Industrial & Manufacturing Oil, Gas & Natural Resources Downstream & Refining

Lubricants & Specialty Products

Capital-intensive extraction and processing programs where safety, regulation, and supply chain complexity define execution.

ExxonMobil Shell Chevron TotalEnergies
Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align key stakeholders, timelines, and success criteria before deeper technical discovery.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, timeline, purchasing constraints, and success criteria across maintenance, operations, and procurement.

      Alignment Questions

      Quick Grounding: Who Are You and What Brought Us Here?

      • Tell me your name, role, and the single site or fleet this conversation should focus on for decision-making.
      • Which of these best describes the primary business unit we’re discussing? Options: Trucking / Fleets, Manufacturing plant / Production line, Mining / Heavy industry, Automotive service center, Marine / Power generation, Other
      • How do you usually interact with lubricant suppliers today—direct account, through distributor, or mixed? Options: Direct account with manufacturer, Through one primary distributor, Multiple distributors, Spot purchases from various suppliers, Not sure / Other
      • Has your team explored changing or consolidating lubricant suppliers in the past 24 months? Options: Yes — actively evaluating, Yes — considered but paused, No — this is new, Not sure
      • What’s the single most important reason you engaged with us now (select one)? Options: Reduce downtime / failures, Extend drain intervals / reduce consumption, Simplify procurement / consolidate SKUs, Better OEM approvals and compliance, Price pressure, Improve lab-based oil analysis & insights, Other

      Who's Really Calling the Shots — and Why?

      • If this change fails, whose name will be on the problem—and who could quietly block it?
      • Which functions must sign off for a lubricant program change to proceed? Options: Maintenance / Reliability, Operations / Plant Manager, Procurement / Sourcing, Engineering, Health, Safety & Environment (HSE), Finance / Accounting, Quality, Other
      • Who would you point to as the internal champion for this work—someone who’ll push it across the line?
      • Are there external stakeholders (OEM reps, unions, major customers) whose buy-in is required? Options: OEM approval required, Union/worker rep involvement, Major customer audit requirements, Regulatory body involvement, No external stakeholders, Other
      • For each key stakeholder you named, how influential are they on a scale from 1 (informal) to 5 (final approver)? List stakeholder and number.

      Timeline Pressure: Are We Racing the Clock or Building Consensus?

      • What’s the real deadline driving this evaluation—budget window, upcoming outage, warranty expiration, or something else? Options: Quarterly / fiscal purchase window, Planned outage/turnaround, Warranty or OEM audit date, Supplier contract renewal, Equipment failure forcing change, No firm deadline, Other
      • If you had to pick, are you trying to move fast to secure a short-term win or do you need time to build consensus for long-term change? Options: Fast — immediate implementation, Balanced — pilot then rollout, Slow — need broad consensus first, Unsure
      • What happens if this decision slips past your target date? Who or what will feel the consequences most?
      • How flexible is your timeline if technical validation uncovers compatibility or OEM concerns? Options: Very flexible — quality first, Somewhat flexible, Hard deadline — minimal flexibility, Depends on which stakeholder raises the issue
      • Are there scheduled maintenance windows or seasonal peaks we must coordinate around? Please list the next two critical dates.

      Money Talks: What Budget Rules Are Non‑Negotiable?

      • When finance looks at this decision, what metric matters most—purchase price, total cost of ownership (TCO), or short-term budget impact? Options: Purchase price per unit, Total cost of ownership (TCO), Inventory carrying cost, Supplier consolidation savings, Service & labor reduction, Other
      • Do you have a target or range for annual cost savings, or a threshold ROI we should aim to exceed? Options: % savings target (provide number below), Specific $ savings target (provide number below), No explicit target — qualitative goal, Unsure
      • Which procurement methods are acceptable for execution (select all that apply)? Options: Purchase order to manufacturer, Purchase order to distributor, Long-term supply contract, Blanket release order, Frame agreement with spot purchasing, Through existing approved vendor list only
      • Are there payment, credit, or logistics constraints we should know about (net terms, invoicing cadence, EDI, local warehousing)?
      • To what extent is consolidation of SKUs important to procurement: critical, nice-to-have, or low priority? Options: Critical — one-vendor goal, Important — fewer SKUs preferred, Nice-to-have, Low priority — performance over consolidation

      Operational Voices: What Must the Field Insist On?

