Health, Education & Government Healthcare Providers Value-Based Care & Population Health

Value-Based Payment & Analytics

Clinical, operational, and financial complexity where patient outcomes, revenue, and compliance all intersect.

Arcadia Health Catalyst Lightbeam Health Inovalon
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, timeline, and what ‘good’ looks like for clinical, finance, and operations stakeholders.

      Alignment Questions

      Opening the Room: Who's in it with us?

      • Who from your organization will be participating in evaluating this analytics platform? Please list names, titles, and their expected involvement.
      • Which of these stakeholder groups will have decision influence on this engagement? Options: ACO Medical Director, CFO / Finance, CMO / Clinical Leadership, VP/Director Population Health, Chief Data Officer / IT, Chief Operating Officer, Care Management Leadership, Physician Council / Clinic Leads, Board / Executive Committee, Other
      • Who will be the primary day-to-day point of contact and who will serve as the executive sponsor for this initiative?
      • Which single stakeholder currently feels the most urgency to move forward with better analytics and why? Options: ACO Medical Director, CFO, VP Population Health, Clinical Operations Lead, Physician Leadership, Other
      • How does your team usually make decisions for initiatives like this—consensus, executive-led, procurement-driven, or committee vote? Options: Consensus across stakeholders, Executive sponsor decision, Procurement/Legal-led process, Formal committee vote, Other

      Who's Really Holding the Keys?

      • If the contract landed on a desk tomorrow, who would actually have authority to sign and why would they approve it? Options: CFO / Finance, Executive Sponsor (CEO/COO), Board or Executive Committee, Procurement / Legal, Clinical Governance (CMO/Medical Board), Other
      • Walk us through a recent vendor selection—who championed it, who opposed it, and what made the difference?
      • Which formal approval steps are required for commercial engagement in your organization? Options: Legal review, Procurement approval, IT/security signoff, Finance/CFO signoff, Clinical governance/medical board, Data governance, Board approval, Other
      • Do you operate inside procurement windows, annual budget cycles, or other timing constraints that will affect contract timing? Options: Quarterly budget review, Annual budget cycle, Procurement windows only, Ad-hoc approvals, No specific constraints, Unsure
      • Who in your organization is most likely to veto this project and what are the top concerns that would trigger a veto?

      If We Miss the Mark, Who Notices?

      • Whose performance metrics or incentives are most exposed if this initiative underperforms? Options: ACO Medical Director, CFO, VP Population Health, Clinical Operations Lead, Physician Leaders, Quality/Compliance Lead, Other
      • How are outcomes for value-based programs currently tracked—formal reviews, incentive cliffs, or informal check-ins? Options: Formal monthly performance reviews, Quarterly executive reviews, Annual incentives tied to shared savings, Ad-hoc/informal updates, No formal tracking
      • Describe a past analytics or vendor effort that failed to meet expectations—what broke down and how did that impact stakeholders?
      • When leaders lose faith in analytics outputs, which criticisms surface most often? Options: Data is too late, Metrics aren’t actionable, Provider-level detail is missing, Attribution is disputed, Tool is not user-friendly, Other
      • If early deployment shows warning signs, how would you prefer we escalate and communicate those issues? Options: Immediate call with exec sponsor, Weekly written status reports, Executive dashboard alerts, Weekly sync with project team, Other

      What Would 'Good' Actually Look Like for Each Team?

      • If clinical leadership had to sign off today, what measurable changes would make them declare this a success?
      • From a finance perspective, what exact financial targets or tolerances (e.g., PMPM, shared savings %) would justify continued investment?
      • Which operational outcomes are highest priority for your operations leaders? Options: Reduction in avoidable ED visits, Reduced readmissions, Faster claims reconciliation, Improved care transitions, Lower administrative burden on providers, Other
      • How do provider-facing stakeholders define ‘actionable’—what timeliness and granularity do they need to engage clinicians? Options: Patient-level within 30–90 days, Monthly provider-level drilldown, Condition/episode-specific reports, Near-real-time alerts, Other
      • Select the success signals that would most influence your decision to scale this solution. Options: Total cost of care reduction, Improved quality scores (HEDIS/other), Provider adoption rate, Attribution accuracy, Timeliness of data, Reduction in avoidable utilization, Other

      Unseen Friction: Politics, Trust, and Data Skepticism

      • Where do trust gaps live today—between clinicians and finance, clinicians and analytics, or within the executive team? Options: Clinicians vs Finance, Clinicians vs Analytics, Analytics vs Executive Team, IT vs Clinical, Other
      • Describe a time when analytics data provoked strong pushback—what emotions surfaced and how was it handled?
      • How open are physician leaders to being shown provider-level performance in scorecards? Options: Very open, Somewhat open, Reluctant, Strongly opposed, Depends on anonymity/aggregation
      • Which change-management resources are available to support provider adoption here? Options: Clinical champions, Dedicated training team, Change management lead, Internal communications team, No formal resources, Other
      • If we proposed co-validation of attribution and metrics with your clinicians, what concerns would still keep you cautious?

      Timeline Reality Check: When Does This Matter?

      • If you had to place a non-negotiable deadline on seeing initial impact, when is it and why? Options: 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 6 months, By next contract renewal, Other
      • What external calendar events (contract renewals, reporting deadlines, board meetings) create hard milestones for this project? Options: Contract renewal, Medicare/MA reporting deadlines, Quarterly board review, Budget cycle, Regulatory audit window, Other
      • Given common claims latency (e.g., 60–90 days), how do you currently manage expectations for early results?
      • How flexible is your internal timeline if integration or validation requires more time than expected? Options: Very flexible, Somewhat flexible, Rigid / fixed deadline, Unsure
      • What concrete milestones and checkpoints would you expect during the first 90 days?

      The Budget & Risk Trade-offs You’re Willing to Make

      • What's the maximum financial or operational risk your organization is willing to absorb for a vendor to deliver meaningful change?
      • Which commercial model aligns best with your organization's risk appetite? Options: Fixed subscription, Success-based / shared savings, Hybrid (base + success), Pilot/POC with limited spend, Other
      • How much runway—budget and executive patience—is typically given to pilots before a go/no-go decision? Options: 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Depends on pilot scope, Unsure
      • Which contractual protections are must-haves for you (select all that apply)? Options: SLA with financial penalties, Data ownership and return rights, Termination for convenience, Acceptance criteria tied to payment, Indemnity/insurance clauses, Other
      • If a success fee is considered, which financial metrics would you be comfortable tying payment to? Options: Total cost of care reduction (PMPM), Shared savings %, Avoidable admissions avoided, Improvement in specific quality measures, Reduced utilization per 1,000, Other

      How Will We Validate and Celebrate Early Wins?

