Industrial & Manufacturing Heavy Construction & Infrastructure Utility & Industrial Plant Construction

Oil & Gas Facility Construction

Bechtel Fluor KBR McDermott
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, approval thresholds, timeline, and success criteria across Project Director, VP of Capital Projects, and Procurement.

      Alignment Questions

      Quick Snapshot: Where We Start

      • What is the project name or short identifier you'd like us to use?
      • Which facility type best describes this scope? Options: Gas processing plant, Compressor station, NGL fractionator, Pipeline segment or loop, Metering / PRV station, Multiple of the above, Other
      • Which basin(s) and states are we talking about? Options: Permian (TX/NM), Appalachian (Marcellus/Utica), Haynesville (LA/TX), Eagle Ford, Gulf Coast, Multiple basins, Other
      • What role do you play on this project? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement Manager, Operations / Plant Manager, Owner's Project Management Office (PMO), Other
      • Which phase best matches the project right now? Options: Concept / Pre-FEED, FEED, Procurement / Bid Evaluation, Contract Negotiation, Mobilization planning, Active site construction, Commissioning / Startup
      • When is your target authorization-to-proceed or mobilization window? Options: Within 0–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, Undecided

      Are You Settling For 'Good Enough' With Your Current Delivery?

      • If you described incumbent or current delivery as a single sentence, what would it be?
      • How would you rate incumbent performance across safety, schedule, and quality against your expectations? Options: Exceeds expectations, Meets expectations, Sometimes misses expectations, Consistently underperforms, Not applicable / no incumbent
      • Which of the following problems have you experienced with the current provider or approach? Select all that apply. Options: Missed milestones / schedule slippage, Subpar safety (TRIR/EMR), Poor craft productivity, Excessive change orders, Poor QA/QC or rework, Logistics bottlenecks, Permitting delays, Other
      • Tell us about one recent example where the delivery model or contractor performance created real pain—what happened and what did it cost you (time, budget, stakeholder confidence)?
      • How long have you tolerated these issues before deciding to explore other delivery options? Options: This is new (first occurrence), A few months, 1–2 years, 2+ years, Ongoing across multiple projects

      What Would Actually Mean 'Success' for This Project?

      • If you had to name the single most important success metric for the owner organization on this job, what would it be (schedule, safety, cost, uptime, other)? Options: Schedule / on-time startup, Safety (TRIR/EMR targets), Capital cost adherence, Operational performance / throughput, Regulatory compliance, Other
      • What specific numeric targets or thresholds do stakeholders expect (e.g., target startup date, TRIR target, cost variance limit)? Please list numbers or dates.
      • Which stakeholders will sign off on acceptance criteria and what are their top concerns? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement, Operations, HSSE / EHS, Regulatory / Permitting, Other
      • Are there commercial levers tied to those metrics today (bonuses, liquidated damages, acceptance gates)? Options: Yes — liquidated damages, Yes — performance incentives, Yes — milestone-based payments, No formal commercial levers yet, Undecided
      • How will you know—tangibly—that this project was worth choosing a different delivery partner?

      Hidden Site Realities Nobody Mentions (But Will Win or Break the Job)

      • What's one site constraint you think everyone is underestimating right now?
      • What is the permitting status for this site and which permits remain critical-path? Options: All permits secured, Most permits secured, minor pending, Major permits pending (air, water, ROW), Permitting not started, Unknown / needs assessment
      • Which physical site constraints could materially impact schedule or productivity? Select all that apply. Options: Limited laydown / staging area, Restricted access roads, Seasonal weather constraints, Geotechnical issues, Utilities not available on site, Nearby operations causing coordination needs, Environmental / habitat restrictions, Other
      • Are there incumbent vendors, fabricators, or subcontractors already committed on site we must coordinate with? If so, who and what scope?
      • Do you have as-built, geotech, or permit documentation available to share? If not, what’s missing? Options: All documentation available, Partial documentation, Only high-level drawings, No documentation available, Unknown

      Who Really Signs the Check — Decision Dynamics and Approval Triggers

      • Where do decisions typically slow down in your approval chain—and why? (Budget thresholds, technical sign-offs, executive buy-in, procurement rules?)
      • What are the formal approval thresholds (dollar or scope bands) and who sits at each level? Options: Project Director up to $X, VP Capital Projects up to $Y, C-suite or Board required over $Z, Procurement approvals for vendor selection, Other / custom thresholds
      • How fixed is your target mobilization date versus being aspirational? What happens if it slips? Options: Firm — immovable, Fairly fixed with contingency plan, Flexible within a few weeks, Flexible by months, Undecided
      • What procurement path are you most likely to take for this scope? Options: Competitive lump-sum RFP, Reimbursable / time & materials, Hybrid (unit rates + target cost), Prequalified shortlist then negotiation, Direct award to incumbent, Owner self-managed
      • Who will be our primary point of contact for commercial vs technical vs scheduling issues?

      Labor, Subcontractors, and Basin Realities — The Practicalities of Getting Work Done

      • How would you characterize craft availability and productivity in the target basin right now? Options: Plentiful and competitive, Adequate with localized shortages, Tight — limited availability, Severely constrained, Unknown
      • Do you require union labor, non-union, or a mix? Are there site-specific labor agreements we must honor? Options: Union required, Non-union required, Mix depending on trade, No specific requirement, Unknown
      • Which trades or subcontractor scopes are hardest to secure in this region right now? (e.g., heavy mechanical, E&I, civil, specialty vendors) Options: Mechanical erection, Pipe fabrication, Electrical & Instrumentation, Civil / earthworks, HVAC / Controls, Specialty skids / modules, Other
      • Have you experienced labor-related productivity metrics we should know (man-hours per spool, weld rates, crew sizes)? Please provide examples or averages.
      • How open are you to modularization, off-site fab yards, or increased prefabrication to reduce field labor needs? Options: Very open — prefer it, Open with clear ROI, Skeptical — needs convincing, Prefer traditional field build, Undecided

      What Keeps You Up at Night — Risks, Contingencies, and Who Bears Them

      • If you had to name the single risk that most threatens this project's success, what is it?
      • Which of these risk categories are top concerns for you? Select up to three. Options: Labor productivity shortages, Permitting delays, Long‑lead equipment deliveries, Material price escalation, Safety incidents / regulatory action, Design scope changes, Third‑party coordination
      • What contingency budget or schedule buffer do you currently have allocated for these risks? Options: >15% cost contingency, 10–15% cost contingency, 5–10% cost contingency, <5% cost contingency, No contingency defined, Unknown
      • Who on your team is responsible for risk monitoring and escalation, and how often do they report progress? Options: Project Director, Risk Manager / PMO, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement, Operations, No formal owner
      • What mitigation measures have you already considered or committed to (e.g., fabricate early, split package delivery, holdback clauses)? Options: Advance fab yards / skids, Split procurement to reduce long-lead exposure, Schedule float for permitting, Performance incentives/penalties, Contingency labor pools, Other

      If This Went Perfectly — What Changes for Your Team and Business?

