Health, Education & Government Life Sciences & Pharma Clinical Development & Trials

Patient Recruitment

Regulated development and commercialization journeys where clinical, quality, and market access align.

Science 37 Medidata Signant Health Syneos Health
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, timelines, enrollment targets, and what ‘on-time enrollment’ means to each stakeholder.

      Alignment Questions

      Tell Me Your Trial — Fast

      • In one sentence, summarize the study we’d be helping with (indication, primary endpoint, and any unusually strict eligibility)
      • Which phase is this study? Options: Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV, Other
      • What is the total planned randomized sample and the average target per active site?
      • Where are you today on the timeline (site activation, first patient in, current enrollment rate)? Options: Not started/Pre-launch, Launch initiated (sites activating), Active enrollment but behind target, Active enrollment and on track, Near completion
      • How many calendar weeks or months are you from your originally planned primary completion date? Options: On schedule, 1–3 months behind, 3–6 months behind, 6–12 months behind, 12+ months behind
      • Who on your team will be our main day-to-day contact for recruitment operations and escalation (name/title)?

      Are You Settling for Slow Enrollment?

      • If enrollment stayed exactly as it is today for the next 3 months, what would the impact be on the study and on you personally?
      • How strong is the pressure from leadership to change approach versus stay the course? Options: Immediate change required (weeks), Consider changes within 1–3 months, Open but no urgency, No change expected
      • What would have to go wrong for leadership to escalate to a formal remediation plan?
      • How does current enrollment shortfall make you feel when you prepare updates for executives (e.g., anxious, defensive, motivated to act)? Options: Anxious, Defensive/embarrassed, Motivated to act, Resigned, Other
      • What internal costs or risks are you most worried about if enrollment continues to lag (timeline, budget, regulatory, reputational)? Options: Timeline delay, Increased budget, Regulatory risk, Site attrition, Loss of leadership confidence, Other
      • What is the single most persuasive outcome that would get your team to approve an external recruitment approach quickly?

      Where Are Patients Dropping Out — And Why It Matters

      • Which funnel step is performing worst right now: referral, pre-screen, consent, or conversion to randomization — and why do you think that is? Options: Referral generation, Pre-screen eligibility, Consent/enrollment, Randomization conversion, Not tracked clearly
      • Do you have recent funnel metrics (referrals → pre-screens → consents → randomizations)? If yes, please paste or summarize the last 3 months.
      • How consistently do sites log referrals and pre-screen outcomes into your CTMS or tracker? Options: All sites consistently, Most sites, Some sites, Rarely/none
      • When a referred patient fails pre-screen, what are the top three reasons you hear from sites or coordinators?
      • Are there competing trials recruiting the same patient population at key sites? If so, which competitor attributes (incentives, simpler protocol, faster visits) are winning patients? Options: Yes—more attractive incentives, Yes—less restrictive eligibility, Yes—closer site locations, No significant competing trials identified, Unknown
      • How would you rate the accuracy of site feasibility estimates submitted during study start-up? Options: Very accurate, Somewhat accurate, Often optimistic, Mostly inaccurate

      Who Actually Decides — And Who’s Being Heard

      • Who are the decision-makers and influencers for enrollment strategy (names/titles: e.g., CMO, clinical ops, biostatistics, legal, procurement)?
      • If we proposed a new multi-channel recruitment program, which stakeholders would need to sign off before launch? Options: Clinical Operations, Regulatory/QA, Legal/Compliance, Sites/PI network, Procurement/Commercial, Data Privacy
      • How does each stakeholder define 'on-time enrollment' (e.g., primary completion by X date, % of sites hitting targets, median time-to-randomization)? Please list differences.
      • What deadlines or milestones are non-negotiable (e.g., safety database lock, interim analysis date, regulatory submission)?
      • Who will have final say on go/no-go decisions and what evidence do they require (conversion rates, cost per randomization, site performance)?
      • How do you typically resolve conflicts when site priorities diverge from sponsor timelines? Options: Formal escalation ladder, Weekly steering calls, Director-level intervention, Ad hoc negotiation

      If Enrollment Were Miraculously Fixed — What Would That Feel Like?

      • Describe an outcome that would make the sponsor say this recruitment intervention 'worked' — the exact phrase they would use in the board meeting.
      • What numerical KPIs must we meet to call the program successful (pick the primary three)? Options: Referrals per week, Pre-screen pass rate, Consent rate, Randomizations per site per month, Cost per randomized patient, Time-to-randomization
      • What is your target cost-per-randomized-patient range for a remediation program like this? Options: <$5,000, $5,000–$10,000, $10,000–$20,000, >$20,000, Undisclosed/Varies by indication
      • How frequently would you want performance reporting (and what level of detail) to feel confident in our progress? Options: Daily high-level, Weekly detailed, Biweekly, Monthly
      • Beyond numbers, what qualitative signals would make you feel this approach is changing the trajectory (site confidence, patient feedback, improved prescreen quality)?
      • If we exceeded your expectations, what would you want documented and shared internally to lock in future support? Options: Case study, Executive summary, Site-level performance pack, Full analytics dashboard

      What's Already Been Tried — And What We Learned

      • Which recruitment channels have you already used on this study (select all that apply)? Options: Site-driven recruitment, Digital advertising (search/social), Physician referral outreach, EHR screening, Patient registries/advocacy groups, Other
      • For each channel that was used, which delivered acceptable results and which underperformed? Please give brief examples.
      • Have you previously engaged third-party recruitment vendors? If yes, what were the top two reasons the relationship didn’t fully resolve the issue? Options: Poor conversion rates, Slow deployment, Lack of therapeutic expertise, No site coordination, Cost overruns, Other
      • Have any protocol or operational changes been attempted to boost enrollment (e.g., broaden eligibility, add sites, increase visits reimbursement)? What was the result?
      • What lessons from past attempts should we never repeat or that we must replicate?
      • What internal resources (site liaisons, call center, marketing approvals) are currently available to support an external recruitment partner at launch? Options: Site coordinators, Sponsor-managed call center, IRB/Regulatory support, Creative approvals team, None available / will need to be provided

      Data, Permissions, and Practicalities — Can We Move Quickly?

      • How many sites have active EHR screening permissions in place and are willing to share patient-level identifiers for pre-screening? Options: All sites, Most sites, Some sites, None
      • What IRB or legal constraints will govern advertising or direct-to-patient outreach for this protocol?
      • Do sites have required tech integrations (CTMS, electronic referrals, API access) to enable referral tracking and attribution? Options: Fully integrated, Partially integrated, Manual CSVs only, No integrations
      • Which data feeds would you be comfortable sharing to measure performance: de-identified referrals, site-level conversion rates, or patient-level outcomes? Options: De-identified referrals, Site-level conversion rates, Patient-level data with agreements, None
      • How fast could IRB-approved creative (ads, landing pages, consent scripts) realistically be reviewed and signed off? Options: <2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 4–8 weeks, >8 weeks
      • Are there any critical regulatory or privacy red lines we must avoid (e.g., no social media targeting, no PHI in outbound comms)?

