Health, Education & Government Life Sciences & Pharma Imaging Systems

Interventional Imaging

Regulated development and commercialization journeys where clinical, quality, and market access align.

Siemens Healthineers Philips GE HealthCare Canon Medical
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, timeline, budget constraints, and clinical and operational success criteria across cardiology, IR, and hospital leadership.

      Alignment Questions

      Getting Oriented: Who’s in the Room and What Brought You Here

      • Who from your team will be involved in this discovery and decision process? Options: Interventional cardiologist, Interventional radiologist, Cath lab director, Hybrid OR / OR director, Hospital administrator / CFO, Biomedical/clinical engineer, Procurement, Nurse manager / clinical educator, Facilities / project manager, Other
      • Which single statement best captures why you engaged in this conversation today? Options: Replace an aging system, Equip a new hybrid OR, Increase procedural capacity, Address dose concerns, Improve integration/workflow, Resolve service/reliability issues, Regulatory/compliance need, Other
      • What is your target decision/timing window for selecting a solution (rough range is fine)? Options: ASAP (<3 months), Near-term (3–6 months), Mid-term (6–12 months), Longer-term (12–24 months), Flexible / Undecided
      • What capital range is leadership currently prepared to consider for this project? Options: <$500k, $500k–1M, $1M–2.5M, $2.5M–5M, >$5M, Unsure / Needs approval
      • Who is the ultimate approver for capital, and who are the key clinical influencers? Please name roles (or names) and their top priority if known.

      Are You Comfortable Running With the Status Quo?

      • If nothing changes, where do you expect this lab to be in two years—more delays, more cancellations, or functioning similarly? Options: More cancellations, More delays and throughput loss, About the same, Worse patient/dose issues, Unsure
      • Which recurring problems have you tacitly accepted rather than addressed?
      • How often do procedures get delayed or cancelled specifically because of imaging equipment or integration issues? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely, Never
      • When those delays or cancellations occur, who in your organization absorbs the clinical or financial impact? Options: Cath lab director, Department chair, Hospital administration / finance, Scheduling team, Surgeons/interventionalists, Patients/families, Other
      • How long have these tolerances (delays/downtime/dose compromises) been part of your normal operations? Options: <6 months, 6–12 months, 1–3 years, 3–5 years, >5 years

      Where It Really Hurts — Moments That Break the Day

      • Think of the last case where imaging quality or room layout contributed to a complication, near-miss, or a cancelled case—what happened and how did it feel for the team?
      • How frequently does image quality limit your ability to choose devices or procedural approaches? Options: Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
      • Which procedure types feel most constrained by your current imaging (select all that apply)? Options: PCI / coronary interventions, CTO PCI, Structural (TAVR, MitraClip), Peripheral interventions, Interventional radiology embolizations, Neuro interventions, Electrophysiology / EP lab, Other
      • Have you had staff radiation exposure concerns or any recorded patient dose incidents in the past 12 months? Options: Yes — documented incident, Yes — informal/concerns raised, No documented incidents, Unsure
      • When imaging constrains throughput, which root causes are usually responsible? Options: Detector field-of-view/coverage, C-arm reach/positioning limits, Room footprint blocks equipment placement, Poor image quality at low dose, Slow integrations with monitors/EMR, Service downtime / repair lead time, Workflow / staffing bottlenecks, Other
      • Describe a recent case where dose management mattered — what did you wish your system could have done differently?

      Have We Been Selling the Problem Wrong?

      • What common vendor assumptions about upgrading imaging do you find misleading or irrelevant to your reality?
      • Which vendor claims do you most often find overstated or unhelpful when evaluating systems? Options: Low dose with equal image quality, Service SLAs always met, Plug-and-play integrations, Fits any room footprint, Training is straightforward, Installation is quick, Other
      • Which integrations cause your team the most headaches (pick all that apply)? Options: Hemodynamic monitoring, PACS/Imaging archive, EMR/procedure documentation, EP recording systems, Anesthesia monitoring, OR video/AV, IT/security/firewall, Other
      • How confident are you that a new imaging platform can be integrated without disrupting existing workflows? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Unsure, Not confident
      • If a vendor offered a turnkey room plan, what specific concerns would make you skeptical?

      If Money and Approvals Weren’t the Problem — What Would You Choose?

      • If capital and approvals were instantaneous, what three capabilities would you add to this lab right away?
      • Which of these outcomes are top priorities for this project? (select up to 5) Options: Image quality at low dose, Maximum detector coverage / FOV, Flexible C-arm / ceiling mount options, Seamless hemodynamic/EP integration, AI-assisted dose monitoring/alerts, Remote service/diagnostics, Guaranteed uptime SLA, Room footprint optimization, Comprehensive training & credentialing
      • Which single outcome would most convince leadership to invest? Options: Increase throughput / capacity, Reduce cancellations due to downtime, Lower patient and staff radiation dose, Enable new procedure types, Reduce lifetime service cost / faster repairs, Other
      • How would improved image quality at lower dose change the types of cases you accept or clinical decisions you make?
      • Can you estimate the annual revenue or capacity impact from reducing cancellations or increasing throughput by a modest percent (give number or best guess)?

      Walls, Wires, and Power — The Practical Barriers We Must Solve

      • What is the single physical or technical constraint at your site that vendors almost always underestimate?
      • Which site constraints apply to the room(s) under consideration? (select all that apply) Options: Insufficient power capacity, Limited ceiling height, Door width / corridor access, Control room space limits, Floor load restrictions, HVAC / cooling limits, IT/firewall policies, Permitting/backlog, None of the above
      • Do you have an in-house project manager and a facilities owner assigned to room builds/retrofits? Options: Yes — both assigned, Yes — either PM or facilities, No — not assigned yet, Unsure
      • What IT / security policies (firewall, HL7, DICOM, VPN) could realistically delay integration, and how long do those approvals usually take?
      • What is your facilities group's typical timeline estimate for a room build or retrofit from approval to turnover? Options: 3–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Depends — provide details
      • Who signs off on installation windows and permits, and what are the common reasons they stall?

      Who Will Fight for This Project? — Politics, Champions, and Risks

      • If this project needed an internal champion to push through capital approval, who would realistically step up and why?
      • How politically risky is this project inside your organization? Options: Very risky — likely to face pushback, Some risk — needs championing, Low risk — expected, No risk — broadly supported, Unsure
      • What objections do you expect from finance or procurement and what information would neutralize them?
      • Has a similar capital request been rejected in the past 2–3 years? If so, what was the reason? Options: Yes — cost/prioritization, Yes — unclear ROI, Yes — technical concerns, No — not rejected, Unsure
      • Which pieces of evidence would most sway a skeptical approver (pick up to 4)? Options: Detailed ROI model, Downtime cost analysis, Reference site visits, Clinical outcome case studies, Dose reduction data, Service uptime guarantees, Trial/pilot data
      • Who should be on the governance committee post-purchase (list roles or names if known)?

      Testing the Promise — How Will You Know It’s Working?