      • Imagine we deliver exactly to your success signals: what immediate business outcomes would you expect (production gains, cost savings, regulatory relief, reputational wins)?
      • Post‑handover, how important is a clear warranty and improvement channel (e.g., 24/7 support, spare parts strategy, warranty SLAs)? Options: Critical — must have, Important but negotiable, Nice to have, Not needed
      • What operational KPIs will you monitor in the first 90 days after startup? Options: Throughput / capacity, Emissions / environmental compliance, Safety performance, Downtime / reliability, Maintenance backlog, Other
      • If a different delivery model (e.g., lump‑sum with heavy prefabrication) could materially reduce field schedule by X weeks, what value would X need to represent for you to prefer that model?
      • What internal stakeholders would need to be convinced for you to change the delivery model and who is easiest to influence? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement, Operations, Finance, Other

      How Bold Are You Ready to Be — Practical Next Steps

      • If we proposed a short, low‑risk pilot (e.g., one module prefabricated in our yard) to prove schedule and productivity gains, how willing would you be to try it? Options: Very willing — ready now, Willing with approvals, Open but need more data, Not willing at this time, Undecided
      • Which procurement route would you prefer to explore first with us? Options: Competitive lump-sum RFP, Target-price / cost-share hybrid, Reimbursable with guaranteed max, Direct negotiation with prequalification, Need help deciding
      • What additional information would you need from us to take the next step (references, site visit, safety records, detailed schedule, cost models)? Select all that apply. Options: Safety performance and TRIR/EMR records, Reference projects in the basin, Fabrication & erection productivity data, Preliminary schedule and critical path, High-level cost model / price ranges, HSE program and training plans, Other
      • Who needs to attend the next conversation to make progress and what decision or output would make that meeting successful?
      • Realistically, when should we aim to re‑connect to move this forward? Options: Within 1 week, 1–2 weeks, Within a month, 2+ months, Undecided
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document existing scope, incumbent performance, permitting status, site constraints, and craft/subcontractor availability in the target basin.

      Current State

      Quick Snapshot — Where We’re Starting

      • Which basin is this project primarily located in? Options: Permian, Appalachian, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Gulf Coast, Rockies, Other — please specify
      • How would you describe the site type today? Options: Greenfield, Brownfield/modification, Partial demolition + rebuild, Leased yard / fab yard only, Multiple sites / spread across pads
      • Do you have a current scope or FEED document we should align to (attach or summarize below)? Options: Yes — full FEED, Yes — preliminary scope only, No formal FEED yet, Scope is informal / email threads
      • What is the high‑level target in one sentence (e.g., 'Add 200 MMscfd inlet, compressor swap, and NGL recovery skid')?
      • What is your target in‑service / commissioning quarter or date today? Options: Next 3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months, TBD
      • Who is our primary operational contact on your side for site questions (name, role, email)?

      What’s Quietly Costing You Time and Money?

      • If this project were allowed to remain 'fine' instead of fixed, what recurring problems would keep happening?
      • Which of these have already eroded budget or schedule on this scope? Options: Permitting delays, Incumbent contractor claims, Site condition surprises, Long‑lead equipment slips, Labor productivity shortfalls, Design rework / RFIs, Other — describe
      • Can you quantify recent impacts (last similar project) in cost or weeks of delay? Please share numbers or ranges.
      • When these problems occur, who on your team ends up firefighting most often? Options: Project Director, VP Capital Projects, Procurement, Operations Site Lead, Third‑party PM/Owner Rep, Other
      • How does it feel internally when delays happen—annoying, risky to your job, likely to stop future projects, or something else? Options: Annoying/habitual, Creates political risk, Threatens budget approval for future projects, Erodes trust with operations, Other — describe

      Who’s Actually Calling the Shots When Timelines Slip?

      • When the schedule starts to slide, whose approval or buy‑in actually unlocks decisions fastest? Options: Project Director, VP Capital Projects, Procurement Lead, Operations/Facility Manager, CFO/Finance, Board/Owner Rep, Other
      • What are the formal approval thresholds (cost and schedule) that trigger executive escalation? Options: <$250k, $250k–$1M, $1M–$5M, $5M–$20M, >$20M, Unsure / not documented
      • How do procurement timelines interact with your decision gates (e.g., bid period length, negotiation buffer, PO issuance)? Options: Procurement drives schedule, Parallel procurement and approvals, Procurement delays after approvals, We use sole‑source for long‑leads, Varies by package
      • Tell us about any internal decision friction—missing signatures, competing priorities, or risk aversion—that has delayed past projects.
      • If we needed to accelerate a critical decision this month, who would we invite to the table and why?

      Site Surprises That Keep You Up at Night

      • What on the site would you call a 'known unknown'—things we suspect might be an issue but haven’t yet validated? Options: Unmapped utilities, Unknown soil conditions, Contaminants/previous spills, Space/congestion limits, Access/road limits, Floodplain or environmental constraints, Other — describe
      • Have you completed geotechnical, environmental, and ROW surveys? If so, what’s their status? Options: All complete, Geotech only, Environmental only, ROW/access pending, None started
      • Are there physical access constraints (narrow roads, weight limits, seasonal closures) that affect heavy lifts or deliveries? Options: Yes—seasonal, Yes—permanent/structural, No significant constraints, Unsure / need study
      • How constrained is laydown and temporary workspace on site? Options: Plenty of laydown, Tight — needs optimization, No clear space—requires offsite yards, TBD
      • Tell a short story about the last time a site surprise forced a major replan or change order—what happened and what was the fallout?

      Permits, Long‑Leads & Single Points of Failure

      • If permitting and long‑lead items were the only two things to go wrong, which would worry you more and why? Options: Permits—most worrisome, Long‑lead equipment—most worrisome, Both equally worrying, Neither—other concerns dominate
      • Which permits are required and what is each permit’s current status? Options: Air/Emission, Water/Stormwater, NPDES, CWA/Section 404, Local building, Occupancy/operating, Other — specify
      • For long‑lead equipment (compressors, heat exchangers, cryo trains, automation), which items are ordered, committed, or not started? Options: Ordered & on schedule, Ordered & delayed, Quoted but not ordered, Not quoted/not started, Vendor lead time unknown
      • Are there single‑vendor or single‑source items that would stop the project if they slipped? Please identify and describe the contingency plan if known.
      • What internal or external regulatory milestones (inspections, public hearings) pose the biggest schedule risk?

      Craft, Subcontractors and Local Market Reality

      • In this basin today, would you rate craft availability as:? Options: Abundant — no concern, Adequate with premium pricing, Tight — will constrain schedule, Severely constrained — requires subcontractor relocation
      • Which craft trades are most constrained or critical on this scope? Options: Mechanical erectors, Pipefitters/fitters, Welders (NDT/qualified), Electrical & instrumentation, Civil/earthworks, Insulation/painting, Other — specify
      • Do you have preferred or incumbent subcontractor relationships we must honor or coordinate with? Options: Yes — incumbent named, Yes — preferred list, No formal preferences, Open to new subcontractors
      • How comfortable are you with a Host that self‑performs mechanical work and uses fab yards to reduce field hours? Options: Very comfortable, Somewhat comfortable, Neutral, Prefer purely subcontracted model, Need more info
      • If craft shortages were to delay the schedule, what trade‑offs would you accept: extend schedule, increase premium pay, offsite prefab more scope, or reduce scope? Options: Extend schedule, Increase premium pay, Increase offsite prefabrication, Reduce scope / phase scope, Other — describe

      Incumbent Performance — Reality vs Expectation

      • If an incumbent contractor is involved, what has been most disappointing about their performance? Options: Schedule slippage, Poor quality / rework, Safety incidents, Cost overruns / claims, Communication gaps, Other — describe
      • Have there been active claims, open change orders, or disputes with an incumbent that we should know about? Options: Yes — active claims, Yes — closed claims with cost impact, No claims, Unknown / need to check
      • How would you rate incumbent safety and quality performance using TRIR/EMR or descriptive terms? Options: Excellent — meets expectations, Acceptable with minor issues, Below standard — frequent recordables, Unacceptable — regulatory intervention
      • If we were to replace an incumbent, what immediate operational or contract friction points should we anticipate (access, backcharges, retained personnel)?
      • What unresolved warranty, punchlist, or latent defect issues exist from prior work that could affect acceptance? Options: Several known items, A few isolated items, None known, Unsure / need audit

