect.
This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.
Inside this journey
-
Clinical Outcome Discovery
Align on the current medication-safety gaps, regulatory triggers, stakeholders, and the measurable success signals needed to reduce adverse drug events.
Discovery Questions
A quick starting moment
- Tell me briefly what event or trigger prompted your team to start this medication-safety project and when it occurred.
- How many inpatient beds and active prescribers would you expect to include in an initial pilot?
- Who in your organization typically signs off on the scope and success criteria for pilots like this?
- Describe the single outcome your leadership will call success for a pilot, and include the numeric target if there is one.
Where medication safety causes real pain
- Name the one medication-safety failure that would make you stop this project immediately if it recurred during a pilot.
- How often do high-severity medication alerts currently fire per 1,000 admissions in the service line you would pilot?
- Which clinician groups override the most alerts today, and which workflows do those overrides most affect?
- Estimate the financial or regulatory impact from your most recent sentinel medication event, using ranges if needed.
- Who on your team feels the greatest pressure when these events occur, operationally or legally?
Where current controls quietly fail
- When a guideline or formulary change happens overnight, what breaks first in your medication guidance and alerting workflow?
- Do you currently have a defined process to update clinical decision support content within 72 hours of a major guideline change?
- Which systems must be integrated for the platform to evaluate medications in real time at your site? Select all that apply.
- List the roles responsible today for alert tuning, and give the approximate FTEs or percentage time allocated to that work.
- Rate your medication and order data cleanliness and accessibility for mapping external content on a 1 to 5 scale, where 5 means ready for real-time matching.
- If real-time APIs are not available for order checks, would lack of those APIs stop the pilot from proceeding?
Who else is on the shortlist
- Name the other external vendors, incumbent tools, or internal projects your team is actively considering for this capability.
- What would have to be true about your current approach for your team to decide to keep it instead of switching to an external partner?
- Do any internal teams have an active proposal to build this capability in-house, and if so who would lead that effort?
- List the deal-breaker gaps you see in the incumbent or internal options that would push you to select a new partner.
- If you stayed with the incumbent or built internally, what concrete change would be required within 6 months to avoid switching vendors?
Outcomes that make the CFO and CPO sign
- Identify the single metric your chief pharmacy officer or VP quality will use to determine this pilot is worth expanding enterprise-wide.
- Within how many weeks after pilot start would leadership expect to see measurable change against that metric?
- Specify the numeric acceptance criteria and any linked thresholds that must be hit for you to consider enterprise rollout.
- Would achieving a reduction in override rates to under 40% alone be sufficient to trigger expansion, or do you require linked clinical outcome improvements?
- Identify the approvals or committees that would still need to sign off before contract signature even if the pilot meets targets.
Integration, timelines, and technical gates
- Tell us which integration gap or missing connector, if not resolved, would force you to cancel the pilot.
- Specify the APIs, message feeds, or interfaces your EHR and pharmacy teams must expose for the pilot to function as intended.
- Are there scheduled batch loads, daily cutoffs, or record-locking behaviors that could prevent real-time decision support during peak hours?
- State the IT integration team that would own the work and their estimated available hours per week for this project.
- Rate your data mapping readiness for medication codes and orderables on a 1 to 5 scale.
- Can legal or compliance approve the required data-sharing and integration agreements within your target go-live window?
Who signs and who tunes after go-live
- Point to the role that will own post-deployment safety reviews and the tuning cadence, and say whether that role can change alerts without committee approval.
- At what cadence do you expect executive-level outcome reviews during the pilot and through the first year of rollout?
- Provide the stakeholder groups you require in tuning sprints and identify who has final approval to suppress classes of low-severity alerts.
- What escalation path do you expect when a clinician reports a harmful near-miss tied to a decision support recommendation?
- Would the clinician safety committee's refusal to endorse external content updates stop deployment?
Agreeing next steps without wasted time
- Define the earliest pilot start date your team could commit to with the current resource picture.
- Select the people we should invite to the kickoff so decisions on scope, tuning, and success metrics can be made there.