      • What concrete signals will let you declare the upgrade a success at 30, 90, and 365 days?
      • Which KPIs must be met for formal acceptance? Options: Image quality benchmarks (objective), Dose-per-procedure targets, Procedure volume / throughput, Average case time reduction, Equipment uptime percentage, Staff radiation exposure reduction, Integration / documentation reliability, Training completion and competency, Patient outcome metrics
      • Who will own post-install validation and sign formal acceptance/hand-over? Options: Cath lab director, Department chair, Biomedical engineering, Clinical educator/super-user, Hospital project manager, Other
      • Do you currently capture baseline image quality and dose metrics that we can use for comparison? Options: Yes — detailed logs available, Yes — rough estimates only, No baseline metrics, Unsure
      • If initial outcomes fall short of targets, what escalation or remediation path would you expect?
      • Would you be open to a pilot case series or staged acceptance to validate performance before full sign-off? Options: Yes, Maybe — depends on terms, No

      Learning & Change — Training, Adoption, and Handover

      • What typically kills clinical adoption after a promising installation — training gaps, workflow friction, or staff resistance? Options: Training gaps, Workflow friction, Staff resistance, Service/uptime issues, Other
      • How do your clinicians prefer to learn new imaging capabilities? Options: Hands-on proctoring in OR, Classroom + e-learning modules, Simulation lab sessions, Peer-to-peer mentoring / super-users, Vendor-led workshops, Other
      • Approximately how many clinicians/operators will require credentialing or competency sign-off on the new system? Options: 1–3, 4–6, 7–10, >10, Unsure
      • What training schedule minimizes disruption to caseload (evenings/weekends, block days, staggered sessions, etc.)? Options: Evenings / weekends, Block off consecutive days, Staggered short sessions, During historically low-volume weeks, Other
      • Who should own long-term user adoption — vendor clinical educators, local super-users, or a combined model? Options: Vendor-led ownership, Local super-user ownership, Joint vendor + local, Other
      • Describe a past training or implementation that worked well for you — what made it successful?

      Ready to Map the Next Steps?

      • If we leave this meeting having done one thing, what single next step would move this project forward most effectively?
      • Which immediate next steps do you want us to prioritize? Options: On-site technical survey, Proof-of-concept demo / image sessions, Tailored ROI & total cost model, Initial room design concept, Reference site visit, Pilot case series, Draft commercial terms for review
      • Who should we schedule the site survey or demo with, and what dates/times are realistic over the next 2–4 weeks?
      • What concerns must our proposal address to make it easy for your approvers to say yes?
      • Would you like a tailored ROI and high-level schedule estimate delivered within 7 business days? Options: Yes — please deliver, Maybe — discuss first, No — not necessary
      • Is there anything we haven’t asked that would change how we approach your situation?
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document existing systems, procedural volumes, dose issues, room footprint limits, service history, and procurement constraints.

      Current State

      A Quick Tour of Your Lab Right Now

      • Which procedure environments should we map during this discovery? Options: Cath lab(s), Interventional Radiology suite(s), Hybrid OR(s), Electrophysiology lab(s), Angio/fluoro room(s) elsewhere, Other (please specify)
      • Who are the core stakeholders we should include or speak with (clinical, technical, operational, finance)? Options: Interventional cardiologist(s), Interventional radiologist(s), Cath lab director/manager, OR/hybrid manager, Biomedical/clinical engineering, IT/cybersecurity, Facilities/plant ops, Finance/capital planning, Other (please name)
      • How many active procedure rooms that use fluoroscopic imaging do you run today, and how are they typically labeled or used?
      • Please estimate monthly procedural volume across those rooms (total combined): Options: < 50, 50–100, 101–200, 201–400, 401–800, > 800
      • Describe the typical case mix and complexity in a week (examples: CTO PCI, peripheral interventions, complex embolizations, TAVR support, EP cases).

      Are We Accepting Radiation as a Cost of Doing Business?

      • How much of the current patient and staff radiation exposure do you consider 'unavoidable' versus 'fixable'? Options: Mostly unavoidable, Some avoidable elements, Largely fixable with better tools/processes, Unsure
      • What dose metrics do you track regularly (select all that apply)? Options: Dose-Area Product (DAP/KAP), Air Kerma at patient entrance, Fluoroscopy time, Cumulative dose reports per case, Staff badge dosimetry, We do not track consistent metrics
      • Share a recent example where dose concerns changed clinical behavior or case strategy (what happened and how did staff react?).
      • How often do staff badge reports or dose reviews trigger formal follow-up (education, workflow change, equipment review)? Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely, Never, Only after an incident
      • Which dose-reduction technologies or practices have you tried, and what was the result? Options: Collimation/field-size discipline, Low-dose fluoroscopy presets, Roadmapping and last-image hold, Pulse-rate reduction, Shielding changes, Vendor dose-management tools, None of the above

      When Throughput Turns into a Bottleneck

      • Which procedures or times of day routinely create delays or cancellations because of imaging availability or performance? Options: Emergent cases displacing scheduled cases, Long complex cases blocking prime time, Equipment prep or warm-up delays, Imaging quality causing repeats, Other (please describe)
      • What is your current average room turnover time between cases (estimate)? Options: < 20 minutes, 20–35 minutes, 36–50 minutes, 51–75 minutes, > 75 minutes, Don't track
      • How often does imaging-related downtime directly cause a case cancellation or reschedule? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Rarely/Never
      • Estimate the backlog or lost-case volume in the last 6–12 months attributable to imaging limitations (narrative or number).
      • What throughput or capacity improvement would make a meaningful financial or clinical difference for you (e.g., +1 case/day, reduced OR overruns)? Options: Add 1–2 cases/day, Reduce overruns by 30%, Enable dedicated complex-case days, Other (describe)

      Is the Room Cramped — or Just Badly Designed?

      • What have you physically squeezed into the room to make procedures possible (mobile pumps, monitors, imaging add-ons)?
      • What are the fixed architectural constraints we must account for (room dimensions, ceiling height, door sizes, floor loading)? Options: Room footprint adequate, Low ceiling height, Narrow doorways, Limited floor loading, Unusual HVAC ducting, Other structural limits
      • How do current room constraints affect clinical choices—do you avoid certain devices or approaches because of space/equipment clashes? Options: Yes, often, Occasionally, Rarely, Never
      • Describe any near-term renovation plans or constraints that would impact system selection (budgeted remodel, no renovations allowed, temporary moves). Options: Major remodel planned, Minor upgrades planned, No renovations planned, Waiting on capital approval
      • If a new system required structural work (ceiling rigging, floor anchors), what approvals or lead times would that demand in your facility?

      When the System Stops, What Gets Canceled?

      • How costly is an unplanned imaging system outage to your service line (revenue, patient risk, staff overtime)? Options: Minimal, Noticeable but manageable, Significant financial and operational impact, Critical—major disruption
      • How many unplanned outages or major service incidents have you had in the last 12 months? Options: 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6+
      • What is your average time-to-repair for those incidents (hours/days), and who performs repairs? Options: Vendor field service—<24 hrs, Vendor—24–72 hrs, Third-party service—varied, Local biomedical handles first response, Other (explain)
      • Do you have a formal uptime or availability target tied to service agreements, and are you meeting it? Options: Yes — target met, Yes — target missed, No formal target, Unsure
      • Share a specific outage story that still influences trust in your imaging vendor today (what happened and what was the result?).

      Red Tape That Kills Momentum

      • What procurement rules or approval gates would surprise a vendor trying to win your business?
      • Which of the following best describes your capital approval timeline for imaging equipment? Options: Under 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, Dependent on fiscal year/capital cycle
      • Do you tend to purchase outright, lease/finance, or use a capital lease for imaging systems? Options: Capital purchase, Lease/finance, Operating lease, Mix depending on budget, Unsure
      • Are there contracting or compliance requirements that typically slow deals (e.g., approved vendor list, pre-qualifying trials, security questionnaires)? Options: Approved vendor list, Clinical evaluation/ trial, Extensive IT/security questionnaires, Local union rules, Other (specify)
      • Who must sign off on final vendor selection (roles or committee names) and who is the ultimate decision owner?