      Operational Interfaces and Acceptance Criteria

      • What concrete acceptance criteria will operations use to sign off mechanical completion and turnover? Options: Mechanical completion checklist, Performance testing to X parameters, HSE compliance only, Documentation completeness (O&M, as‑built), Other — specify
      • Are operational performance targets already specified (e.g., capacity, TRIR/EMR targets, startup ramp rates)? Options: Yes — all targets documented, Partial targets documented, No formal targets, Targets informal / verbal
      • Who will own commissioning and startup operations—your crew, the contractor, or a blended team? Options: Owner operations, Contractor / EPC team, Blended team, Third‑party commissioning agent
      • Are there contractual acceptance gates tied to milestone payments we should be aligned with? Options: Yes — payment gates defined, Yes — loosely defined, No payment gates, Unsure
      • What are the single most important non‑negotiables for handover (safety record, zero leaks, guaranteed throughput, O&M training, other)?

      If We Were to Tidy This Up, What Would Success Actually Feel Like?

      • Imagine 12 months from now and this project is running on schedule—what three things happened differently to make that possible?
      • Which single metric would make you consider this project an operational success (on‑time, on‑budget, safety, throughput)? Options: On‑time delivery, On‑budget to baseline, Safety (TRIR/EMR targets), Guaranteed throughput/performance, Minimal punchlist at turnover
      • How confident are you in your current baseline estimates (cost, schedule) on a 0–10 scale, and why did you choose that number? Options: 0–3 low, 4–6 moderate, 7–8 high, 9–10 very high
      • What would you most want your EPC partner to take off your plate in the first 60 days? Options: Permitting push, Long‑lead procurement, Site survey and geotech, Subcontractor alignment, Detailed schedule and P6 plan, Other — describe
      • What keeps you awake at night about handing the project to a new EPC partner?

      Immediate Red Flags & Next Steps

      • Are there any regulatory deadlines, lease obligations, or commercial milestones in the next 90 days we must avoid missing? Options: Yes — regulatory deadline, Yes — commercial milestone, No critical 90‑day items, Unsure / need confirmation
      • What internal approvals would we need from you to move from discovery into a joint mobilization plan? Options: Project Director sign‑off, VP Capital approval, Procurement release, Finance/Legal signoff, All of the above
      • Which three documents or datasets would accelerate our ability to validate the current state (attach or list): Options: Current scope/FEED, As‑built surveys, Permit registry, Long‑lead purchase orders, Incumbent contract / change orders, Vendor lead time confirmations
      • Who else on your team should join the next technical alignment session (name, role)?
      • If you could give us one last candid piece of advice about working with your team, what would it be?
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define the measurable success signals (schedule, TRIR/EMR targets, cost baselines) and non‑negotiables for the project.

    Discovery Questions

    Let’s Get Oriented: Tell Us the Big Picture

    • In one sentence, what is the primary business objective driving this project right now?
    • Which facility type best describes this scope? Options: Gas processing plant, Compressor station, NGL fractionation, Pipeline/loop/launcher-receiver, Plant upgrade/expansion, Other
    • Which basin(s) will this project operate in? Options: Permian, Appalachian, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Other / multiple
    • Who on your team will own day‑to‑day delivery decisions (name & role)?
    • Who are the executive approvers we should plan to engage (roles only: e.g., VP Capital Projects)? Options: VP Capital Projects, CFO/Controller, Project Director, Procurement Lead, Operations Director, Other
    • What current contractor or internal model are you replacing or augmenting (incumbent name, if any), and how satisfied are you with them on a 1–5 scale? Options: 1 - Very dissatisfied, 2 - Dissatisfied, 3 - Neutral, 4 - Satisfied, 5 - Very satisfied

    Are You Settling for ‘Good Enough’ When You Could Be Getting Better?

    • When you think about past projects in this basin, what compromises have you quietly accepted to keep things moving?
    • How often do those compromises create rework, schedule slips, or cost impacts? Options: Almost every project, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely
    • What’s the single recurring issue you wish someone would fix once and for all (e.g., field fit-up, late long‑lead equipment, craft quality)?
    • How does your leadership react when that issue surfaces—push for speed, accept extra cost, or pause and re-scope? Options: Push for speed, Approve additional cost, Pause and re-scope, Other
    • How long has this pattern been tolerated, and what’s the downside if it continues for another project cycle?

    Where the Schedule Really Bends (and Why That Matters)

    • If the project slips by one major milestone, who feels the impact most—and what happens to the business case?
    • What is your target first‑gas/commissioning date, and how flexible is it? Options: Fixed—no change, Tight—±2 weeks, Moderate—±1–2 months, Flexible—quarter or more, Not defined
    • Which schedule risks keep you up at night today (select all that apply)? Options: Permitting delays, Long‑lead equipment deliveries, Craft availability, Weather/seasonality, Right‑of‑way/logistics, Incumbent demobilization, Other
    • What contingency or float have you built into the baseline schedule (days/weeks/months)? Options: None, 0–2 weeks, 2–8 weeks, 2–6 months, More than 6 months, We don’t know
    • When schedule pressure rises, what trade‑offs are you most likely to accept (cost increases, reduced scope, overtime, quality concessions)? Options: Accept cost increases, Reduce scope, Increase overtime, Shorten QA/QC windows, Other
    • Tell us about a past milestone that was missed—what caused it and what was the project’s reaction?

    How Safety Targets and Reputation Drive Your Choices

    • If your leadership had to choose between schedule and safety, where do they draw the line—and does that match how you actually operate on site?
    • What TRIR (or EMR) target would you consider a project success versus acceptable performance? Options: TRIR 0.0–0.5 (best), TRIR 0.6–1.0, TRIR 1.1–2.0, TRIR >2.0, Use EMR target instead
    • Have safety incidents or regulatory scrutiny ever delayed or stopped a project for your organization? Tell us what happened.
    • How important is a contractor’s visible HSE program and zero‑recordable history when you shortlist partners? Options: Critical—must have, Very important, Helpful but not decisive, Not a priority
    • What HSE reporting or KPIs will you require during delivery (e.g., daily toolbox, near‑miss reporting, contractor audits)? Options: Daily toolbox talks, Near‑miss reporting, Monthly safety audits, Performance dashboards, Third‑party audits, Other
    • How would a safety event change your appetite for continuing with the current delivery model? Options: Immediate stop and review, Pause & remediate, Continue with mitigation, Depends on severity

    The Money Question: Where Are You Comfortable Drawing the Line?