      What Would Make You Pull the Trigger — Timeline, Terms, and Evidence

      • What short-term evidence (first 30 days) would you need to approve continued spend on a remediation campaign? Options: Steady increase in referrals, Improved pre-screen pass rate, One or more sites meeting targets, Acceptable cost per referral
      • Which commercial models are you open to exploring (fixed fee, performance-based, hybrid) and which would be a deal-breaker? Options: Fixed fee, Performance-based (per randomized), Hybrid, Retainer + bonus, Undecided
      • What are the non-negotiables in your contract (data ownership, patient privacy, indemnity, audit rights)?
      • Assuming terms are acceptable, how quickly could you sign and mobilize an external recruitment partner? Options: Immediately (within 1 week), 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, Longer than 2 months
      • What are your preferred acceptance criteria for a formal go/no-go after launch (quantitative thresholds and timeline)?
      • Who needs to be present in a 30–45 minute launch-readiness call to greenlight activation? Options: Sponsor clinical ops lead, Site operations lead, Regulatory/QA rep, Vendor project manager, Data analyst
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document site performance, enrollment shortfalls, competing trials, eligibility bottlenecks, and available data sources.

      Current State

      Quick Snapshot: Where Things Stand Today

      • How far behind target are you right now (absolute patients and percent of planned timeline)? Options: 0–10 patients / <10% behind, 11–50 patients / 10–30% behind, 51–200 patients / 30–60% behind, 200+ patients / >60% behind
      • What is the planned enrollment rate per month versus your current actual rate?
      • Which trial locations (sites/regions) are meeting, exceeding, or missing targets — list top 3 that are underperforming and why you think that is.
      • How long have you been tracking this shortfall, and what corrective actions have already been tried? Options: Less than 1 month, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, More than 6 months
      • If you had to assign a confidence score to your current ability to hit enrollment in the next 3 months, what would it be (0–10)? Options: 0–2, 3–4, 5–6, 7–8, 9–10

      Are Sites Really Who They Said They Were?

      • Many feasibilities sound promising on paper — which site assumptions from feasibility have proven inaccurate?
      • Which of the following best describes the main reason sites are underperforming? Options: Overstated patient volume, Staffing changes / coordinator turnover, Competing trials at site, Lack of engagement from PI, Operational bottlenecks (scheduling, screen failures)
      • For the sites missing targets, how predictable are their shortfalls—are there repeatable patterns by day, week, or referral source? Options: Consistent pattern across sites, Patterns vary site-to-site, Unpredictable / sporadic, Not sure
      • When underperformance occurs, what typically happens next—do sites escalate early, try local outreach, or wait for sponsor intervention? Options: Site escalates and acts quickly, Site tries local outreach, Site waits for sponsor/CRO guidance, No consistent follow-up
      • Describe a recent example of a site that turned from struggling to productive — what changed and who made it happen?

      What's Eating Your Eligible Pool?

      • Is the protocol excluding more patients than expected, and if so, where in the eligibility checklist are most failures happening? Options: Inclusion criteria too narrow, Key lab/value thresholds, Concomitant medication exclusions, Imaging/assessment requirements, Other
      • How often do competing trials target the same patient population in the same regions, and which competitors are most active? Options: No competition, Low competition, Moderate competition, High competition
      • Which patient-level barriers are you seeing most frequently (transportation, cost, time, distrust, comorbidities)? Options: Transportation, Financial/cost concerns, Time/availability, Mistrust or reluctance, Comorbidities/contraindications, Other
      • How much of the screen fail volume is due to documentation/data gaps versus true clinical ineligibility? Options: Mostly documentation/data gaps, Balanced mix, Mostly true clinical ineligibility, Unsure
      • Tell us about any local referral sources (clinics, advocacy groups, specialty practices) that have been unexpectedly poor or unexpectedly strong.

      Where Are Patients Getting Lost?

      • Which step of the funnel (referral → pre-screen → consent → randomization) is breaking most often for you? Options: Referral generation, Pre-screen qualification, Scheduling / getting to site, Consent conversion, Randomization eligibility
      • Across channels (site outreach, digital ads, physician referrals, EHR screening), where do you see the biggest drop-offs and which channel underdelivers most? Options: Site outreach, Digital campaigns, Physician referrals, EHR-based IDs, Patient advocacy referrals
      • How well are you tracking referral-to-randomization conversion by channel and by site today? Options: Fully tracked and reported, Partially tracked (some channels/sites), Minimal tracking, Not tracked
      • When a patient falls out of the funnel, what follow-up or re-engagement steps exist, and who owns them?
      • Share a recent patient pathway that failed — where did they disengage, and what would have kept them in?

      What Data Are You Truly Sitting On?

      • Which of these data sources are available to us for screening, outreach, or analytics (select all that apply)? Options: EHR (structured), EHR (free text / clinical notes), Claims data, Site registries / databases, Patient portals, Sponsor / CRO historical enrollment data, None of the above
      • Do you have IRB or data-sharing permissions in place that would allow targeted messaging or EHR screening at participating sites? Options: Yes, permissions in place, Partial permissions at some sites, No, but we can get approval, No and unclear timeline
      • How accessible and clean is the data (examples: diagnosis codes, meds, lab values) for near-term cohort identification? Options: Ready and high-quality, Requires moderate cleaning, Poor quality / heavy work, Not sure
      • What reporting cadence would be useful to you (weekly funnel, daily alerts for high-priority referrals, monthly summaries)? Options: Daily alerts, Weekly reports, Biweekly summaries, Monthly reports, Ad hoc queries
      • Are there legal, privacy, or site-specific constraints we should know about before proposing EHR or outreach tactics?

      Who Owns What — Roles, Timing, and Decision Triggers

      • If enrollment remains behind target, who at the sponsor/CRO makes the call to change strategy, and how quickly can that decision be executed? Options: Site PI / CRC, Study Manager, Clinical Ops Director, Commercial / Portfolio Lead, Steering Committee
      • What are the concrete enrollment acceptance criteria (per site and overall) that will trigger incremental resourcing or a go/no-go decision?
      • Who at each critical stakeholder group (sponsor, CRO, sites) will be our point of contact for rapid operational changes?
      • How flexible are timelines for site activation, and what minimum notice do we have to deliver a campaign at a given site? Options: 1 week, 2–3 weeks, 4–6 weeks, More than 6 weeks
      • Describe any recent internal decisions or political pressures that shape how aggressive you can be with outreach or incentives.

      If We Did Nothing Different, What Happens?