      How Connected Is Your Tech Ecosystem—Really?

      • Which integrations are non-negotiable for a new imaging system (mark all that must be present at go-live)? Options: PACS/DICOM, EMR/ADT/HIS, Hemodynamic monitoring/EP recorder, Anesthesia records, OR scheduling/ERP, Device/implant tracking, Other (specify)
      • Which interface standards do you require or prefer (HL7, DICOM, FHIR, vendor APIs)? Options: DICOM, HL7 v2/v3, FHIR, Proprietary APIs, No preference stated, Other (explain)
      • Has your IT/security team ever rejected a vendor integration request? If yes, what was the primary reason? Options: Security concerns, Network capacity, Interoperability issues, Licensing/costs, No rejections
      • Who owns the network and cybersecurity sign-off for medical devices in your organization (team/title)?
      • Tell us about any past integration failures or painful go-live moments that we should avoid—what went wrong and how did it feel for the team?

      What Small Win Would Change the Conversation?

      • If one measurable improvement could happen in the next 90 days, what would push you from exploring to actively committing? Options: Demonstrated dose reduction, Proof of uptime/responsiveness, Room-fit/installation plan, Preliminary business case with ROI, Clinical staff endorsement, Other (specify)
      • Which three metrics will the executive approvers insist on seeing in a proposal (e.g., cases/day, cost per case, uptime %)?
      • What are the top blockers we should clear to make a timely recommendation (select all that apply)? Options: Capital approval, Clinical preference variability, Room build/permits, IT/security sign-off, Service contract negotiations, Other (describe)
      • Who would you like to include in the next conversation or workshop to accelerate clarity (roles/names and availability)?
      • How soon would you like a tailored current-state summary and next-step recommendation from us? Options: Within 1 week, 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, Longer than 4 weeks, Unsure
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target clinical outcomes, throughput and capacity goals, dose-reduction targets, uptime requirements, and approval milestones.

    Discovery Questions

    Quick Check — How we landed here

    • Briefly describe the primary reason you’re exploring a new imaging or room solution today.
    • Who is leading this initiative from your side and who else will be actively involved? Options: Cath lab director, Interventional cardiologist, Interventional radiologist, Hospital CEO/COO, VP of Facilities, Procurement, Other
    • What single event or pressure made this a priority now (aging system failure, throughput constraint, safety concern, new service line, etc.)? Options: Aging equipment, Frequent downtime, Dose/safety incident, Capacity constraints, New service/hybrid OR build, Regulatory/accreditation need, Other
    • What is your target timeline for decision and installation? Options: Immediate (0–3 months), Short (3–6 months), Medium (6–12 months), Long (>12 months), TBD
    • If you’ve looked at vendors before, what specifically stopped you from moving forward last time?

    Why Isn’t Today Good Enough?

    • In what concrete ways is the current system preventing clinicians from achieving the outcomes they expect?
    • How often do these clinical limitations materially affect patient care or case flow? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Unknown
    • Which procedures or service lines see the biggest impact from current imaging limits? Options: PCI/Complex PCI, Structural heart, Peripheral interventions, Neuro/interventional radiology, Hybrid OR cases, EP
    • Give an example of a recent case where imaging or room constraints changed the clinical decision or outcome.
    • How long has your team been tolerating these limitations before deciding to act? Options: A few months, 1–2 years, 3–5 years, More than 5 years

    What’s Really Keeping Your Team Up at Night?

    • If you had to name the single operational risk tied to imaging performance that scares you most, what would it be?
    • How many unplanned downtime events did you experience in the past 12 months? Options: 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, More than 10, Don't track
    • On average, how many procedures are lost or rescheduled per downtime event? Options: None, 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, More than 10
    • Estimate the monthly financial impact (revenue / throughput) of imaging-related cancellations or slowdowns. Options: < $10k, $10k–$50k, $50k–$150k, $150k–$500k, > $500k, Unknown
    • Who currently owns uptime, maintenance decisions, and vendor escalation on your side? Options: Biomedical engineering, Cath lab manager, Vendor service contract, VP of Clinical Ops, Other

    If Outcomes Could Talk — What Would They Say?

    • Imagine your ideal clinical outcome for the highest-volume procedure — what must change for that outcome to be routine rather than lucky?
    • Which measurable clinical metrics would prove that outcome is achieved? Options: Contrast volume (mL), Fluoroscopy time, Air kerma / DAP, Procedure time, Complication rate, Length of stay, Device success rate, Other
    • Of the metrics you selected, which are currently tracked and how reliable are those measurements? Options: All tracked & reliable, Some tracked, gaps exist, Tracked but unreliable, Not tracked, Unsure
    • What are current baseline values for the top two metrics you care most about?
    • Who will be the clinical owners responsible for validating improved outcomes? Options: Department chair, Cath lab director, Quality committee, Clinical engineering, Other

    Numbers That Matter — Capacity, Flow, and Margin

    • If your lab had 20% more effective capacity next year, what three tangible benefits would you expect to see?
    • What is your current annual procedure volume (all relevant labs combined)? Options: < 500, 500–1,000, 1,000–2,500, 2,500–5,000, > 5,000, Unknown
    • What is your peak daily throughput target per room after an upgrade? Options: 1–3 cases, 3–5 cases, 5–8 cases, 8+ cases
    • What utilization rate would you consider a healthy long-term goal for the renovated rooms? Options: < 50%, 50–65%, 65–80%, 80–95%, 95%+
    • How important is short-term ROI versus long-term clinical value when evaluating alternatives? Options: Primary: ROI, Balanced: ROI + clinical, Primary: clinical value, Unsure

    Radiation and Safety — What Is Non‑Negotiable?

    • If your clinical team could set a hard limit on patient dose for routine procedures, what would that limit look like? Options: Reduce by 10%–20%, Reduce by 20%–40%, Reduce by 40%–60%, Minimize as much as possible (no % target), Unsure
    • What staff exposure targets or policies do you want the new system to enable? Options: ALARA with monitoring, Specific annual dose limit, Room-level shielding improvements, Real-time staff alerts, Other
    • How do you currently monitor and document dose for patients and staff? Options: System logs/DICOM dose, Badge monitoring only, Manual charting, Not consistently tracked, Other
    • Have any recent incidents or staff concerns driven urgency around dose or safety improvements? Please describe frequency and impact.
    • Are there regulatory, accreditation, or payer-driven dose thresholds or reporting requirements we must meet? Options: Yes — specify in comments, No, Unsure

    Approval, Timing, and the Little Things That Break Deals

    • What single non-clinical hurdle has derailed projects in the past — budget, facilities, vendor terms, or politics?
    • Who signs off on capital for this purchase and what information do they expect? Options: CFO, Capital committee, CEO/Board, VP Facilities, Department chair, Other
    • What is a realistic approval lead time for this capital cycle? Options: Weeks, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Longer / multi-cycle
    • Are there competing capital projects or budget constraints this year that could affect timing? If yes, list or describe.
    • What specific documentation, financial analysis, or clinical evidence will the approval group demand? Options: Clinical ROI / volume impact, Total cost of ownership, Service / uptime guarantees, Room build scope & costs, Peer-reviewed outcomes data, Other

    What Would Success Feel Like — Week One, Month Six, Year One

    • Looking back six months after go-live, describe the one change that would convince you this project succeeded clinically and operationally.
    • Which success signals are non-negotiable for you? (pick all that apply) Options: Image quality at target dose, Throughput improvement by X%, Uptime ≥ 99%, Reduction in patient dose by X%, Fewer cancellations due to equipment, Staff satisfaction improvement, Other
    • How will those signals be validated and who must sign them off?
    • What training, simulation, or onboarding support would make clinicians comfortable to adopt new workflows quickly? Options: Onsite hands-on training, Simulation lab sessions, Super-user program, Remote refresher modules, Proctoring during early cases, Other
    • What governance cadence and dashboards do you want in place after deployment to keep performance on track? Options: Weekly operations review, Monthly clinical KPI report, Quarterly executive review, Real-time performance dashboard, Ad-hoc as needed
  3. Solution Experience

    Run scenario-based sessions that show how upgraded imaging, dose management, and room design deliver the customer’s defined outcomes.

