Health, Education & Government Higher Education Online Programs & Partnerships

Online Program Development

Multi-stakeholder institutional decisions where academic mission, student outcomes, and financial sustainability converge.

Coursera edX Pearson Online & Blended Learning Wiley Education
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles (provost, dean, faculty), timeline, constraints, and what ‘good’ looks like for academic quality and enrollment outcomes.

      Alignment Questions

      Quick Introductions — Who Are We Talking With Today?

      • Please tell us your name, role, and the unit you represent (college, school, or division).
      • How involved are you personally in decisions about online program partnerships right now? Options: Lead decision-maker, Key influencer/advisor, Provide recommendations to leadership, Observer/support role, Unsure
      • What is the single most urgent reason you agreed to this conversation today? Options: Enrollment decline, Board or executive directive, Competitor threat, Revenue diversification, Faculty pressure, Other
      • What would you like us to understand first about your institution before we dive deeper?

      Are We Just Living With A Slow-Motion Crisis?

      • When you look at enrollment over the past three years, which description fits best? Options: Mild decline (<5%), Moderate decline (5–15%), Severe decline (>15%), Flat/steady, Recovering/increasing, Unsure/no consolidated data
      • How long have you been tracking the current trend, and what internal stories do people tell about its cause?
      • Which programs or departments have you identified as vulnerable if trends continue? Options: Undergraduate majors, Graduate programs, Continuing education/certificates, Professional programs (e.g., nursing), Non-credit workforce programs, Multiple/all of the above
      • What would have to change in the next 12–18 months for you to feel confident the decline is reversed?
      • How would you describe the emotional climate around enrollment—concerned, cautiously optimistic, defensive, resigned, other? Options: Very concerned/anxious, Cautiously optimistic, Defensive/protective, Resigned/accepting, Motivated/urgent

      Who's In The Room When A Big Decision Is Made — And Who's Silent?

      • If we mapped the decision network for an online program partnership, who would be listed as formal decision-makers? Options: Provost, Dean(s), CFO/VP Finance, VP Enrollment, Faculty Senate/Committee, Board/Trustees, Legal/compliance, Other
      • Who tends to have the loudest influence in those conversations (name roles) and why?
      • Are there stakeholders whose buy-in is currently missing but critical for approval? Options: Yes—faculty leadership, Yes—finance, Yes—board/trustees, Yes—IT/tech, No, we have necessary stakeholders, Unsure
      • How long does it typically take to move from initial interest to a signed partnership at your institution? Options: <3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, No standard timeline
      • Tell us about a recent internal decision that felt fast and one that felt stalled—what made them different?

      What Keeps You Up At Night About Outsourcing Program Development?

      • Which of the following concerns would make you hesitant to partner with an external online program provider? Options: Academic quality erosion, Faculty resistance and morale, Unfavorable revenue-share economics, Loss of brand control, Data/privacy risks, Hidden implementation costs, None of the above
      • Have you had prior experiences (positive or negative) with vendors that shape this concern? Please describe one concrete example.
      • How worried are you that a partner will push enrollment at the expense of academic rigor? Options: Extremely worried, Moderately worried, A little worried, Not worried
      • If a partnership model were to reduce net institutional revenue as scale increases, how would that affect your appetite to proceed? Options: Stop the project, Renegotiate terms, Accept with caveats, Depends on other benefits
      • What assurances or guardrails would make those worries feel resolved?

      Paint the Program’s Current Life—From Recruitment To Retention

      • Describe your current enrollment funnel for the program(s) of interest (lead sources, conversion rates, typical cycle).
      • Which internal capacities are strongest today and which are weakest? Options: Instructional design, Marketing/enrollment operations, Learning tech/LMS, Student success/advising, Data & reporting, Faculty development
      • What are the most common failure modes that threaten program viability in your environment (e.g., low retention, accreditation pushback, faculty attrition)? Options: Low retention/completion, Poor course quality, Faculty resistance/non-engagement, Insufficient marketing ROI, Operational/IT failures, Regulatory or accreditation issues
      • Give an example of a course or cohort that underperformed—what exactly went wrong and how long did it take to surface?
      • How do faculty currently feel about online delivery—enthusiastic, skeptical, fearful, pragmatic, mixed? Share specific anecdotes if possible. Options: Enthusiastic, Skeptical, Fearful of quality loss, Pragmatic/conditional, Mixed

      If We Could Agree On One Clear Target, What Would It Be?

      • What is your numeric target for a pilot cohort (enrolled students) that would make you call the pilot a success? Options: <25 students, 25–50 students, 51–150 students, 151–300 students, >300 students, Undecided
      • What margin or net revenue threshold must the program meet to be considered financially viable for your unit? Options: Loss-absorbing (short term), Break-even, Low positive margin (5–10%), Healthy margin (>10%), Depends on strategic value
      • Which academic quality guardrails are non-negotiable for you? (Select all that apply.) Options: Faculty control of curriculum, Peer review of course design, Assessment integrity and proctoring, Accreditation alignment, Faculty compensation/support plan, Transparency of learning outcomes and assessments
      • What pilot metrics beyond enrollment and margin will you use to judge success (e.g., CPS, course satisfaction, 30/90-day retention)? List your top three.
      • How quickly would you expect early indicators (application volume, CPS, initial retention) to surface during a pilot? Options: Within 1 month of launch, Within 1–2 months, Within a semester, After first semester completion, Unsure

      Where Can We Compromise — And Where Must We Hold Firm?

      • Which elements are non-negotiable from your perspective (select the single most critical if you must choose)? Options: Academic control by faculty, Transparent financial reporting, Student learning outcomes protection, Data access and ownership, Brand approval rights, Other
      • Which areas are you willing to be flexible on to accelerate impact? Options: Pilot scope size, Time to market, Shared governance model, Commercial terms (rev-share vs fee), Operational handoffs
      • Describe a realistic exit or pause condition for a pilot that would satisfy governance (what metric threshold or time period triggers a rethink?).
      • Who would need to sign off on those exit criteria, and how often should governance reviews occur? Options: Provost/VP Academic, Dean(s), CFO/VP Finance, Faculty committee, Joint governance board, Other
      • If a pilot needed rapid corrective action, who should have authority to approve changes mid-course? Options: Provost/Dean, Joint steering committee, Project lead from vendor, Project lead from institution, Other

      Your Ideal Pilot — Day One, Day 90, Day 365

      • On day one of a pilot, what three operational items must be absolutely in place for you to consider the launch legitimate?
      • By day 90, which of these early metrics would convince you the partnership is on track? Options: Application volume meets expectations, CPS within target, Course satisfaction > benchmark, Faculty engagement levels stable, LMS and tech stable, Retention above minimum
      • What longer-term (12 months) signals would justify scaling beyond the pilot? Options: Sustained enrollments, Positive financial model, Faculty adoption and advocacy, Accreditation/compliance confirmation, Student outcomes improved
      • How important is speed to market versus getting every detail agreed up front? Options: Speed is essential, Balance of speed and rigor, Prefer thorough alignment before launch, Depends on program
      • Share one aspirational outcome for students that would make this partnership feel mission-aligned to you.