      • What are the tangible consequences if enrollment stays on this trajectory (timeline delays, additional cost, missed endpoints)? Options: Timeline delay, Increased trial cost, Risk to statistical power, Regulatory / approval delay, Other
      • How tolerant is leadership to incremental budget spend to accelerate enrollment versus accepting a delayed timeline? Options: Highly tolerant, Somewhat tolerant, Reluctant, Not at all
      • What has been the internal reaction from investigators and sites to the under-enrollment—supportive, defensive, or disengaged? Options: Supportive and engaged, Defensive but cooperative, Disengaged, Mixed
      • If enrollment falters further, what contingency plans exist (extend recruitment window, add sites, amend protocol)? Options: Extend window, Add sites, Protocol amendment, Pause recruitment, Other
      • Which of these outcomes is least acceptable to you — and why?

      Quick Wins & Next Steps: Where We Can Move Fast

      • If we prioritized three immediate actions to boost referrals this month, which would you choose? Options: Targeted digital ads, EHR screening at top sites, Activated physician outreach, Re-engage previous screen-fails, Site coordinator support / staffing help
      • What short-term constraints would block any of those actions (IRB, budget, legal, site approvals)? Options: IRB approval, Budget availability, Legal/data agreements, Site willingness, None
      • How quickly can you provide pilot sites, contact lists, or data extracts for a rapid proof-of-concept? Options: Immediately (within 1 week), 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, Longer than 4 weeks
      • Who should be in the room for a 30–45 minute run-through of our initial plan and data requirements?
      • What success signal from a 6–8 week pilot would make you feel confident to scale our approach? Options: Conversion uplift (referral→randomization), Reduced time-to-randomize, Lowered cost-per-randomized-patient, Improved site responsiveness, Other
  2. Customer Discovery

    Align on the enrollment gap, target KPIs (referral→pre-screen→consent→randomization), constraints, and success signals.

    Discovery Questions

    Quick Snapshot: What's on your plate right now?

    • How urgent is this enrollment shortfall to your overall program? Options: Critical — must move within 0–4 weeks, High — act within 1–3 months, Moderate — address this quarter, Low — longer-term concern
    • Give a one‑sentence summary of the enrollment problem you're asking us to solve.
    • Which phase and therapeutic area is this study? Options: Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV, Combination/Other
    • What therapeutic area and specific indication are you recruiting for? Options: Oncology, Neurology, Cardiology, Rare disease, Endocrinology/Metabolic, Immunology, Psych/Behavioral, Other — specify
    • How many patients do you planned vs currently enrolled (please provide both numbers)?
    • How many active sites are in the intent-to-enroll pool and how many are currently enrolling patients?
    • How is this shortfall making the study leadership feel—what are the biggest emotional or political pressures you’re facing? Options: Frustrated/angry, Anxious/urgent, Cautiously optimistic, Resigned/accepting, Other

    If I Could Only Fix One Thing, It Would Be…

    • If there were a single, fixable cause behind most of your enrollment losses, what is it?
    • How large is the enrollment gap at the site level vs centralized expectations (estimate percent shortfall by site)? Options: <10%, 10–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, >75%
    • Where in your funnel are you losing the most people: referrals, pre‑screen, consent, or randomization? Options: Referrals, Pre‑screen, Consent, Randomization, Evenly across stages
    • Describe one patient story or specific screening failure that best illustrates the enrollment friction you're seeing.
    • Which of the following operational bottlenecks are present right now? Options: Site staffing shortages, Eligibility criteria too narrow, Competing trials siphoning patients, Poor referral triage, Ineffective patient outreach materials, EHR screening not enabled, Other — specify
    • How consistently are your sites logging screening failures and reasons into CTMS or your tracker? Options: Real‑time and consistent, Intermittent, Rarely, Not tracked
    • Which stakeholder reactions have surprised you most (sponsor leadership, sites, IRB, patients)?

    How Much of This Is Actually Controllable?

    • What portion of the shortfall do you believe could be improved without changing the protocol? Options: Most (>75%), Meaningful (40–75%), Some (10–40%), Little to none (<10%)
    • Which constraints currently force a protocol amendment to materially improve enrollment? Options: Eligibility windows, Concomitant medication restrictions, Required in‑clinic procedures, Geographic site limits, Other — specify
    • What IRB or regulatory approvals would a recruitment campaign need before going live (e.g., central IRB OK, site‑level signoff)? Options: Central IRB approval only, Each site must approve ads/materials, Pre-approval by sponsor/regulatory team, No IRB required for preliminary outreach, Not sure / need to confirm
    • Do you have EHR screening access at participating sites today, and what level of access is available? Options: Full EHR query access, Limited patient list access, Only site‑manual screening, Varies by site, No EHR access
    • Which of these data feeds are available to support recruitment analytics? Options: CTMS screening logs, EHR query results, Claims/PBM data, Site recruitment portal, None of the above
    • How quickly could sites enable EHR screening or integrate our referral portal if we needed it? Options: 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 1–2 months, Longer / uncertain
    • What past internal fixes have moved the needle even a little—and why did they help?

    Imagine the Enrollment Headline in 90 Days

    • If the study were back on track in three months, what single headline would make you breathe easier?
    • Set target funnel KPIs you’d require to call this a success (provide % for referral→pre‑screen→consent→randomization).
    • What is your acceptable cost-per-randomized-patient (range) for a remediation program? Options: <$5,000, $5,000–$15,000, $15,000–$30,000, >$30,000, Not sure / need benchmarking
    • How many randomized patients per week across the program would you need to see before leadership accepts the path forward? Options: 1–5, 6–15, 16–30, >30
    • Which success signals would convince you to scale the program vs pause it? Options: Sustained weekly randomizations, Improved site conversion rates, Referrals meeting quality thresholds, Favorable CPPR, Positive patient feedback
    • Who ultimately signs off that the enrollment remediation is successful (name role/title)?
    • What would a minor vs major success look like to your CEO/Head of R&D?

