Industrial & Manufacturing Energy, Utilities & Sustainability EV Charging Infrastructure

Workplace Charging

Long-cycle programs where regulation, capital, and grid reliability define the pace.

Example organizations in this space: ChargePoint Blink Eaton SemaConnect

This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.

Inside this journey
  1. Site & Stakeholder Discovery

    Align on desired outcomes, constraints, stakeholders, and success signals; capture tenant mix, EV adoption estimates, parking layout, and electrical capacity constraints.

    Discovery Questions

    Starting the conversation: why this matters now

    • Tell me briefly why workplace charging is on your agenda today and who raised it first in your organization.
    • How many employees at this location do you estimate already commute in an EV? Options: 0–5, 6–20, 21–50, 51–100, 100+
    • When was the last time you ran a tenant benefits or commute survey that included charging questions? Options: In the last 3 months, 3–12 months ago, Over a year ago, Never
    • Walk me through a typical weekday morning in the garage from arrival to peak occupancy, including any tenant or visitor patterns you notice.
    • Which of these stakeholders will need to sign off for a new charging program? Options: Facilities director, VP of HR, Property owner or asset manager, Tenant representative, Legal, CFO, Parking operator, Other
    • Who will be the day-to-day contact for tenant communications and approvals? Options: Facilities manager, Property manager, HR lead, Third-party parking operator, Other
    • Why would you decide not to move forward after a site assessment, for example a utility upgrade cost, tenant objections, or timeline conflicts?

    Where keeping things the same actually costs you

    • If you left the garage without charging for the next 12 months, what specific leasing or retention outcome would most likely happen?
    • Describe any recent incidents where lack of charging affected a recruiting conversation or a tenant negotiation.
    • How many tenants have already asked for reserved or dedicated EV stalls? Options: None, 1–2 tenants, 3–5 tenants, More than 5 tenants, Not sure
    • When you think about a new program, what budget horizon do you have in mind for capital and annual operating costs? Options: Capital only this year, Capital next budget year, Capital + operating budget available, No budget yet
    • Which of the following consequences would make this project a top priority for leadership? Options: Losing tenants, Losing recruits, Meeting sustainability targets, Competitive disadvantage, Tenant complaints rise, Other
    • What single acceptance criterion, if met by a pilot, would get you to move forward immediately?

    Where the technical limits live and what breaks first

    • Where do you expect the biggest technical risk to be, electrical capacity, metering, or garage access control? Options: Electrical capacity / switchgear, Metering and billing, Garage access and gate control, Physical layout and conduit space, Unsure
    • Estimate the available spare electrical capacity in the building main or garage switchgear in kilowatts or amps. Options: Under 50 kW, 50–150 kW, 150–300 kW, Over 300 kW, I do not know
    • Who owns the electrical drawings and single line diagrams needed for scope and permitting? Options: Building engineer, Third-party electrical consultant, In-house engineering team, Utility, Unknown
    • Is there an existing submetering or tenant billing meter that could be used, or would new metering be required? Options: Existing submeters available, Shared building meter only, New submetering required, Unsure
    • If a utility upgrade were required, are you prepared to lead the application and cover any interconnection deposits? Options: Yes, we will lead and pay, No, we need vendor support, We need to discuss with ownership, Unsure
    • Name the utility account manager or contact who handles large electrical service requests for the site, if known.

    Who's on the chargers and how you'll measure success

    • Imagine the program runs for six months, what utilization rate per charger would convince you this met the employee benefit goal? Options: Under 10%, 10–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, Over 75%
    • Tell me which user groups matter most for you, employees, visitors, fleet, or tenants with dedicated stalls. Options: Employees, Visitors, Onsite fleet, Tenants with dedicated stalls, All of the above
    • In months, how quickly do you expect employees to adopt charging after launch? Options: 1–2 months, 3–4 months, 5–6 months, 6+ months, Unsure
    • Have you measured daily parking occupancy and turnover in the garage recently? Options: Yes, within last month, Yes, within last 6 months, Data older than 6 months, No
    • Rate how important per-tenant billing accuracy is on a scale from 1 to 5. Options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • What would cause you to pause the program after a pilot, for example metering issues, unexpected upgrade costs, or low adoption?