      Who Owns The Work — Roles, Data, and Resource Gaps

      • Which of the following responsibilities can your institution commit to owning during a pilot? Options: Faculty assignments and oversight, Program-level admissions decisions, Content approvals, Student advising, Data access and reporting, None — vendor to lead
      • Which roles are you short on and would want the partner to staff or supplement? Options: Instructional designers, Marketing/enrollment ops, LMS administrators, Student success coaches, Data analysts, Faculty development trainers
      • Do you currently have secure, shared data systems and approvals in place (SIS, LMS, CRM) to support a partner's access? Options: Yes—ready, Partially—some integrations needed, No—significant IT work required, Unsure
      • If we asked you to name the single biggest resource gap that would derail a pilot, what would it be?
      • What timeline and lead time expectations do you have for internal staff dedicating bandwidth to a pilot (hours per week, months of prep)?

      Timeline, Approvals, and What Could Stop This From Happening

      • What is your ideal start term for a pilot (semester or month)? Options: Next available term (3–4 months), Two terms out (6–9 months), One year out, Flexible/depends on approvals
      • List the key approvals and procurement steps that must occur before we could sign an agreement.
      • What are the single biggest likely blockers between now and a signed pilot agreement? Options: Budget/finance objections, Faculty resistance, Board/trustee concerns, IT/integration issues, Contracting/legal delays, Other
      • If an obstacle appears, which escalation path would be most effective at your institution? Options: Provost-led escalation, Dean and project sponsor, Joint steering committee, Formal governance review, External mediator/consultant
      • How flexible is funding for a pilot (internal reallocation, one-time funds, must be budgeted in advance)? Options: Flexible/one-time funds available, Requires budget reallocation, Needs approval in next fiscal cycle, Unsure

      Deciding Together — What Would Make You Say Yes?

      • Which commercial model do you prefer to discuss first? Options: Revenue-share, Fee-for-service, Hybrid (reduced fee + rev-share), Unsure/want to see scenarios
      • What specific transparency or reporting would you require from a revenue-share partner to feel confident (frequency and content)?
      • What governance cadence would you want during a pilot (weekly operational; monthly steering; quarterly governance)? Options: Weekly operational + monthly steering, Bi-weekly operational + monthly steering, Monthly only, Quarterly only, Other
      • What would be an acceptable next step after this discovery session (e.g., internal alignment meeting, data exchange, draft pilot proposal)? Options: Internal alignment meeting with leadership, Data request and campus readiness audit, Draft pilot proposal with costs, Faculty briefing session, Pilot terms workshop
      • Who should we include on the next call from your side, and what decision would you like them empowered to make?
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document enrollment trends, internal instructional design/marketing/tech capacity, faculty sentiment, and failure modes threatening program viability.

      Current State

      Start with What You Already Know

      • Tell me briefly: what triggered your interest in exploring online program partnerships right now? Options: Three-year enrollment decline, Competitor launched online program, Board/leadership revenue mandate, Faculty/department request, Other (explain)
      • How many programs (by department) are you actively concerned about for near-term viability? Options: Just one program/department, 2–3 programs, 4–6 programs, More than 6, Unsure
      • Which single metric would make you comfortable saying a program is back on track? Options: Enrollment headcount, Net tuition margin, Retention/continuation rate, Application-to-enrollment conversion, Other (specify)
      • Who on your campus needs to be involved in deciding whether to run an online pilot (names/roles)?

      Where the Numbers Are Hiding the Story

      • If the enrollment data could speak honestly, what uncomfortable trend would it reveal about your programs?
      • How have enrollments changed over the past three years at the program level? Options: Growing >5%/yr, Stable (±5%), Declining 5–15%/yr, Declining >15%/yr, I don’t have reliable program-level data
      • Which student segments have you lost (or never reached)? Options: Adult learners (25+), Working professionals, Out-of-state students, Part-time students, International students, Traditional undergraduates, Other
      • What are your current application → admitted → enrolled conversion rates for the target program(s)? Please include typical ranges or a recent example.
      • When you look at retention after term one, what stands out as the biggest driver of attrition? Options: Academic preparation, Financial barriers, Student support gaps, Course design/mismatch, Scheduling conflicts, Other
      • Do you have a single source of truth (CRM or SIS) where enrollment pipeline and retention metrics live? Options: Yes — fully integrated, Partially (some systems talk to each other), No — we use spreadsheets and siloed reports, Unsure

      Who's Holding the Pieces (and Is Anyone Dropping Them)?

      • If a pilot required tight coordination between marketing, instructional design, and IT, where would that most likely break down on your campus?
      • Which teams currently own these capabilities: market research, paid digital marketing, instructional design, LMS administration, and student success? Options: All in-house, Mostly in-house with contractors, Fragmented across departments, We don’t consistently own these capabilities
      • How many full-time equivalents (FTEs) do you have for online/digital program development and marketing combined? Options: 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, 10+
      • Where do your current teams feel most constrained: speed, skillset, budget, or governance? Options: Speed (time to market), Skillset (ID/production expertise), Budget, Governance/approval bottlenecks, All of the above
      • Describe a recent internal project that stalled—what caused it to stall and how long did it take before escalation?

      What Faculty Are Really Thinking (Beyond the Meeting Notes)

      • If faculty could be candid, what would they say are the biggest risks of partnering with an external online provider?
      • How would you characterize faculty sentiment toward online learning on a scale from champion to opponent? Options: Enthusiastic champions, Open but cautious, Skeptical, Opposed
      • Have faculty expressed specific non-negotiables about academic quality or governance (e.g., control of curriculum, assessment, hiring instructors)? If so, list them.
      • Which incentives or protections would most shift faculty from ‘open but cautious’ to ‘active partner’? Options: Faculty co-design roles, Clear academic governance clauses, Revenue sharing for departments, Dedicated faculty training & support, Authorship/credit recognition, Other
      • Tell me about a faculty-led change that worked well here—what made it successful and who helped make it happen?

      Failure Modes We're Seeing (So You Don’t Have To Learn Them the Hard Way)

      • What’s the worst-case scenario you fear if an online program is launched poorly? Options: Brand reputation damage, Worse retention than in-person, Financial loss leading to cuts, Faculty backlash, Regulatory/quality issues, All of the above
      • Where have you already seen signs that a shift to online could amplify existing problems (give concrete examples)?
      • Which operational failure would hurt you most in year one: marketing targeting volume over fit, LMS outages, low course quality, or unclear financial terms? Options: Marketing volume-over-quality, LMS instability, Poor course design/engagement, Unfavorable financial terms, Other
      • How would you like us to demonstrate risk controls up front (examples: pilot control metrics, faculty signoffs, phased payment triggers)? Options: Pilot acceptance criteria, Faculty review checkpoints, Payment tied to enrollment/retention, Quarterly governance meetings, Independent course audits, Other
      • When a program fails on your campus, who ends up owning the fallout and how is it typically resolved?

      What Would 'Back on Track' Actually Feel Like?