    The Work You've Already Tried (and What Surprised You)

    • Which recruitment vendors or internal tactics have you used in the last 12 months for this study? Options: Digital ads vendor, Patient advocacy outreach, Physician referral activation, EHR vendor/queries, Site-level hires/RCs, Other — list names
    • Which channel delivered the most usable referrals previously (even if conversion was low)? Options: Digital search ads, Social media, Physician referrals, EHR-identified patients, Patient advocacy groups, Other
    • Share one example where a vendor promised faster enrollment but didn’t deliver—what specifically failed?
    • What vendor behaviors or deliverables did you value most when a campaign actually worked? Options: Speed to launch, Transparent funnel reporting, High‑quality pre‑screens, Site coordination support, Flexible contracting
    • When a prior campaign failed, what sign earlier on would have helped you stop and fix it sooner?
    • How important is prior therapeutic-area experience in a vendor for you to move forward? Options: Critical — must have, Very important, Nice to have, Not important
    • What internal capabilities do you want to keep (vs hand off) when working with an external recruitment partner? Options: Creative/IRB review, Site relationships, CTMS/reporting, Regulatory signoff, None — outsource fully

    Decision Pressure, Commercial Tradeoffs, and Non‑Negotiables

    • If things don’t improve in the next 8 weeks, which outcome is most likely? Options: Protocol amendment, Add new sites, Pause study, Extend timeline and budget, Other — explain
    • Which commercial structures are acceptable to you for a remediation program? Options: Fixed fee, CPO (cost-per-outcome), Hybrid (retainer + incentive), Performance-only
    • Which contractual terms are deal‑breakers for you (choose all that apply)? Options: Unlimited pass‑through fees, Long minimum term, No performance guarantees, No data access, Strict IP restrictions
    • What internal procurement or legal timelines should we expect to work within? Options: 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 1–2 months, Longer / complex
    • What budget flexibility exists if initial pilots demonstrate impact? Options: Can scale quickly with proven ROI, Limited flexibility, Needs board approval, No flexibility
    • Are there any competing internal priorities or upcoming milestones that could block a fast decision? Options: Regulatory submission, Budget freeze, Leadership change, None of the above, Other — specify
    • What commercial KPI(s) should be tied to payment in your view (e.g., cost-per-randomized, qualified leads, conversion rate)? Options: Cost-per-randomized-patient, Qualified referrals, Referral→randomization conversion, Site-level enrollment targets, Other — specify
    • Which financial stakeholders must be engaged before contracting (titles/roles)?

    Signals, Reporting, and a Fast Path to 'Yes'

    • What immediate evidence would make you stop searching and say, 'Start tomorrow'?
    • Which metrics must be visible in our dashboard to keep you confident (pick top 3)? Options: Referrals by channel, Pre-screen pass rate, Consent rate, Randomizations by site, CPPR, Time-to-randomization
    • How often do you want live reporting and what cadence for strategic reviews? Options: Daily dashboard, weekly review, Weekly dashboard, biweekly review, Weekly dashboard, monthly review, Biweekly dashboard, monthly review
    • What data‑sharing permissions or integrations do we need to plan for up front (EHR queries, CTMS access, de‑identified patient data)? Options: EHR query access, CTMS integration, Referral portal access, De‑identified patient lists, None yet / need to confirm
    • Which pilot scope would you consider appropriate to test our approach (sites only, DTP + sites, one country, multi‑site)? Options: Single high‑performing site pilot, Multi‑site regional pilot, DTP + selected sites, Full program scale
    • Realistically, what's your internal decision timeline if we present a proposal next week? Options: Immediate (within 1 week), 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, Longer / TBD
    • What worries you most about bringing in a new recruitment partner? Tell us the specific fear.
    • If you're comfortable, who would we meet next from your side to validate feasibility (name/role/email)?
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how our multichannel pipeline (digital, physician, EHR, site support) converts referrals to randomizations in your trial context.

    Experience Meetings

    • Pre-Experience Alignment
    • Pipeline Walkthrough — Live Scenario
    • Channel Deep-Dive: Digital, Physician, EHR, Site Support
    • Conversion Funnel Mapping & Tracking Workshop
    • Validation & Commitment Checkpoint
    • Set KPI targets and clear acceptance criteria for initial launch validation.
    • Define each channel's tactical plan, ownership, and expected yield in measurable terms.
    • Agree required IRB language and creative constraints per channel.
    • Finalize tracking/attribution approach so every referral can be tied to channel and site.
    • Confirm site vs DTP responsibilities and SLAs for referral follow-up.
    • Seller to provide IRB-ready sample creative and draft messaging for sponsor review.
    • Sponsor to list EHR systems per site and provide contact for EHR query integration.
    • Seller to deliver channel-level projected conversion rates and expected volumes for the campaign.
    • Designate a site liaison at sponsor side to coordinate site support processes.
    • Funnel Definitions & Ownership
    • Finalize funnel stage definitions and assign owners for each transition.
    • Agree tracking implementation and data feeds that will prove conversion performance.
    • Introductions & Objectives
    • Complete a successful validation test demonstrating end-to-end traceability.
    • Seller to deliver final tracking spec (tags, APIs, portal mappings) and sample dashboard within 5 business days.
    • Sponsor IT/site teams to implement test EHR query and provide test record for validation exercise.
    • Create a shared test-plan and schedule the live validation run.
    • Agree the reporting cadence and recipients for ongoing campaign performance updates.
    • Review of Preconditions and Validation Results
    • Obtain sponsor confirmation that the validated pipeline satisfies the defined future-state outcome.
    • Resolve or assign owners for any remaining risks or regulatory blockers.
    • Agree on the channel mix, site responsibilities, KPI targets, and the next meeting to scope commercial terms.
    • Create a clear, dated checklist for handoff to Solution Scope and Deployment stages.
    • Sponsor to provide formal sign-off on the validated future-state statement and KPI targets.
    • Seller to draft a preliminary SOW and channel scope document for review ahead of the Solution Scope meeting.
    • Assign owners and deadlines for outstanding regulatory items and tracking implementation tasks.
    • Schedule the Solution Scope meeting and share the sign-off checklist and required documents.
    • Produce one clear current-state sentence capturing where enrollment is breaking.
    • Quantify consequence in monetary or timeline terms for sponsor stakeholders.
    • Agree a single measurable future-state outcome sentence (e.g., % lift in randomizations or reduced time-to-randomization).
    • Confirm data sources, trial scenarios, and decision-makers required for the live walkthrough.
    • Assign pre-work owners and deadlines so the Solution Experience can be tailored and data-driven.
    • Sponsor provides site-level enrollment data, baseline referral→randomization rates, and list of prioritized sites.
    • Sponsor supplies one or two exemplar patient personas and protocol eligibility constraints for the scenario.
    • Seller provides template conversion model and requests access or anonymized sample records to populate it.
    • Identify and confirm the decision-makers who must validate the Solution Experience outputs.
    • Recap Preconditions
    • Demonstrate, with the sponsor's data, that the pipeline can deliver the defined future-state outcome.
    • Validate each pipeline handoff and assumption directly with sponsor stakeholders.
    • Agree on expected channel-level conversion lifts and time-to-randomization estimates.
    • Identify any fatal execution gaps that would prevent expected outcomes.
    • Commit to the next technical/channel scoping sessions needed to operationalize the model.
    • Seller to deliver a scenario-specific conversion model (referral→randomization) populated with sponsor data within 3 business days.
    • Sponsor to validate and annotate eligibility constraints and confirm competing-trial impacts on the scenario.
    • Seller to provide historical case studies and channel benchmarks that map to the sponsor's therapeutic area.
    • Schedule channel deep-dive sessions and tracking workshop dates.
    • Overview & Objectives
    • Scenario Brief
    • Current State Statement
    • Baseline Rates & Target KPIs
    • Impact Summary & Expected Deliverables
    • Digital Channel (ads, landing pages, call center)
    • Tracking Architecture
    • End-to-End Pipeline Walkthrough
    • Open Issues & Regulatory Considerations
    • Physician Referral Activation
    • Consequence Quantification
    • EHR Screening & Site-Based Identification
    • Future State Definition
    • Sign-off Checklist & Next Milestones
  4. Solution Scope

    Define channels, site vs DTP responsibilities, IRB-approved creative delivery, tracking, and measurable KPIs by site and channel.