    • What is your target cost baseline (budget range) for this scope, and how was it derived?
    • Which commercial structures would you consider—lump‑sum, reimbursable, hybrid—and which is your preferred starting point? Options: Lump‑sum (fixed price), Reimbursable (cost‑plus), Hybrid (target cost/incentive), Undecided
    • What level of cost certainty do your stakeholders require at contract award (select one)? Options: +/- 2–5% (high certainty), +/- 5–10%, +/- 10–20%, Higher tolerance, No clear requirement yet
    • How are change orders typically handled and escalated in your organization, and what would you change about that process?
    • What contingency or reserve do you expect a contractor to hold or propose (percent of total)? Options: None, 1–2%, 3–5%, 6–10%, 10%+
    • If a contractor proposed a shared‑savings or performance‑incentive model, how open would you be to that approach? Options: Very open, Somewhat open, Unsure, Not open

    What Would Success Feel Like—Beyond the KPIs

    • Imagine handover day when everything is in spec—what three outcomes would make you celebrate?
    • Which performance baselines matter most post‑handover (select top 3)? Options: Schedule adherence, TRIR/EMR performance, First‑gas reliability, Operational efficiency, Warranty responsiveness, Cost predictability
    • How will your operations team measure whether the project delivered lasting value at 30/90/365 days? Options: Availability metrics, Throughput performance, Maintenance incidents, Warranty tickets, Other
    • What non‑negotiables must be in place at acceptance (e.g., third‑party certifications, permits closed, vendor O&M training)?
    • If we promised a specific reduction in field labor hours through prefab and fab‑yard work, how would you validate that claim during delivery? Options: Daily/weekly productivity reports, Independent productivity audit, Time‑lapse documentation, Joint site walkthroughs, Other

    What’s Actually Preventing Faster, Safer, Cheaper Delivery?

    • What assumptions have you been operating under that, if proven wrong, would materially change project scope or delivery approach?
    • Where do you see the greatest single point of failure—supply chain, permits, labor, incumbent performance, or something else? Options: Supply chain/long lead, Permitting, Craft labor availability, Incumbent contractor issues, Site constraints/logistics, Other
    • How much visibility do you currently have into the critical path items (e.g., vendor lead times, spool fabrication timelines)? Options: Full visibility, Good visibility, Partial visibility, Minimal/none
    • Who has the authority to reallocate budget or change delivery method if critical path risks materialize? Options: Project Director, VP Capital Projects, Procurement, CFO, Other
    • If you could remove one bottleneck today, what would it be and why?

    Decision Triggers: When Will You Commit—and What Will It Take?

    • What are the non‑negotiable decision triggers that must be met before contract award and mobilization?
    • Which procurement milestones matter most in your evaluation (prequalification, technical bid, commercial bid, reference checks)? Options: Prequalification, Technical bid, Commercial bid, Reference checks, Site visits, Other
    • How will you weigh tradeoffs between safety record, schedule performance, and price when you score proposals? Options: Safety first, then schedule, then price, Schedule then price then safety, Price first with minimum safety threshold, Balanced weighted score
    • What mobilization triggers are realistic for you—signed contract, permit package, long‑lead delivery confirmation, or milestone payments? Options: Signed contract, Permits approved, Long‑lead confirmed, Mobilization payment, Other
    • Who needs to be in the room for a final commitment conversation, and what will each person be listening for?

    The Practical Reality: Site, Permits, and People

    • What is the current permitting status and which outstanding permits pose the largest schedule risk? Options: All permits secured, Most permits applied/awaiting, Major permits pending, Permits not started, Unknown
    • Describe site constraints we should know—logistics, laydown, access roads, environmental limits, or community issues.
    • How would you rate craft availability and subcontractor depth in your target basin right now? Options: Plentiful, Adequate, Tight but manageable, Severely constrained, Unknown
    • Have you previously used prefab/fab‑yard modularization? What worked and what didn’t?
    • What logistics or staging constraints would force us to shift more work offsite versus field assembly?

    Closing the Gap: What Support Would Make This Decision Easier?

    • If we provided a short risk‑heat‑map and a mobility plan this week, would that help accelerate your internal approvals? Options: Yes—very helpful, Somewhat helpful, Unlikely to change approvals, Not sure
    • Would you value a joint site risk workshop that includes HSE, operations, procurement and field leads? Options: Yes—schedule it, Maybe—need agenda, No
    • What artifacts or assurances would make stakeholders comfortable to select an EPC partner today (e.g., fixed‑price module, performance bond, staged acceptance)?
    • How do you prefer to receive progress transparency during delivery—weekly dashboards, daily standups, or milestone gate reviews? Options: Daily standups, Weekly dashboards, Milestone gate reviews, Ad‑hoc on request, Other
    • Realistically, how soon would you be ready to run a pilotscope or mobilize a small team to derisk the critical path? Options: Immediately, Within 30 days, 30–90 days, 3–6 months, Longer / unsure

    Final Check: Quick Facts for Our Proposal

    • What single metric should our proposal prioritize: strict schedule, lowest life‑cycle cost, safety performance, or minimal owner involvement? Options: Strict schedule, Lowest life‑cycle cost, Safety performance, Minimal owner involvement, Balanced approach
    • Do you require references from similar basin projects as part of prequalification? Options: Yes—same basin & scope, Yes—same basin preferred, Yes—similar scope anywhere, No
    • Who will be our point of contact for scope clarifications during bidding, and what is the preferred communication channel? Options: Project Director (email), Procurement (portal), Operations (phone/email), Other
    • Is there anything we have not asked that would change how we design our approach for you?
  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how our EPC delivery model—self‑performed mechanical, fab yard prefabs, and HSE controls—delivers the customer’s outcomes and mitigates key basin risks.

    Experience Meetings

    • Current State & Consequence Alignment
    • EPC Delivery Model — Proof Points & Mapping
    • Site-Specific Sequencing & Simulation Workshop
    • Validation & Mutual Confirmation (Pre-Commercial)
    • Customer to validate long-lead equipment list and confirm permitting milestones or outstanding permit actions.
    • Agree which proofs require deeper documentation (e.g., productivity calculation, logistics risk register) before decision.
    • Seller to deliver a tailored one-page 'Proof Map' linking each delivery element to quantified customer outcomes (schedule days saved, labor hours saved, TRIR risk reduction).
    • Customer to identify any contested assumptions (e.g., craft productivity baseline) and provide recent project productivity data or claims from incumbents.
    • Seller to provide two short basin-specific case studies (with anonymized metrics) relevant to the customer's facility type within 5 business days.
    • Review Site Constraints & Inputs
    • Produce a draft, basin-aware execution sequence that clearly shows how prefabrication and self-perform reduce field duration.
    • Identify top critical-path risks and assign concrete mitigations and owners.
    • Integrate HSE gates into the schedule so safety acceptance is a milestone, not an afterthought.
    • Agree on a short list of deliverables (Gantt, procurement list, mobilization triggers) and deadlines for decisioners to review.
    • Seller to produce a draft execution Gantt with prefabrication windows and field labor forecasts within 4 business days.
    • Introductions & Objective
    • Joint assignment of owners for each critical-path risk with agreed mitigation deadlines.
    • Recap: Current State, Consequence, Future State
    • Obtain explicit customer validation that the EPC model meets the agreed success signals or capture the precise gaps remaining.
    • Agree the commercial path to be pursued and clear mobilization triggers tied to sequence milestones.
    • Define owners and deadlines for any remaining gaps or documentation required before Mutual Commit.
    • Customer to provide formal confirmation (email sign-off) that validated success signals are acceptable or to list remaining gaps with metrics.
    • Seller to produce a short commercial options brief (lump-sum vs hybrid vs reimbursable) with risk allocation highlights aligned to the sequence and deliver within 5 business days.
    • If agreed, schedule the Mutual Commit meeting and circulate the draft mobilization triggers and milestone-based payments for review.
    • Produce a single-sentence Current State that all stakeholders can read back identically.
    • Agree on quantified consequences (cost, days, safety/regulatory exposure) that create urgency.
    • Lock the measurable success signals (schedule, TRIR/EMR, cost baselines) that the Solution Experience must demonstrate.
    • Identify required artifacts and owners for the Proof meeting.
    • Customer to provide baseline schedule, recent incident/TRIR data, and any current contractor productivity metrics (within 3 business days).
    • Seller to draft one-sentence current state and estimated consequence summary for customer review.
    • Agree on date for the EPC Proof meeting and list of attendees (Project Director, VP Capital Projects, Procurement, EPC delivery leads).
    • One-sentence Recap
    • Prove, with site-relevant metrics and case studies, that our delivery model moves the needle on the customer's success signals.
    • Tie every proof back to the customer's stated consequence so benefits are explicit and urgent.
    • Obtain customer validation or precise objections for each claimed benefit to guide follow-up materials.
    • Define Target Milestones & Acceptance Criteria
    • Summary of Proofs & Workshop Outcomes
    • Current State Statement (Diagnosis)
    • Future State Definition (Proof Target)
    • Execution Sequencing Exercise (Hands-on)
    • Quantify Consequence
    • Customer Validation Against Success Signals
    • Self-Performed Mechanical — Evidence
    • Commercial & Mobilization Triggers
    • Confirm Success Signals / Acceptance Criteria
    • Fab Yard Prefab — Proof of Schedule & Labor Reduction
    • Critical Path Risk Register
    • HSE Integration into Sequence
    • Decision & Next Steps
    • Validation & Next Steps
    • HSE & Zero-Recordable Controls — Risk Mitigation
    • Mapping Exercise: Basin-Specific Risks
    • Confirm Next Deliverables
    • Validation Checkpoints
  4. Solution Scope