      • Imagine 12 months after a successful pilot—what would have to be true for you to feel relieved and confident?
      • Which early outcome matters most to your leadership: enrollment velocity, first-term retention, student satisfaction, or margin visibility? Options: Enrollment velocity, First-term retention, Student satisfaction (NPS/CPS), Clear margin visibility, Other
      • What minimum numeric targets would you set for a pilot (e.g., enroll X students, Y% retention, CPS <$Z)? Please list any concrete thresholds.
      • What trade-offs are you willing to make for speed (e.g., narrower program targeting, temporary faculty stipends, limited course offerings)?
      • If success requires one behavior change from your campus, what should it be (e.g., faster approvals, delegated governance, or centralized marketing budget)? Options: Faster academic approvals, Delegated pilot governance, Centralized marketing budget, Dedicated cross-campus team, Other

      Next Small Tests That Tell Us Everything

      • What single, low-risk pilot would convince you this approach is worth scaling?
      • What data access would we need to prove/disprove the pilot within the first 3–6 months (types and frequency)? Options: Daily/weekly marketing funnel data, SIS enrollment & retention snapshots, Student satisfaction surveys, LMS engagement analytics, Financial P&L updates, Other
      • Who would be the named owners on your side for a pilot (department lead, IT liaison, faculty lead, enrollment manager)? Please list roles and contact approach.
      • What would be an acceptable exit point if early signals go poorly (timeframe and metric triggers)?
      • Which quick wins should we prioritize in the first 60 days to build credibility on campus? Options: Faculty co-design workshop, Landing page + lead gen test, LMS smoke test & pilot course build, Clear pilot governance charter, Student advisory panel, Other
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target enrollment, margin thresholds, pilot metrics, and non-negotiable academic quality guardrails for any partnership.

    Discovery Questions

    Start Here: What's Driving This Conversation?

    • What prompted you to explore an online program partnership now? Options: Three-year enrollment decline, Competitor launched an online program, Board directive to grow revenue, Opportunity in adult learner market, Interested faculty or department, Other
    • Who is the primary decision-maker and who else must sign off (roles, not names)? Options: Provost, Dean of Continuing Education, Department Chair/Program Director, VP Enrollment Management, Chief Financial Officer, Board/Trustees, Other
    • What timeline are you targeting for a pilot decision and first cohort start? Options: Decision in 1 month, start within 3 months, Decision in 2–3 months, start 3–6 months, Decision in 3–6 months, start 6–9 months, Longer than 6 months / academic cycle dependent
    • What hard constraints should we know about (accreditation windows, budget caps, IT limitations, union rules)? Options: Accreditation reporting windows, Fixed budget cycle, Limited IT/integration capacity, Faculty/union contract constraints, No night/weekend support allowed, Other
    • How important is maintaining on-campus curricular parity and reputation to this decision? Options: Mission-critical — can't be compromised, Very important — limited flexibility, Somewhat important — open to acceptable differences, Secondary to enrollment and access

    What If Enrollment Isn't The Real Problem?

    • Could focusing on enrollment growth be masking deeper issues that threaten program sustainability? Options: Yes — likely masking deeper issues, Possibly — some concern, Unlikely — enrollment is the core issue, Not sure
    • Which internal failure modes have threatened program viability in the past? Options: Low course completion/retention, Insufficient instructional design, Weak marketing targeting, Faculty resistance or poor engagement, Technology failures, Lack of student support, Other
    • How long has the enrollment decline been happening, and what internal or market events align with that timing?
    • Which competitor moves worry you most right now (e.g., faster time-to-market, aggressive pricing, employer partnerships)? Options: Faster time-to-market, Lower price point, Stronger employer relationships, Superior marketing reach, Higher program quality reputation, Other
    • If a partner increased applications but completion fell by 10 points, how would you evaluate that trade-off?

    Imagine the Future: What Does 'Good' Actually Mean?

    • If you could lock in one outcome for this program, which would you pick? Options: Sustained cohort enrollment growth, Improved completion/retention, Net program margin above a threshold, High student satisfaction/learning outcomes, Employer-aligned outcomes and placements
    • Target enrollment per cohort for the pilot (choose the best range): Options: 10–25, 26–50, 51–100, 100+
    • Describe the enrollment mix you need (e.g., adult part-time learners, transfer students, returned alumni): Options: Working adults (part-time), Full-time post-traditional students, Transfer students, Recent grads, Employer-sponsored learners, Other
    • What retention and completion benchmarks must we meet to consider the pilot successful (provide a percentage or example)? Options: Retention ≥ 70%, Retention ≥ 80%, Completion ≥ 60% within expected timeframe, Completion ≥ 75%
    • What student satisfaction or learning outcome thresholds are non-negotiable (e.g., NSSE/other survey target, employer feedback)?

    These Lines We Won't Cross

    • What academic standards or red lines would make you walk away, even if enrollment targets are met?
    • Which of these curricular or accreditation guardrails must be preserved without exception? Options: Faculty curriculum ownership/approval, Credit hour definitions, Accreditation reporting and outcomes, Assessment alignment with program outcomes, Synchronous hours or faculty contact minimums, Other
    • What grading, assessment security, or academic integrity policies are essential for parity with on-campus offerings?
    • How much editorial control over syllabi and assessments must faculty retain? Options: Full control (faculty approve all content), Shared control (partner proposes, faculty approves), Faculty set outcomes only; partner designs delivery, Other
    • Would you accept variations in modality (microlearning, competency-based) or must the online course closely mirror the on-campus format? Options: Must mirror on-campus closely, Open to modality innovation with faculty approval, Prefer experimentation in pilot only, Unsure

    Show Me the Money: Margins, Pricing, and Financial Reality

    • Is there a minimum net margin per enrolled student below which the partnership is financially unacceptable? Options: Yes, No, Depends on scale and strategic benefits, Unsure — need help modeling
    • Select the range that best matches the minimum acceptable net margin per student (including institutional costs): Options: <$500 net per student, $500–$1,500 net per student, $1,500–$3,000 net per student, >$3,000 net per student, Prefer to state as percentage
    • Which commercial models are you willing to consider? Options: Revenue-share, Fee-for-service, Hybrid (fixed + rev-share), Milestone-based fees, Royalty or per-enrollment fee
    • How do you expect marketing costs, scholarships, and lead acquisition expenses to be allocated? Options: Partner covers marketing costs, Shared marketing budget, Institution covers marketing, Case-by-case (pilot-specific)
    • At what enrollment scale or revenue milestone would you expect renegotiation of economics? Options: After pilot cohort, At sustained 2–3 cohorts, When enrollment doubles pilot size, Fixed calendar review (e.g., year 2), Other

    If We Pilot — How Will We Judge It?

    • What single metric would cause you to call the pilot a clear success?
    • Select up to three metrics that must be tracked and reported weekly/monthly during the pilot: Options: Cost-per-enrolled-student (CPS), Applications and conversion rate, Enrollment yield, Retention by week/term, Course-level satisfaction (NPS), Learning outcomes/assessment pass rates, Net margin per student, LMS engagement metrics (time in course)
    • What pilot duration and cohort size would you view as statistically meaningful? Options: One term/semester, small cohort (10–25), One term, medium cohort (26–50), Two terms + larger cohort (50+), Prefer multiple mini-cohorts over one large cohort
    • What operational acceptance criteria (CPS threshold, minimum retention, course quality score) must be met to move to scale?
    • How frequently and in what format do you want performance updates during the pilot? Options: Weekly dashboard + monthly review, Bi-weekly standups, Monthly executive summary, On-demand access to live dashboard

    Faculty Pulse: Allies or Roadblocks?