    Who else is on the table: incumbents and DIY options

    • Name the alternatives you are actively considering right now, including internal options and any incumbent providers.
    • List any internal project or facilities teams that have proposed solving charging without an outside vendor.
    • Are you currently under contract with an incumbent charging provider or hardware vendor for this site? Options: Active contract on site, Contract expiring soon, No contract, Unsure
    • Could your current approach be made to work by investing only in software or operational changes instead of new hardware? Options: Yes, likely, Maybe with modest changes, No, hardware changes needed, Unsure
    • Explain what success would look like if you stayed with the current provider for another year.
    • Identify the single detail about an incumbent or an internal plan that would cause you to reject it outright.

    Operational readiness: who, what, and the gating constraints

    • Given your current headcount and parking policy, do you have a staff member who can manage daily reporting and tenant billing exceptions? Options: Yes, dedicated staff, Part-time staff, No, will need vendor support, Unsure
    • Confirm whether you control access to the garage gate systems and whether API integration is permitted. Options: Full control with API allowed, Control without API access, Managed by tenant or third party, Unknown
    • Estimate how many hours per month your facilities team could dedicate to a charging pilot. Options: Under 5 hours, 5–15 hours, 15–40 hours, Over 40 hours, None available
    • Is there a facilities budget line for tenant electricity or amenity utilities that could cover operating costs? Options: Yes, available, Yes, but limited, No dedicated budget, Unsure
    • List any required internal approvals or committees that must sign off before construction work begins.
    • Could regulatory or building code issues, such as AHJ restrictions on the garage, stop the project before permits are approved? Options: Yes, No, Probably not, Unsure

    How you will measure success and who decides

    • Imagine the pilot proves adoption matches your forecast, would you be prepared to commit to rollout funding within 30 days? Options: Yes, Need CFO approval, Need board or owner approval, Not ready
    • Explain which KPIs you will use to decide pilot success, utilization, per-stall revenue, tenant satisfaction, or other metrics. Options: Utilization, Per-stall revenue, Tenant satisfaction, Reduction in complaints, Other
    • Rate the importance of automated tenant billing accuracy relative to a simple flat-fee model, 5 is critical. Options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • Share any target timelines your procurement or capital planning team has for decisions this quarter. Options: Decision within 2 weeks, Decision in 1 month, Decision in 2–3 months, No target timeline
    • Are there lease clauses or tenant agreements that limit where or how you can charge visitors? Options: Yes, material restrictions, Some restrictions to consider, No known restrictions, Unsure
    • Identify the single operational failure mode, such as billing disputes or charger downtime, that would make you pause the program.

    Next steps, pilot design, and commitment

    • Would a short pilot focused on one floor or tenant group reduce your risk enough to proceed? Options: Yes, Maybe, No
    • Select the earliest realistic launch window you can support for site assessment, permitting, and installation. Options: 0–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–9 months, 9+ months
    • Confirm whether your team can provide drawings and parking counts within 10 business days of engagement. Options: Yes, No, Need more time
    • Provide the name and email of the person who will approve contracts if the commercial terms meet your acceptance criteria.
    • Do you have a preferred procurement or P-Card process we need to follow for small capital projects? Options: Yes, we will share process, No formal process, Use owner procurement, Unsure
    • Can your team commit to a decision timeline after a pilot, for example signing within two weeks if acceptance criteria are met? Options: Yes, No, Need to negotiate
  2. Program Experience

    Walk through how a workplace charging program delivers retention, tenant-billing, access control, and load-management outcomes using the buyer's real site scenarios.