    Specify scope boundaries, modules (FEED, procurement, modular fabrication, site construction, commissioning), responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.

    Scope Configuration

    • Pipe Spool Prefabrication and Painting
    • Process Skid Fabrication and FAT
    • Heavy Mechanical Erection and Rigging
    • Field Piping Installation and Welding (NDE)
    • Pressure Vessel Setting and Hydrotesting
    • Compressor Set Installation, Alignment, Start-up
    • Electrical Power Installation and Cable Pull
    • Instrumentation Installation and Loop Checkout
    • Distributed Control System Installation and FAT/SAT
    • Heat Exchanger Installation and Tie‑ins
    • Pipeline Stringing, Welding, and Coating
    • Pipeline Hydrostatic Testing and Pigging
    • Pre-commissioning: Flushing, Nitrogen Purge, Leak Test
    • Commissioning, Startup Support, and Operator Training

    Scope Questions

    Pipe Spool Prefabrication and Painting

    • Do you require off-site pipe spool prefabrication and painting as part of the scope? Options: Yes, No
    • Estimated number of spool assemblies or total spool length (provide units and any major spool-by-spool counts if available).
    • Specify required painting/coating specification and corrosion class (select closest and add details if 'Other'). Options: Owner standard / NACE / ISO, FBE (fusion bonded epoxy), Epoxy primer + topcoat, Primer + topcoat (field touch-up), Other
    • What are the delivery windows and any logistics constraints for spools (max piece weight/length, site laydown limitations, road/bridge restrictions)?
    • Which acceptance documents and inspections are mandatory on delivery? (select all that apply) Options: Material mill certificates, Weld maps and NDE records, Coating inspection reports / holiday test, Dimensional inspection / fit-up reports, Packing and preservation photos, Other
    • Who is responsible for final QA/QC and acceptance of spools (Contractor, Owner, Third-party)? Options: Contractor, Owner/Engineer, Third-party inspector, Hybrid - specify

    Process Skid Fabrication and FAT

    • Do you require process skid fabrication and Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) at the yard? Options: Yes, No
    • How many skids and what are the approximate footprints/weights for each skid?
    • Who provides the engineered skid design and P&IDs (Owner provides full design, Contractor to detail & fabricate, or joint responsibility)? Options: Owner provides engineered skid drawings, Contractor to detail & fabricate, Joint responsibility
    • Which FAT activities/tests are required (select all that apply)? Options: Mechanical run/pressure test, Instrumentation loop checks, Control system integration tests, Leak and functional tests, Start-up simulation
    • What witness and documentation requirements apply to FAT (Owner witness, third-party certification, FAT protocol expected)? Options: Owner witness required, Third-party certification, Standard FAT protocol (no witness), Other
    • Are there transport or loadout constraints for skids (route, height/weight limits, special lifting requirements)?

    Heavy Mechanical Erection and Rigging

    • Will the contractor self-perform heavy mechanical erection and rigging activities? Options: Yes, No, Partial (specify)
    • List major lifts/modules with estimated weights and required lift radii or provide available lift schedule.
    • What site access and crane availability constraints exist (existing crane pad, need for crane mobilization, laydown areas)? Options: Site has crane pad and power, Requires crane mobilization, Limited laydown - small cranes only, Unknown
    • Will specialized rigging or third‑party heavy lift subcontractors be required? Options: Contractor will self-perform, Third-party rigging subcontractor required, Owner will provide rigging services
    • Specify erection acceptance criteria (alignment tolerances, bolting torque records, NDE post-erection). Options: Alignment tolerances, Torque records and bolting checks, Post-erection NDE, As-built documentation required
    • Are there HSE lift permit conditions, exclusion zones, or local lifting restrictions to include in the plan?

    Field Piping Installation and Welding (NDE)

    • Should field piping installation and welding with NDE be included in scope? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide pipe classes/material specs, pressure ratings and applicable code (ASME B31.3, Owner spec, other).
    • What is the anticipated total field pipe length or approximate number of joints/welds?
    • Which NDE methods and acceptance levels are required for field welds? (select all that apply) Options: Radiographic (RT), Ultrasonic (UT), Magnetic Particle (MT), Liquid Penetrant (PT), Visual only
    • Are specific WPS/PQR and welder qualifications required (ASME/QC standards, owner pre-qualification)? Options: WPS/PQR required to ASME, Welder qualification per owner standard, Standard contractor qualifications acceptable
    • Any hot work, pre-heat/post-heat controls, or welding consumables limitations to capture?

    Pressure Vessel Setting and Hydrotesting

    • Are pressure vessel setting (crane-assisted placement) and hydrotesting included in scope? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide number, dimensions, and weights of vessels to be set.
    • What hydrotest method and media are required (hydrostatic with water, pneumatic with nitrogen) and what are the test pressures? Options: Hydrostatic (water), Pneumatic (nitrogen), Other
    • Are external/internal coatings or insulation applied post-setting and who is responsible for these scopes? Options: External coating only, Internal coating/linings, Insulation required, No coatings/insulation
    • Which records/certificates are mandatory for vessels (mill certs, hydrotest charts, NDE) and is third-party witness required? Options: Mill certificates, Hydrotest charts, NDE records, Third-party witness required, Other
    • Who will sign off mechanical completion for vessels (Contractor, Owner, Third-party)? Options: Contractor, Owner/Engineer, Third-party inspector, Hybrid

    Compressor Set Installation, Alignment, Start-up

    • Do you require compressor set installation, precision alignment, and start-up support? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide compressor OEM, model, and any OEM acceptance or warranty support requirements.
    • Will field alignment, coupling checks, vibration baseline and balancing be performed by Contractor or OEM? Options: Contractor, OEM representative, Owner/third-party
    • What performance acceptance criteria are required for start-up (flow, pressures, efficiency, allowable vibration)?
    • Are OEM service representatives or special tools/spares required to be on-site for start-up? Options: OEM rep onsite required, Contractor-certified technicians sufficient, Owner to provide
    • Any special HSE or lifting requirements for compressor skid set and coupling activities?