    • If faculty buy-in is limited, how do you anticipate that will affect your willingness to scale? Options: Would halt scaling, Would proceed cautiously with more safeguards, Faculty concerns can be managed, Unsure
    • Which faculty or academic stakeholders need to be engaged early and what is their current sentiment? Options: Department chairs, Tenured faculty, Adjuncts/contingent faculty, Curriculum committee, Faculty senate, Other
    • What incentives, protections, or governance structures would make faculty comfortable with a partner-led development model? Options: Co-teaching opportunities, Curriculum approval rights, Revenue/royalty share for faculty, Professional development and training, Clear IP and authorship terms, Other
    • Tell us about a past example where faculty resistance was resolved — what worked and what didn't?
    • How much time and support (hours/person or training days) are you willing to commit for faculty onboarding? Options: <10 hours, 10–25 hours, 25–50 hours, 50+ hours, Varies by faculty

    Hidden Risks & Fail‑Safes

    • What hidden risk—technical, reputational, or operational—keeps you up at night about partnering on online programs?
    • Which of these operational risks should we prioritize mitigation for? Options: LMS instability or data loss, Student data/privacy concerns, IP ownership disputes, Accreditation non-compliance, Poor early student outcomes, Brand/reputation dilution
    • What reporting, data access, and dashboards do you require from a partner to feel in control? Options: Live enrollment funnel dashboard, Weekly CPS and spend reports, Student activity and assessment reports, Learning outcomes dashboards, Access to raw data exports
    • What cancellation, exit, or remediation terms feel reasonable if the pilot misses agreed acceptance criteria? Options: Immediate pause and review, Continue with corrective plan, Financial penalties/credits, Exit after one full term, Other
    • Who in your organization will own risk escalation and who will be the primary contact for operational issues?

    Decide or Delay: What Would a 'Yes' Look Like?

    • If you had to get one commitment from a partner today to move forward, what would it be (e.g., guaranteed CPS range, faculty oversight clause, pilot timeline)?
    • Who must approve the pilot contract and what is each approver’s target decision timeline? Options: Provost, Dean, Legal counsel, Finance/CFO, Faculty governance, Board
    • What internal resources (staff time, IT support, marketing coordination) will you commit if we proceed to pilot? Options: Dedicated project manager (FTE), Faculty lead release time, IT integration support, Marketing coordination time, Financial analyst for modeling, Other
    • What would make you comfortable saying 'yes' within the next 30 days? Options: Clear pilot scope and budget, Faculty approval in principle, Preliminary business case with modeled margins, Legal and compliance checklist completed, Other
    • Which next step do you prefer after this discovery session? Options: Detailed pilot scope & cost proposal, Joint pilot planning workshop with faculty, Internal review with stakeholders, Another discovery session focused on finance, Other
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through a pilot-based scenario showing how our program development, marketing, and student success approach delivers the agreed outcomes while protecting academic standards.

    Experience Meetings

    • Solution Experience Prep & Alignment
    • Pilot Scenario Walkthrough — Academic Quality & Outcomes
    • Proof Artifacts Session — Course Module, Marketing Funnel, Student Success
    • Validation & Decision Workshop — Acceptance Criteria and Next Steps
    • Both parties schedule the Pre-Deployment Readiness review and assign owners for each readiness item.
    • Customer nominate faculty leads and governance contacts for the pilot (due in 5 business days).
    • Both parties agree on the pilot acceptance metrics spreadsheet and sign off on initial thresholds.
    • Recap Purpose & Validation Rules
    • Demonstrate concrete proof that course quality meets or exceeds the customer's academic guardrails.
    • Show marketing economics that meet the agreed enrollment and CAC targets for the pilot.
    • Validate that the student success approach is projected to meet or improve retention thresholds.
    • Obtain explicit validation (or list of required changes) for each proof artifact.
    • Seller share the full artifact package (module files, rubrics, marketing plan, student success workflows) in a shared folder.
    • Customer provide line-by-line feedback or redlines on the course module and marketing assumptions within 5 business days.
    • Seller produce a tracking dashboard prototype showing how pilot KPIs will be reported weekly.
    • One-line Recap: Current State, Consequence, Future State
    • Obtain explicit customer validation that the pilot proves the defined future state against quantified consequences.
    • Finalize and sign off on pilot acceptance criteria and governance model.
    • Assign owners and set concrete dates for SOW, pilot kickoff, and readiness review.
    • Document any required modifications with owners and deadlines if approval is conditional.
    • Customer provide formal approval or conditional approval with documented modifications (due within 3 business days).
    • Seller finalize the pilot SOW and baseline dashboards and circulate for signature (due within 5 business days).
    • Introductions & Meeting Objectives
    • Produce and record a single agreed one-sentence current-state summary.
    • Quantify the consequence in measurable terms that the pilot must mitigate.
    • Define a single measurable future-state sentence that will be proven by the pilot.
    • Agree on a complete list of artifacts and timelines required for the Solution Experience.
    • Customer deliver enrollment trends, faculty sentiment summary, and top 3 failure modes (due in 48 hours).
    • Seller draft an initial one-sentence future-state hypothesis for customer review (due in 24 hours).
    • Schedule the Pilot Scenario Walkthrough and circulate final agenda and artifacts one week in advance.
    • Re-state Current State, Consequence, Future State
    • Confirm that every pilot activity directly addresses an identified failure mode or consequence.
    • Agree on specific academic guardrails and the process for faculty support and review.
    • Obtain alignment on pilot milestones, owners, and go/no-go decision gates.
    • Identify any gaps in the scenario that require adjustment before proof artifacts are presented.
    • Seller provide detailed pilot timeline with milestone owners and dates (deliverable within 3 business days).
    • Course Module & QA Evidence
    • Review Pilot KPIs & Acceptance Thresholds
    • Confirm One-Sentence Current State
    • Pilot Narrative: Timeline & Milestones
    • Marketing Funnel & CAC Projection
    • Quantify Consequence
    • Validation Script: Problem → Proof → Confirmation
    • Mapping: Pilot Activities to Failure Modes
    • Decision & Governance
    • Define One-Sentence Future State
    • Academic Guardrails & Faculty Support
    • Student Success Pathways & Retention Impact
    • Tie-back Exercise: Artifact → Consequence → Future State
    • Assign Owners & Schedule Next Milestones
    • Confirm Required Artifacts & Pre-work
    • Validation Checks & Feedback Loops
    • Open Validation Questions
    • Quick Q&A to Confirm Fit
  4. Solution Scope

    Define services, pilot scope, deliverables, responsibilities, timeline, and measurable acceptance criteria (CPS, satisfaction, retention).