- Describe the measurement method you will use for clinician time impact during the pilot and the role accountable for collecting that data.
- Point out the top three risks you require mitigation for before signing a Statement of Work.
- Assuming we can provide a 6-week technical integration and a 12-week tuning window that meets your acceptance criteria, are you prepared to sign a pilot agreement within the same month?
-
Clinical Workflow Walkthrough
Walk through how evidence-based guidance and alerts will surface in the buyer's EHR workflows using real clinical scenarios and user roles.
Solution Experience
- Clinical Workflow Walkthrough
- Confirm the current state and its cost to your team
- You confirm the current alert fatigue and workflow friction statement matches what your clinicians experience.
- Provide two representative patient cases and the list of EHR user roles to test in the next session.
- Agree pilot acceptance criteria and target metrics
- You agree the demonstrated workflows deliver the operational outcome of fewer low-value interruptions and align with the pilot acceptance metrics.
- Execute the two validated clinical scenarios in a test EHR environment and deliver recordings plus alert logs and tuning rule snapshots before the follow-up.
- Walk through Scenario A, clinician order-entry perspective
- Confirm pilot acceptance criteria including target override rate, acceptable alert latency, and clinician time impact thresholds.
- You identify any remaining evidence needed to approve a pilot, including performance and reporting requirements.
- Identify the decision makers and required stakeholders who must attend the pilot validation review.
- Walk through Scenario B, cross-role handoff and nurse administration
- Review tuning rules, content update cadence, and analytics signals
- Validate the demonstrated future state
- Clinical Workflow Walkthrough
- Clinical Workflow Walkthrough Deck
- Clinical Workflow Solution Brief
- meeting
- slides
- document
-
Solution Scope
Define modules, pilot service line, responsibilities, tuning windows, acceptance criteria, and ongoing content-maintenance expectations.
Scope Configuration
- EHR Contextual Trigger Integration
- Medication Interaction Rule Set Deployment
- Dose Verification and Range Check Implementation
- Diagnostic Decision Tree Activation
- Imaging Appropriateness Criteria Enforcement
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Order Checks
- Alert Tuning and Severity Suppression
- Clinical Content 72‑Hour Update Service
- Real‑time Override and Outcome Analytics Dashboard
- Order Set and Protocol Synchronization
- Latency and Runtime Performance Optimization
- Clinician Workflow Training and Go‑Live Support
- Audit Logging and Intervention Trace Export
- Rule Versioning and Rollback Controls
Scope Questions
EHR Contextual Trigger Integration
- Which EHR screens (for example CPOE order entry, medication administration record, or reconciliation) should trigger contextual guidance for medication safety?
- Do you currently have an integration endpoint that exposes real-time FHIR resources (for example MedicationRequest, Observation) or HL7 v2 feeds we must consume?
- Who on your informatics team will be the API owner for testing the EHR trigger (provide name, role, and email)?
- How many distinct hospital locations or EHR instances must the trigger integration cover for the initial pilot (for example single hospital ED, multi-hospital system)?
- When should the trigger be active during the clinician workflow (for example on order save, on order sign, on post-verification in pharmacy)?
- Describe any existing EHR performance constraints we should design for (for example max API response 200 ms, max concurrent calls per second).
Medication Interaction Rule Set Deployment
- Which inpatient service line do you want to pilot the interaction rule set on (for example adult medical-surgical, pediatrics, ICU)?
- Do you have an existing formulary or local interaction exceptions list that must be applied to the deployed rule set?
- Who will be the clinical owner for rule acceptance decisions (title and contact) during pilot tuning?
- How many interaction categories (for example major, moderate, minor) do you require and what override threshold will you accept for a major interaction alert?
- Specify the source lists or coding systems your EHR uses for medications and interactions (for example RxNorm, local drug IDs).
- Identify any existing clinical decision support (CDS) rules that must remain disabled or reconciled to avoid duplicate interaction alerts.
Dose Verification and Range Check Implementation
- Which patient populations need dose-range checks (for example neonates, renal impairment, weight-based dosing units)?
- Do you maintain a dosing reference (for example local dosing table, pharmacy protocol spreadsheet) that we should import as the authoritative ranges?