    Solution Experience

    • Program Experience Session
    • Orientation: end-to-end program and timeline
    • You confirm the restated current state and the financial and retention consequences as accurate.
    • Provide tenant mix, parking layout, electrical capacity figures, and the latest tenant survey responses before the forecast run.
    • You confirm the tenant billing and access-control workflow shown would eliminate the specific operational gaps you described in Discovery.
    • Confirm the current state and its cost
    • Deliver a site-specific utilization and electrical capacity forecast using the provided tenant mix and survey results within three business days after receiving inputs.
    • Proof: tenant billing and access-control workflows using your tenant mix
    • Provide 1-2 sample tenant billing rules or preferred fee structures for validation in the next session.
    • You accept the load-management outcome as feasible for your electrical capacity or identify the point at which a utility upgrade is required.
    • Proof: load-management on your electrical capacity
    • You agree the remaining evidence needed to finalize commercial terms and set a target decision date.
    • Confirm the internal decision timeline and the acceptance criteria that will trigger go/no-go approval.
    • Service, incentives, and acceptance criteria
    • Validate the demonstrated outcomes
    • Agree next evidence and decision steps
    • Program Experience Session
    • Solution Experience Deck
    • Program Solution Brief
    • meeting
    • slides
    • document
  3. Solution Scope

    Define equipment counts, electrical upgrade responsibilities, per-tenant access and billing rules, service SLAs, incentive support, and measurable acceptance criteria.

    Scope Configuration

    • Install Level 2 Charging Stations
    • Install DC Fast Chargers
    • Install Electrical Distribution, Metering, and Panels
    • Coordinate Utility Interconnection and Capacity Upgrades
    • Deploy Network Management Software and Monitoring
    • Configure Dynamic Load Management
    • Configure Access Control and User Provisioning
    • Configure Per-Tenant Billing and Payment Processing
    • Commission and Test Charging System
    • Submit Tax Credit and Incentive Applications
    • Provide Ongoing Maintenance and SLA Support
    • Install Signage, Stall Markings, and Wayfinding
    • Deliver Employee and Tenant Enrollment Communications
    • Manage Warranty Claims and Spare Parts Provisioning

    Scope Questions

    Install Level 2 Charging Stations

    • How many Level 2 charging ports do you want installed initially (count by parking stall)? Options: 1-4, 5-10, 11-20, 21+
    • Which parking areas are candidates for Level 2 stations (select by type and level)? Options: Surface lot, Garage level(s), Reserved tenant stalls, Visitor/short-term stalls
    • Require weather-rated enclosures or canopy-mounted pedestals for any Level 2 locations? Options: Yes, No, Depends on location
    • Provide the stall identification format we should use for installer placement and signage (for example: G1-G10, R1-R5).
    • List any tenant allocation priorities or lease clauses that affect which stalls are used for charging (for example reserved stalls for Tenant A).
    • Are there existing parking permits, concierge programs, or tenant parking zones that will constrain Level 2 placement? Options: Yes, No

    Install DC Fast Chargers

    • How many DC fast charging (DCFC) dispensers do you expect to install at initial deployment (count of dispensers)? Options: 0, 1-2, 3-4, 5+
    • Which specific curbside or forecourt areas are being considered for DCFC (describe location and level)?
    • Would you prefer integrated payment kiosks at DCFC bays or app-only payment via the networked platform? Options: Integrated kiosk, App-only payments, Both
    • Name the person on your facilities team who will approve concrete pad cutting, trenching, and bollard placement for DCFC.
    • State the maximum available delivered power at the proposed DCFC location in kW or continuous amps per the site assessment.
    • Any vehicle clearance, turning-radius, or ADA constraints at the proposed forecourt that affect dispenser placement? Options: Yes, No

    Install Electrical Distribution, Metering, and Panels

    • Which electrical documents can you provide from the building: single-line diagram (SLD), panel schedule, and as-built service drawing? Options: Single-line diagram (SLD), Panel schedule, As-built service drawing, None available
    • Upload or summarize the main service amperage and meter point designation shown on the latest utility bill (for example: 1200 A at meter M-1).
    • Which metering approach will you accept for tenant billing: separate revenue-grade kWh meter, shared building meter, or submetering per stall? Options: Separate tenant meters, Shared building meter, Submetering
    • Identify who will own and operate new distribution equipment after installation (building owner, property manager, or a third-party maintainer). Options: Building owner, Property manager, Third-party maintenance provider, Undecided
    • Specify any physical constraints in the electrical room (limited breaker spaces, conduit chase fill limits, transformer clearance) that could limit new panels.
    • What measurable acceptance criteria will confirm electrical upgrades are complete (for example: signed final SLD uploaded, installed breakers tested to the panel schedule, revenue-grade meter installed and labeled)?