    Scope Configuration

    • Produce IRB‑Compliant Ad Copy and Creative
    • Launch Condition‑Specific Search Ad Campaigns
    • Deploy Targeted Social Media Recruitment Campaigns
    • Run Geo‑Targeted Digital Campaigns for Site Catchments
    • Operate Patient Call Center Pre‑Screening
    • Conduct Telephone Pre‑Screening and Eligibility Checks
    • Implement Site EHR Patient Identification
    • Operate Physician Referral Outreach Program
    • Mine Patient Databases and Deliver Qualified Leads
    • Build Trial Landing Page with Pre‑Screen Form
    • Operate Referral Tracking Portal and Log Referrals
    • Provide Referral-to-Randomization Conversion Reports by Channel and Site
    • Manage Paid Media Budgets and Bid Optimization
    • Deliver Site Handoff Packs with Qualified Patient Profiles

    Scope Questions

    Produce IRB‑Compliant Ad Copy and Creative

    • Who will own IRB submission and approvals for advertising materials? Options: Sponsor (we will provide materials only), Vendor (you handle IRB submission), Shared — vendor drafts, sponsor submits, Site(s) handle IRB
    • Are there existing IRB templates, mandatory disclaimers or legal copy that must appear in all creatives? Options: Yes — sponsor provides, Yes — site provides, No standard copy available
    • Which creative formats are required or preferred (select all that apply)? Options: Static banner (web), Animated display, Native ads, Search ad copy, Social image, Social video, Landing page assets, Print/physical materials
    • What languages and regional variations must ads support? Options: English only, English + Spanish, Multilingual (specify in free response)
    • Describe any therapeutic-area or protocol-specific claims or prohibitions that creatives must follow (e.g., no mention of placebo, no guaranteed benefit).
    • What is the expected IRB turnaround time and number of revision cycles we should budget for? Options: < 1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, More than 4 weeks

    Launch Condition‑Specific Search Ad Campaigns

    • Which conditions/indications should search campaigns target (list primary and secondary)?
    • Which search engines or platforms should we use? Options: Google, Microsoft/Bing, Other search networks, All of the above
    • Do you have preferred or prohibited keywords/phrases (provide lists if available)? Options: Sponsor provides keyword list, Vendor to propose keywords, No restrictions provided
    • What geographic scope should search campaigns cover (global, country, state, site catchments)? Options: Global, Country-level, State/Province, Zip/radius around sites, Custom regions — specify
    • What landing experience do you want for search traffic (central trial page, site-specific pages, direct contact)? Options: Central trial landing page, Site-specific landing pages, Direct phone/email CTA, EHR pre-screen flow
    • What is the target CPA (cost-per-acquisition) or target referral conversion metric for search traffic? Options: Provide target (free response)

    Deploy Targeted Social Media Recruitment Campaigns

    • Which social platforms should be included? Options: Facebook/Meta, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Reddit, Other
    • Which audience segments should we target (patients, caregivers, advocacy group members, HCPs)? Options: Patients with condition, Caregivers, Patient advocacy followers, Physicians/HCPs, General population awareness
    • Are there age, gender, or demographic restrictions for social targeting? Options: No restrictions, Age range (specify), Gender-targeted, Other demographic filters (specify)
    • What creative formats should be used for social campaigns? Options: Image ads, Short video (≤30s), Long video (>30s), Carousel, Stories/Reels, Text-only boost
    • Do social creatives require pre-approval by sponsor/site or IRB before launch? Options: Yes — IRB approval required, Yes — sponsor approval required, No pre-approval beyond standard review
    • Are there restrictions around patient testimonials or use of PHI in social content? Options: Yes — no testimonials allowed, Testimonials allowed with signed release, Sponsor will provide guidance

    Run Geo‑Targeted Digital Campaigns for Site Catchments

    • Please list participating sites and their catchment radii (miles or km) for geo-targeting.
    • Do you want geofencing (e.g., around clinics), zip/radius targeting, or broader DMA targeting? Options: Geofencing around specific locations, Zip/radius targeting, DMA/metro targeting, State/country level
    • Are there areas to explicitly exclude from targeting (e.g., competing trial sites, sensitive locations)? Options: Yes — sponsor will provide exclusion list, No exclusions required
    • Will site-level landing pages or site-specific CTAs be used for catchment traffic? Options: Site-specific landing pages, Central landing page with site selector, Direct call-to-site routing
    • Who is responsible for local site coordination when a geo-referred patient expresses interest? Options: Vendor handles initial contact + site handoff, Site responsible for direct outreach, Hybrid — vendor schedules site callbacks
    • What performance KPIs do you expect for geo campaigns (e.g., referrals per site/week)?

    Operate Patient Call Center Pre‑Screening

    • What hours and days should the call center operate (include timezones)? Options: Business hours only, Extended hours (evenings/weekends), 24/7 coverage, Custom hours — specify
    • Which languages must call center agents support? Options: English, Spanish, Other (specify)
    • Should agents follow IRB‑approved scripts or can they use flexible conversational screening? Options: Strict IRB‑approved scripts only, Scripted with permitted probes, Flexible interview protocols
    • What is the expected call disposition workflow (schedule site callback, send info pack, no follow-up)? Options: Schedule site callback, Send IRB-approved info pack, Enroll in follow-up nurture, Close with no follow-up
    • Do you require call recording, QA monitoring, and transcripts stored for audit? Options: Yes — record and store, Yes — QA but not stored long-term, No recordings required
    • What SLA do sites require for handoff after a qualified caller is identified? Options: Within 24 hours, Within 48 hours, Within 72 hours, Custom SLA (specify)

    Conduct Telephone Pre‑Screening and Eligibility Checks

    • Who will perform clinical eligibility checks by phone (trained nurse, CRC, vendor clinician)? Options: Vendor clinical staff, Site clinical staff, Sponsor-designated clinicians, Hybrid model
    • Which screening items are allowable by telephone before site visit (e.g., meds, diagnosis, basic labs)?
    • Is verbal pre-screen consent acceptable for calls, or is documented written consent required prior to screening? Options: Verbal consent acceptable (IRB-approved), Written consent required before screening, Sponsor to advise
    • What maximum call duration should we budget for an initial telephone pre-screen? Options: < 10 minutes, 10–20 minutes, 20–40 minutes, > 40 minutes
    • Should telephone pre-screen results be entered directly into the portal/EHR or provided as a handoff file to sites? Options: Direct portal entry, EHR integration, Handoff file (CSV), Email to site CRC
    • What minimum data elements must be captured during phone screening to qualify a referral?