    Scope Configuration

    • Produce edited lecture video series
    • Create full LMS course shell
    • Migrate and configure course content in LMS
    • Implement single sign-on and user provisioning
    • Design and launch program landing page
    • Launch paid search and social ad campaigns
    • Integrate lead capture forms with CRM
    • Publish SEO-optimized program pages
    • Produce closed captions and transcripts
    • Create instructor facilitation guide
    • Film and edit expert interview segments
    • Integrate proctoring and integrity tools
    • Deploy 24/7 student support chat

    Scope Questions

    Produce edited lecture video series

    • Should we include an edited lecture video series for this program? Options: Yes, No
    • What is the target average duration per lecture video (minutes)? Options: 5-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40+, Not sure
    • What raw assets are available to produce videos (e.g., raw lecture recordings, slide decks, scripts)?
    • Who will appear on camera and provide speaker availability? Options: Faculty, External SMEs, Teaching Assistants, Vendor production team, Other
    • Do you require multi-camera shoots, studio production, or simple single-camera edits? Options: Single-camera edits, Multi-camera shoots, Studio production, Animation/illustration heavy, Not sure
    • What are the acceptance criteria for the edited videos (resolution, encoding, visual style, LMS-ready packages)?

    Create full LMS course shell

    • Do you want a complete LMS course shell created (syllabus, modules, activities, gradebook, resources)? Options: Yes, No
    • Which LMS will be used or targeted for the course shell? Options: Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace/D2L, Moodle, Other / custom
    • What syllabus and schedule templates should be used (uploadable formats or standards)?
    • Who will own learning outcomes and assessment mapping (faculty, instructional designers, vendor)? Options: Faculty, Instructional Designers (institution), Vendor instructional designers, Shared responsibility
    • Are there accessibility or institutional LMS configuration standards we must follow? Options: Yes, No
    • What are the acceptance criteria for the course shell (content completeness, pass/fail QA checklist, student-facing readiness)?

    Migrate and configure course content in LMS

    • Do you require migration of existing course content into the target LMS? Options: Yes, No
    • What volume of courses and assets need migration (number of courses, hours of video, files)? Options: Single course (1-3 modules), Partial program (4-6 courses), Full program (7+ courses), Custom — specify in notes
    • What source formats will we migrate from (e.g., ZIP exports, SCORM, AICC, local files, Google Drive)? Options: LMS export package, SCORM modules, Local files (mp4, pdf, docx), Cloud storage (Google Drive/Dropbox), Other
    • Who will perform QA and sign-off after migration (department lead, instructional designer, QA team)? Options: Faculty lead, Dept admin, Institutional instructional designer, Vendor QA team, Other
    • Are there special configuration requirements (adaptive release, conditional activities, grade mappings)? Options: Yes, No
    • Describe the acceptance criteria for successful migration (content intact, links working, gradebook configured, accessibility checks).

    Implement single sign-on and user provisioning

    • Do you need SSO and automated user provisioning for students and instructors? Options: Yes, No
    • What identity provider and protocols are required (SAML, OAuth2, OIDC, CAS)? Options: SAML, OAuth2 / OIDC, CAS, LDAP, Not sure / need vendor help
    • Will provisioning integrate with a directory service (e.g., Active Directory, Azure AD) or SIS? Options: Active Directory / Azure AD, SIS (student information system), Manual CSV provisioning, Other
    • What user attributes and groups must be provisioned (role, course enrollments, program affiliations)?
    • Are there compliance or security policies (MFA, session timeouts, data residency) we must enforce? Options: Yes, No
    • Define acceptance criteria for SSO and provisioning (successful login test cases, provisioning sync frequency, zero-login errors).

    Design and launch program landing page

    • Do you want us to design and publish a program landing page? Options: Yes, No
    • What are the primary conversion goals for the landing page (lead capture, application starts, content downloads)? Options: Lead capture, Application starts, Information requests, Content downloads, Other
    • Who will supply brand assets, photography, and copy edits (marketing team, vendor, both)? Options: Institution marketing, Vendor creative team, Shared responsibilities, Other
    • What CMS or hosting environment will host the landing page (institution web, vendor-managed, other)? Options: Institution CMS, Vendor-hosted landing page, Marketing automation landing page (HubSpot/Marketo), Other
    • Do you need A/B testing, analytics tagging, and tracking pixels implemented? Options: Yes, No
    • List acceptance metrics for the landing page (load time, conversion rate target, mobile responsiveness, analytics validated).

    Launch paid search and social ad campaigns

    • Should we run paid search and social advertising for program launch? Options: Yes, No
    • What channels are prioritized (Google search, Facebook/Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, Programmatic)? Options: Google Search, Facebook / Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, Programmatic Display, Other
    • What is the initial monthly ad budget range? Options: <$5k, $5k-$15k, $15k-$50k, $50k+
    • What target CPA (cost per enrolled student) or CPL (cost per lead) should campaigns aim for?
    • Who will provide creative assets and compliance approvals for ad copy and targeting? Options: Institution marketing, Vendor marketing team, Both, Other
    • What are campaign acceptance criteria (qualified leads within target CPA, conversion-to-applicant rate, tracking validated)?

    Integrate lead capture forms with CRM

    • Do you require lead capture forms integrated to your CRM or marketing automation system? Options: Yes, No
    • Which CRM/marketing platform should the forms integrate with (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slate, Ellucian CRM Recruit, Other)? Options: Salesforce, HubSpot, Slate, Ellucian CRM Recruit, Other
    • What fields and lead data must flow to the CRM (contact info, program of interest, UTM source, consent flags)?
    • Do you require real-time push, batch sync, or both for leads? Options: Real-time push, Batch sync (daily), Both, Not sure
    • Who will own lead routing and follow-up SLAs (admissions, vendor, hybrid)? Options: Admissions team, Vendor enrollment team, Shared routing
    • Define acceptance criteria for form integration (leads arriving with full fields, no duplicates, correct UTM tracking).

    Publish SEO-optimized program pages

    • Do you want SEO-optimized program pages published as part of the launch? Options: Yes, No
    • What primary keywords or audience intents should the pages target?
    • Who will approve meta content and institutional compliance for published pages? Options: Institution marketing/SEO team, Vendor SEO team, Shared approval
    • Do you need ongoing SEO monitoring and content refreshes post-launch? Options: Yes, No
    • Which CMS or hosting environment will the SEO pages be published to? Options: Institution CMS, Vendor-hosted, Marketing automation platform, Other
    • Define acceptance criteria for SEO pages (indexing confirmed, meta tags set, core web vitals within targets).

    Produce closed captions and transcripts

    • Do all videos and audio assets require closed captions and full transcripts? Options: Yes, No, Partial (selected assets)
    • What accuracy or certification level is required for captions (human-reviewed, automated, ADA-compliant)? Options: Human-reviewed captions, Automated captions (vendor-reviewed), Automated only, ADA-compliant required
    • What languages are required for captions and transcripts? Options: English, Spanish, Other languages (specify), Multiple languages
    • Do transcripts need timestamps, speaker identification, and downloadable files for LMS use? Options: Yes, No
    • Who will review and approve final caption/transcript files? Options: Faculty, Dept admin, Vendor QA, Accessibility office
    • List acceptance criteria for captions/transcripts (accuracy threshold, file format, LMS integration).