      • What would an early win look like that no one could argue with—an indisputable, measurable result?
      • Which existing data sources and reports do you trust most today to prove impact? Options: Claims extracts, Financial P&L / cost reports, Provider scorecards, EMR / clinical reports, Quality/HEDIS dashboards, Other
      • Who must sign acceptance that early milestones were achieved? Options: Executive sponsor, Clinical lead / Medical Director, Finance lead / CFO, Cross-functional steering committee, Other
      • How should early results be communicated to your physician network to maximize credibility and adoption? Options: Provider-level dashboards, Weekly summary emails, Town-hall presentations, One-on-one provider reviews, Integrated EHR notifications, Other
      • What measurement cadence builds confidence—weekly, monthly, quarterly—and why? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Other

      Mapping Responsibilities: Who Owns What

      • Where do handoffs tend to break down today—between clinical, finance, operations, IT, or vendor teams? Options: Clinical leadership, Finance/CFO, Operations, IT/Data engineering, Care management, Vendor handoffs, Other
      • List the internal teams that must be involved in implementation and the primary responsibility you expect each to own.
      • Which of these responsibilities would you expect our team to take on as vendor-delivered services? Options: Data ingestion & mapping, Attribution reconciliation, Dashboard configuration & UX, Provider and admin training, Ongoing analytics & monitoring, Governance facilitation, Other
      • What SLA or response expectations should we plan for between our implementation team and yours? Options: 24–48 hour response, 3–5 business days, Weekly touchpoints, Monthly steering committee, Other
      • After deployment, who will own ongoing governance and performance review? Options: Clinical governance committee, Finance operations owner, Cross-functional steering committee, Vendor-managed governance, Other

      Commitment & Next Steps: What Would Make You Say Yes?

      • If you could pin one non-negotiable condition that would make you comfortable signing, what would it be?
      • What outstanding questions or proof points must be resolved before you would recommend this to leadership?
      • Which next step from us would be most helpful right now? Options: Technical deep-dive with IT/security, Pilot using retrospective claims data, Executive-level commercial review, Clinical co-validation workshop, Legal/contract template review, Other
      • How soon should we schedule a follow-up to align on scope, timeline, and responsibilities? Options: This week, Within 2 weeks, In a month, After internal approvals, Other
      • Who else from your organization should be included in that follow-up meeting (names and roles)?
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document data sources, attribution rules, claims latency, reporting cadence, and physician engagement barriers.

      Current State

      Start Here: Tell Us Who You’re Bringing to the Table

      • What is your primary role and how you are involved in value-based contracts? Options: ACO Medical Director, VP/Director Population Health, Health System CFO, CMO/Clinical Leader, Analytics Director, Other
      • Which payer types make up the majority of your attributed population today? Options: Medicare Shared Savings (ACO), Medicare Advantage, Commercial risk, Medicaid managed care, Mixed
      • Approximately how many attributed lives or unique members are in scope for your value-based contracts? Options: <10k, 10k–50k, 50k–150k, 150k–500k, >500k
      • Who are the key decision-makers we should align with during discovery (roles and names if available)?
      • What's the primary outcome your leadership cares about this year (choose one)? Options: Lower total cost of care, Improve quality metrics/compliance, Increase provider adoption of pathways, Maximize shared savings, Reduce avoidable utilization

      If Your Data Could Talk, It Would Tell Us Where It Hurts

      • How confident are you in the accuracy of your claims-derived cost and utilization metrics today? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neutral, Skeptical, Not confident at all
      • Which data sources do you currently combine to measure total cost of care and quality? (select all that apply) Options: Commercial claims paid, Medicare FFS claims, Medicare Advantage encounter data, Medicaid claims/encounters, EHR clinical data, Pharmacy claims, Cost/accounting ledgers, Other
      • How do you currently ingest claims data into analytics (choose all that apply)? Options: Direct payer feeds (API/SFTP), Clearinghouse exports, Vendor-supplied normalized files, Manual batch uploads, We don’t have a formal ingestion process
      • What is your typical end-to-end claims latency (from service date to usable claim in your analytics)? Options: <30 days, 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 90–180 days, >180 days, Varies widely by payer
      • Which parts of the claims pipeline cause the most frustration (mapping, late adjudication, denials, remits, other)? Options: Mapping/normalization, Late adjudication/payments, Denied/aged claims, Pharmacy lag, Missing provider identifiers, Other
      • Tell us about a recent example where delayed or missing claims directly impacted a clinical or financial decision.
      • Who owns ETL/data quality internally and what checks are currently run before metrics are published? Options: In-house data engineering, Population health analytics team, Finance/actuarial, Third-party vendor, No single owner

      Who Really Owns Attribution — and Does Everyone Agree?

      • If attribution were a courtroom, how contested would the verdict be across your stakeholders? Options: Rarely contested, Occasionally disputed, Frequently disputed, Continuously contested
      • What attribution method(s) are you currently using or required by contract (select all that apply)? Options: Prospective assignment, Retrospective claims-based, Panel-based attribution, Majority of visits, Custom contractual definition, Payer-specified algorithm
      • How often do you reconcile attribution between clinical rosters and payer lists, and who signs off? Options: Daily/real-time, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Infrequently or ad-hoc
      • What are the top reasons providers dispute attribution, and how long do disputes typically take to resolve? Options: Missing visits in claims, Incorrect TIN/NPI mapping, Delay in encounter submission, Roster mismatches, Payer coding differences
      • Describe a recent attribution disagreement: who raised it, the root cause, and the outcome.
      • What level of attribution transparency is required for provider-level performance conversations (claims-line detail, visit-level evidence, aggregated summaries)? Options: Claims-line detail, Visit-level summaries, Aggregated monthly metrics, Contract-level summaries only

      When Reports Arrive, Do They Move People to Action?

      • Is the information you share with physician leaders viewed as timely and actionable or as 'nice to know'? Options: Timely and actionable, Somewhat actionable, Informative but not actionable, Ignored
      • What reporting cadence currently drives decisions across clinical, financial, and operational teams? Options: Real-time dashboards, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Event-triggered only
      • How are reports consumed by clinicians and leaders (EHR inbox, email PDFs, BI portal, meetings, other)? Options: EHR inbox/alerts, Email reports/PDFs, BI/dashboard portal, Regular leadership meetings, Ad hoc data requests
      • What level of provider-level drilldown do you need to make a coaching conversation credible (panel-level, NPI-level, visit, claim-line)? Options: Panel-level summary, NPI/provider level, Visit-level with notes, Claim-line detail
      • Give an example of a time a report led to a measurable change in care or cost—what enabled that shift?
      • Which audiences typically don’t act on the reports you publish, and why do you think that is? Options: Primary care physicians, Specialists, Practice managers, Finance, Care managers, Other

      What Makes Physicians Tune Out (Even When the Numbers Look Bad)?

      • Why do clinicians push back on analytic findings—what do they say is missing or misleading? Options: Data is out of date, Not clinically granular, Attribution seems wrong, Metrics feel punitive, Lack of workflow integration, Other
      • How often do clinicians request case-level evidence before changing practice, and what form of evidence convinces them? Options: Always, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
      • What engagement tactics have you tried (peer comparisons, outreach scripts, financial incentives, CME sessions) and what worked or failed? Options: Peer benchmarking, One-to-one coaching, Financial incentives, Group education/CME, Embedded EHR alerts, None tried
      • Describe an instance where a physician changed behavior based on analytics—what was different about that interaction?
      • Which clinician-facing formats get the best response: single metric scorecards, case lists, narrative patient stories, or real-time alerts? Options: Single metric scorecards, Case lists for outreach, Narrative patient stories, Real-time EHR alerts, Interactive dashboards

      Imagine You Could Prove Savings Next Quarter — What Would That Require?

      • If leadership asked for a credible, provider-level savings estimate in 90 days, how achievable is that with current data and processes? Options: Very achievable, Achievable with effort, Possible but unlikely, Not achievable
      • Which outcome signals would make stakeholders accept a savings claim (cost per member, readmission reduction, utilization drops, quality improvement)? Options: Total cost per member, ED visit reduction, Inpatient days reduced, Readmissions, Quality measure improvements, Other
      • What level of statistical or actuarial validation does finance require before accepting a savings estimate? Options: Formal actuarial sign-off, Peer-reviewed methodology, Internal finance review, Basic reconciliations only
      • Who must sign off on acceptance criteria for success (names/roles), and what acceptance hurdles have sunk prior pilots?
      • What timeframe do you think is realistic to demonstrate provider-level adoption changes that lead to savings? Options: 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 3–6 months, 6–12 months

      Integration Reality Check: Can We Actually Connect?