    Implement Site EHR Patient Identification

    • Which EHR systems are used by participating sites (Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, other)? Options: Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, Other/Proprietary, Multiple — list
    • Will EHR queries be run by site staff, vendor with site access, or via a centralized EHR integration? Options: Site staff run queries, Vendor runs queries with site access, Centralized integration (FHIR/HL7)
    • Are there IRB or patient-consent constraints on contacting patients identified via EHR? Options: Yes — contact requires opt-in/consent, Yes — contact allowed under IRB waiver, No additional constraints
    • What frequency should EHR matching run (one-time, daily, weekly, on-demand)? Options: One-time, Daily, Weekly, On-demand
    • What data fields should be returned in matches (MRN, diagnosis code, recent labs, contact info, last visit date)?
    • Do sites permit automatic export into the referral portal or must results be reviewed before export? Options: Automatic export permitted, Manual review required before export, Hybrid — auto then site verifies

    Operate Physician Referral Outreach Program

    • Which physician groups or specialties should we prioritize for outreach?
    • What outreach channels are acceptable (email, phone, in-person visits, mail, HCP portals)? Options: Email, Phone, In-person visits, Direct mail, HCP portals, Professional social networks
    • Are there compensation or incentive programs for referring physicians that must be disclosed or managed? Options: Yes — incentive program exists, No incentives, Sponsor will advise
    • What materials should be provided to physicians (PDF intro pack, eligibility checklist, referral form, patient handouts)? Options: Intro pack (PDF), Eligibility checklist, Referral form, Patient-facing handout, EHR message templates
    • How should physician referrals be transferred to sites (secure portal, fax, EHR message)? Options: Secure referral portal, EHR inbox/message, Fax, Email (secure)
    • What KPIs should track physician program success (referrals/month, qualified referrals, conversions)?

    Mine Patient Databases and Deliver Qualified Leads

    • Which patient databases are available for mining (proprietary vendor lists, claims, registries, advocacy lists)?
    • Are records in the databases consented for outreach, or is re‑consent required prior to contact? Options: Consented for outreach, Re-consent required, Depends on database — specify
    • What match criteria should be used to surface qualified leads (ICD codes, medication history, procedure codes, lab values)?
    • In what format and cadence should leads be delivered to sites (real-time portal, daily batch CSV, weekly report)? Options: Real-time portal, Daily batch CSV, Weekly report, Ad-hoc deliverables
    • What minimum quality thresholds do you require for leads (e.g., phone verified, DOB match, recent encounter within X months)?
    • Are there PII/PHI transfer restrictions or specific encryption/transfer methods required? Options: Standard secure FTP/portal, Encrypted email, Direct EHR integration only, Sponsor will specify

    Build Trial Landing Page with Pre‑Screen Form

    • Will landing pages be central trial pages or site-specific pages per catchment? Options: Central trial page, Site-specific pages, Hybrid (central with site anchors)
    • What minimum form fields must be captured on the pre-screen form?
    • Do you require embedded tracking pixels (Google, Meta) and UTM parameter capture? Options: Yes — Google Analytics, Yes — Meta pixel, Yes — both, No tracking pixels
    • Who will host the landing page and manage SSL/compliance (vendor-hosted, sponsor-hosted, site-hosted)? Options: Vendor-hosted, Sponsor-hosted, Site-hosted
    • Is an IRB‑approved consent or privacy notice required on the form prior to submitting contact information? Options: Yes — show consent/notice, No — standard privacy notice, Sponsor to advise
    • Should the landing page be optimized for mobile-first traffic and ADA accessibility? Options: Yes — mobile and ADA required, Mobile required only, No special requirements
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, launch timeline, data-sharing, regulatory responsibilities, and acceptance criteria for go/no-go.

    Agreement Modules

    • Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Commercial Terms & Pricing Schedule
    • Payment Schedule & Invoicing
    • Data Processing & Data Sharing Agreement (DPA)
    • Regulatory & IRB Responsibility Agreement
    • Site Participation Addendum
    • EHR Access & Screening Permissions
    • Creative & IRB-Approved Materials Sign-off
    • Tracking, Reporting & Analytics Integration Agreement
    • Launch Timeline & Go/No-Go Acceptance Criteria
    • Change Control & Scope Adjustment Agreement
    • Termination, Data Return & Transition Plan
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Validate IRB approvals, site access, EHR screening permissions, creative sign-off, and call center resourcing for launch.

      Readiness Questions

      Start Here: A quick launch-readiness pulse

      • How confident are you that this study is ready for an aggressive recruitment launch? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Unsure, Not confident
      • What is the planned or target launch date we should build toward?
      • Who will be our primary operational contact on your side for day-to-day launch decisions (name, role, best contact)?
      • Which single 30-day outcome would make you call this launch an early success?
      • Are there immovable governance or executive review dates we must align with? Options: Yes, No, Unsure

      If we flipped the switch tomorrow, what would break?

      • If we launched tomorrow, what's the first thing you genuinely fear would derail progress?
      • Which of these areas do you consider most fragile for launch? Options: IRB approvals, Site access/permissions, EHR screening access, Creative/landing page sign-off, Call center staffing, Contracting/commercial terms, Tracking integration, Other
      • For each fragile area you selected, how long do you estimate remediation would take?
      • Who on your team can make emergency decisions to keep launch on schedule (name/role), and how quickly can they respond?
      • Have you experienced launch slips for similar reasons in the last 12 months? Tell us about one example and its root cause.

      Rules, Red Lines, and Regulatory Reality

      • What IRB or regulatory assumptions are you currently trusting that we should challenge before deployment?
      • Is this study on a central IRB, local site IRBs, or a mix? Options: Central IRB, Site/local IRBs, Both, Unsure
      • Which specific materials still require IRB sign-off (e.g., ads, landing pages, call scripts, emails)?
      • What is the typical IRB turnaround time at your sites (and please note any outliers)? Options: <1 week, 1-3 weeks, 3-6 weeks, >6 weeks, Varies widely
      • Do any sites or the IRB require vendor pre-approval, redaction of vendor names, or specific language we must embed? Options: Yes, No, Sometimes/Depends, Unsure
      • Who is our IRB/regulatory liaison (name, role, preferred format for materials and feedback)?

      Site Doors: Who Can Walk Through?