    Coordinate Utility Interconnection and Capacity Upgrades

    • Have you filed a utility interconnection application or received a make-ready estimate from the local utility? Options: Yes - application filed, Estimate only, No
    • Provide the current service entrance capacity and available spare amps per the utility or recent load letter.
    • Name your primary utility contact for interconnection coordination (include role and preferred contact info).
    • List any utility-requested studies, equipment upgrades, or fees disclosed during site assessment (for example: transformer replacement, SCADA tie-in, easement work).
    • What evidence will validate utility interconnection and capacity upgrade completion (for example: signed interconnection agreement, utility-issued meter set approval, and final utility invoice)?
    • Confirm whether you expect the project to fund utility upgrades upfront or require landlord/owner reimbursement or financing options. Options: Buyer funds upfront, Owner/landlord funds, Need financing discussion, Shared cost split

    Deploy Network Management Software and Monitoring

    • Which building systems must the charging network integrate with (for example garage gate controller, access control system, or building management system)? Options: Garage gate control, Access control, Building management system (BMS), None
    • Require OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) or another open protocol for charger communication to your platform? Options: OCPP required, Proprietary allowed, Undecided
    • Indicate preferred network provisioning for chargers: Ethernet to switch, dedicated Wi-Fi SSID, cellular modem, or captive-portal Wi-Fi. Options: Ethernet backhaul, Dedicated Wi‑Fi SSID, Cellular modem, Captive portal
    • Who on your IT team will coordinate firewall rules and port openings to allow charger telemetry and API access?
    • Which monitoring KPIs must be available at go-live (for example real-time occupancy, per-stall kWh, fault alerts, utilization trends)? Options: Real-time occupancy, Per-stall kWh, Fault alerts, Utilization trends, Custom
    • Are there cybersecurity or TLS certificate requirements for remote device management we should plan for? Options: Yes, No, Need to confirm

    Configure Dynamic Load Management

    • Estimate the percentage of installed stations you expect to be charging concurrently during the site's peak hour (for load-management planning). Options: 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%
    • Which distribution panels or subpanels (identify by panel ID from the panel schedule) should be included in the dynamic load-management domain?
    • Select the primary load-management objective you prioritize: maximize simultaneity, minimize demand charges, or guarantee reserved amps per tenant. Options: Maximize simultaneity, Minimize demand charges, Guarantee reserved amps per tenant, Balance objectives
    • What maximum continuous per-station current (amps) should be enforced by default during peak periods? Options: 8 A, 12 A, 16 A, 20 A, Custom
    • Who will approve automated load-shedding events and escalation rules during utility curtailment or emergency events?
    • Confirm whether overrides are allowed for emergency vehicles or fleet charging that bypass normal load-management limits. Options: Allow overrides for emergency/fleet, No overrides allowed, Allow with manual approval

    Configure Access Control and User Provisioning

    • How will employees and tenants be identified for charger access: badge reader (employee ID), corporate single sign-on (SSO), phone app account, or email invite? Options: Badge reader (ID), Corporate SSO, Phone app account, Email invite
    • Do you require per-tenant access windows (for example Tenant A: 7am–7pm, Tenant B: 24/7) enforced at the charger level? Options: Yes, No, Some tenants only
    • Upload the list of tenant admin contacts and indicate your preferred user import method (CSV upload or API provisioning). Options: CSV upload, API provisioning, Manual entry
    • Are there HR, union, or privacy policies that restrict sharing employee identifiers (for example license plate, employee ID) with third-party systems? Options: Yes, No, Need to confirm
    • Which user attributes must be captured for billing and compliance (choose all that apply)? Options: Employee ID, License plate, Company cost center, Email address, Other
    • Who will handle ongoing user provisioning (onboarding and offboarding) and at what cadence (daily, weekly, ad hoc)? Options: Daily, Weekly, Ad hoc, Other