      • Which technical connection types are available for claims and clinical feeds at your organization? Options: Secure API, SFTP batch files, HL7/FHIR, Vendor-hosted normalized exports, Manual CSV uploads, No current connectors
      • What security and compliance controls must be in place before any data exchange (BAA, encryption, IP allowlist, penetration testing)? Options: Business Associate Agreement (BAA), AES/TLS encryption, IP allowlisting, Vulnerability/pen testing, SOC2/ISO attestation, Other
      • How many test environments and months of retrospective data will you make available for validation? Options: 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, Only production
      • Who are the operational owners for integrations (IT, data engineering, vendor management, security) and what SLA expectations do they set? Options: IT/Infrastructure, Data engineering/BI, Vendor management, Security/compliance, Population health ops
      • Describe any past integration blockers (firewall rules, payer approvals, data schema mismatches) and how long they took to resolve.

      Risks, Assumptions, and the Things People Don’t Say Out Loud

      • What assumptions are we making about your data, people, or processes that, if wrong, would sink the project?
      • Which risks keep you awake regarding analytics-driven initiatives (budget, governance, provider backlash, regulatory scrutiny)? Options: Budget constraints, Governance misalignment, Provider resistance, Regulatory/compliance risk, Data quality/latency, Other
      • How much contingency budget/time do you have to handle unexpected ETL or attribution work? Options: None, < 10% of project, 10–20% buffer, >20% buffer
      • If we surfaced a major attribution or claims gap in month one, what decision process would you follow to pause, fix, or continue?
      • Who are the informal influencers (clinical champions or skeptics) we should engage early to de-risk rollout?

      Closing the Loop: What Would Make This an Easy Yes?

      • What are the top three criteria leadership will use to decide whether to proceed with a partnership like ours?
      • What timeline do you have in mind for a pilot or initial deployment? Options: Immediate (30 days), Short (60–90 days), Medium (3–6 months), Longer (6–12 months)
      • Which stakeholders need to be engaged and on what cadence to reach a decision (weekly syncs, steering committee, exec review)? Options: Weekly working team, Biweekly steering committee, Monthly exec review, Ad hoc
      • What would be a minimally viable first milestone that would convince you we’re on the right track (e.g., validated attribution for a subset, reconciled cost per member, provider-level case list)? Options: Validated attribution for subset, Reconciled cost per member, Provider-level case list, Pilot ROI projection
      • What final question or concern would you want addressed before greenlighting a pilot?
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target savings, quality improvements, provider adoption goals, and measurable success signals.

    Discovery Questions

    Start Here: The One Outcome You’d Put on Your Door

    • If you had to boil this engagement down to a single, headline outcome you’d proudly share with your board, what is it?
    • Which stakeholder group would celebrate that headline the most right now? Options: ACO Medical Director / Clinical Leadership, CFO / Finance, Population Health Director, Network/IPA Leadership, Chief Medical Officer, Other
    • By when do you need that headline outcome to be visible to decision-makers? Options: Immediately (0–3 months), Short-term (3–6 months), Medium (6–12 months), Longer-term (12+ months)
    • On a scale of confidence, how likely do you feel your organization can hit that headline without external help? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neutral/Unsure, Not confident
    • What single obstacle, if removed, would make that headline outcome far more achievable?

    What Happens If Nothing Changes?

    • How much additional downside would you face in the next 12–24 months if current performance persists—revenue loss, penalties, or lost contracts? Options: < $500k, $500k–$2M, $2M–$10M, > $10M, Not sure / need analysis
    • Which quality or financial consequences worry you most if trends continue (pick top two)? Options: Loss of shared savings, Increased downside risk, Medicare/MA penalties, Commercial contract non-renewal, Reputational harm, Provider burnout
    • How would continuing current performance affect provider relationships and morale—do you have examples or stories?
    • Have previous improvement efforts stalled or reversed? If so, what was the proximate cause? Options: Data inaccuracy / lag, Attribution misalignment, Provider engagement failure, Insufficient incentives, Operational capacity, Other
    • Over what timeframe do these risks become urgent enough to force a major course correction? Options: Now (0–3 months), Soon (3–6 months), This year (6–12 months), Longer (12+ months)

    Where Would the Savings Actually Come From?

    • What are your instincts—are the largest avoidable costs coming from inpatient utilization, ER use, post-acute care, high-cost clinics, or something else? Options: Inpatient admissions & readmissions, Emergency department utilization, Post-acute care / SNF, Pharmacy / specialty drugs, High-cost outpatient imaging / procedures, Care management gaps, Other
    • Of the areas you selected, which three specific diagnoses, service lines, or patient cohorts drive most of the variation?
    • What percentage reduction in those drivers would you view as a meaningful win (pick range)? Options: 1–3%, 3–6%, 6–10%, >10%
    • How are those opportunities currently being measured—claims TCOC, condition-specific metrics, utilization counts, or something else? Options: Total Cost of Care (TCOC) by attributed provider, Condition-specific cost & utilization, Episode / bundle costs, Utilization counts (ED, admissions), Quality measure-driven costs, Not currently measured
    • Tell us about a recent case or patient cohort that illustrates where avoidable spend is concentrated.

    What Would Better Quality Actually Feel Like?

    • If your clinicians could wave a wand and eliminate one quality gap that causes the most harm to patients or costs to the system, what would it be?
    • Which measurable quality endpoints are highest priority for you (choose up to four)? Options: HEDIS measures (e.g., A1c control), 30-day readmissions, Preventable ED visits, Care gap closure rates, Medication reconciliation, Risk-adjustment capture / coding accuracy, Patient experience / CAHPS
    • For each priority measure, what target improvement would shift decisions in your favor (absolute or relative)?
    • How do frontline clinicians describe the quality problems—are they surprised by the data, skeptical, or already aware and frustrated? Options: Surprised, Skeptical of data, Aware but frustrated, Actively engaged, Varies widely
    • What patient stories or clinical scenarios do you want leadership to see to make this feel urgent and human?

    Who Needs to Change Their Behavior (and How Much)?

    • Which provider groups must change their practice patterns for outcomes to improve—primary care, hospitalists, specialists, care management, or others? Options: Primary care, Hospitalists / inpatient teams, Cardiology / specialty clinics, Behavioral health, Care management / care coordinators, Post-acute providers / SNFs, Other
    • What adoption target would prove a program is taking hold (e.g., % of attributed PCPs actively using scorecards or % of high-risk patients in a care pathway)? Options: 25%–40%, 40%–60%, 60%–80%, >80%
    • What incentives or levers currently exist to change behavior—financial bonuses, peer comparison, operational support, or EMR nudges? Options: Financial incentives, Peer benchmarking / recognition, Operational workflows / standing orders, EHR/CDS alerts, Protected time / staffing, None
    • Describe the strongest source of resistance you've seen from clinicians when asked to change how they manage patients.
    • If adoption stalls, what practical steps would you expect leadership to take to re-engage clinicians? Options: Adjust incentives, Provide more data granularity, Add operational support, Hold leaders accountable, Pause and re-scope

    How Will We Measure Success—Beyond A Single Report?