    Experience Meetings

    • Solution Experience Kickoff — Align Current State, Consequence, and Future State
    • Scenario Selection & Script Workshop
    • Clinical Scenario Simulation — Live Run & Validation
    • Image Quality & Dose Validation Lab — Technical Proof
    • Room Design & Workflow Rehearsal — Validate Footprint, Integration, and Staff Flow
    • Technical team to publish the full validation report (metrics, raw logs, image sets) within 48 hours.
    • Customer to confirm clinician participants and any patient-equivalent models or device kits required.
    • Technical team to prepare measurement equipment and sample data collection sheets.
    • Brief Recap: Current State & Success Criteria
    • Produce side-by-side proof (data + clinician confirmation) that the future state is achievable for the tested scenarios.
    • Force clinician validation of whether observed image quality at reduced dose is clinically acceptable.
    • Identify any remaining gaps that require configuration, training, or further proof.
    • Capture and circulate the scenario run data package (images, dose logs, timing) within 24 hours.
    • If gaps exist, owner to define tuning actions (settings changes, training topics) and schedule follow-up runs.
    • Customer clinical lead to sign a validation note indicating acceptance or conditional acceptance based on next steps.
    • Validation Protocol Review
    • Deliver reproducible technical evidence that images at the target dose meet the pre-agreed clinical acceptance criteria.
    • Provide a narrow set of tunings (if needed) with owners and timelines to close any remaining technical gaps.
    • Obtain technical stakeholder confirmation that the measured improvements meaningfully reduce the documented consequences.
    • Introductions & Objectives
    • Agree and schedule any tuning session required before commercial finalization.
    • Customer to confirm technical acceptance or list required adjustments in writing.
    • Recap Scenario Requirements for Room & Integration
    • Prove the room design supports the scripted workflows without introducing new bottlenecks.
    • Confirm system integrations function during procedural flows and do not impede clinical decisions.
    • Establish clear room acceptance criteria and remediation owners for any identified shortcomings.
    • Room planning team to issue an updated room layout with marked changes required from rehearsal.
    • Integration owners to list any API/cabling/service items needed and schedule installation windows.
    • Customer operations lead to sign off on throughput targets or document required process changes to achieve them.
    • Achieve a single, customer-signed current-state sentence to remove ambiguity.
    • Document explicit, quantified consequences that create urgency to act.
    • Agree a one-sentence future-state outcome that all scenarios must prove.
    • Lock 2–3 target scenarios and clear success metrics for the upcoming sessions.
    • Customer to submit the one-sentence current state, three quantified consequences, and one-sentence future state 48h before the next session.
    • Seller to prepare measurement templates (dose, time, image quality checklist) for each selected scenario.
    • Schedule simulation dates, reserve space and necessary staff, and confirm required phantom or patient-equivalent models.
    • Review Selected Procedures
    • Translate each chosen procedure into a time-stamped script with success checkpoints.
    • Agree measurement responsibilities and instruments so data is comparable to the current-state baseline.
    • Finalize the variation matrix ensuring scenarios cover common edge cases the customer cares about.
    • Seller to produce final scenario scripts and distribute to all participants 24h before simulation.
    • One-Sentence Current State
    • Scenario Run 1 — Baseline vs Proposed
    • Map Current Workflow Steps
    • 3D Walkthrough / Mock-up Rehearsal
    • Baseline Measurements
    • Proposed System Measurements at Target Settings
    • Immediate Data Review & Forced Validation
    • Integration Checks
    • Define Targeted Outcome Checkpoints
    • Quantify Consequences
    • Script Runs & Variation Matrix
    • Define Future State (One Sentence)
    • Side-by-Side Image & Metric Comparison
    • Scenario Run 2 — Variation (e.g., high BMI / complex anatomy)
    • Throughput & Turnover Simulation
    • Debrief: Tied Outcomes to Consequence
    • Actionable Tuning & Sign-Off Criteria
    • Select Initial Scenarios & Success Metrics
    • Measurement & Validation Plan
    • Risk & Contingency Review
    • Logistics & Roles for Experience Sessions
    • Finalize Room Acceptance Criteria
    • Decide Next Validation Steps
  4. Solution Scope

    Define system configuration, room planning, integrations, training, service SLAs, responsibilities, and measurable acceptance criteria.

    Scope Configuration

    • Install Ceiling-Mounted C-arm Angiography System
    • Install Floor-Mounted C-arm Angiography System
    • Install Flat-Panel Detector and Collimator Assembly
    • Integrate Hemodynamic Monitoring Interfaces (HL7/Analog)
    • Integrate Electrophysiology and Recording Systems
    • Deploy Roadmapping and Real-Time Image Fusion Software
    • Implement Low-Dose Fluoroscopy Protocols and Filters
    • Perform Image Quality Calibration and Optimization
    • Install Radiation Shielding and Lead Curtain Systems
    • Deliver Hands-On Clinical Applications Training
    • Provision Service Agreement with Defined Uptime SLA
    • Activate 24/7 Remote Monitoring and Diagnostics
    • Conduct Onsite Preventive Maintenance Visit
    • Perform Emergency Field Repair and Parts Replacement

    Scope Questions

    Install Ceiling-Mounted C-arm Angiography System

    • Do you intend to include a ceiling-mounted C-arm in the room build? Options: Yes, No, Undecided
    • What is the finished ceiling height in the target room (or planned height)? Options: ≤ 3.0 m (≤ 9.8 ft), 3.0–3.5 m (9.8–11.5 ft), > 3.5 m (>11.5 ft), Unknown / Need measurement
    • Is structural reinforcement or overhead support already present for a ceiling-mounted system? Options: Yes, engineered support present, No, reinforcement required, Unknown
    • Are there constraints for ceiling-mounted equipment travel (e.g., doors, booms, OR lights)? Options: Yes, multiple constraints, Minor constraints, No significant constraints, Unknown
    • Which detector sizes / coverage are required or preferred for the C-arm? Options: 20x20 cm, 30x30 cm, 40x40 cm, Other - specify in next field
    • Please specify any room access or infection-control requirements (e.g., Positive Pressure, Laminar Flow, OR sterile field) that affect ceiling-mounted installation.
    • Is the imaging table compatible with a ceiling-mounted C-arm or will a table change be required? Options: Compatible, Table replacement required, Unknown