    Configure Per-Tenant Billing and Payment Processing

    • Which billing model do you prefer per tenant: tenant account billing, employee-billed per charge, or included as a tenant amenity? Options: Tenant account billing, Employee-billed, Included as amenity, Hybrid
    • Do you require cost-center or general ledger (GL) mapping for each tenant's invoices to feed your accounting system? Options: Yes, No, Partial
    • Indicate your preferred invoice cadence and format for tenant billing (for example monthly PDF or CSV export). Options: Monthly PDF, Quarterly, On-demand CSV, Custom
    • Which payment settlement flows do you accept for transaction capture (for example direct tenant invoice, payment card via portal, payroll deduction)? Options: Tenant invoice, Card via portal, Payroll deduction, Other
    • Are there tax jurisdiction rules or sales-tax exemption requirements that must be applied to tenant billing? Options: Yes, No, Need to confirm
    • Who will be the authorized signer to approve billing terms and merchant account setup for the property?

    Commission and Test Charging System

    • Which commissioning test scripts do you require to be executed (connectivity, per-stall kWh metering accuracy, payment transaction, load-management cutover)? Options: Connectivity, kWh metering accuracy, Payment transaction, Load-management cutover
    • Provide preferred commissioning windows when tenant vehicle traffic is minimal for live testing and user acceptance trials.
    • How will you verify and accept system commissioning (for example AHJ inspection passed, per-stall kWh within ±2% of a reference meter, successful tenant payment transaction)?
    • Who on your team will sign the commissioning checklist and formally accept the charging system into operational status?
    • Are there AHJ inspection items or municipal pre-energization permits required before stations can be energized? Options: Yes, No, Need to confirm
    • List any tenant-specific acceptance tests we should perform (for example reserved-stall booking, visitor payment refunds, fleet priority scenarios).

    Submit Tax Credit and Incentive Applications

    • Which incentive programs do you plan to pursue (for example federal investment tax credit (ITC), state rebate, or utility rebate)? Options: Federal ITC, State rebate, Utility rebate, Local grant
    • Do you have required tax and entity documentation available for applications (for example W-9, organization legal name, and finance contact)? Options: Yes - all available, Partial, No
    • Provide the project cost breakout to use in applications (hardware, labor, utility upgrades, network fees).
    • Who will be the finance or tax contact authorized to sign and submit incentive paperwork?
    • Are there vendor or hardware eligibility constraints in your target state program (for example approved hardware lists or certified installers)? Options: Yes, No, Unknown
    • Specify any incentive application deadlines or completion-by dates that will constrain project scheduling.
  4. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial and legal terms, confirm responsibilities for utility upgrades and metering, lock payment and billing arrangements, and set project milestones.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Order Form and Billing Schedule
    • Equipment Purchase Addendum
    • Utility Upgrade & Metering Responsibility Schedule
    • Authorization to Act for Utility Filings
    • Project Milestones & Acceptance Criteria
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA)
    • Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
    • HIPAA Business Associate Addendum (conditional)
    • Incentive & Rebate Support Addendum
    • Change Order Agreement
  5. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, execution, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Capture concrete readiness facts the installation depends on — site access windows, tenant approvals, electrical room access, metering points, and utility contacts.

      Pre-Deployment Questions

      Environment and site access

      • Is this a single-site deployment or multiple sites (we use this to plan crew routing)? Options: Single site, Multi-site (2–5 locations), Multi-site (6+ locations)
      • Which vendor access windows are permitted for physical installation at the site(s)? Select all that apply (so we can schedule crews to match access). Options: Business hours (vendor access without escort), Business hours (escort required), After hours only (evening/night), Weekend only, Access not yet approved
      • Named on-site access owner who will meet crews or coordinate building-entry (provide name and role so we can confirm escorts/permits).