    • What three metrics would you want on a one-page dashboard to convince your CFO and Medical Director that the program is working?
    • Which of these types of signals would count as early proof (pick all that apply)? Options: Month-over-month utilization declines, Provider-level engagement and action logs, Improved coding / risk capture, Care gap closures, Positive patient outcomes / reduced complications, Small dollar savings realized in finance
    • How often must those signals update to feel actionable—daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly
    • What degree of attribution disagreement between analytics and clinical expectation is tolerable before trust breaks (e.g., percentage point difference)? Options: <5% variance, 5–10% variance, 10–20% variance, >20% variance, Unsure / need discussion
    • Who in your organization must sign off on the definition of 'success'—and how do they prefer it documented? Options: CFO, Medical Director / CMOs, Quality / Population Health Director, Executive Steering Committee, Board, Other

    Can Your Data Tell the Story We Need?

    • How long is your typical claims lag today (time from service to usable claim in your analytic set)? Options: 0–2 months, 2–4 months, 4–6 months, 6+ months, Varies by payer
    • Which data feeds are readily available to us today for measurement (select all that apply)? Options: Medical claims (paid), Encounter data, Pharmacy claims, EHR clinical data (lab, vitals), Membership / enrollment rosters, Risk scores, Provider directories / rosters
    • Do you currently accept an external attribution model or do you require alignment to an internal model or payer model? Options: Use external agreed model, Align to our internal model, Must align to payer's model, Open to negotiation
    • Have you run sample reconciliations between your financials and a third-party analytics platform before? If yes, what were the top discrepancies?
    • Will a small test feed / hashed sample data set be available within the pilot window to validate metrics? Options: Yes — ready now, Yes — within 30 days, Maybe — needs approvals, No / not available

    What Does a Minimal, Convincing Pilot Look Like?

    • If we proposed the smallest scope that would still prove impact, would you prefer a provider cohort pilot, a condition-focused pilot, or a utilization-targeted pilot? Options: Provider cohort (e.g., 10–25 PCPs), Condition-focused (e.g., CHF, COPD, Diabetes), Utilization-targeted (e.g., high ED users), Hybrid / other
    • What pilot size would be persuasive for your leadership (choose one)? Options: Small (1–2 clinics or 5–15 providers), Medium (3–10 clinics or 15–50 providers), Large (>50 providers or system-level)
    • How long should the pilot run before you expect credible early signals? Options: 6–8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9–12 months
    • What specific threshold(s) would you call a successful pilot (quantitative or qualitative)?
    • What resources (people or systems) would you commit to a pilot to ensure it doesn’t fail for avoidable reasons? Options: Dedicated project manager, Clinical champion(s), Data analyst resource, Finance point-of-contact, EHR/integration support, Limited/no resources available

    From Conversation to Commitment — What’s Missing?

    • What procurement or internal approval steps typically block starting a new analytics partnership? Options: Formal RFP, Legal / contract review, Security / privacy review, Finance budget approval, Clinical governance sign-off, Other
    • How quickly could you move through those steps if the leadership sees strong early signals? Options: Immediately (30 days), Within 60–90 days, 3–6 months, Longer than 6 months
    • What commercial or contractual flexibility would make you comfortable taking a first step (e.g., pilot pricing, milestone payments, performance guarantees)? Options: Pilot pricing, Milestone-based payments, Savings/shared-gain model, Money-back / SLA guarantees, Flexible termination
    • Who else should we bring into the next conversation to make decisions move faster?
    • What would you like us to prepare for that next conversation (data samples, a one-page value projection, a pilot SOW, or something else)? Options: Sample analytics output, One-page savings & impact projection, Draft pilot SOW, Security & privacy docs, Case studies / references, Other
  3. Solution Experience

    Translate the customer’s real claims and clinical scenarios into a shared vision of outcomes and actionable workflows.

    Experience Meetings

    • Solution Experience Pre-Work Alignment
    • Current State & Consequence Quantification Workshop
    • Scenario Mapping & Outcome Proof Session
    • Workflow Acceptance & Measurement Criteria
    • Executive Outcome Confirmation & Mutual Validation
    • Set SLAs for data refreshes and reconciliation during pilot.
    • Identify the exact data transformations and attribution alignments required to prove the future state consistently.
    • Obtain explicit customer confirmation ('this is what we meant') for each scenario shown.
    • Agree on a small pilot scope based on the validated scenarios.
    • Seller to deliver the scenario runbooks (data inputs, transforms, output screenshots) for each scenario.
    • Customer to confirm any necessary data corrections and provide updated extracts if required.
    • Seller to prepare a projection model showing pilot-to-annualized impact for agreed scenarios.
    • Customer to designate workflow owners who will participate in the pilot.
    • Review Validated Workflows
    • Finalize the workflow playbooks and assign owners for each step.
    • Agree on exact metric definitions, attribution rules, and acceptable tolerances that will be used to judge success.
    • Establish a UAT plan with clear pass/fail criteria tied to the future state.
    • Introductions & Objectives
    • Seller to deliver workflow playbooks and UAT scripts populated with sample cases.
    • Customer to assign named owners for provider engagement, data reconciliation, and UAT sign-off.
    • Seller and customer to agree on pilot start date and data cadence for the pilot run.
    • Both parties to document contingency steps for attribution discrepancies during pilot.
    • Executive Summary: Current State & Consequence
    • Obtain executive approval to proceed to the pilot and Solution Scope stage.
    • Secure executive commitments for necessary resources and decision criteria.
    • Confirm any final conditions that must be met before pilot kick-off.
    • Customer executive to provide written approval or documented decision to proceed.
    • Seller to issue a pilot statement of work that maps to validated scenarios and acceptance criteria.
    • Both parties to schedule the Solution Scope kickoff meeting with identified attendees.
    • Seller to update the commercial/capacity plan based on approved pilot scope.
    • Ensure all mandatory preconditions are assigned and scheduled (data, SMEs, test accounts).
    • Customer selects 2-4 real scenarios and provides sample data extracts for each.
    • Customer can state a one-sentence current state using the provided template.
    • Mutual agreement on the success criteria for the live Solution Experience.
    • Customer to deliver anonymized claims extract (sample) for selected scenarios by agreed date.
    • Customer to provide attribution rules, provider roster, and baseline KPIs.
    • Seller to provision sandbox environment and confirm connectivity requirements.
    • Seller to send current-state one-sentence template and example phrasing.
    • Readout of Pre-Work Artifacts
    • Produce and agree on a crystal-clear one-sentence current state.
    • Create a quantified consequence statement with at least one monetized figure and one operational metric.
    • Obtain stakeholder alignment that the quantified consequence represents a meaningful business problem.
    • Agree on a one-sentence future state outcome to be proved during the Solution Experience.
    • Seller to produce a one-page consequence summary with calculations and assumptions.
    • Customer to verify and sign-off on baseline KPIs and cost assumptions used in the workshop.
    • Seller to create the future-state success signal definition (metrics and thresholds).
    • Customer to nominate an executive sponsor who will validate the consequence document.
    • Re-state Current State & Future State
    • Validate that the platform can ingest the customer's real data and reproduce the problem and the projected improvement.
    • Scenario 1: End-to-End Walkthrough
    • Proof Summary from Scenarios
    • One-Sentence Current State Exercise
    • Provider & Clinician Workflow Design
    • Pre-work Checklist Review
    • Projected Impact & Pilot Ask
    • Current State Template & One-Sentence Exercise
    • Consequence Quantification
    • Validation Pause & Q&A
    • Metric Definitions & Attribution Rules
    • Attribution & Reporting Impact
    • Scenario 2: Variation & Attribution Check
    • Acceptance Tests / UAT Plan
    • Decision & Conditions
    • Scenario Selection
    • Aggregate Impact Projection
  4. Solution Scope

    Define modules, responsibilities, data integration SLAs, attribution alignment, and acceptance criteria for deliverables.