    Electrical Power Installation and Cable Pull

    • Is electrical power installation and cable pulling included in the scope? Options: Yes, No
    • List voltage levels, critical power systems (generators, UPS) and single-line diagrams availability.
    • Approximate number of cable pulls and the longest run lengths (note conduit/tray fill concerns).
    • Which cable types and installations apply (select all that apply)? Options: Power cables, Instrumentation cables, Control/communications (fiber), Tray-mounted installation, Direct burial
    • What testing and acceptance are required for electrical installation (IR/megger, phase rotation, load testing)? Options: Insulation resistance (megger), Phase rotation checks, Load/functional testing, Power system coordination study
    • Who will coordinate electrical tie-ins to owner utility or upstream power provider? Options: Contractor, Owner, Utility with contractor coordination

    Instrumentation Installation and Loop Checkout

    • Should instrumentation installation and loop checkout be included? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide the estimated number of I/O points, types of signals (analog, digital, HART) and instrument list availability.
    • Who provides instrument specifications and data sheets (Owner provided, Contractor to source, hybrid)? Options: Owner provides instrument index/data sheets, Contractor to prepare and source, Hybrid
    • Loop checkout scope required (select all that apply). Options: Wiring continuity, Power checks, Signal calibration, Functional control tests, HART/diagnostic verification
    • Are calibration standards/traceability (e.g., NIST) required for instrument calibration certificates? Options: NIST traceable required, Manufacturer certificates acceptable, Owner standard
    • Who will witness and accept loop testing (Owner, Contractor, Third-party)? Options: Owner witness, Contractor acceptance, Third-party witness

    Distributed Control System Installation and FAT/SAT

    • Is DCS/PLC installation and FAT/SAT required for this project? Options: Yes, No
    • Specify DCS/PLC platform/vendor and any existing systems that require integration (SCADA, historian).
    • What FAT activities are required (select all that apply)? Options: I/O validation, Simulated process scenarios, Redundancy/failover tests, Cybersecurity and network checks, HMI/operator function validation
    • Describe network architecture and OT security responsibilities to be covered by the scope (firewalls, VLANs, vendor access).
    • Who is responsible for logic/sequence of operations and control narratives (Owner control engineer, Contractor, Joint)? Options: Owner provides logic/SOP, Contractor develops and validates, Joint development
    • Are Site Acceptance Tests (SAT) and operator HMI training included in the DCS scope? Options: Include SAT and training, SAT only, Neither

    Heat Exchanger Installation and Tie‑ins

    • Do you require heat exchanger installation and associated tie‑ins? Options: Yes, No
    • Provide number, sizes, orientation (vertical/horizontal) and support/load requirements for each exchanger.
    • What tie‑in weld types and NDE are required for exchanger connections? Options: Full penetration welds with RT/UT, Partial penetration welds with MT/UT, Visual inspection only, Other
    • Are thermal expansion loops, special supports, or bypass piping required for hot service? Options: Expansion loops required, Special supports required, No special thermal measures
    • Are hydrotests or performance tests on exchanger circuits required (heat duty, pressure drop acceptance)? Options: Hydrotest required, Performance testing required, Both, None
    • Who will accept exchanger commissioning and provide performance signoff? Options: Owner, Contractor, OEM/Third-party
  5. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial structure (lump‑sum, reimbursable, hybrid), allocation of risk, change‑order mechanics, and mobilization triggers tied to milestones.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master EPC Agreement
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Commercial Structure Election
    • Price & Payment Schedule
    • Risk Allocation Matrix
    • Change Order Procedure
    • Mobilization Triggers & Milestones
    • Performance Guarantees & Liquidated Damages
    • Insurance, Bonds & Indemnities
    • Acceptance, Handover & Commissioning Criteria
    • Warranty & Post-Completion Support
    • Subcontracting & Craft Labor Commitments
    • Permits, Regulatory & Compliance Responsibilities
    • HSE & Site Safety Commitments
    • Escalation & Dispute Resolution
  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm permits, long‑lead equipment deliveries, craft mobilization plans, logistics, and HSE prechecks before site mobilization.

      Readiness Questions

      Quick Read: Are We Ready to Talk Mobilization?

      • On a simple readiness scale, how would you describe the project right now? Options: Mission-ready (all major items green), Mostly ready (low-risk open items), Partially ready (some high-impact gaps), Not ready (major blockers)
      • What target date are you planning for site mobilization? Options: Within 4 weeks, 1–2 months, 2–4 months, 4+ months, No target yet
      • Who will act as the single point of contact for mobilization decisions from your team? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement Lead, HSE Lead, Other (name/role)
      • If you had to name the single thing you worry about most before mobilizing, what is it?
      • Briefly describe any recent internal or external events that have shifted your mobilization date.

      If We Mobilize Tomorrow, What Would Break First?

      • What single permit or approval—if not secured—would immediately stop mobilization?
      • Which permit types are still outstanding for this site? Options: Environmental (air/effluent), Building/structure, Right-of-way/land use, Pipeline crossing/ROW, Fire & life safety, Electrical service/transformer, Local municipal, Other
      • For the outstanding permits you selected, what are the current status and the remaining actions required?
      • Who owns each permit application and communications with regulators? Options: Owner (E&P/Midstream), EPC Contractor, Third-party consultant/permitter, Joint responsibility, Other
      • Have you faced permit-related stoppages on recent projects? If so, what was the impact and how long did it add to schedule?

      Where the Long‑Lead Risks Live

      • Which single long‑lead item would halt commissioning if it’s late or damaged?
      • Which long‑lead equipment or skids apply to this scope? Options: Compressor packages, Cryogenic trains/heat exchangers, Fractionation columns, Dehydration/TPU skids, Large transformers, Control system panels/PLC cabinets, Proprietary rotating equipment, Other
      • What is the procurement/delivery status for the long‑lead items you depend on? Options: Identified and ordered, Identified but not ordered, Fabrication started, In transit to fab yard, Delivered to site, Critical delay reported
      • What lead‑time variance (in weeks) would you consider tolerable before project risk escalates? Options: <2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, >12 weeks
      • Are there single‑source or vendor lock constraints we must navigate (manufacturers that must be used)? Please list and explain any risk.

      Who Needs to Say Yes — and How Fast?

      • If a week of delay costs X, who in your organization can approve the extra spend immediately to avoid it?
      • Who holds final authority to authorize site mobilization? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement Lead, Owner Executive Committee, Joint sign-off
      • What are the approval thresholds that require escalating beyond the project team? Options: <$250k, $250k–$1M, $1M–$5M, $5M–$20M, >$20M
      • What is the typical decision turnaround time at each escalation level (same day, 1–3 days, 1–2 weeks, >2 weeks)? Options: Same day, 1–3 days, 1–2 weeks, >2 weeks
      • Tell the story of a recent approval that missed its timeline—what happened and what would you change next time?

      Labor: Can We Build with the People Available?

      • If you needed to ramp craft by 50% in six weeks, where would the workforce realistically come from?
      • Rate craft availability in your target basin right now. Options: Plentiful, Adequate, Tight, Severe shortage, Unknown
      • Which trades are most constrained and must be addressed in our mobilization plan? Options: Pipefitters, Welders, Electricians, Instrument technicians, Millwrights, Riggers/Crane crews, Other
      • Are there mandatory local hiring, union rules, or incumbent subcontractor commitments that will affect crew sourcing? Options: No constraints, Other, Mandated incumbents, Preferred vendor list, Union labor required
      • What shift patterns, overtime limits, or training windows should we anticipate that could change productivity assumptions?