- Who will provide patient-specific inputs required for dose calculations (for example current weight, latest creatinine, dialysis status) and via which EHR field names?
- How do you want weight-based doses evaluated when documented weight is older than a threshold (for example older than 24 hours)?
- When a dose exceeds a hard stop threshold, what action should occur in the EHR workflow (for example block order, require pharmacist cosignature, fire soft alert)?
- Provide examples of three high-risk medications at your institution where dose-range checking is mandatory (drug name and typical dosing range).
Diagnostic Decision Tree Activation
- Which diagnostic workflows should activate decision trees (for example chest pain in ED, fever in oncology, sepsis screening)?
- Do you have local order sets or pathway documents we must reference when building the decision tree steps (please attach or name the document ID)?
- Who is the clinical SME (subject matter expert) that will approve branching logic for the decision tree during build and tuning?
- How many decision points should be visible to clinicians before requiring an expanded view (for example show 3 items then expand)?
- Describe required provenance for each decision node (for example cite guideline name and date such as Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021) that must be displayed in the EHR.
- Identify any regulatory or local compliance constraints that affect diagnostic prompts (for example CMS sepsis measure timing).
Imaging Appropriateness Criteria Enforcement
- Which imaging order types should trigger appropriateness checks (for example CT with contrast, MRI spine, plain films)?
- Do you require the system to reference national appropriateness criteria (for example ACR Appropriateness Criteria) or local radiology protocols?
- Who will own adjudication of overridden appropriateness recommendations (radiology director, ordering clinician, or peer review)?
- How should the system surface alternatives when an imaging order is flagged (for example suggest alternative modality, require documented clinical indication)?
- When imaging orders are modified or canceled due to appropriateness checks, what audit or notification is required (for example email to ordering provider, radiology log)?
- Provide three example imaging scenarios from your facility where appropriateness enforcement is high priority (modality and clinical indication).
Antimicrobial Stewardship Order Checks
- Which stewardship checks do you require for the pilot (for example duration alerts, duplicate therapy, IV-to-oral switch)?
- Do you maintain an antibiogram or local susceptibility matrix we must reference when suggesting empiric therapy?
- Who will approve stewardship thresholds (for example default duration in days for community-acquired pneumonia) during the pilot?
- How should restricted antimicrobial orders be routed (for example require antimicrobial stewardship team approval, require pharmacy verification)?
- Identify the EHR order attributes we must read to enforce stewardship rules (for example order start date, specimen culture results, allergy list).
- Estimate the target reduction in inappropriate antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) you expect from the pilot (percentage).
Alert Tuning and Severity Suppression
- Which clinician roles should be able to tune alert thresholds in production (for example pharmacists, physician informaticists, nursing leaders)?
- Do you want severity suppression rules by patient cohort (for example suppress low-severity in ICU or exclude hospice)?
- Who will own weekly tuning sprints and change approvals during the quarter-long tuning period (title and contact)?
- How many incremental tuning windows do you want in the initial quarter (for example weekly, biweekly)?
- Specify the maximum acceptable alert override rate for the pilot that will be used as an acceptance threshold (for example 40% override for interruptive alerts).
- Confirm which alert channels are considered interruptive in your EHR (for example hard stop modal, in-line order warning, passive info banner).
Clinical Content 72‑Hour Update Service
- Which clinical content types require the 72-hour update SLA (for example drug interaction updates, new guideline advisories, black box warnings)?
- Do you require automated push of content changes into your EHR content repository or a staged import for informatics review?
- Who on your clinical editorial or pharmacy team will receive 72-hour change notices (name and role)?
- How should emergency updates be validated in the EHR (for example rapid approval by pharmacy director within 24 hours)?
- Provide an example recent guideline change you expect the service to capture within 72 hours (for example new dosing restriction for a medication class).
- Indicate any governance constraints on content changes (for example pharmacy committee sign-off required, physician chair approval).
Real‑time Override and Outcome Analytics Dashboard
- Which outcome metrics must be visible on day one of the dashboard (for example alert override rate, time-to-order completion, ADE — adverse drug event — incidence)?