    Scope Configuration

    • Integrate Medicare and Commercial Claims Feeds
    • Ingest and Normalize EHR Clinical Data
    • Configure Contract Benchmarks and Targets
    • Align Patient Attribution to Payer Rosters
    • Compute Provider-Level Performance Scorecards
    • Calculate Quality Measures (HEDIS/MIPS/STARS)
    • Model Shared Savings and Risk Scenarios
    • Run Total Cost of Care Attribution Analysis
    • Reconcile Claims to Contract Benchmarks
    • Identify Care Gaps and Export Patient Lists
    • Run Risk Adjustment Reconciliation and HCC Mapping
    • Activate Provider Drill-Down Dashboards
    • Analyze Cost Variation by Provider/Condition/Setting
    • Train Clinical and Finance Users on Platform

    Scope Questions

    Integrate Medicare and Commercial Claims Feeds

    • Which payer feed types should we ingest for this engagement? Options: Medicare FFS, Medicare Advantage, Commercial, Medicaid, Other
    • Which transfer methods/formats will your payers provide? Options: SFTP, API / FHIR, EDIFACT/837, Flat files (CSV/Delimited), Other
    • How much historical claims data do you need loaded for analysis? Options: 12 months, 24 months, 36+ months, Custom
    • What is the typical claims latency (time from service to availability) we should plan for? Options: Near real-time, 1-7 days, 1-3 months, 3+ months
    • Who will provide payer identifiers/rosters and mapping files? Options: Customer, Payer, Third-party vendor, Unknown
    • Are there PHI/BAA/compliance constraints or special encryption protocols we must follow? Options: Yes, No
    • If yes, please describe required compliance controls, encryption, or transfer windows.

    Ingest and Normalize EHR Clinical Data

    • Which EHR systems are in-scope for clinical data ingest? Options: Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, Athenahealth, Other
    • What clinical data domains are required (select all that apply)? Options: Diagnoses, Medications, Lab results, Procedures/Orders, Clinical notes, Vitals
    • What access method will be used for EHR data extraction? Options: Direct DB access, FHIR API, Flat exports / CCD, HL7 feeds, Other
    • How frequently should clinical data be synchronized to the platform? Options: Real-time/near real-time, Daily, Weekly, Monthly
    • Do clinical data extracts require de-identification, patient consent handling, or special handling? Options: Yes, No
    • Describe any local code systems, custom fields, or mappings (e.g., local diagnosis codes, lab codes) that must be normalized.

    Configure Contract Benchmarks and Targets

    • Which contract types should be configured for benchmarking? Options: Medicare MSSP, Medicare Advantage, Commercial shared savings, Full risk / capitation, Other
    • Do you have benchmark files or specifications available for import (e.g., payer-provided benchmarks)? Options: Yes, No
    • Which baseline should benchmarks reference? Options: National benchmarks, Payer benchmarks, Historical internal performance, Custom targets
    • Which performance metrics must be included in contract configuration? Options: Total cost of care, ED visits, Admissions, HEDIS measures, Risk score / RAF
    • Do you require tiered or cohort-specific benchmarks (e.g., by LOB, geography, or risk cohort)? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide contract effective dates, term, and reporting cadence that we should encode.

    Align Patient Attribution to Payer Rosters

    • Which attribution model does your contract use? Options: Prospective roster-based, Retrospective claims-based, Hybrid, Unknown / To be defined
    • Do you have payer rosters with stable member identifiers we can ingest? Options: Yes, No
    • How often are rosters updated by the payer or customer? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Other
    • What level of unmatched-member tolerance is acceptable during reconciliation? Options: <1%, 1-5%, 5-10%, >10%
    • Do you require automated reconciliation reports between roster and claims? Options: Yes, No
    • Describe any existing attribution rules, tie-breakers, or special enrollment scenarios we must honor.

    Compute Provider-Level Performance Scorecards

    • Which provider types should be included on scorecards? Options: Primary care, Specialists, Hospitalists, Behavioral health, Other
    • Which metrics should appear on provider scorecards? Options: Cost per attributed member, Utilization rates (ED/admissions), Quality scores, Patient panel risk mix, Referral patterns
    • How frequently should provider scorecards be refreshed and distributed? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Ad-hoc, Real-time
    • Do you want peer comparisons and benchmark overlays on the scorecards? Options: Yes, No
    • What access controls are required for scorecard visibility? Options: Provider-only, Manager + Provider, Finance and Execs only, Open to all authorized users
    • List any custom KPIs, thresholds, or visualizations required specifically for providers.

    Calculate Quality Measures (HEDIS/MIPS/STARS)

    • Which quality programs and measures must be calculated? Options: HEDIS, MIPS, STARS, Other
    • Do you have official measure specifications and numerator/denominator logic available? Options: Yes, No
    • Which source data will contribute to each measure (select all that apply)? Options: Claims, EHR, Registry, Patient surveys, Other
    • What reporting cadence is required for quality measure monitoring? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Annual
    • Do you require reconciliation of our calculated measures against payer-submitted or CMS values? Options: Yes, No
    • Please list priority measures and any custom populations, exclusions, or business rules.

    Model Shared Savings and Risk Scenarios

    • Which payment models should we be prepared to simulate? Options: Upside-only shared savings, Two-sided risk, Capitation, Bundled payments, Other
    • What inputs are available for modeling (select all that apply)? Options: Claims costs, Benchmark targets, Provider contract terms, Care management costs, Other
    • At what granularity do you need scenario outputs? Options: Aggregate only, By line of business, By provider group, By condition/cohort
    • Do you require waterfall calculations, timing of cash flows, and allocation rules in the model? Options: Yes, No
    • How often should scenarios be run and shared (cadence)? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Ad-hoc
    • Describe any contract-specific allocation rules (e.g., withholds, stop-loss, bonuses) that must be modeled.

    Run Total Cost of Care Attribution Analysis

    • Which cost basis should the platform use? Options: Paid amounts, Allowed amounts, Standardized costs, Relative value units (RVUs)
    • Which cost components should be included in TCOC? Options: Professional services, Facility charges, Pharmacy, Post-acute care, Ancillary services
    • What attribution window or episode length do you want for episodes of care? Options: 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, Custom
    • Do you require condition-level grouping, episode-based grouping, or both? Options: Condition-level, Episode-based, Both, No preference
    • Is normalization across payers/LOBs required to compare costs? Options: Yes, No
    • Identify specific cost drivers or areas of interest we should highlight in the analysis.

    Reconcile Claims to Contract Benchmarks

    • What reconciliation tolerance would you accept between claims-derived values and contract benchmarks? Options: <1%, 1-3%, 3-5%, >5%
    • Which variance types should trigger investigations? Options: Coding differences, Timing/latency, Provider attribution, Claim denials/adjustments, Other
    • Who will own follow-up for reconciliation exceptions? Options: Customer, Seller / Analytics Team, Hybrid, Undecided
    • What cadence do you want for reconciliation reporting (monthly, quarterly, etc.)? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Per-contract period, Ad-hoc
    • Do you require automated exception workflows (tickets, dispute tracking) for reconciliation items? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide examples of past reconciliation issues or priorities to help prioritize investigations.