    Create instructor facilitation guide

    • Do you want a detailed instructor facilitation guide for online delivery? Options: Yes, No
    • What should the guide include (weekly facilitation script, assessment rubrics, discussion prompts, tech troubleshooting)? Options: Facilitation script, Assessment rubrics, Discussion prompts, Tech troubleshooting, Grading guidance, Other
    • Who will co-author or approve the guide content (lead faculty, instructional designer, department chair)? Options: Lead faculty, Instructional designer, Department chair, Other
    • Do instructors require synchronous training sessions or recorded onboarding only? Options: Live synchronous training, Recorded training only, Both
    • What are the acceptance criteria (clarity, usability, faculty satisfaction targets, observed adherence in pilot)?

    Film and edit expert interview segments

    • Should we film expert interview segments to supplement course content? Options: Yes, No
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial model (rev-share vs fee triggers), governance, faculty support plan, and pilot acceptance/exit criteria.

    Agreement Modules

    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Commercial Model & Compensation Schedule
    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Pilot Acceptance & Exit Criteria
    • Governance Charter
    • Faculty Support & Academic Quality Plan
    • Data Sharing & Reporting Agreement
    • Intellectual Property & Content Ownership
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA) & Operational Commitments
    • Risk Allocation, Liability & Indemnity
    • Payment Terms & Billing Schedule
    • Change Order & Amendment Procedure
    • Termination & Transition Plan
    • Confidentiality & Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
    • Execution & E-Signature
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm data access, faculty assignments, content handoffs, LMS environments, and risk controls are in place for production.

      Readiness Questions

      How ready does this feel right now?

      • Thinking broadly, how would you rate your team's overall readiness to move this pilot into production? Options: Very ready, Somewhat ready, Not ready, Unsure
      • Which of the following are already in place for this pilot? Options: Signed partnership agreement, Data sharing / DPA, LMS sandbox or staging, Mapped course shells, Assigned faculty, Marketing plan and budget, Analytics dashboard or BI access, Student support plan
      • Who are the executive stakeholders we should keep informed during pre-deployment (names and roles)?
      • What is your target production date for launching the pilot? Options: Within 1 month, 1–2 months, 3–4 months, Next academic term, TBD
      • Describe one concrete milestone that would make you say “we're definitely ready” to publish the pilot.

      What's the hidden gap that would break launch?

      • What single unresolved gap in your current setup would most likely derail the pilot if left unaddressed?
      • How confident are you that internal teams will meet deadlines for the areas that typically slip (e.g., faculty approvals, accessibility fixes, roster sync)? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, Unsure
      • Have you experienced missed handoffs between academic units and tech on past launches? If yes, briefly describe what commonly went wrong.
      • Which failure modes worry you most for this pilot? Options: Low initial enrollments, Low early retention/completion, Faculty resistance, LMS outages or performance, Data/privacy breach, Financial underperformance
      • Typically, how long does it take your faculty to review and sign off final course content? Options: <1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, >4 weeks, Varies by course

      Who's actually running the course?

      • If the lead faculty were unavailable the week before launch, do you have a documented backup who could step in without missing a beat? Options: Yes, named backup and documented plan, Yes, informal backup but not documented, No backup, Unsure
      • Please list the named individuals (role and contact) who will be responsible for: faculty lead, instructional designer liaison, LMS admin, and student success coach.
      • Which governance body approves last-minute content or syllabus changes during a pilot? Options: Academic affairs committee, Program director, Department chair, Faculty governance committee, No formal body, Other
      • How many members of the pilot faculty team have prior online teaching experience? Options: None, 1–2, 3–5, More than 5, Unsure
      • What support or incentives are in place to secure faculty engagement across the pilot timeline?

      Can data move when we need it to?

      • If enrollment spiked tomorrow, could we pull enrollment, LMS usage, and early-retention data fast enough to adapt? Options: Yes, real-time dashboards, Yes, daily exports, Periodic reports only, No, manual-only processes, Unsure
      • Which data feeds can we access ahead of launch? Options: Applications feed, Confirmed enrollments, SIS roster sync (daily), LMS activity logs, Grades and assessments, CRM marketing leads, Student support tickets, Financial aid status
      • Are there signed data-sharing agreements and an identified technical owner for integrations? Options: Yes, agreement and owner, Agreement only, Owner only, Neither, Unsure
      • What systems (SIS, LMS, CRM, SSO) — including vendor and version — will we be integrating for the pilot?
      • What is the typical SLA for API or data access requests at your institution? Options: Same day, 1–3 business days, Up to 1 week, 2+ weeks, Varies widely

      Content handoffs: where do good projects stall?

      • Where in your content production workflow do deadlines usually slip—editing, faculty review, accessibility, media production, or another area?
      • Describe your current authoring workflow and who owns each stage (storyboarding, media production, QC, accessibility remediation, final approval).
      • Are source files and media stored in a shared repository with version control and naming conventions? Options: Yes, centralized with version control, Yes, but disorganized, No centralized repository, Unsure
      • Do you have a documented accessibility remediation process and a named owner for accessibility sign-off? Options: Yes, documented process and owner, Informal process, owner unclear, No process, Unsure
      • How do you prefer we coordinate content handoffs and milestones? Options: Weekly sync meetings, Deliverable checklist with dates, LMS staging links and comments, As-needed emails, Project management tool updates

      Is your LMS battle-tested for a live pilot?

      • When was the last time your LMS experienced an outage during peak traffic, and what was the impact?
      • Which LMS environment will host the pilot? Options: Existing production course, Dedicated production instance, New instance for pilot, Unsure
      • Do you have a sandbox for QA and a documented promotion process from staging to production? Options: Yes, documented process, Partial process, No process, Unsure
      • What authentication/SSO method will students use to access the LMS? Options: SAML/SSO, OAuth, Institutional single sign-on, Local LMS accounts, Other, Unsure
      • Are third-party LTI tools required for the pilot and are licenses or procurement approvals in place? Options: All listed and licensed, Some required; procurement pending, No third-party tools needed, Unsure
      • Who is responsible for LMS incident response and what is the escalation path?

      Who will own the risks you don’t want to talk about?

      • If a data breach, accreditation issue, or reputational incident occurred during the pilot, who has the authority to halt the launch? Options: Provost/VP Academic, Dean/Director, Legal/Compliance, Program Chair, No clear authority, Unsure
      • What insurance, indemnity, or contractual controls must be in place before go-live? Options: Cyber insurance, Indemnity clauses, Performance SLAs, Data processing addendum, Other
      • Are FERPA, accreditation reporting, and Title IV responsibilities assigned and documented for the pilot? Options: Yes, clearly assigned, Partially assigned, Not assigned, Unsure
      • Describe any past incidents (privacy, academic integrity, tech outage) that shape how conservative you want to be with risk controls?
      • What contingency plans exist for instructor replacement, major tech failures, or rapid enrollment shortfalls? Options: Instructor backup pool, Alternate delivery plan (asynchronous only), Marketing pause or re-budget plan, Financial contingency, No plan

      Can we run the playbook together?