      • If maintenance could write a requirement list without procurement input, what three items would be non-negotiable?
      • Which product attributes are deal-breakers for your equipment (select all that apply)? Options: Specific OEM approval (list in next question), Compatibility with current fluids, Extended drain capability, Cold-start performance, High-temp stability, Food-grade / low toxicity, Other
      • List the top OEM specs, part numbers, or equipment models we must be explicitly compatible with (free text).
      • How disruptive is a product changeover on your shop floor—rate the expected difficulty: trivial, manageable with training, or high risk requiring full outage? Options: Trivial — quick swap, Manageable with targeted training, Moderate — requires scheduling, High risk — needs outage and detailed validation
      • Who on the maintenance team will own trials, sampling, and technician enablement? Provide role and name if available.

      Success Signals: How Will Everyone Know This Worked?

      • What are the top 3 measurable outcomes that would make stakeholders call this a success (e.g., X% fewer failures, Y% longer drain intervals, $ saved)?
      • Which single KPI will Finance hang its hat on when deciding to renew or expand the program? Options: TCO reduction, Maintenance labor hours reduced, Number of unscheduled failures, Inventory turns / SKU reduction, Compliance / audit pass rate, Other
      • What minimum lab or trial results would satisfy operations and OEM compliance (e.g., specific oil analysis thresholds, number of successful unit-hours)?
      • Who will sign the final acceptance—name and function—and what form of evidence do they require (report, field inspection, lab certificate)? Options: Signed acceptance by Maintenance Manager, Operations sign-off after trial, Procurement contract execution, Formal lab report with trending, Other
      • How long should we wait after deployment before we evaluate success—30, 90, 180 days, or a year? Options: 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (6 months), 1 year, Other / depends on equipment

      Barriers & Hidden Risks: What's Stopping Change?

      • What's the one reason this initiative could quietly die inside your organization?
      • Are there contractual commitments with current suppliers that would limit our ability to switch or consolidate now? Options: Yes — exclusive supply terms, Yes — minimum purchase commitments, No contractual limits, Unknown — need to check
      • Have you experienced warranty pushback or OEM concern when changing fluids previously? Tell us what happened.
      • Which operational groups are most likely to resist change and why (e.g., technicians worried about extra work, procurement worried about price)? Options: Field technicians, Operations leadership, Procurement, Finance, Quality / compliance, Other
      • What mitigation or assurances would reduce the perceived risk (e.g., trial scope, failback plan, third-party lab validation)? Options: Small-scale pilot, OEM sign-off, Guaranteed compatibility testing, Rollback / failback plan, Training & SOP updates, Other

      Aligning on Next Moves: Who Does What and When?

      • Given what we've surfaced, what are the top three immediate next steps you want us to take?
      • Who will be responsible on your side for coordinating the pilot and communications (name, role, and best contact method)?
      • Which of these pilot scopes makes sense to prove value quickly? Options: Single machine / engine, Single equipment class across site, Multiple sites small-scale, Full site phased approach, Lab-only compatibility then field trial
      • What decision checkpoints do you want on the calendar (dates or cadence) before committing to broader rollout? Options: Weekly touchpoints, Bi-weekly progress reviews, Milestone-based (test complete, review), Only ad-hoc as issues arise, Other
      • How would you prefer we document and share progress so all stakeholders stay confident (choose up to two)? Options: Concise executive one-pager, Detailed lab and field reports, Dashboard access with KPIs, Weekly email summaries, On-site review meetings, Other
    2. Current State Mapping

      Document fleet composition, OEM specs, current lubricants, failure modes, inventory practices, and supply constraints.

      Current State

      Start Here — Tell Us About Your Fleet

      • Approximately how many vehicles / machines are in scope for this lubricants program? Options: 1–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 500+
      • Which types of equipment make up the majority of your fleet? Options: On-highway trucks, Off-highway/mining, Construction equipment, Manufacturing presses & conveyors, Compressors & turbines, Metalworking machines, Other
      • How would you describe your operating environment (choose all that apply)? Options: High dust/abrasion, High heat / continuous duty, Cold start / low temp, Wet / corrosive, Clean indoor plant, Marine/mining corrosive, Other
      • Can you summarize the geographic footprint and number of sites this scope covers?
      • Who on your team is the day-to-day owner for lubricant decisions and who signs off on changes?

      Are We Ignoring Manufacturer Requirements?

      • How confident are you that every unit is currently running a lubricant that fully meets the OEM’s written specification? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, We don't know / no centralized view
      • Which OEMs and model families are most important for performance or warranty risk in your operation? Options: Cummins, Caterpillar, Navistar/International, Detroit/VM Motori, OEM industrial brands (e.g., Siemens, ABB), Other
      • Have you had any formal OEM rejections, warranty flags, or non-compliance notes tied to lubricant choice in the last 24 months? Describe what happened.
      • Do any contracts, customers, or regulatory bodies require specific OEM approvals or documented spec compliance? Options: Yes—strictly required, Sometimes required, No contractual requirement, Unsure
      • What process or checklist do you use to verify a product matches an OEM spec before it is used on a unit?