      Getting Stuff to Site Without a Trainwreck

      • What single transport or logistics constraint would cause the biggest schedule failure?
      • Which logistical constraints apply to this site? Options: Oversize/overweight permits, Bridge/route load limits, Rail siding availability, Port/harbor constraints, Local road restrictions, Seasonal/weather closures, Customs/import delay, None of the above
      • Have route surveys, transport engineering, or abnormal transport permits been completed? Options: Complete, In progress, Not started, Not required
      • What on-site laydown and storage capacity is available for delivered modules and materials? Options: Sufficient on-site laydown, Limited on-site space, No laydown on-site; off-site required, Dedicated off-site yard secured
      • Share an example of a recent logistics failure on a comparable job and the mitigation that worked or didn't work.

      HSE: What Keeps You Awake at Night?

      • If a single safety lapse could stop mobilization, what's the scenario you fear most?
      • Which pre‑mobilization HSE checks are still outstanding? Options: Site-specific inductions, Job hazard analyses (JHAs)/JSA, Emergency response plan, Contractor HSE prequalification, Lifting plans and certifications, Hot work and confined-space permits, Environmental control measures, PPE issuance and verification
      • Have we completed any joint HSE readiness activities (e.g., tabletop drill, full‑scale drill) with owner and major subs? Options: Full-scale drill completed, Tabletop exercise only, Planned but not yet run, Not planned
      • What TRIR/EMR targets will you hold the construction team to during mobilization and early construction? Options: Zero recordable target, TRIR <0.5, TRIR 0.5–1.0, TRIR >1.0, Owner will define after mobilization
      • What previous incident or near-miss must shape our mobilization plan to prevent repeat issues?

      Commercial Triggers & Escalation: Who Pays When Things Change?

      • If a long‑lead item slips and requires expedited freight that doubles cost, who is expected to carry that incremental cost?
      • Which commercial structure best reflects how you want mobilization risk allocated? Options: Lump‑sum with owner bearing schedule risk, Reimbursable/cost‑plus with cap, Hybrid (shared risk and incentives), Owner-supplied equipment, Other
      • Which mobilization triggers must be met before we physically mobilize crews? Options: Permits in hand, Critical equipment delivered or on route, NTP and contract finalized, Owner funds released, Site access and temporary utilities established, HSE plan approved
      • What formal escalation path and timing do you require for scope or schedule disputes during mobilization? Options: Project Director → VP within 24 hours, Joint change board weekly, Immediate executive escalation, Contractual dispute process only, Other
      • What contingency budget percentage or schedule buffer do you expect to hold for the mobilization phase? Options: No contingency, 2–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, Other

      Sign‑offs & Handover: How Will We Know You're Ready?

      • What are the non‑negotiable acceptance criteria that must be met before you consider mobilization successful? Options: All permits approved, Critical equipment on-site, Required crafts mobilized, Laydown and temporary facilities in place, HSE prechecks complete, QA/QC plan and documentation in place
      • Who must sign the mobilization checklist and what constitutes a joint sign‑off? Options: Project Director, VP, Capital Projects, Procurement Lead, HSE Lead, Joint signature (Owner + EPC)
      • Which documentary proof must be in hand at mobilization (FAT reports, mill test certs, insurance, vendor guarantees)? Please list the top items.
      • How often do you want formal mobilization review meetings during the first 30 days on site? Options: Daily, 3x per week, Weekly, As-needed/emergency only
      • Thinking ahead: what would make you glad you mobilized on the agreed date? Describe the early signs of a clean mobilization.
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Schedule and coordinate fabrication, field erection, QA/QC, and commissioning tasks with owners, sequencing, and escalation paths.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify mechanical completion, performance testing, safety benchmarks, and handover documentation against agreed acceptance criteria.

      Validation Questions

      Project Snapshot — Start Here

      • Briefly describe the project and the primary objective (facility type, nameplate capacity, and target start‑up window).
      • Which basin(s) will this project be executed in? Options: Permian, Appalachian, Haynesville, Gulf Coast, Rockies, Other
      • Who is the owner-side accountability lead for delivery (name and role)?
      • What procurement stage are you currently in? Options: Pre‑qualification, RFP/RFQ drafting, RFP issued, Shortlisting bidders, Commercial negotiation, Awarded/locked
      • What internal approval timeline do you have to authorize an EPC award? Options: Immediately, Within 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Longer than 12 months, Undecided

      Is This a Ticking Clock or a Strategic Play?

      • If the critical path slips by three months, what financial or operational consequences would you face? Options: Lost production revenue, Contractual penalties, Increased financing cost, Regulatory/compliance impacts, Missed market windows, Other
      • What is the absolutely latest commercial / startup date that you cannot move?
      • How confident are you in the current schedule baseline and the assumptions behind it? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Doubtful, Not confident at all
      • Which schedule drivers in this basin have surprised you before (e.g., permitting, equipment, craft availability)? Please give examples.
      • Who on your team owns schedule escalation and what is their escalation path? Options: Project Director, Program/PMO, VP Capital Projects, Operations Lead, Procurement Lead, External advisor

      What’s Keeping Safety and Compliance From Being 'Solved'?

      • If a recordable injury happened on site, what would it cost you in terms of reputation, operations, and regulatory exposure? Options: Minor impact, Moderate operational disruption, Major schedule and reputational damage, Significant regulatory scrutiny/shutdown
      • How do you currently measure and enforce contractor HSE performance—and which metrics matter most to you? Options: TRIR/EMR targets, Leading indicator dashboards, Third‑party audits, Near‑miss reporting, HSE Management Plan sign‑off
      • Which TRIR/EMR target would you require from an EPC partner for this project? Options: TRIR <0.5 / EMR industry-leading, TRIR 0.5–1.0, TRIR 1.0–2.0, No strict numeric target, but strict processes
      • Have you experienced safety-driven work stoppages with contractors previously? Tell us what happened and the root causes.
      • Which site-level HSE deliverables are mandatory before turnover (select all that apply)? Options: Permit‑to‑Work systems, Completed HSE file and audits, Incident investigation reports, Operator site inductions, Third‑party verification

      Where Is the Incumbent Letting You Down?

      • If your incumbent stayed on, which repeat failure would cause the most damage to schedule, cost, or safety? Options: Poor schedule adherence, Quality rework, Slow response to change orders, Weak craft productivity, Inadequate safety controls, Poor communication
      • Which specific performance areas have you been most dissatisfied with from incumbent contractors? Options: Schedule, Quality, Safety, Change‑order transparency, Cost control, Communication
      • Describe a moment when incumbent performance materially affected project outcomes—what happened and what would you have done differently?
      • How open are you to replacing an incumbent mid‑project versus waiting to re‑procure at a milestone? Options: Open to replace anytime, Prefer at defined milestone, Only at contract end, Not open to replacing
      • Are there incumbent subcontractor relationships you consider essential to preserve? If so, which and why?