    Install Floor-Mounted C-arm Angiography System

    • Do you intend to install a floor-mounted C-arm rather than ceiling-mounted for this project? Options: Yes, No, Undecided
    • What is the available floor footprint for the C-arm base and travel path (provide dimensions if known)?
    • Has a structural engineering assessment of floor loading capacity been completed? Options: Yes, capacity adequate, Yes, reinforcement required, Not yet assessed
    • Are there corridor or elevator constraints for delivering floor-mounted equipment to the room? Options: No constraints, Narrow corridors/elevators, Stairs-only access, Unknown
    • Do you require integrated motorized movement / robotic positioning for the floor C-arm? Options: Yes, No, Optional
    • Will the floor-mounted C-arm need to coexist with ceiling booms, lights, or other overhead equipment? Options: Yes, multiple coexisting systems, Some overhead equipment, No
    • Are there preferences for service access location or maintenance aisles for a floor-mounted system? Options: Back of room access, Side access, Front access, No preference

    Install Flat-Panel Detector and Collimator Assembly

    • Is this a new detector install or a replacement/upgrade of an existing detector? Options: New install, Replacement, Upgrade, Unknown
    • Which detector size/form factor do you require or prefer? Options: Small (≤20x20 cm), Medium (~30x30 cm), Large (≥40x40 cm), Other / custom
    • Are there specific collimation or FOV requirements for specialized procedures (e.g., neuro, peripheral, pediatric)? Options: Yes - describe below, No, Unsure
    • Will the detector need to interface with existing image storage, PACS, or gateway hardware? Options: Yes - PACS integration required, No, Unknown
    • Are there constraints that affect detector placement (e.g., sterile field, OR table position, angulation limits)? Options: Yes, No, Unknown
    • Do you require lead or scatter grid options and which patient groups (e.g., pediatric) need special consideration? Options: Standard grid, High-performance grid, Pediatric filter, Other / Unsure
    • Please list any vendor models or compatibility requirements for the flat-panel detector (brand/model or protocol)

    Integrate Hemodynamic Monitoring Interfaces (HL7/Analog)

    • Do you need integration with hemodynamic monitoring systems via HL7, analog, or both? Options: HL7, Analog, Both, Unsure
    • Which hemodynamic monitor vendors/models are in use (list all)?
    • How many simultaneous physiologic channels (pressure, ECG, waveform) must the interface support? Options: 16+, 1–4, 5–8, 9–16
    • Does the hospital EHR/EMR require HL7 integration for procedure documentation? Options: Yes, No, Planning to
    • Are there network/security policies (e.g., VLAN, firewall rules, VPN) that affect HL7 connectivity? Options: Yes - restrictions apply, No, Unknown
    • Is timestamp synchronization (NTP) required across imaging and hemodynamic systems? Options: Yes, No, Unsure
    • Are analog signal conversion or breakout boxes needed at bedside for legacy equipment? Options: Yes, No, Unknown

    Integrate Electrophysiology and Recording Systems

    • Do you require integration with EP recording systems for mapping and ECG synchronization? Options: Yes, No, Possibly
    • Which EP system vendors/models are present (list all)?
    • Is real-time signal sharing (ECG leads, intracardiac signals) required between imaging and EP systems? Options: Yes, No, Selective channels only
    • Are regulatory or institutional policies in place for telemetry/data archiving that affect integration? Options: Yes, No, Unknown
    • Do you require synchronized timestamps and cross-modality image/ECG fusion for post-procedure analysis? Options: Yes, No, Optional
    • Will the EP integration require dedicated cabling, fiber runs, or shields in the room? Options: Yes, No, Unknown
    • Are remote review or multi-site streaming features required for EP procedures? Options: Yes, No

    Deploy Roadmapping and Real-Time Image Fusion Software

    • Which imaging data sources need to be fused (select all that apply)? Options: Intra-procedural fluoroscopy, Pre-op CT, Pre-op MRI, Ultrasound, 3D rotational angiography, Other
    • Do you require automatic registration (image-to-image) or manual registration workflows? Options: Automatic registration, Manual registration, Both
    • Is GPU / compute hardware available on-site or will an appliance be required? Options: Available, Appliance required, Unknown
    • What latency / refresh rates are acceptable for real-time fusion during procedures? Options: <100 ms, 100–300 ms, >300 ms, Unsure
    • Do you need DICOM SR, SEG, or other structured output for fusion results saved to PACS? Options: Yes, No, Unknown
    • Which clinical specialties will use fusion (e.g., neurointerventional, peripheral, structural heart)?
    • Are there licensing or concurrent-user requirements for fusion software (number of seats)? Options: 1–2 seats, 3–5 seats, 6+ seats, Unknown
    • Please list any proprietary formats or third-party tools the fusion software must support.

    Implement Low-Dose Fluoroscopy Protocols and Filters

    • Is a formal low-dose program required for this site (e.g., ALARA policy, pediatric focus)? Options: Yes - adult focus, Yes - pediatric focus, No / standard dose only, Undecided
    • What dose-reduction targets or KPIs should be used (e.g., % reduction from baseline, absolute mGy targets)?
    • Do you need specific hardware filters (e.g., copper, spectral filters) or software dose shaping enabled? Options: Hardware filters, Software-only, Both, Unsure
    • Are there patient cohorts requiring special protocols (pediatrics, bariatric, neuro) that must be defined? Options: Yes - pediatrics, Yes - bariatric, Yes - neuro/interventional, No
    • Who will own dose governance (Radiation Safety Officer, Physicist, Dept Director)? Options: RSO, Medical Physicist, Dept Leadership, Other
    • Do you want automated dose tracking and reporting integrated into the workflow? Options: Yes, No, Optional
    • Are there regulatory dose limits or local reporting thresholds we should configure? Options: Yes - provide details, No, Unknown

    Perform Image Quality Calibration and Optimization

    • Is initial factory acceptance testing (FAT) and on-site calibration required? Options: Yes - both FAT and SAT, On-site only, Factory only, Unsure
    • Which image-quality metrics are required for acceptance (e.g., MTF, CNR, spatial resolution)?
    • Will you supply phantoms and reference materials, or should these be provided? Options: Customer supplies, Vendor provides, Both, Unknown
    • Do you require optimization at specific target dose levels (e.g., low-dose clinical protocols) during calibration? Options: Yes - low dose targets, Standard dose only, Both
    • Should periodic QA schedules and acceptance criteria be documented in the handover deliverable? Options: Yes, No, Optional
    • Are clinical stakeholders (physicians, techs) available to validate image quality during commissioning? Options: Yes - physicians and techs, Techs only, No, Unknown
    • Please list any legacy systems whose image characteristics must be matched for clinical continuity.

    Install Radiation Shielding and Lead Curtain Systems

    • Has a shielding assessment (radiation survey/lead calculations) already been completed? Options: Yes - completed, No - required, In progress
    • What lead equivalence is required for permanent walls and temporary barriers (e.g., 0.5 mm Pb, 1.0 mm Pb)? Options: 0.5 mm Pb, 1.0 mm Pb, Custom - specify below, Unknown
    • Do you need mobile lead curtains, ceiling-suspended shields, or fixed wall shielding? Options: Mobile curtains, Ceiling-suspended shields, Fixed wall shielding, Combination
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, warranties, service response commitments, installation windows, and governance for capital approval.