      • If we handed you a day-of-launch playbook today, how confident are you that your team would follow it under pressure? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Low confidence, No confidence, Unsure
      • Which rehearsals or readiness checks would you require before go-live? Options: Faculty dry-run, Full-load performance test, Marketing readiness check, Student orientation session, Support desk simulation
      • Who is assigned to own day-of-launch roles (marketing lead, enrollment manager, helpdesk lead, LMS admin)? Please provide names or roles.
      • What urgent-issue communication channels and escalation paths will be used on launch day? Options: Phone tree, Slack/Teams channel, Email distribution list, Incident management tool (PagerDuty, etc.), SMS/text
      • How will you communicate pilot expectations and troubleshooting instructions to students and faculty in the two weeks before launch?

      What success signals will make us breathe a sigh of relief?

      • What minimum measurable signals would you accept as evidence the pilot is working and which of those would trigger an adjustment or pause?
      • Select the key metrics we should monitor closely in the first 6 weeks. Options: Applications, Confirmed enrollments, Marketing CAC (cost per enrolled student), Week 2 retention, Course completion rate, Student satisfaction (NPS), Average grade distribution, Helpdesk response time
      • What are your threshold targets for the metrics above (for example CAC <$X, retention >Y%)? Please specify which metric each target maps to.
      • How often would you like joint review meetings to assess metrics and go/no-go criteria during the pilot? Options: Weekly, Biweekly, Monthly, Ad hoc as needed
      • Which stakeholders must attend any go/no-go reviews? Options: Provost, Dean, Program Director, Marketing Lead, IT/LMS Admin, Faculty Lead, Student Success Lead
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule production tasks, launch marketing cadence, train faculty/support teams, and execute the pilot launch with clear owners.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify course quality, LMS stability, marketing cost-per-enrolled-student, and early retention meet the agreed benchmarks.

      Validation Questions

      Opening: Where this conversation starts

      • Which of these best describes your role today? Options: Provost, Dean (Continuing Education), Director of Online Learning, VP Enrollment Management, Other (please specify)
      • What is the single most urgent trigger that brought you to explore an online partnership now? Options: Three-year enrollment decline, Competitor launched online program, Board directive to generate revenue, Need to expand adult learner market, Other (please specify)
      • Who on your leadership team will need to be convinced for a pilot to move forward? Options: President/Chancellor, Provost, Dean, Faculty Senate/Committee, Finance/CFO, Chief Academic Officer, Other
      • How would you describe the current decision timeline for program-level initiatives? Options: Immediate (1–2 months), Near-term (3–6 months), Academic-term (6–12 months), Longer (12+ months), Not sure
      • In two sentences, what would count as a successful pilot for you?

      If enrollment keeps sliding, what breaks first?

      • If your enrollment declines continue for another year, what's the first program or function you expect to see real harm in—and why?
      • Which of these consequences worries you most about continued decline? Options: Program closures, Faculty layoffs or reassignment, Reduced course offerings, Loss of accreditation/quality reputation, Budget cuts to student services, Other (please specify)
      • Who in your institution tends to voice that worry most loudly—and how have they expressed it in past decisions?
      • How would continued decline make you feel about taking an external partnership—relieved, skeptical, pressured, or something else? Options: Relieved, Skeptical, Pressured, Hopeful but cautious, Other (please specify)
      • How long have you been managing this decline, and what stopgap responses have you already tried?

      Who’s really calling the shots—and what would it take to move them?

      • If we asked the dean, provost, and faculty chair to rank their decision priorities for a partnership, where would enrollment growth, academic quality, and financial return fall? Options: Enrollment growth highest, Academic quality highest, Financial return highest, Balanced evenly, Not sure
      • Which formal approvals will a pilot need before launch (e.g., curriculum committee, faculty senate, finance), and who typically slows that process? Options: Curriculum Committee, Faculty Senate, Academic Affairs/Provost, Finance/CFO, Board/Trustees, None/Informal
      • What evidence or guardrail would most quickly reassure your faculty about maintaining academic standards? Options: Peer-reviewed course design, Faculty co-creation credits, Assessment/learning outcomes alignment, Third-party quality audit, Pilot classroom observations, Other (please specify)
      • Tell me about a past decision where faculty resistance stopped a project—what happened and how long did it take to resolve?
      • If a single stakeholder needed to be convinced to proceed, who is that person and what would we need to show them?

      Where quality feels most vulnerable

      • If you had to name the single greatest academic-quality risk for moving online, what would it be? Options: Dilution of curriculum rigor, Faculty unfamiliarity with online pedagogy, Poor assessment integrity, Inadequate student support, Brand/reputation damage, Other (please specify)
      • How do you currently measure course quality and faculty effectiveness for face-to-face programs? Options: Student evaluations, Peer review, Learning outcome assessments, Retention/completion data, Not consistently measured, Other (please specify)
      • Describe a concrete example when course quality dipped—what were the indicators and what remedial actions worked or failed?
      • Which academic guardrails are non-negotiable for you in any partnership (choose up to three)? Options: Faculty control of syllabus, Assessment ownership by institution, Accreditation alignment, Transparent grade data, Faculty development and stipends, Student learning outcome parity
      • How emotionally willing are faculty to change pedagogy for online learning—excited, cautious, resistant—and what would shift that stance? Options: Excited, Cautious, Resistant, Depends on incentives/support

      Unpacking your current capabilities (so we know what we’d actually need to do)

      • Tell us about your in-house capacity for instructional design, marketing, and LMS/tech support—what exists and what’s missing?
      • Which best describes your current marketing capability for adult/online audiences? Options: Strong in-house team with proven conversions, Basic in-house capability, limited digital expertise, Minimal/no dedicated online marketing, Rely on vendor or third-party agencies
      • How many full-time equivalents (FTEs) do you estimate are directly involved in online course creation today (ID, media, faculty support)? Options: 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, 10+
      • Which systems and data pipelines are available for us to access in a pilot (e.g., SIS, LMS, CRM, analytics)? Options: SIS (Student Information System), LMS, CRM/Marketing Automation, BI/Analytics dashboards, None readily available, Other (please specify)
      • Give one recent example where internal capacity limited a timely program decision or launch—what was the bottleneck?

      What success actually looks like (not just numbers)

      • If we remove the jargon, what does ‘success’ feel like to you at the end of a six-month pilot?
      • Which outcome metrics would make this partnership defensible to your board or provost? Options: Net new enrollments, Cost-per-enrolled-student (CPS), Retention after term 1, Student satisfaction/NPS, Program margin thresholds, Other (please specify)
      • What target CPS and first-term retention would you need to see to consider scaling beyond a pilot? Options: CPS <$2,000, CPS $2,000–$4,000, CPS $4,000–$6,000, Retention >70%, Retention 60–70%, Retention <60%
      • Which qualitative signals—stories, faculty endorsements, student feedback—matter most to you alongside the numbers? Options: Faculty endorsements, Student testimonials, Employer interest/hiring inquiries, Academic committee approval, Media or peer recognition
      • How quickly do you expect to see leading indicators (applications, CPLs, conversion rates) after marketing begins? Options: Within 2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, 3+ months, Unsure

      If we tried a pilot, what would make it fail?