      The Hidden Constraints No One Puts on the Gantt

      • Which single local constraint—permits, long‑lead equipment, craft shortages, logistics, community relations—would most likely derail the plan if left unaddressed? Options: Permitting/approvals, Long‑lead equipment, Skilled craft shortages, Laydown/logistics bottlenecks, Landowner/ROW issues, Weather/seasonality
      • Which permits or regulatory approvals are still outstanding and what are their expected target dates?
      • Which long‑lead equipment items are on order or at risk (select all that apply)? Options: Compressors, Heat exchangers, Fractionation columns, Turbines/engines, Control systems/PCS/DCS, Skids and prefabs, Other
      • How have you validated craft availability in the basin—do you have commitments or do you expect the contractor to supply craft? Options: We have secured craft, Relying on market availability, Expect contractor to provide craft, Uncertain and need assessment
      • What contingencies (schedule, overtime, local crews) are you willing to accept to mitigate weather or seasonal work stoppages?

      If Success Had a Scorecard, What Would It Measure?

      • Beyond cost, which single metric would make you feel the project was unquestionably successful? Options: On‑time start‑up, Zero recordables (TRIR/EMR), First‑pass commissioning success, Declared capacity met, Low warranty call rate, Other
      • List the top three non‑negotiable acceptance criteria for mechanical completion and turnover (e.g., throughput, emissions, certified drawings).
      • What level of FAT/SAT and test documentation will you require to accept equipment and systems? Options: Full witnessed FATs with data, FATs plus partial site testing, Site acceptance tests only, Comprehensive data packages and loop checks
      • How would you prefer to manage defects and warranty work after turnover (select one)? Options: 12‑month warranty with SLAs, 90‑day remedial window then escalation, Dedicated on‑call contractor team, Escalation to executive sponsors
      • What operational KPIs should we track together during the first 12 months to prove handover success?

      How Will You Make the Final 'Yes'?

      • If two bids are within 5% on price, what differentiator would make you choose one contractor over another? Options: Proven basin schedule performance, Superior safety record, Self‑perform mechanical capability, Fabrication capacity and prefabs, Commercial flexibility, Stronger references
      • Who holds signature authority for award and what internal approvals or committees must sign off?
      • Which commercial model do you prefer for this scope and why? Options: Lump‑sum fixed price, Reimbursable / T&M, Target cost / gainshare, Hybrid (early works + lump‑sum), Undecided / open
      • What contract terms are absolute deal‑breakers for your organization?
      • What evidence, demonstrations, or references would you need to convince your VP of Capital Projects and Procurement to award?

      Small Changes That Unlock Big Outcomes

      • What one small change at scope, contract, or schedule could materially reduce your project's primary risk?
      • Would you trade some commercial certainty for greater schedule certainty (for example early works or staged lump‑sum for critical modules)? Options: Yes, Maybe with defined guardrails, No
      • Are you open to early‑works packages, mobilizing fab yards, or pre‑assembling skids to de‑risk the field schedule? Options: Yes — broadly, Yes — limited to critical-path items, No — prefer full mobilization later, Need more information
      • Would you consider vendor‑managed fabrication (our fab yards) to reduce field hours and labor risk? Options: Definitely, Maybe — need cost comparison, Not interested
      • What KPI or pilot scope would you authorize quickly to validate our delivery model for you?

      What Keeps You Up at Night — Be Honest

      • When you picture the worst‑case outcome for this project, which scenario feels most likely and why?
      • Which risks do you assess as highest probability today? Options: Cost escalation, Schedule slip, Safety incident, Permitting delay, Equipment delivery failure, Labor strikes/disputes, Warranty disputes
      • Have you experienced warranty or handover disputes before? Describe the pain points and the resolution timeline.
      • How much budget and schedule contingency do you typically accept for projects like this? Options: <5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, >20%, No standard contingency
      • Who would you want on a joint escalation team if an issue threatened delivery (names/roles)?
  7. Success

    Review delivered outcomes vs. success signals, capture lessons learned, and maintain a shared channel for warranty issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Outcome Validation Workshop
    • Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement Session
    • Warranty, Defects Resolution & Enhancements Handoff
    • Final Acceptance & Commercial Closeout
    • Recurring Performance Review (30/90/180 Day Check‑Ins)

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Issue draft Acceptance Certificate and Final Account statement for signature.
    • Document a prioritized list of 6–10 actionable improvements with owners and delivery dates.
    • Ensure positive practices are codified so repeatable successes are preserved.
    • Produce a distribution plan so lessons reach FEED, procurement, fabrication, and field teams.
    • Draft the Lessons‑Learned Report and circulate to all meeting participants for sign‑off.
    • Update contract and procurement checklists with at least three agreed changes (e.g., clarified acceptance criteria, supplier pre‑quals).
    • Schedule implementation checkpoints for each high‑priority improvement (owner, 30/60/90 day milestones).
    • Warranty Scope & Timelines Overview
    • Establish a single, agreed warranty ticketing channel with templates and notification rules.
    • Classify and assign all open defects with SLAs and owners to ensure timely resolution.
    • Define governance for enhancement requests and a cadence for backlog review.
    • Provision the shared channel, create initial tickets for all open defects, and notify owners.
    • Publish the triage matrix and SLA document to the channel and obtain stakeholder acknowledgment.
    • Create an enhancement intake form and schedule monthly backlog review meetings.
    • Acceptance Criteria Checklist Review
    • Obtain formal agreement on final acceptance status and sign‑off approach.
    • Resolve or schedule resolution for all commercial open items and agree payment/retention terms.
    • Ensure clear start date and conditions for warranty obligations and handover documentation.
    • One‑Sentence Current State
    • Publish agreed schedule for retention release and final settlement milestones.
    • Deliver warranty pack (drawings, O&M manuals, spare parts list, test records) to the owner's channel.
    • Operational Dashboard Review
    • Verify continued alignment to success signals and detect regression early.
    • Ensure warranty items are progressing to closure within SLAs and identify systemic issues.
    • Maintain a prioritized enhancement roadmap informed by operating data and consequence.
    • Update the shared performance dashboard and circulate to stakeholders before the next review.
    • Close resolved warranty tickets and move recurring systemic items into a corrective action plan.
    • Publish the updated enhancement backlog with proposed schedule for approved items.
    • Obtain stakeholder validation on which success signals are met, partially met, or unmet with evidence.
    • Quantify business consequences for unmet signals and agree remediation priorities.
    • Establish clear owners and timelines for remediation, acceptance, or warranty actions.
    • Produce a signed Outcome Validation Report with metric tables, evidence links, and accepted/unaccepted items.
    • Create remediation tickets for each unmet success signal with owners, due dates, and acceptance criteria.
    • Schedule the first follow‑up performance review (30 days) and assign pre‑work data owners.
    • Pre‑work Review (Top 5 inputs)
    • Measured Outcomes vs Success Signals
    • What Went Well
    • Safety and Compliance Update
    • Outstanding Punch‑List & Remedies
    • Current Open Defects Register
    • Financial Reconciliation
    • Warranty Tickets & Resolution Status
    • Consequence Assessment (Quantified)
    • Triage Rules and SLA Definitions
    • What Failed and Why
    • Shared Channel & Ticketing Protocol
    • Prioritized Improvement Ideas
    • Reliability & Maintenance Work Orders
    • Final Signatures and Certificates
    • Future State Target Clarification
    • Enhancement Backlog and Prioritization Criteria
    • Warranty Commencement & Mobilization Close
    • Enhancement Backlog Prioritization
    • Gap Analysis & Root Cause Mapping
    • Ownership & Implementation Plan
    • Proof Points & Tiebacks
    • Escalation Paths and Contacts
    • Record of Decisions and Next Administrative Steps
    • Documentation and Distribution
    • Decisions, Owners, and Next Review Date
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.