    Identify Care Gaps and Export Patient Lists

    • Which types of care gaps are highest priority to detect? Options: Preventive services, Chronic disease monitoring, Medication adherence, Follow-up visits, Screenings
    • What format should patient lists be exported in for downstream workflows? Options: CSV, EHR-importable format, Secure portal / dashboard, API
    • Do you want risk stratification or prioritization included with each patient list? Options: Yes, No
    • How often should care-gap lists be refreshed for outreach? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Ad-hoc
    • Are there PHI sharing restrictions or user role limits for exported patient lists? Options: Yes, No
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, contract benchmarks, SLAs, governance cadence, and mutual responsibilities.

    Agreement Modules

    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Pricing & Payment Schedule
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA) & Data Integration SLAs
    • Data Processing Agreement / Business Associate Agreement (DPA/BAA)
    • Attribution & Benchmarking Agreement
    • Acceptance Criteria & Deliverable Sign-off
    • Governance, Reporting & Escalation Plan
    • Security & Compliance Addendum
    • Implementation Timeline & Go-Live Conditions
    • Change Order / Scope Amendment Process
    • Termination, Data Return & Exit Plan
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm data access, test feeds, provider rosters, environments, and risk controls are prepared for integration.

      Readiness Questions

      Setting the Stage: Who’s accountable and what feels like a win?

      • Which single role will be most accountable for the program meeting its first-year targets? Options: ACO Medical Director, VP/Director Population Health, Health System CFO, Chief Quality Officer, Director of Clinical Analytics, Other
      • When you say “success” for this engagement over the first 12 months, pick the top 2 outcomes you’d point to in a board meeting. Options: Total cost of care reduction (%), Improved quality scores (e.g., HEDIS/HCC), Provider adoption/engagement rate, Avoided penalties / retained shared savings, Faster data-to-insight cycle, Operational workflow changes implemented
      • Tell us about one recent win or small success your team had with analytics — what changed and who noticed?
      • On a scale, how confident are you today that your organization can act on provider-level insights within 60 days of seeing them? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neutral, Not confident, No idea
      • Who else needs to be in the room for decisions about data, clinical change, and finance to actually move forward? Options: Physician leaders/chiefs, IT/data engineering, Contracting/legal, Care management leadership, Finance/CFO office, Operational leadership (clinic/hospital), Other

      If the data could lie to you, what would it say? (Where it breaks)

      • What if your claims data is giving a comforting but inaccurate story—where would that mislead you most?
      • Which claim feeds do you currently receive (select all that apply) and which arrive with the longest delay? Options: Institutional inpatient claims, Institutional outpatient claims, Professional/physician claims, Pharmacy claims, Capitation / PMPM, Dental/auxiliary
      • How long is the typical latency from service date to receiving usable claims for each source (give examples if variable)? Options: <30 days, 31–60 days, 61–90 days, 91–180 days, >180 days, Varies significantly by payer
      • Describe a concrete example where delayed or partial claims data led to a missed clinical or financial opportunity.
      • Which data elements do you trust least when making provider-level decisions (e.g., attribution, facility identifiers, place of service, primary diagnosis)? Options: Attribution, Facility identifiers, Provider NPI mapping, Place of service, Diagnosis coding consistency, Cost/allowed amount fields

      Who pulls the trigger? Power, politics, and the real decision map

      • If the person who owns clinical decisions doesn’t trust the data, what tends to happen—do you pause, pilot, or change course? Options: Pause until validated, Run a small pilot, Proceed with caveats, Escalate governance, Other
      • List the exact stakeholders (name/role) who must sign off on: data model, attribution, and commercial terms.
      • How do competing incentives show up between clinical leaders and finance — give one recent example where tension slowed action.
      • What governance cadence have you relied on historically for rapid decisions (weekly, biweekly, monthly)? Which cadence actually resulted in decisions? Options: Weekly, Biweekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Ad-hoc
      • Who would be your internal champion for getting physicians to trust a new analytics workflow? Options: ACO Medical Director, Chief of Primary Care, Clinical informatics lead, Physician champion(s), Nurse/care manager leader, No clear champion yet

      Attribution: The rules that change incentives — are we really aligned?

      • If your attribution rules shifted tomorrow, would your shared-savings payouts or provider rankings materially change? Options: Yes, significantly, Yes, somewhat, No, minimally, Unsure
      • Which attribution model(s) are you currently using or required by payers (select all that apply)? Options: 30-day plurality, 90-day plurality, Episode-based attribution, Prospective attribution roster, Medicare ACO assignment, Custom/Proprietary model
      • How often do providers dispute attribution or membership, and what’s your current dispute resolution process? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely/never, No formal process
      • Share a recent attribution dispute example and what resolved it — or why it remains unresolved.
      • What level of provider-level transparency (visit-level, claim-level, episode-level) do physician leaders need to act confidently? Options: Visit-level / claim-level detail, Episode summaries with drilldown, Provider scorecards only, Aggregated trends

      Why aren’t physicians opening the dashboard? Turning data into a conversation they’ll join

      • Why do you think physician leaders have resisted previous analytics efforts—what feeling or belief holds them back?
      • What formats have you found most effective to engage physicians (select top 2)? Options: Email summaries, One-page provider scorecards, Case-based lists with drilldowns, Short in-person huddles, EHR-integrated alerts, Monthly performance meetings
      • How much time per month can a typical physician realistically allocate to reviewing performance details? Options: <30 minutes, 30–60 minutes, 1–2 hours, >2 hours
      • Who on your team has successfully persuaded skeptical physicians before, and what approach did they use?
      • What would make a physician say, “This is worth my time” — be specific (e.g., patient stories, dollars at stake, simple action steps)?

      If the numbers were off, how wrong can they be before people stop trusting them?

      • Imagine we’re five weeks post-go-live and something looks off—what error threshold would trigger a rollback or formal pause? Options: >1% variance, >5% variance, >10% variance, Decision based on stakeholder judgment, No predefined threshold
      • Which metrics must reconcile perfectly to your satisfaction (select all critical ones)? Options: Total cost of care, Utilization by setting (inpatient/ED), Quality measures (HEDIS/ACO), Provider-level cost, Risk score/HCC capture, Member attribution
      • What sample test cases or named providers would you want us to validate before broader rollout?
      • Describe your current acceptance sign-off flow — who signs off and what evidence do they require?
      • What tolerance for changes in early months would you accept as we refine models and feeds? Options: Tight tolerance — minimal changes, Moderate — expect iterative tweaks, Flexible — still in discovery, Unsure

      Integration Reality Check: Are the pipes actually ready?

      • Is your technical team confident they can provide the necessary data extracts and test feeds within the timeline you expect? Options: Yes — confident, Somewhat — with caveats, No — likely delays, Unsure
      • Which of these access methods can you provide for initial integration (select all that apply)? Options: SFTP file drops, API endpoints, Direct DB access, HL7 interfaces, Flat-file via secure upload, No standard method yet
      • List any security, compliance, or contracting steps that historically add time to integrations (e.g., BAAs, PO approvals).
      • Do you maintain a single canonical provider roster, and how often is it refreshed? Options: Yes — daily, Yes — weekly, Yes — monthly, Multiple rosters/no canonical, No formal roster
      • What non-technical risks worry you most about integration (e.g., staffing turnover, competing projects, vendor fatigue)?

      Timing, sequencing, and the price of delays — who bears the risk?