      • Name the top two things that have sunk pilots or vendor partnerships at your institution in the past.
      • How tolerant are you of early underperformance in enrollment if quality and student experience are strong? Options: Very tolerant (quality first), Somewhat tolerant (short runway), Low tolerance (need quick traction), Not sure
      • What exit triggers would you insist on including in a pilot agreement to protect academic standards and budget? Options: Enrollment below threshold, Retention below threshold, Quality audit failure, Faculty petition/concern, Financial loss threshold, Other (please specify)
      • Have you ever ended a partnership early? If yes, what specific milestone or behavior prompted that decision?
      • What contingency or remediation would make you feel comfortable continuing if the pilot underperformed against one metric but excelled in another?

      What would make you say yes—really?

      • If you could design the commercial model from scratch, what would your ideal balance be between revenue-share and fee-for-service? Options: Revenue-share preferred, Fee-for-service preferred, Hybrid (mix), Undecided—need scenarios
      • Which financial transparency items do you require before agreeing to revenue-share (choose all that apply)? Options: Full marketing spend reports, Enrollment funnel data, Net tuition reconciliation, Monthly financial statements, Third-party audit rights
      • What faculty support or incentives would be decisive for instructor buy-in (e.g., course release, stipend, co-creation credit)? Options: Course release, Lump-sum stipend, Per-course honorarium, Faculty co-creation credit/recognition, Professional development time, Other (please specify)
      • How would you prefer governance of the pilot to be structured—who needs a seat at the table and what voting rights matter?
      • What would be an acceptable pilot length and sample size for you to make a confident scaling decision? Options: One term cohort (3–4 months), Two-term pilot (6–9 months), Full academic year, Metric-driven timeline (until X enrollments)

      Practical next steps & readiness signals

      • Which of these readiness items are already in place for a pilot? Options: Committed faculty/single program identified, Access to LMS and course shells, Marketing contacts and CRM access, SIS data sharing agreements, Budget allocated for pilot, None yet
      • What data access or privacy constraints would we need to navigate before launch (FERPA, IRB, vendor contracts)? Options: FERPA concerns, IRB requirements, Vendor procurement policies, Data sharing agreements needed, No significant constraints
      • Who would be the day-to-day operational owner on your side for a pilot (name/role), and how many hours/week can they commit?
      • Which LMS(s) and integration requirements should we plan around? Options: Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace/D2L, Moodle, Proprietary/Other, We need help deciding
      • Realistically, what is the earliest you could approve a pilot to begin production work? Options: Immediately, In 1 month, In 2–3 months, Next academic term, Unsure

      Final reflection: what keeps you up at night?

      • Beyond the numbers, what about this decision keeps you personally up at night?
      • What would you need to hear from us in our next conversation to sleep better about a partnership?
      • Who else should join our next conversation to materially speed a decision, and what role will they play? Options: Provost/Academic affairs leader, Dean/Department chair, Finance/CFO, Faculty representative, IT/LMS lead, Other (please specify)
      • How soon would you like a tailored pilot proposal after this discovery is complete? Options: Within 1 week, 1–2 weeks, In one month, No rush/unsure
  7. Success

    Review pilot outcomes against success signals, capture learnings, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Pilot Outcomes Review (Executive)
    • Academic Quality & Student Experience Deep-Dive
    • Marketing & Enrollment Economics Review
    • Operational Governance & Continuous Improvement Setup
    • Lessons Learned & Scale Roadmap Workshop

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Create the agreed shared channel and populate it with initial documentation and access for all stakeholders.
    • Agree on a prioritized remediation plan with owners, measurable success criteria, and recheck dates.
    • Ensure faculty concerns are documented and addressed to avoid long-term resistance.
    • Create remediation tickets for each course/issue with deliverables, owner, and deadline.
    • Schedule targeted faculty development sessions and assign mentors for courses requiring support.
    • Define the QA re-evaluation checklist and date when post-remediation validation will occur.
    • One-sentence Current State (Enrollment)
    • Verify whether CPS and conversion rates meet the thresholds needed for a sustainable program.
    • Agree on specific marketing optimizations and reallocation of budget to improve CPS and lead quality.
    • Determine if the commercial model (revenue-share vs fee) requires adjustment before scaling.
    • Run targeted A/B tests for highest-leak funnel stages and report results within the agreed timeframe.
    • Recalculate cohort-level pro forma under recommended campaign changes and share updated margin projections.
    • If needed, prepare a commercial model amendment proposal for executive review.
    • One-sentence Current State (Ops)
    • Create a single, agreed shared channel and location for all pilot-to-production issues and documentation.
    • Define SLAs and escalation paths so operational issues are resolved within predictable timelines.
    • Establish a prioritization process for enhancements and a recurring cadence for status reporting.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • Publish the SLA and escalation matrix and circulate to the support and academic teams.
    • Build the enhancement backlog in the chosen tracking tool and perform initial prioritization for the next release window.
    • One-sentence Current State (Synthesis)
    • Document and socialize the most important pilot learnings so institutional knowledge is preserved.
    • Agree a prioritized roadmap with clear milestones, owners, and decision gates for scaling.
    • Finalize a communication plan that assures faculty and institutional stakeholders of academic integrity and program sustainability.
    • Publish a 'Lessons Learned' memo that includes evidence, decisions, and recommended changes.
    • Finalize and share the scale roadmap with milestones, resource needs, and owners.
    • Prepare the faculty and executive communications and schedule stakeholder briefings.
    • Confirm whether pilot met each pre-agreed success signal and which criteria failed or passed.
    • Surface the explicit consequences of gaps in operational and financial terms to create urgency where required.
    • Reach a clear decision (scale, iterate, or pause) and record accountable owners and deadline for that decision.
    • Publish annotated pilot dashboard with linked evidence for each metric and distribute to all stakeholders.
    • Assign owners for root-cause investigations for each failed signal with deliverables and deadlines.
    • Document the formal decision (go/no-go/modify) and required conditions to move forward.
    • One-sentence Current State (Quality)
    • Confirm whether academic quality meets the partnership's non-negotiable guardrails.
    • Capture Top 5 Learnings
    • Evidence Review: QA Rubric & Student Metrics
    • One-sentence Current State
    • Shared Channel & Single Source of Truth
    • Funnel Performance Walkthrough
    • Financial & Margin Analysis
    • Faculty Feedback & Sentiment
    • Prioritize Enhancements (Impact vs Effort)
    • Recap of Pre-Agreed Success Signals
    • Escalation Path & SLAs
    • Enhancement Backlog & Prioritization Framework
    • Quantitative Metrics Review
    • Identify Leakage & Optimization Opportunities
    • Identify Non-Negotiables at Risk
    • Scale Roadmap & Milestones
    • Roles, RACI, and Support Roster
    • Remediation Options & Proof Plan
    • Decision on Campaigns & Commercial Implications
    • Consequence & Impact Analysis
    • Communication & Change Management Plan
    • Root-Cause Highlights
    • Reporting Cadence & Dashboards
    • Validation & Re-evaluation Trigger
    • Confirm Commitments & Next Review
    • Validation & Stakeholder Confirmation
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.