      What's Really in Your Oils?

      • Which lubricant brands and product families are you using today across engine, transmission, hydraulic, gear, and metalworking fluids?
      • Do you maintain a centralized bill-of-materials (BOM) for lubricants or is purchasing decentralized across sites? Options: Centralized BOM, Site-level purchasing with local SKUs, Hybrid (some central, some local), No BOM
      • How often are different brands or product grades mixed, topped up, or otherwise cross-contaminated in the field? Options: Never / strictly controlled, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently / common practice
      • Where do you store MSDS/TDS and changeover compatibility information—can technicians access it at the point of work? Options: Digital CMMS/wiki, Paper at site, Distributor portal, Not consistently available, Other
      • Have you documented any compatibility incidents (e.g., seal swell, additive drop, lab flags) and what was the operational impact?

      Why Do Equipment Failures Repeat?

      • Which failure modes occur most often that you suspect are lubricant-related? Options: Bearing failure, Gear wear / scuffing, Hydraulic valve sticking, Filter plugging / varnish, Engine wear or soot issues, Seal hardening / leaks
      • How often do lubricant-related failures cause unplanned downtime or safety events? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Yearly, Rarely/Never
      • When a lubricant-linked failure happens, what steps do you take to investigate root cause and who owns that process?
      • Do your oil analysis results typically point to a preventable trend before failure occurs, or do they usually show issues only after the fact? Options: Early warning is common, Mixed—sometimes, Usually post-failure, We don't have an oil analysis program
      • Can you share a recent example where lubricant choice or contamination directly impacted an asset’s life or maintenance cost?

      Where Is Cost Hiding in Plain Sight?

      • What are your current target drain intervals (by asset class) and how often do you actually achieve them?
      • How many unique lubricant SKUs do you stock across your facilities today? Options: Under 10, 10–25, 26–75, 76–200, 200+
      • What percentage of lubricant purchases are emergency buys versus planned replenishment? Options: 0–10%, 11–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 75%+
      • How do you currently measure total cost of ownership (TCO) for lubricants—do you include downtime, maintenance labor, disposal, and energy? Options: Yes—all factors included, Partially (some factors), No—only product cost tracked, Unsure
      • Where do you feel most frustrated about ordering, storing, or tracking lubricant inventory?

      How Well Do You See Into Oil Health?

      • Do you have an active oil analysis / condition-monitoring program today? Options: Yes—centralized program, Yes—site-by-site programs, Pilot only, No
      • If yes, what is your typical sample cadence by asset type (engines, gearboxes, hydraulics, metalworking fluids)?
      • Who performs the lab analysis and what is your typical turnaround time for results? Options: Internal lab, Third-party commercial lab, Distributor-managed lab, No consistent lab
      • Do you have defined thresholds and automated alerts for contaminants, wear metals, or additive depletion? Options: Yes—automated and actioned, Yes—but manual review, Defined but not actioned, No thresholds
      • How do you use oil analysis data—reactive repair, predictive planning, warranty defense, or supplier performance tracking? Options: Reactive repair, Predictive maintenance, Warranty defense, Supplier performance, Not used effectively

      What Would Staying the Same Really Cost You?

      • How reliable is your current lubricant supply chain—have you experienced stockouts or extended lead times in the last 12 months? Options: Very reliable, Occasional delays, Frequent disruptions, Critical shortages experienced
      • Do you rely on single-source suppliers or distributors for any critical grades? Options: Single-source for some grades, Multiple approved suppliers, We source opportunistically, Unsure
      • Are there site-specific storage, handling, or regulatory restrictions that limit the products you can receive or store? Options: Yes—strict restrictions, Some restrictions, No restrictions, Unsure
      • How do supply interruptions affect your ability to meet production commitments or SLAs with customers?
      • What contingency plans do you keep for lubricant shortages (e.g., cross-site transfers, alternative products, emergency procurement)?

      Switching: What Keeps You Up at Night?