      • If implementation slips three months, which impact concerns you most? Options: Lost savings opportunity, Provider trust erosion, Budget/cost overruns, Regulatory/contractual risk, Team bandwidth strain
      • What is your ideal go-live month/quarter, and what immovable deadlines drive that target (e.g., contract year, reporting deadlines)?
      • Which activities must happen before go-live for you to feel comfortable (select top 3)? Options: Data reconciliations complete, Provider training delivered, Governance cadence established, Acceptance sign-off from stakeholders, Provider roster validated
      • Are you open to a phased go-live (pilot group first) and what would make a pilot successful in your view? Options: Yes — pilot preferred, Yes — but only limited scenarios, No — prefer full rollout, Unsure
      • What internal dependencies present the greatest scheduling risk (e.g., IT freeze, fiscal year close)?

      Contracts & Commitments: What needs to be written down?

      • What commercial terms or SLAs would make you feel protected enough to move forward today? Options: Data latency guarantees, Attribution dispute resolution, Performance benchmarks, Dedicated support resources, Termination/exit terms
      • Which acceptance criteria are non-negotiable for final payment/milestone sign-off? Options: Reconciled cost metrics, Provider-level drilldown capability, End-user training completion, Successful test feed transfer, Governance cadence established
      • Have you used holdbacks, milestone payments, or penalties in prior vendor contracts—what worked and what didn’t?
      • If we propose a remediation SLA (e.g., fix critical data errors within X days), what timeframe would be meaningful to you? Options: 24–48 hours, 3–5 business days, 1–2 weeks, Longer/depends on issue
      • Who on your legal/contracting team should be involved in drafting these terms, and by when would you need a draft to review?

      Psychological Readiness: Are you, your leaders, and your clinicians ready to change?

      • If nothing changes in the next 90 days, what outcome would you personally regret most?
      • How open is leadership to iterative learning versus wanting everything proven before any change (pick one)? Options: Iterative learning/adaptive, Prefer fully proven before change, Hybrid — depends on area, Unsure
      • What small, low-risk first step would signal momentum to your team and clinicians? Options: Pilot with 5–10 providers, One focused metric validated, Monthly provider huddle, Targeted training session
      • Who should be our internal points of contact for day-to-day decisions and who for escalation (name/role)?
      • Realistically, when could your organization commit resources to start integration activities (select one)? Options: Immediately, In 2–4 weeks, In 1–3 months, More than 3 months, Unsure
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Execute integration tasks, training for physician and finance users, and coordinate go-live sequencing.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify attribution alignment, metric and cost accuracy, provider-level drilldowns, and user acceptance sign-off.

      Validation Questions

      A Quick Snapshot: Who You Are and What You're Trying to Save

      • What's your role and which hat do you wear most often in value-based contracts? Options: ACO Medical Director, VP/Director Population Health, CFO/Finance Lead, Chief Quality Officer, IT/Data Lead, Other
      • Which risk arrangements are you actively managing right now? Options: MSSP/ACO, Medicare Advantage, Commercial downside risk, Medicaid managed care, Hybrid/Other
      • What are the top 3 outcomes leadership expects from analytics this year (e.g., % savings, quality targets, provider adoption)?
      • What deadline or reporting milestone is creating the most pressure to show results? Options: Quarter-end, Contract renewal, SSP reconciliation, Board/Executive review, No fixed deadline
      • Roughly how many attributed lives does the organization manage under value risk? Options: <10k, 10k–50k, 50k–150k, 150k–500k, >500k

      Are We Comfortable With the Story Your Data Tells?

      • If someone asked you whether your cost and quality metrics are 'trusted' by clinicians and finance, would you say yes or no—and why? Options: Yes — generally trusted, Partially trusted, No — significant trust issues
      • Where have you seen the largest mismatch between the analytics narrative and what frontline clinicians believe?
      • How long after care is delivered do you typically receive reconciled claims that you consider reliable for performance measurement? Options: <30 days, 30–60 days, 60–90 days, 90–180 days, >180 days
      • Which of these data weaknesses cause you the most sleepless nights? Options: Missing claims, Delayed adjudication, Poor cost visibility, Incomplete clinical data, Roster errors, Attribution disagreements
      • Describe a recent decision that was delayed or reversed because you couldn't trust the underlying data.

      Where the Real Costs Hide (and Who’s Ignoring Them)

      • What surprising cost driver has leadership consistently underestimated in your contracts?
      • Which service lines or conditions concentrate the most avoidable cost today? Options: Post-acute care/SNF, Emergency utilization, High-cost procedures, Chronic disease management (e.g., CHF, COPD, DM), Behavioral health/substance use
      • At the provider level today, how confident are you that attribution maps correctly to individual clinicians? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, We don’t have provider-level attribution
      • How often do you reconcile or audit attribution and cost at the provider or clinic level? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Ad hoc, Never
      • Tell us about a time when a hidden cost driver changed the trajectory of a savings forecast—what happened and what did you learn?

      Why Clinicians Push Back (and What Would Change Their Mind)

      • Why do clinicians in your system push back on performance conversations driven by claims data? Options: Too delayed, Not actionable, Blames clinicians unfairly, Lacks clinical context, Format/UX issues
      • How do you currently present performance to clinicians (e.g., dashboards, case reviews, one-on-one scorecards)? Options: Interactive dashboards, Static scorecards/PDFs, Monthly huddles/case reviews, Email summaries, We don’t present regularly
      • When analytics are perceived as credible, how frequently do clinicians change practice or referral patterns? Options: Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
      • What format or evidence most convinces clinicians to act—patient-level case, peer comparisons, financial impact, or something else? Options: Patient-level case, Peer benchmarking, Projected financial impact, Clinical guidelines alignment, Combination
      • Share an example where a clinician adopted a change because analytics were presented in a way they trusted—what made that instance different?

      Decision Power and the Invisible Stakeholders

      • Who ultimately decides whether a performance insight becomes an operational change—and who can quietly veto it? Options: Medical Director, CFO, CMO/Chief Quality Officer, Chief Population Health Officer, Network Executives, Provider Group Leads
      • Which stakeholder group is most likely to prioritize short-term revenue over long-term savings? Options: Physician groups, Hospital leadership, Finance, Payer partners, Other
      • How aligned are finance, clinical leadership, and operations on attribution methodology and reconciliation cadence? Options: Fully aligned, Mostly aligned with some gaps, Significant misalignment, No alignment
      • Do you have a formal governance body for value-based programs (charter, cadence, decision rights)? If yes, describe its current effectiveness. Options: Yes — effective, Yes — partially effective, Yes — ineffective, No
      • Who would be the day-to-day champion and who would be the executive sponsor for analytics-driven initiatives?

      What Success Really Feels Like — Beyond the Dashboard

      • If you had to name the single organizational outcome that would prove our work succeeded, what would it be? Options: Net shared savings, Improved quality scores, Sustained provider behavior change, Reduced total cost of care, Improved patient outcomes
      • What numeric targets for savings, quality, and provider adoption would make leadership say ‘this is working’?
      • Which KPIs must move together to consider the program a success (select all that apply)? Options: Total cost of care, Admissions/ED visits, Risk-adjusted quality measures, Provider-level adoption rates, Revenue/cost reconciliation
      • How quickly do you expect to see the first credible signal that interventions are working? Options: 30 days, 60–90 days, 3–6 months, 6–12 months
      • If targets are met, how will you operationalize and reward sustained performance (e.g., shared savings distribution, staffing changes)?

      Integration Realities: Do We Have the Data & Access We Need?