      • Which site access assumptions are optimistic and likely to be challenged during deployment?
      • What is the contracting status across participating sites? Options: Fully contracted, Contracting in progress, Contracting not started, Declined vendor participation, Unsure
      • Do sites provide EHR screening or patient-identification access to external vendors today? Options: Yes - direct access, Yes - via site staff only, No, Partial at some sites, Unsure
      • Are there site-specific referral routing or patient-contact workflows we must mirror? Please describe key differences.
      • List any site-level restrictions we must honor (contact hours, language, patient privacy rules, preferred communication channels).
      • Which sites have a history of dropping referrals or slow handoffs, and what were the usual causes?

      EHR Screening: Gates, Tokens, and Reality

      • What assumptions about EHR access or query capability might be incorrect and need re-checking now?
      • Which EHR systems are in use across your sites? Options: Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, Athenahealth, Other, Multiple/Varies
      • Do we have formal EHR Data Use Agreements / BAAs in place for the sites where we'll screen patients? Options: Yes for all sites, Yes for some sites, No, In process
      • Are vendors authorized to run queries directly, or must sites run queries and share results? Options: Vendor direct queries, Site-run queries only, Hybrid model, Unsure
      • What PHI fields are required for pre-screening and are any of these restricted at specific sites?
      • Once a request is submitted, how quickly can sites typically enable query access or share results? Options: <48 hours, 3-7 days, 1-2 weeks, >2 weeks, Varies by site

      Creative, Scripts, and What Patients Actually See

      • Which parts of the creative or scripts do you expect the IRB or sites to push back on, based on past reviews?
      • Which assets will require IRB approval? Options: Online ads, Landing pages, Call scripts, Email templates, Physician-facing materials, All of the above, Other
      • Do you have existing IRB-approved templates we must adapt, or do assets need to be created from scratch? Options: Existing templates available, Need to create new assets, Mix of both, Unsure
      • Who must sign off on final creative and scripts (names/roles) and what is their typical review cadence?
      • How many rounds of IRB/site revisions should we plan for on average? Options: 0-1, 2-3, 4+, Varies
      • Will translations or cultural localization be required for patient-facing materials at any site? Options: Yes - translations required, No, Some sites require, Unsure

      People Power: Call Center, Staff, and Shiftwork

      • What staffing gaps would leave our call center or referral routing overwhelmed in week one?
      • Will the call center be vendor-operated, site-operated, or a hybrid model? Options: Vendor-operated, Site-operated, Hybrid model, Not decided
      • What hours and timezones must the call center cover to meet patient and site expectations? Options: Business hours (site TZ), Extended evenings, 24/7, Weekends, Other
      • What SLAs do your sites expect for referral handoffs (time to contact, time to pre-screen)? Options: <4 hours, 4-24 hours, 24-72 hours, >72 hours, No SLA defined
      • Which languages and interpreter support will be required at launch? Options: English, Spanish, Other (specify), No additional languages
      • Who will own escalations if a patient risks being lost between referral and site contact (name/role)? Options: Site coordinator, Vendor call center manager, Sponsor clinical ops, Other

      Tech, Tracking, and the Conversion Signals That Matter

      • Which tracking blind spots do you tolerate today that could mask an early launch problem?
      • What systems must we integrate for tracking and reporting (select all that apply)? Options: CTMS, EHR, Site recruitment portal, Sponsor dashboard, Third-party analytics, Other
      • Do you have existing attribution/UTM rules or naming conventions we must follow? Options: Unsure, Yes, No
      • Which KPI thresholds should immediately trigger a go/no-go conversation or urgent remediation? Options: Referral volume below threshold, Pre-screen conversion below threshold, Consent rate drop, Randomization lag, Other
      • Do you require API feeds for live data or are scheduled CSV uploads acceptable? Options: API preferred, CSV uploads acceptable, Both, Unsure
      • Who should receive daily, weekly, and executive reports and in what formats?

      When Things Go Wrong: Escalation, Decisions, and Go/No-Go

      • What decision will you regret not having predefined if the launch shows early signs of failure?
      • Do we have an agreed go/no-go acceptance criteria document for launch and initial performance? Options: Yes, In draft, No, Unsure
      • What commercial flex (budget reallocation, timeline extension, additional site support) is available if we need rapid remediation? Options: Budget available, Timeline flexible, Both, None, Unsure
      • Who has unilateral authority to pause or continue the campaign if an issue arises? Options: Sponsor clinical ops director, Study manager, Joint vendor + sponsor decision, IRB/regulatory hold, Other
      • How would you like us to surface and document lessons and remediation steps if we need to course-correct? Options: Weekly runbooks, Post-mortem report, Shared live dashboard, Ad-hoc emails/meetings, Other
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule and execute campaign launches, activate referral routing, train site coordinators, and coordinate monitoring cadence.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify tracking, conversion funnels, reporting feeds, and that initial conversion targets are met post-launch.

      Validation Questions

      Quick Snapshot — Tell Us Which Study We're Joining

      • What is the study name / protocol number and a one-line summary of the indication?
      • What phase is the trial currently in? Options: Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV, Not sure / mixed
      • What is the current randomization count versus target (numbers)?
      • Which therapeutic area best describes this program? Options: Oncology, Neurology, Cardiology, Immunology, Rare disease, Endocrinology, Psychiatry, Other
      • Who is our primary point of contact on your team for recruitment decisions (name / role)?

      If the Trial Could Speak Honestly — Why Is It Behind?

      • If you had to name the one truth everyone avoids saying about why enrollment is off-target, what would it be?
      • Which sites are most behind and by roughly what percentage of their forecast?
      • How much of the shortfall comes from feasibility over-estimates versus real screening barriers? Options: Mostly feasibility over-estimates, Mostly screening/eligibility bottlenecks, Even split, Unsure
      • How do you currently track the referral → pre-screen → consent → randomization funnel (tools or metrics)? Options: Sponsor EDC, Site logs/spreadsheets, Recruitment portal, Call center dashboard, No standardized funnel tracking, Other
      • Can you share an example of a recent referral that failed to convert and why?

      Who’s Steering This Ship — Decision Roles & Pressures

      • Who in your organization must sign off on changing recruitment tactics (titles/roles)? Options: Clinical Operations Director, Head of Enrollment/Recruitment, Program Lead/PM, Chief Medical Officer, Regulatory/Legal, Finance, Site PIs, Other
      • Which stakeholder is most likely to say 'no' to an aggressive recruitment change and why?
      • What timeline do stakeholders expect for seeing early evidence that a new recruitment approach is working? Options: 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 30–60 days, 90+ days, Undefined
      • Who on your side will be our day-to-day collaborator for site coordination and data exchange?
      • How confident are you that internal decision roles and escalation paths are clear when a recruitment problem escalates? Options: Completely clear, Mostly clear, Somewhat unclear, Very unclear

      What’s Really Hurting — The Part That Keeps You Up

      • If enrollment doesn’t accelerate, what is the single worst program-level consequence you fear?
      • Which eligibility criteria do sites and patients cite most often as blockers? Options: Age limits, Lab thresholds, Concomitant meds, Prior therapy restrictions, Geographic/visit burden, Other
      • How high is the local competition for your patient population at key sites (number of competing trials)? Options: None, 1–2, 3–5, 6+, Unknown
      • How do enrollment misses translate into program costs or timeline risk (qualitative or $ estimates)?
      • How does this situation make you or your stakeholders feel — frustrated, powerless, pressured, or something else? Options: Frustrated, Pressured, Anxious, Motivated to change, Numb/resigned, Other

      Let’s Challenge Assumptions — What If the Playbook Is Wrong?