      • If you were to change lubricant brands or consolidate SKUs, what is your biggest fear? Options: Compatibility problems, OEM warranty issues, Unexpected failures, Supply reliability, Hidden costs
      • Have you previously attempted a brand switch or consolidation—what worked and what failed?
      • How important is chemical compatibility testing, OEM back-to-back approvals, or site trials for you to consider a new supplier? Options: Critical, Important, Nice to have, Not important
      • Who are the internal stakeholders that must be convinced before a switch can happen (roles, not names)? Options: Maintenance manager, Operations supervisor, Procurement, EHS/Compliance, Finance, Quality
      • What internal approval steps have caused delays in the past when implementing new lubricants?

      If We Could Run a Low-Risk Trial, What Would Win You Over?

      • Would you be open to a controlled pilot focused on a small asset class to validate drain extension and compatibility? Options: Yes—ready now, Yes—within 1–3 months, Maybe—need internal buy-in, No—not interested
      • What specific acceptance criteria would the pilot need to meet for you to consider broader rollout (select all that apply)? Options: No OEM issues, Improved drain intervals, Reduced wear metals, Equal or lower operating cost, Supplier support & training, Safety/EHS compliance
      • What minimum pilot duration and sample size would you require to feel confident in results? Options: 30 days / small sample, 90 days / moderate sample, 6 months / comprehensive, Longer / depends on asset
      • Are there laboratory tests, field compatibility checks, or OEM approvals we must include in the pilot?
      • Do you have any constraints around data sharing, privacy, or third-party access that would affect a joint trial? Options: No constraints, Requires NDA, Limited sharing only, Other

      Where Do We Go From Here — Practical Next Steps

      • Who should be part of a short working session to map assets, specs, and inventory (roles and ideal participants)?
      • What timeline feels realistic for completing a current-state audit and proposing a pilot plan? Options: 2 weeks, 1 month, 2–3 months, Longer than 3 months
      • Which formats of support would be most useful from us at this stage (select up to three)? Options: On-site asset audit, Remote BOM consolidation, Lab compatibility screening, Sample-kit & training, Pilot program design, Commercial consolidation proposal
      • What concerns should we be aware of so we can design the discovery and pilot to minimize disruption?
      • Would you like us to prepare a concise summary of gaps we found after this form and a recommended first pilot scope? Options: Yes—send summary & pilot, Maybe—need internal approval, No—prefer to meet first
  2. Outcome Discovery

    Define target outcomes (e.g., extended drain intervals, consolidation goals, TCO targets) and measurable acceptance signals.

    Discovery Questions

    What's the One Change That Would Make Your Week Easier?

    • If you could change one lubricant-related outcome this quarter, what would it be?
    • Which of the following outcomes feels most urgent for your operation right now? Options: Extend drain intervals, Reduce lubricant SKU count, Lower total lubricant spend, Improve equipment uptime, Reduce disposal costs, Improve OEM compliance
    • Who on your team is most impacted day-to-day by the current lubricant program? Options: Maintenance manager, Shift technicians, Procurement buyer, Operations supervisor, EHS/safety, Plant manager, Other
    • How would finally achieving that priority change how your team feels about maintenance work?
    • How confident are you that your current supplier understands and prioritizes that outcome? Options: Very confident, Somewhat confident, Not confident, Unsure

    What If You Could Double Time Between Oil Changes?

    • What if you could safely double drain intervals—how would that reshape your maintenance schedule, costs, and planning?
    • Which measurements would you use to prove interval extension is real and safe? Options: Average operating hours between drains, Oil-analysis condition indices (BN, viscosity, contaminants), Equipment uptime/availability, Wear particle counts, Fuel efficiency, Maintenance labor hours saved, Disposal volume/cost
    • Which of those metrics do you already capture on a regular basis? Options: Average operating hours, Routine oil-analysis reports, Downtime logs, Wear part replacement records, Fuel usage data, We do not capture these reliably
    • How consistent and timely is your current oil-analysis process (sampling, labeling, lab turnaround)? Options: Highly consistent and timely, Generally reliable with occasional delays, Inconsistent and slow, We don’t have a formal process
    • If lab results were late or variable, how would that affect your willingness to extend drains? Options: Would not extend until fixed, Might extend cautiously, Would still consider with safeguards, Unsure
    • Tell us about a past time you extended an interval successfully or unsuccessfully—what happened and what did you learn?

    What Would SKU Consolidation Actually Free Up for You?

    • If you consolidated to fewer lubricant SKUs or a single supplier, what real benefits would you expect beyond lower unit price?
    • Which consolidation benefits matter most to you? Options: Inventory reduction, Fewer compatibility checks, Simpler training for techs, Easier procurement, Better technical support, Improved compliance tracking
    • How many distinct lubricant SKUs do you currently stock across your facility or fleet? Options: 1–10, 11–25, 26–50, 51–100, 100+
    • How often do compatibility or cross-fill questions cause delays, rework, or uncertainty? Options: Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never
    • What organizational barriers would most slow a consolidation effort (e.g., procurement rules, OEM requirements, internal resistance)?
    • Does your procurement policy include supplier diversity, regional sourcing, or mandated local vendors that affect consolidation? Options: Yes - restrictions apply, No - open to consolidation, Somewhat - exceptions needed, Unsure

    What’s the Real Cost of Doing Nothing?