      Electrical and metering readiness

      • Has the electrical room and proposed feeder access for the installation been identified and is vendor access approved? (this determines where crews can work and whether special permits/escorts are needed). Options: Yes — electrical room identified and access approved, Yes — identified but access restricted (escort/permit required), No — electrical room not yet identified
      • Based on your electrical assessment, is a utility-side upgrade or new service/meter likely required? (this drives utility scheduling and long-lead items). Options: No — existing service sufficient, Yes — utility upgrade or new service required, Unknown — study in progress
      • Does the building allow submetering for tenant billing, or will tenant billing require utility-installed meters? (this determines metering procurement and billing approach). Options: Submetering allowed for tenant billing, Utility-installed meters required, Not decided / needs utility confirmation

      People and ownership

      • Who is the buyer-side owner for final approvals and day-of decision-making (name and role for electrical work, tenant-billing rules, and sign-off)?
      • Have affected tenants provided written approval for charger locations and tenant-billing rules? (if partially approved, indicate status so we can sequence installations). Options: All tenant approvals secured, Partial approvals secured — some pending, No tenant approvals yet

      Timing and constraints

      • Are there scheduling blackout windows or date constraints the deployment must avoid (e.g., move-ins, peak business periods, events)? If yes, we will request the specific dates in DeploymentConfig. Options: No blackout windows, Blackout windows exist — dates will be provided
      • Have AHJ inspection and utility interconnection steps been confirmed as schedulable (so we can plan the mandatory pre-energization gate)? Options: AHJ and utility inspections are scheduled, Inspections requested but not scheduled, Inspections will require seller assistance to schedule
    2. Configuration Details

      Lock the exact configuration values the deployment team will use — charger layouts, load-management thresholds, per-tenant billing rules, access-control mappings, and integration endpoints.

      Configuration Details

      ENVIRONMENTS & INTEGRATIONS

      • Select the deployment region for this installation (choose the region the platform instance will operate in). Options: US - East, US - West, Canada, EU, APAC, Other (enter exact region below)
      • Enter the deployment instance name the platform will use (format: single token, default is "production").
      • Enter your telemetry / webhook endpoint URL (format: https://... ). If platform-managed telemetry is used, enter 'N/A'.

      CHARGER LAYOUT & IDENTIFIERS

      • Number of charger pedestals to configure (numeric — enter integer count).
      • Charger naming prefix to apply to each station identifier (default: "CS-"). Example resulting names: CS-001, CS-002.
      • Nominal charger power per pedestal in kilowatts (kW). Default is 7.2 (enter a single numeric value, e.g., 7.2).

      LOAD MANAGEMENT, BILLING & METERING

      • Select the load-management mode to enforce for this site. Options: Dynamic shared load (recommended), Static per-station limit, Priority-based (tenant priority tiers), None — unmanaged
      • Maximum aggregate charging load allowed on the building feeder (kW). Default 100 kW — confirm or enter the exact kW limit the system must not exceed.
      • Select the tenant billing model to apply by default. Options: Per kWh (metered), Per-session flat fee, Monthly tenant subscription, Hybrid (per kWh + session fee)
      • Default per-kWh rate to display for tenant billing (in cents). Default 30 (enter numeric cents: e.g., 30 = $0.30/kWh).
      • Select the metering source used for billing reconciliation. Options: Charger-integrated metering (per-port), Site-installed revenue-grade meter (aggregated), Utility interval meter (utility-billed)

      ACCESS CONTROL & IDENTITY MAPPINGS

      • Primary access-control method to enable on stations. Options: Mobile app + RFID (recommended), RFID only, Tenant SSO (SAML-based IdP), Tenant SSO (OIDC-based IdP), Guest QR codes / PIN
      • If Tenant SSO is selected above, enter the non-secret SSO identifier your IdP provides (entity ID or client ID). If not using SSO, enter 'N/A'. Do NOT paste secrets.
      • Enter the access-control mapping filename or path that will be uploaded to the connector workspace (format example: access_mappings.csv). If you will not supply a mapping file, enter 'N/A'.
    3. Installation & Commissioning

      Execute physical installation, coordinate tenant and utility scheduling, configure network software and payment flows, and perform onsite testing.