      • Do you currently have automated feeds for claims, EHR, cost, and pharmacy data, or are they manual/extract-based? Options: Automated API/SFTP feeds for all, Mixed automated and manual, Mostly manual extracts, No reliable feeds
      • Which vendors/systems hold the data we’ll need to integrate (select all that apply)? Options: Epic, Cerner/Oracle, Meditech, Change Healthcare claims, Payer files (specific payers), Custom data warehouse, Other
      • Can your team provide test feeds and a staging environment within the typical 4–8 week integration window? Options: Yes — within 4 weeks, Yes — within 8 weeks, Possible but longer, No
      • What internal resource will support ETL, mapping, and ongoing data reconciliation (role and FTE estimate)?
      • What security or vendor approval steps typically slow integrations the most? Options: Legal/BAA review, Security assessment, Network access approvals, Third-party vendor procurement, Other

      Validation & Acceptance — How Will You Know It's Right?

      • What specific acceptance criteria would trigger user acceptance sign-off for analytics and attribution (e.g., margin of error, reconciliation parity, peer review)? Options: <5% variance vs finance, <10% variance, Full parity with internal benchmarks, Clinician validation of cases, Other
      • Who must sign off on UAT and final acceptance for the pilot (names/roles)?
      • Which provider-level drilldowns are non-negotiable for you to act (e.g., patient list, claim-level detail, attribution rationale)? Options: Patient-level case lists, Claim-level detail and adjudication dates, Attribution logic with flags, Risk-adjusted benchmarks, Peer and region comparisons
      • Would you prefer a parallel-run validation period where our analytics run alongside your existing reports before full cutover? Options: Yes — strongly prefer parallel run, Yes — open to parallel run, No — prefer direct cutover
      • What evidence or artifacts from past pilots would you want to see to feel confident about moving forward? Options: Case studies, Reconciliation templates, Demo with our data, Reference calls, Technical specs

      Barriers, Trade-offs, and the Real Commitment

      • If acceptance uncovers material attribution gaps, are you prepared to pause incentives until alignment occurs? Options: Yes — pause and align, No — keep incentives running, Depends on size of gap
      • What internal capacity (FTEs or hours/week) can you realistically commit to discovery, UAT, and clinician outreach? Options: <5 hours/week, 5–10 hours/week, 10–20 hours/week, >20 hours/week
      • Which procurement or contracting steps are likely to extend timeline (select all that apply)? Options: Formal RFP, Security/Legal review, Network executive approval, Budget cycle timing, Other
      • How tolerant is executive leadership of early metric discrepancies during the validation window? Options: Very tolerant (expect noise), Somewhat tolerant, Low tolerance — needs early clarity
      • What would be the single biggest internal barrier to sustaining improvements after go-live?

      Next Steps — What Would Make This Partnership Irresistible?

      • If we fail to start this work now, what negative impact do you foresee over the next 12 months? Options: Missed shared savings, Worse quality scores, Provider disengagement, Financial penalties, No significant impact
      • Which three outcomes would make you comfortable being a public reference for this program?
      • What pilot scope (population size and duration) would you consider compelling to validate value quickly? Options: Small cohort <5k lives for 3 months, Medium 5–25k lives for 3–6 months, Large >25k lives for 6–12 months, Other
      • Who else should be included in the next alignment meeting to accelerate decisions (role and preferred contact)?
      • Preferred cadence for discovery updates and artifacts (select all that suit you)? Options: Weekly 30-minute check-in, Bi-weekly deep-dive, Monthly steering committee, As-needed email updates, Shared collaboration workspace
      • Any final concerns, non-starters, or expectations we should record before we scope a pilot?
  7. Success

    Review outcomes against success signals, operationalize continuous improvement, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Quarterly Success Review
    • Operational Continuous Improvement Workshop
    • Provider Adoption & Engagement Huddle
    • Enhancement Backlog & SLA Alignment
    • Escalation & Contract Risk Review (Ad-hoc)

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Align on SLAs and delivery cadence that map back to contract expectations and operational risk.
    • Create pilot charters (scope, owner, acceptance criteria, data sources) and post to shared channel within 3 business days.
    • Data engineering to commit to any required feed cadence or transformation changes with timelines and test dates.
    • Ops to schedule training or workflow changes for pilot participants and provide training materials.
    • Analytics to prepare a validation checklist and automated report for pilot measurement.
    • Opening & One-sentence Current State for Providers
    • Get clinician leaders to validate the stated provider problem and the local consequence in their terms.
    • Co-design at least one clinician workflow that can be piloted within 30 days and tied to a measurable success signal.
    • Establish a continuous feedback channel for provider issues and enhancement requests.
    • Publish clinician-facing one-pager and workflow scripts to the shared channel and assign local champions.
    • Set up provider feedback thread in agreed communication channel and nominate moderators.
    • Schedule 30-day provider pilot check-in and an adoption snapshot report from analytics.
    • Ops to prepare brief training (10–15 minutes) for participating clinicians and send calendar invites.
    • Current Backlog Snapshot (one sentence)
    • Prioritize enhancements based on explicit consequence and agreed acceptance criteria.
    • Opening & Objectives
    • Define a clear validation and sign-off process to prove each enhancement achieves the future state.
    • Product to publish prioritized backlog with impact statements and target release for each item within 2 business days.
    • Agree and document SLA definitions and escalation matrix in the shared channel.
    • Engineering to provide estimated delivery dates and resource needs for top-priority items.
    • Customer to prepare acceptance test cases for items they will validate and share before release testing.
    • Situation Summary (one sentence)
    • Make a clear, time-bound decision that mitigates contract/financial or patient-safety risk.
    • Assign owners and a validation cadence to confirm the mitigation achieves the intended reduction in risk.
    • Ensure stakeholders are aligned on the communication plan to preserve trust and governance cadence.
    • Document the chosen mitigation, owner, milestones, and publish to shared channel within 24 hours.
    • Analytics to produce an expedited validation report template that will be used to prove mitigation effectiveness.
    • Customer and vendor leads to schedule daily stand-ups until the risk is contained or resolved.
    • Achieve a shared, one-sentence statement of current state and future target for the next quarter.
    • Validate metric-level proofs that link platform outputs to the customer's stated problems and consequences.
    • Agree on a prioritized 90-day roadmap with owners and measurable acceptance criteria.
    • Identify any contract or financial risks that require escalation.
    • Owner to publish one-sentence current state and one-sentence future state to shared channel within 24 hours.
    • Analytics team to deliver provider-level drilldown workbook for the top 3 outlier providers within 7 days.
    • Assign owners and deadlines for each item in the 90-day roadmap and publish acceptance criteria.
    • Finance lead to quantify any projected shared-savings impact or penalty exposure and share within 5 business days.
    • Workshop Framing & Pre-work Review
    • Translate identified performance gaps into 2–3 measurable pilots that can be executed within 30–90 days.
    • Ensure each pilot has explicit acceptance criteria and owners to validate outcomes.
    • Make the consequence of each pilot explicit by estimating financial or quality impact.
    • Impact-Based Prioritization Review
    • Consequence & Exposure
    • One-sentence Current State
    • Current State Snapshot (one sentence each area)
    • Consequence for Providers
    • Mitigation Options (Decision-making)
    • Success Signals Review (Diagnosis)
    • Case Review: Provider Drilldown
    • SLA & Delivery Cadence Alignment
    • Root Cause Diagnosis (break into small groups)
    • Roadmap Commit & Release Plan
    • Decision & Communication Plan
    • Consequence Analysis
    • Design Pilot Interventions (Proof-focused)
    • Co-design Clinical Workflows
    • Metric Impact Modeling
    • Validation & Acceptance Process
    • Follow-up & Validation
    • Define Future State (one sentence)
    • Short-term Adoption Incentives & Measurement
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.