    Agreement Modules

    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Purchase Agreement / Purchase Order
    • Commercial Terms & Pricing Addendum
    • Warranty & Maintenance Agreement
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA)
    • Installation Schedule & Acceptance Criteria
    • Capital Approval & Governance Package
    • Training & Clinical Applications Agreement
    • Room Build & Site Readiness Addendum
    • Integration & IT Readiness Statement
    • Change Order / Scope Management Process
    • Spare Parts, Consumables & Upgrade Terms
    • Liability, Insurance & Indemnity Terms
    • Regulatory Compliance & Documentation
    • Final Acceptance & Sign-off
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm room build, power/IT/integration readiness, permits, owners, and risk controls before scheduling installation.

      Readiness Questions

      Quick Intro: Who's Our Main Contact?

      • Who will be the day-to-day site coordinator for pre-deployment and installation? Options: Cath Lab Director, Facilities Manager/Engineer, IT Director, Procurement Lead, Clinical Educator/Trainer, Other (please name)
      • What is the full site address and which room(s) are planned for this installation?
      • What target installation window are you currently planning for? Options: Next 30 days, 30–60 days, 2–4 months, 4–6 months, 6+ months, TBD
      • Are there hard blackout dates or high-volume periods we must avoid? Options: Yes — provide dates, No, Unsure
      • Have you run a major equipment installation like this before? Tell us one lesson you learned last time.

      What If The Room Isn't Ready When the Truck Arrives?

      • If the room build isn’t completed two days before installation, how would that impact scheduled cases and revenue? Options: Severe disruption — many cases canceled, Moderate disruption — some rescheduling, Minor impact, Unknown
      • What is the current stage of the room build (select the best fit)? Options: Complete and cleared, Construction in final finishes, Structural work ongoing, Demolition/rough-in not started, We haven't started planning
      • Which structural or architectural changes are still required (e.g., wall removal, ceiling reinforcement, lead shielding)?
      • Who is responsible for completing and certifying the room build (team or vendor)? Options: Hospital Facilities, Third-party contractor, Vendor-provided contractor, Shared responsibility, Other
      • How long do you estimate until the room will be physically ready for equipment delivery? Options: Under 2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, 2–3 months, Longer / unknown

      Power & Cooling: Are We Confident the MEP Will Keep Up?

      • If your electrical panel or backup generator can’t support the new system on day one, what contingency would you use? Options: Delay install, Temporary power upgrade, Reschedule high-load services, Other — explain
      • Does the room currently have a dedicated medical-grade electrical circuit sized for the proposed equipment? Options: Yes — meets spec, Yes — needs minor upgrade, No — new feed required, Unsure
      • What is the available panel capacity and breaker size serving the room? (If unknown, note 'Unknown')
      • Is there verified UPS and generator coverage for the imaging system and critical integrations? Options: Full coverage for all systems, UPS only for select systems, No UPS/generator coverage, Unsure
      • Are HVAC/cooling and room temperature controls confirmed to meet vendor requirements during peak procedure loads? Options: Yes — confirmed, Pending confirmation, No — remediation required, Unsure

      Network & Integrations: Will Systems Talk Seamlessly?

      • What would happen if EMR/HIS, hemodynamics, or PACS integrations were blocked by IT policy at go-live? Options: Critical delay to acceptance, We can operate with manual workarounds, We would limit procedures until fixed, Unsure
      • Which systems must integrate with the new imaging platform? Options: EP recording systems, Hemodynamic monitoring, EMR (Epic/Cerner), PACS/DICOM archive, Procedure documentation, Anesthesia systems, Other
      • Which integration standards and protocols are required (choose all that apply)? Options: DICOM, HL7v2, FHIR, Proprietary API, TCP/IP/socket, Other
      • Does your IT/security team require firewall changes, VLAN segmentation, or third-party vendor access? If so, what's the typical approval lead time? Options: No changes required, Yes — 1–2 weeks, Yes — 2–4 weeks, Yes — 4+ weeks, Unsure
      • Who is the IT owner we should coordinate with (name, role, best contact window)?

      Permits, Inspections, and Paperwork That Can Freeze a Schedule

      • If a local inspection fails the day before install, what internal process would get you back on schedule? Options: Expedite repair team, Reschedule install, Request emergency inspection, Other — describe
      • Which permits or approvals are required prior to equipment delivery and installation? Options: Building permit, Electrical permit, Radiation safety clearance, Fire marshal sign-off, Hospital capital approval, None/unsure
      • What are typical lead times for local permits and inspections in your facility or jurisdiction? Options: Less than 2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 1–2 months, 2+ months, Unknown
      • Who manages permit submission and tracking on your side? Options: Facilities, Project Management Office, Vendor/Contractor, Procurement, Other
      • Are there any special regulatory or union rules that could affect install hours or contractor access? Options: Yes — specify in next field, No, Unsure

      Who Decides When 'Ready' Is Actually Ready?

      • If the lead clinician signs off but facilities flag an unresolved issue, whose decision controls acceptance? Options: Clinical director, Facilities/engineering, Hospital administration, Joint governance panel, Other
      • Which roles must sign the pre-deployment readiness checklist before installation proceeds? Options: Cath Lab Director, Radiation Safety Officer, Facilities Manager, IT Lead, Procurement/Finance, Other
      • Who owns the final acceptance criteria and measurable success signals (image quality, uptime, dose targets)? Options: Clinical leadership, Vendor and clinical jointly, Hospital biomedical engineering, Service/operations leadership, Other
      • What escalation path do you want if the installation risks missing a key milestone? Options: Weekly steering committee, Daily stand-ups during install, Escalate to director level, Ad-hoc as needed, Other
      • Are there governance documents (SLA, MOU, capital approval memos) we should review before installation? Options: Yes — available, Yes — not yet compiled, No, Unsure

      Imaging Acceptance: How Do We Know It Works at Day One?

      • If the system meets vendor specs but clinicians find the images unacceptable at target dose, how will that be resolved? Options: Additional on-site tuning, Extend validation window, Escalate to vendor engineering, Defer acceptance, Other
      • What are your minimum image quality and dose targets for acceptance (be specific where possible)?
      • Will you require phantom and clinical-case validation at specified dose levels before final sign-off? Options: Yes — both phantom and clinical, Phantom only, Clinical cases only, No formal validation
      • How many representative clinical cases (and which case types) should be used for go/no-go validation?
      • What maximum downtime or service interruption is acceptable during validation and acceptance testing? Options: Under 4 hours, 4–8 hours, 8–24 hours, Longer — specify, Unsure

      Training & Super-User Readiness: Will Your Team Be Confident on Day One?

      • If the clinical team is only partially trained at handover, how would that affect patient scheduling and safety? Options: Significant case limitations, Limited procedures initially, Use vendor/credentialed staff support, No impact
      • Which user groups require training before clinical use? Options: Interventional cardiologists, Interventional radiologists, Cath lab nurses/techs, Anesthesia, Biomedical engineering, Radiation safety team, Other
      • How many super-users do you expect to certify per shift for independent first-line operation? Options: 1 per shift, 2 per shift, 3+ per shift, None designated yet, Unsure
      • Do you prefer on-site hands-on training, remote/virtual sessions, or a blended approach? Options: On-site only, Remote only, Blended (on-site + remote), Self-paced materials first
      • Are simulation runs or dry-runs with the full clinical team scheduled prior to live cases? Options: Yes — scheduled, Planned but not scheduled, No — not planned, Unsure

      Hidden Risks & Contingencies: What's Your Plan B?