    4. Commissioning & Utility Sign-Off

      Mandatory pre-energization gate: AHJ inspection, utility interconnection approval, metering and billing verification, and named approvals before stations are energized.

      Checklist items

      • Obtain AHJ final inspection certificate
      • Receive written utility Permission-to-Operate (PTO) / interconnection approval
      • Confirm interconnection agreement and upgrade-responsibility documentation
      • Verify lockout/tagout (LOTO) completion and records
      • Validate metering installation and configuration
      • Complete billing and invoice mapping test
      • Perform functional access-control and payment-flow test
      • Verify safety systems and signage
      • Deliver as-built drawings and commissioning report
      • Obtain named energization authorization from required approvers
      • Confirm rollback/de-energization procedure and emergency contact list
  6. Success

    Confirm outcomes against adoption and utilization targets, review utilization and reporting, and maintain a shared channel for issues, maintenance requests, and enhancement requests.

    Success Reviews

    • Go-live Health Check (weeks 1-4)
    • First Measurement Review (weeks 4-10)
    • Acceptance Gate — Outcome Acceptance (around day 90)
    • Ongoing Quarterly Success Review

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Schedule any required tenant- or employee-facing communications needed to drive adoption or clarify billing policies.
    • Produce a documented pass/fail outcome for each acceptance criterion listed in Solution Scope.
    • If any criterion is not met, agree specific remediation tasks, timelines, and verification data required for final acceptance.
    • Capture the named buyer signatory and store the acceptance record in the shared workspace.
    • Publish the Acceptance Gate report recording each criterion's pass/fail status and the named signatory or buyer decision note.
    • For any failed or conditional items, open tracked remediation tasks with verification checkpoints and target completion dates.
    • Confirm the schedule and data requirements for the first Ongoing Quarterly Success Review.
    • Quarterly performance dashboard
    • Verify that utilization and billing accuracy metrics remain within acceptable bounds or document specific improvement plans where they do not.
    • Ensure the maintenance ticket backlog is decreasing or is under a defined remediation plan with owners and dates.
    • Agree the prioritized list of operational improvements and when each will be executed or re-evaluated.
    • Produce the quarterly performance packet including time-series for utilization, billing accuracy samples, and incident resolution metrics.
    • Create or update remediation tasks for any metric trending below target, with specific acceptance criteria for closure.
    • Re-confirm Solution Scope acceptance criteria and owners
    • Confirm that deployed chargers and network configuration match the Solution Scope equipment counts and layouts.
    • Establish owners and target dates for any go-live defects or onboarding gaps identified during the session.
    • Agree the date and data deliverables for the First Measurement Review.
    • Publish a short go-live validation checklist showing pass/fail for each Solution Scope item and circulate to stakeholders.
    • Create a prioritized issue list with remediation owners and target resolution dates in the shared workspace.
    • Schedule the First Measurement Review and specify the data extracts required for that meeting.
    • Present first-period data vs Solution Scope targets
    • Determine whether charger utilization rate and employee adoption rate are trending toward the Solution Scope targets, or document specific causes if not.
    • Agree a concrete remediation plan with named owners and dates to correct any material gaps before the acceptance gate.
    • Confirm the dataset and reporting format to be used at the Acceptance Gate meeting.
    • Deliver a verified usage report that includes sessions per charger per week, unique employee users, and summary of load-management events for the measurement window.
    • Open remediation tasks for each root cause identified, with a target completion date prior to the Acceptance Gate meeting.
    • Validate per-tenant billing event samples to confirm billing attribution logic and record any required corrections.
    • Restate numeric acceptance criteria from Solution Scope
    • Deployment completion verification
    • Present outcome data against each criterion
    • Operational incidents and root causes
    • Root-cause analysis for any shortfalls
    • Enhancement and maintenance requests
    • Operational issues and tickets review
    • Onboarding and communication status
    • Document pass/fail for each criterion
    • Agree corrective actions and timeline to acceptance gate
    • Formal acceptance decision and signatory
    • Action register and follow-up
    • Early operational signals
    • Open issues and immediate remediation
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.