- Do you require data latency of near real-time (for example under 5 minutes) or is daily batch acceptable for analytics?
- Who will be the analytics dashboard owner responsible for weekly review and escalation (name and role)?
- How should clinician-level override detail be handled for privacy when exported (for example de-identified, role-level only, full audit with SSO access)?
- Specify which downstream outcomes you want correlated with CDS interventions (for example reduction in harm events, 30-day readmission, pharmacy turnaround time).
- State the acceptance criteria for the dashboard data coverage and freshness that will constitute 'ready for pilot review'.
Order Set and Protocol Synchronization
- Which order sets require synchronization with the platform during the pilot (for example pneumonia, anticoagulation, perioperative antibiotics)?
- Do you maintain order sets in a central repository we can pull from or must we map from the EHR order set IDs?
- Who will be responsible for approving synchronized order set changes in your governance process (title and contact)?
- How frequently should order set synchronization occur after go-live (for example daily, weekly, on-demand)?
- Describe any mapping complexity we should expect (for example duplicate local medication codes, compounded preparations).
- Indicate which protocol updates are out of scope for the pilot and will require a separate SOW (statement of work).
-
Pilot Evaluation
Run a focused pilot to measure alert override rates, clinician time impact, content update cadence, and integration latency against agreed acceptance criteria.
- decision_readiness
- current_state
- stakeholders
- success_criteria
- desired_state
- gaps
- desired_state
- decision_readiness
- current_state
- success_criteria
- stakeholders
- gaps
- stakeholders
- current_state
- desired_state
- success_criteria
- gaps
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial and legal terms, governance, acceptance criteria, and the phased rollout plan including support and escalation paths.
Agreement Modules
- Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Order Form / Subscription Agreement
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Acceptance & Go-Live Criteria
- Governance & Steering Committee Charter
- Support & Escalation Addendum
- Change Order Agreement
- Data Processing Agreement / HIPAA BAA (conditional)
-
Deployment
Lock readiness facts and configuration values before execution begins.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm concrete readiness facts — data access, integration endpoints, test environments, owners, and go-live windows — before build begins.
Pre-Deployment Questions
Environment and site access
- Which environments are available for integration at this site (select all that apply)?
- For each non-production environment selected above, is network access from the seller's build/test IP range currently allowed, or on what date will access be granted? (This is a readiness fact so we can schedule connectivity testing.)
Data and configuration
- Which patient data feeds or message types must the platform be able to read or write (select all that apply)?
- Is there a named clinical content owner who will approve initial mappings and tuning? Provide the owner's name, role, and preferred contact (so we know who signs content acceptance).
- Are any data governance, PHI, or IRB approvals required before using production-like test data in non-production environments?
- If approvals are pending, specify the approval type and expected completion date (this date gates test runs).
People and ownership
- Identify named owners for these workstreams: integration/network, clinical content/editorial sign-off, informatics/tuning, and project sponsor. Include name, role, and preferred contact for each (one fact per owner).
- Is there a designated EHR integration engineer or vendor contact responsible for firewall/VPN and API-credential coordination?
Timing and constraints
- Which target window should we plan for build and initial go-live (select one for planning; provide exact dates below if available)?
- List any firm blackout dates, change freezes, or regulatory milestones that will prevent build or go-live work (so we can avoid scheduling conflicts).
- Are there performance or latency ceilings required during integration testing (e.g., maximum response times or transaction SLAs) that the deployment team must validate?
- Is a documented rollback and on-call escalation path in place for go-live day?
-
Integration & Configuration
Capture exact configuration values the deployment team will use — API credentials, alert thresholds, content sync schedules, and tuning roles.
Configuration Details
Environments & Endpoints — tell us exactly where the platform will connect
- Primary production EHR integration endpoint URL (format: https://full-host/path — enter the FHIR base URL or REST endpoint the platform will call; leave blank if production is not yet available)
- Select the integration environment this configuration targets (Default: Production)
- EHR integration API/version to target (free text — exact value used in the connector settings, e.g., 'FHIR R4', 'HL7 v2.6', or 'Custom API v2.3')
Authentication & Credential Handoff — non-secrets only, and how the secret will be exchanged
- Authentication method for the integration (choose the single method the platform will use)
- Provide the non-secret identifier for the credential the buyer will supply (e.g., OAuth client_id or integration service account user name). DO NOT paste secrets.