      • What single unforeseen issue has derailed an install in your past projects and how was it resolved?
      • Which of these worst-case risks are you most concerned about for this deployment? Options: Failed inspection, Power/network shortfall, Delayed equipment delivery, Staffing shortages, Vendor resource constraints, Other
      • Do you have a contingency plan for urgent case coverage if installation overlaps scheduled procedures? Options: Alternate room available, Transfer to partner hospital, Use legacy equipment with limited capability, No contingency
      • Is a temporary service agreement or loaner equipment acceptable if final system delivery is delayed? Options: Yes — acceptable, Prefer not, but possible, No — not acceptable, Unsure
      • Do you have local service or third-party technicians available for after-hours support during the install window? Options: Yes — vendor-approved local partner, Yes — internal biomedical team, No, Unsure

      Final Checklist: Who Signs, When, and How?

      • If we commit to an install date today, what internal approvals must be in place before we schedule equipment delivery? Options: Capital approval, Facilities sign-off, IT security sign-off, Radiation safety approval, All of the above, Other
      • What is your preferred cadence and channel for pre-deployment check-ins (e.g., weekly call, dashboard updates)? Options: Weekly steering call, Bi-weekly, Daily briefings in final week, Asynchronous project portal updates, Combination
      • Who will be authorized to approve the final go/no-go for installation day? Options: Hospital administration, Clinical director, Facilities manager, Joint sign-off (clinical + facilities), Other
      • List the key deliverables we should collect before confirming the installation date (e.g., drawings, permits, network diagrams). Options: Signed room drawings, Electrical/as-built diagrams, Network/firewall diagram, Radiation safety sign-off, Delivery access plan, Other
      • What is the best date and time for a readiness walk with our delivery, facilities, IT, and clinical leads?
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule and coordinate equipment delivery, installation, clinical applications training, and service handover with clear owners.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify image quality at target dose levels, system integrations, workflow validation, and uptime commitments before acceptance.

      Validation Questions

      Start Here: What's Top of Mind?

      • What's the single biggest reason you're exploring a new interventional imaging system right now? Options: Replace aging system, Equip a new hybrid OR, Expand capacity to meet demand, Improve image quality at low dose, Reduce staff/patient radiation exposure, Improve uptime and service reliability, Regulatory or accreditation requirements, Other
      • Who is driving this project day-to-day and who will be your internal project champion? Options: Interventional cardiologist, Interventional radiologist, Cath lab director/manager, Department chair, Hospital/Health system admin, Biomedical/Facilities engineer, Other
      • How soon do you expect to make a final decision? Options: Immediate / within 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, Unsure
      • What is the rough capital range you have available for this project? Options: Under $500k, $500k–$1M, $1M–$2M, $2M–$5M, Over $5M, Undecided
      • In one sentence, what is the single outcome you want this new system to deliver?

      Where You Really Are Right Now

      • If nothing changes, how will your lab look a year from now—more crowded, slower, or constrained in ways that cost revenue? Options: More crowded and delayed, Throughput stagnates, Quality or dose issues worsen, Staffing burnout increases, Not sure
      • Which imaging systems are you currently using in your interventional suites (select all that apply)? Options: Siemens, Philips, GE HealthCare, Canon/Toshiba, Smaller vendor or legacy system, Mixed vendors, Unknown / not sure
      • Approximate annual case volumes for each service line (enter numbers for Cath/PCI, IR, Hybrid OR, EP):
      • What are the most pressing dose-related concerns today? Options: High patient dose peaks during complex cases, Staff occupational exposure, Lack of dose monitoring/analytics, Pediatric or vulnerable patient population, No notable dose concerns
      • Which systems do you currently integrate with the imaging platform (hemodynamics, EP recording, PACS, EMR, dose tracking)? Options: Hemodynamic/Philips/GE/etc., EP recording system, PACS, EMR/ADT/Order entry, Dose monitoring software, None of the above / uncertain
      • How often do system issues (quality, integration, service) delay or cancel scheduled procedures? Options: Never, Rarely (a few times/year), Occasionally (monthly), Often (weekly), Regularly (multiple times/week)

      What's Keeping Your Team Up at Night?

      • How many high-revenue cases have you had to reschedule or divert in the last 12 months because of imaging or service failures—and what was the impact?
      • Describe a recent case where imaging quality, dose limitations, or downtime affected clinical decisions or outcomes.
      • How does your clinical team feel about the current system when handling complex or edge-case procedures? Options: Confident, Frustrated, Worried about safety/dose, Reluctant to perform high-complexity cases, Mixed
      • Which three clinical or operational limitations of your current setup cost you most (choose up to three)? Options: Poor low-dose image quality, Small detector/field-of-view, Bulky equipment/room footprint, Slow workflows between imaging and hemodynamics, Lack of integration with devices/records, Poor service uptime, Insufficient staff training
      • How long have these pain points been tolerated before initiating this replacement project? Options: Under 6 months, 6–12 months, 1–2 years, Over 2 years

      Are We Settling For 'Good Enough'?

      • What assumptions about 'acceptable' image quality, room footprint, or dose are you ready to challenge if the evidence shows measurable benefits? Options: Prioritizing lowest up-front cost, Keeping familiar vendor to avoid retraining, Accepting current dose levels as standard, Keeping current room layout to avoid construction, None / unsure
      • Which internal rule or habit has historically constrained your procurement choices (e.g., existing vendor contracts, 'we always choose X', shortest procurement path)? Options: Existing service contract, Preferred-vendor list, Clinician preference for familiarity, Capital-cycle timing, Other
      • Who typically raises the toughest objections during capital approvals—clinical leaders, finance, facilities, or risk/compliance—and why? Options: Clinical leaders (safety/outcomes), Finance (cost/ROI), Facilities/engineering (build complexity), Risk/compliance (regulatory), Other
      • What evidence or proof would tip internal skeptics toward saying yes? Options: Peer-site visit/demo, Quantified ROI model, Clinical trial data, Service/uptime guarantees, Pilot/test period, Other
      • If improving low-dose imaging saved measurable time per case, how likely is leadership to prioritize that over initial capital cost? Options: Very likely, Somewhat likely, Unlikely, Need proof/data

      Paint the Win: What 'Better' Actually Looks Like

      • If your lab performed flawlessly for six months after upgrade, what three outcomes would you want to report to your board?
      • Which of these metrics matter most for proving success (select up to three)? Options: Case throughput / number of cases, Average procedure time, Radiation dose reduction (%), Downtime hours avoided, Procedure-related complication rates, Revenue retained/added, Staff exposure metrics
      • What target dose-reduction percentage would you consider a meaningful clinical win? Options: Less than 10%, 10–25%, 25–50%, Greater than 50%, Unsure
      • What throughput or capacity improvement (e.g., cases per day/week) would make this investment unquestionably worth it?
      • Who must sign off that the system met these success metrics after installation? Options: Department chair, Cath lab director, Hospital admin/CFO, Clinical engineering/biomed, Quality/safety officer, Other

      Try On the Solution: How Should It Feel in the Room?