      • Which long-held assumption about your sites’ patient access might be false?
      • How often do site feasibility estimates come with supporting EHR query data or just verbal assurances? Options: Always with EHR data, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
      • What screening steps currently discard the most potentially eligible patients (and why)?
      • Have you assumed that investigator enthusiasm equals referral volume? If yes, how has that assumption held up? Options: Yes — accurate, Yes — somewhat inaccurate, No — we never assumed that, Unsure
      • What would have to be true about your patient population to consider shifting to more DTP or centralized recruitment?

      Picture Success — What Would Real Improvement Look Like?

      • If we achieved your ideal enrollment outcome in 90 days, what would we have changed (metrics and day-to-day)?
      • Please provide target funnel KPIs (referral → pre-screen → consent → randomization) as percentages or numbers.
      • What is an acceptable cost-per-randomized-patient for this program (or target range)? Options: <$5,000, $5k–$10k, $10k–$20k, >$20k, TBD / not decided
      • Which reporting cadence and formats would reassure leadership (dashboard, weekly digest, site-level scorecards)? Options: Real-time dashboard, Daily digest, Weekly report, Bi-weekly review, Monthly executive summary
      • What short-term wins would signal to you that a recruitment approach is worth scaling?

      Operational Reality — What Must Change to Make Success Real?

      • What single operational constraint would break any recruitment plan if we didn’t solve it first?
      • Are IRB or central ethics approvals in place for recruitment materials and digital outreach? Options: All approvals in place, IRB pending, Partial approvals (some sites), No approvals yet, Not applicable
      • Do participating sites allow EHR screening and automated referral routing (and which EHRs)? Options: Yes — most sites, Some sites, No, Unknown
      • What privacy or data transfer agreements (DTA / BAAs) will influence timelines? Options: Standard BAA required, Custom DTA needed, No additional agreements, Unsure / need to check
      • What call center / patient navigation resourcing is available at launch vs what you expect us to provide? Options: Sponsor provides full resourcing, Shared resourcing, We expect vendor to provide, Unsure

      Proof Point — What Would Convince You to Move Forward?

      • If you could ask us to deliver one measurable pilot in 30–60 days, what would that be?
      • Which sites or geographies should we prioritize for a pilot (names or descriptors)?
      • What acceptance criteria will you use to declare the pilot successful (example: X randomizations, Y% conversion, Z cost)?
      • How soon can procurement/commercial terms be signed to enable a rapid start? Options: Immediately, Within 2 weeks, Within 30–60 days, Longer than 60 days, Unsure
      • Who needs to be on a weekly operational check-in during the pilot (roles/emails)?
  7. Success

    Review enrollment outcomes, cost-per-randomized-patient versus targets, capture learnings, and maintain a shared channel for improvements.

    Success Reviews

    • Success Review — Enrollment Outcomes & CPA
    • Site Performance Deep Dive
    • Cost & ROI Review — Finance & Commercial
    • Retrospective — Learnings & Playbook Updates
    • Continuous Improvement Cadence & Handoff

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Publish a 'Lessons Learned' document with data attachments to the shared channel.
    • Schedule site-specific retraining or operational support sessions.
    • Adjust referral routing or caps for identified sites and notify stakeholders.
    • Financial Summary & Reconciliation
    • Validate financial accounting for the program and confirm CPA accuracy.
    • Agree on any billing adjustments or commercial reconciliations.
    • Identify cost optimization levers for future trials.
    • Deliver reconciled financial workbook and detailed CPA supporting files.
    • Implement any agreed billing credits or contract amendments.
    • Create a per-channel unit cost library for future budgeting.
    • Framing & Goals
    • Document a prioritized list of lessons with evidence and recommended playbook updates.
    • Assign owners and timelines to update SOPs, templates, and training materials.
    • Create a test backlog to validate high-impact improvements in subsequent trials.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • Update the recruitment playbook and site onboarding checklist based on decisions.
    • Create an experiment/test plan with owners and success metrics for follow-up trials.
    • Purpose of Ongoing Cadence
    • Provision and structure a shared channel for all stakeholders to access results and artifacts.
    • Agree dashboard KPI set and reporting cadence for ongoing monitoring.
    • Assign monitoring and escalation owners and document the governance model.
    • Confirm the onboarding checklist for transferring new studies into the cadence.
    • Provision the agreed shared channel, upload final artifacts, and set permissions.
    • Publish the agreed KPI dashboard and schedule automated reports.
    • Create a governance RACI and distribute to stakeholders.
    • Schedule the recurring performance review meetings and invite core participants.
    • Confirm whether enrollment targets and acceptance criteria were met.
    • Validate CPA calculation and explain variances to target.
    • Assign owners for any immediate remediation or closure activities.
    • Agree timeline for final sign-off and post-mortem deliverables.
    • Produce consolidated final results and CPA report for sponsor sign-off.
    • Assign owners and deadlines for all urgent remediation items identified.
    • Publish meeting minutes and supporting datasets to the shared channel.
    • Recap Site Targets & Commitments
    • Identify root causes of underperformance at each flagged site.
    • Agree site-level corrective actions with clear owners and timelines.
    • Decide site continuation or reallocation of referral capacity.
    • Ensure necessary site access or approvals are tracked and remediated.
    • Create a site action tracker listing owners, actions, and due dates.
    • Executive Summary of Outcomes
    • CPA Calculation Walkthrough
    • Top & Bottom Performers
    • Shared Channel & Knowledge Repository
    • Wins: Proven Tactics by Channel
    • Funnel & Time-to-Randomization by Site
    • Channel & Incrementality Analysis
    • KPI Drilldown (Funnel & Channels)
    • Failures & Root Cause Analysis
    • Dashboard & Reporting Cadence
    • Scenario Modeling & Optimization Opportunities
    • Operational Barriers & Site Feedback
    • Cost Review — CPA vs Target
    • Playbook & Template Changes
    • Roles, Responsibilities & Escalation Path
    • Recurring Meeting Schedule & Governance
    • Key Wins, Gaps & Risks
    • Commercial Decisions & Adjustments
    • Future Tests & Experiment Backlog
    • Site Remediation Plans
    • Decisions & Immediate Actions
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.