- How will the buyer deliver the secret to the seller (choose the secure handoff channel the buyer will use; the secret itself is exchanged off-form)
Alerting & Tuning — concrete runtime thresholds the build will apply
- Default severity threshold to display as interruptive (Default: Critical & High)
- Initial alert suppression window after clinician dismissal in minutes (Default: 30 — enter an integer number of minutes)
Content Synchronization & Ownership — cadence and who decides tuning changes
- Clinical content sync schedule for the platform (Default: Daily)
- Name the buyer role responsible for day-to-day tuning decisions (free text — exact role/title used in governance logs, e.g., 'Medication Safety Pharmacist')
-
Rollout Execution
Execute EHR integration, content import, tuning sprints, and phased go-lives with clear owners, timelines, and rollback plans.
-
-
Safety & Outcome Reviews
Review outcomes against success signals, maintain a recurring tuning cadence, and track issues and enhancement requests for continuous improvement.
Success Reviews
- Go-live Health Check (week 1-4)
- First Measurement Review (week 4-10)
- Acceptance Gate Review (around day 90)
- Ongoing Outcomes & Tuning Review (monthly for first 3 months, then quarterly)
Issues & Enhancements
- Run a quarterly clinician survey to measure perceived alert fatigue and time impact and summarize results.
- Execute the agreed tuning changes and report the outcome in the next checkpoint.
- Run a clinician feedback pulse focused on alerts with the highest override rates and summarize findings.
- Validate and publish the measurement calculation method for override rate and clinician time impact.
- Restate acceptance criteria and numeric targets
- Produce a documented acceptance decision referenced to the targets recorded in Solution Scope, with a named buyer signatory where enterprise governance requires it.
- For any unmet criteria, agree a remediation plan with owners and dates sufficient to close the acceptance loop.
- Confirm the incumbent system's decommissioning plan or read-only retention and the status of data migration or archival.
- Publish the acceptance record including pass/fail per criterion and the named buyer signatory where required.
- Create a remediation tracker for any failed criteria with owners and target resolution dates.
- Execute or confirm the incumbent system wind-down steps and archive or migrate legacy data as documented.
- Trend review for key outcomes
- Ensure alert override rate and adverse drug event rate continue to trend toward or remain within the targets recorded in Solution Scope.
- Keep the tuning backlog prioritized and progressing, with clear owners and dates for the top items.
- Verify content maintenance meets the agreed SLA and log any required catch-up actions.
- Schedule the next tuning window and list the specific rules or content sets to be adjusted.
- Publish the prioritized enhancement request list with expected delivery quarters.
- Re-confirm success criteria and owners
- Confirm the integration endpoints and test environments are stable enough to begin collecting meaningful usage data.
- Identify and assign owners for any go-live defects with committed resolution dates.
- Publish the go-live defect log with owners and target resolution dates.
- Enable agreed monitoring dashboards for usage and error metrics for the first 30 days.
- Present first-run metrics
- Determine whether alert override rate and average clinician time per alert are on track to meet the targets recorded in Solution Scope.
- Document root causes for any gaps and commit to specific tuning or content actions with clear dates.
- Diagnose gaps versus targets
- Tuning actions and results
- Present outcome data against each criterion
- Deployment and integration validation
- Document pass/fail per criterion and rationale
- Agree corrective tuning and timelines
- Open issues and enhancement request backlog
- Early adoption signals and usage patterns
- Content maintenance and SLA adherence
- Open issues and immediate remediation
- Formal acceptance decision and signatory capture
- Confirm data integrity and measurement sources
- Confirm path to acceptance gate
- Incumbent system wind-down confirmation
- Short action wrap-up and next checkpoints
- Agree short-term actions and cadence
- Agree remediation plan for unmet criteria