      • Imagine the room after installation—what immediate difference during a complex procedure would make you certain the system was the right choice?
      • Which features are non-negotiable to include in a demonstration or clinical evaluation? Options: Low-dose live fluoroscopy modes, Large flat-panel detector / extended coverage, 3D rotational angiography / cone-beam CT, Image fusion / roadmapping, Seamless hemodynamics / EP integration, Remote service & diagnostics, Flexible ceiling/floor mounting for footprint constraints
      • How long of an on-site clinical evaluation (demo/trial) would you need to be confident in adoption? Options: Single-day demo, 3–5 day on-site demo, 1–4 week trial, 1–3 month site evaluation, Not sure
      • Who must be present for clinical evaluation sessions to validate performance (list roles)? Options: Interventional cardiologist, Interventional radiologist, Cath lab director/manager, Radiology technologist/RT, Biomedical engineer/biomed, IT/network admin, Hospital admin
      • How will you objectively assess image quality at target dose—phantom testing, blinded reader scoring, or real-case endpoints? Options: Phantom-based metrics, Blinded reader evaluation, Comparative cases at target dose, Clinical outcome proxies, Combination of above, Undecided

      Where Installation Often Breaks Down

      • What single overlooked room, power, or IT detail has derailed past installations—and how long did recovery take?
      • Do you have as-built room drawings, MEP (mechanical/electrical/plumbing) plans, and shielding specs available? Options: Complete and current, Partial / needs updating, In progress, Not available
      • Who owns room build permits, contractors, and sign-off at your facility? Options: Facilities/engineering, Project management office, External contractor, Clinical leadership, Shared responsibility
      • Are there constraints we should know about (ceiling height, HVAC, floor loading, lead shielding, seismic anchoring)? Options: Ceiling height, HVAC/clean air, Floor load limits, Lead shielding requirements, Seismic or structural issues, No constraints / unsure
      • What IT/integration policies will affect deployment (firewall, DICOM routing, HL7, VPN, on-prem vs cloud)?

      Who Holds the Keys to 'Yes'?

      • If this project stalls, whose ‘no’ is most likely to stop it—and what would persuade them otherwise?
      • Please list decision-makers, their role, and their primary concern (clinical, financial, operational, compliance):
      • Who has final budget authority for capital purchases like this? Options: CFO/Finance, Hospital CEO/Executive Team, Capital committee, Department chair, Other
      • Are there procurement constraints (preferred vendor lists, incumbent service contracts, buy-back programs) that could limit vendor selection? Options: Preferred vendor list, Existing long-term service contract, Buy-back/upgrade clause, No constraints identified, Unsure
      • What would be the most helpful next step to maintain momentum? Options: On-site demo, ROI and TCO model, Room survey/MEP review, Executive briefing, Peer site visit, Clinical trial proposal

      Risks, Red Flags, and How We'll Handle Them

      • If this procurement or deployment goes sideways, what is the worst realistic outcome for your service line, and who bears that impact?
      • What are the top three risks you foresee during procurement and deployment (technical, clinical, financial, scheduling)?
      • How sensitive is this project to schedule slippage—can you absorb delays without clinical or financial consequences? Options: Cannot miss scheduled dates (critical), Some flexibility but costly, Flexible timeline, Unsure
      • What minimum uptime or SLA would you require to accept the system? Options: 99.9% / 24x7, 99% / 24x7, 95% / business hours, Custom SLA tied to case volume, Unsure
      • What emergency service response times are essential for your lab (choose the fastest acceptable) Options: Under 4 hours, 4–8 hours, 8–24 hours, 24–72 hours, On-site within contract days

      Close the Loop: How Will We Keep This Partnership Honest?

      • If we set success metrics today and never revisit them, how quickly would this project fade into 'business as usual'? Options: Within 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, We would keep active governance
      • How often would you prefer formal success reviews after installation? Options: Weekly for first month, Monthly for first 3 months, Quarterly for first year, Biannually/Annually, Other
      • What format for issue reporting and enhancement requests works best for your team? Options: Shared online channel (Slack/Teams), Email with ticketing, Vendor portal, Regular governance meetings, Combination
      • Who should be part of the post-installation governance or success team? Options: Clinical champion (physician), Cath lab manager, Biomedical engineer, IT/network lead, Hospital admin/finance, Vendor account manager
      • Would you require documented remediation steps or financial remedies if acceptance criteria are not met? Options: Yes, documented remediation & penalties, Yes, remediation plan only, Maybe / depends on case, No
      • What would make you comfortable recommending this vendor to peers after a successful deployment?
  7. Success

    Review outcomes against success signals, capture lessons learned, and maintain a shared channel for issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Success Signals Review
    • Lessons Learned Workshop
    • Open Issues & Enhancement Backlog Review
    • Executive Value & ROI Review
    • Operational Handover & Ongoing Support Plan

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Request formal approvals for proposed investments or renewals with a timeline.
    • Welcome & Objectives
    • Ensure all critical issues have owners and committed resolution timelines.
    • Create a prioritized enhancement roadmap tied to measurable benefits.
    • Establish a clear, shared channel and reporting cadence for ongoing tracking.
    • Publish a prioritized backlog with owner and target delivery dates.
    • Configure and grant access to the shared issue/ enhancement channel for agreed stakeholders.
    • Escalate any unresolved high-severity issues to the agreed executive contact.
    • Executive Summary of Outcomes
    • Obtain executive alignment on measured value and recommended next steps.
    • Secure approval (or conditional approval) for any proposed reinvestments or contract changes.
    • Establish executive-level cadence for ongoing KPI reviews.
    • Deliver a concise ROI and impact brief for executive records.
    • Secure stakeholder agreement on acceptance or conditional acceptance criteria.
    • Schedule quarterly executive KPI reviews for the coming year.
    • Handover of Documentation & Contacts
    • Confirm operational readiness to run the system in steady state with clear owners.
    • Ensure monitoring and alerting are configured and owners know response procedures.
    • Establish a recurring review and training cadence to sustain outcomes.
    • Share final operations binder (digital) containing SOPs, manuals, contact lists, and warranty info.
    • Provision dashboard access to operational leads and set alert routing.
    • Schedule the first three recurring operational review meetings and training refresh sessions.
    • Confirm which success signals are met with supporting evidence.
    • Document and prioritize gaps with agreed owners and deadlines.
    • Deliver a one-page metric dashboard comparing baseline and current performance with data sources.
    • Assign owners and due dates for each remediation action identified.
    • Schedule follow-up success verification meeting after remediation completion.
    • Recap Project Timeline & Key Decisions
    • Produce a documented lessons-learned register capturing strengths and failures.
    • Create a prioritized improvement backlog with owners and timelines.
    • Agree on which practices will be standardized across future deployments.
    • Compile and distribute a formal lessons-learned document within 5 business days.
    • Implement top 3 process changes and report status at the next operational review.
    • Update deployment playbooks and training materials to reflect agreed changes.
    • Status of Open Issues
    • Monitoring, Dashboards & Alerting
    • Financial Impact & ROI
    • Enhancement Requests & Business Value
    • What Went Well (Strengths)
    • Baseline vs Delivered Metrics
    • Gap Analysis & Root Causes
    • What Went Poorly (Pain Points)
    • Prioritization & Roadmap
    • Training & Knowledge Transfer Plan
    • Clinical & Safety Outcomes
    • Root Causes & Preventive Actions
    • Assign Owners, SLAs & Timelines
    • Spare Parts, Service SLA & Escalation
    • Strategic Recommendations
    • Acceptance & Sign-off Items
    • Executive Decisions & Next Steps
    • Recurring Review Cadence & Owners
    • Shared Channel & Reporting Cadence
    • Prioritize Improvements & Owners
    • Remediation Actions & Owners
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.