    • If you kept the current program unchanged for the next 12 months, what hard and soft costs would you expect to see?
    • Which cost categories create the most pressure on your budget today? Options: Lubricant purchase price, Waste disposal fees, Inventory carrying costs, Unplanned downtime, Labor for lubricant handling, Replacement parts due to wear
    • Do you maintain an internal TCO or lifecycle cost target for lubricant-related expenses? Options: Yes - formal TCO target, Informal targets only, No TCO target, Unsure
    • Have you previously run an ROI or TCO analysis for a lubricant change or trial? If so, what was the outcome? Options: Yes - showed clear savings, Yes - negligible or mixed, No, but would consider, We started but didn’t finish
    • Which stakeholders need to see TCO/ROI evidence before they’ll approve changes? Options: Maintenance, Operations, Procurement, Finance, Plant leadership, EHS/Safety
    • How soon would a convincing TCO case need to show benefits to influence your decision-making cycle? Options: Within 30 days, 30–90 days, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Longer

    Where Are You Comfortable Taking Risk to Win Improvement?

    • How much operational risk are you willing to accept in exchange for cost or performance gains? Options: Low - avoid any risk, Moderate - controlled pilots only, High - aggressive testing allowed, Depends on equipment criticality
    • Which failure modes are absolute show-stoppers (events that would stop a pilot immediately)? Options: Catastrophic engine failure, Hydraulic or transmission seizure, Bearing failures, Seal degradation causing leaks, Corrosion-related failures, Excessive deposit formation
    • For a pilot program, what maximum scope would you accept before requiring broader sign-off? Options: Single machine, Single shift across similar machines, Subset of fleet (10–25%), Single site, Multi-site pilot
    • What safety, environmental, or compliance constraints must any test or change observe?
    • Who is authorized to stop a trial if an adverse issue arises? Options: Maintenance manager, Plant manager, Operations director, EHS/Safety lead, Contractual escalation required

    How Will You Know We’ve Delivered—Exactly?

    • What exact signals would make you say explicitly 'this supplier delivered' rather than 'this is acceptable for now'?
    • Which of these would you use as pass/fail acceptance criteria for a pilot? Options: % drain interval improvement, No increase in failure rate, Lab chemistry within OEM thresholds, Reduction in maintenance labor hours, Lower lubricant spend per operating hour, Improved uptime metrics
    • For the most important acceptance criteria, what numeric targets would you set (provide ranges or exact values)?
    • Who must sign off on pilot acceptance results before full rollout? Options: Maintenance manager, Operations manager, Procurement/Buyer, Finance, Plant director, Other
    • How would you prefer acceptance data to be delivered for review? Options: Executive summary with key metrics, Full lab reports and raw data, Interactive dashboard, On-site review meeting, Third-party validation report

    Are Your Samples, Data, and People Ready to Prove It?

    • If we started an oil analysis and pilot tomorrow, could you reliably produce representative samples and records? Options: Yes, ready now, Partially ready with some setup, No, we need help setting up
    • Which sampling points are documented and accessible today? Options: Engine oil points, Transmission points, Hydraulic system points, Gearboxes, Compressors, Grease/sampleable bearings, Coolant, We don’t have documented points
    • How frequently are samples currently collected for the systems you want to optimize? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Ad hoc/on-failure, Never
    • Do you have historical lab data we can review for baseline comparison? Options: Yes - full history available, Some historical data, No historical data, Unsure
    • Do you use an in-house lab, a preferred external lab, or multiple labs? Please name them if possible.
    • Would you accept remote monitoring/dashboard delivery of oil-analysis data or prefer periodic written reports? Options: Prefer dashboard/real-time, Prefer periodic written reports, Both, No preference

    Timing, Decision Rhythm, and What Moves the Needle

    • If we presented a clear path to your desired outcomes, what timeline would you expect before making a final commitment? Options: 30 days or less, 30–90 days, Quarter (3 months), 3–6 months, 6+ months
    • What internal procurement or budget windows will influence when you can sign a contract?
    • Which stakeholders, committees, or external approvers are typically involved in lubricant procurement decisions? Options: Maintenance, Operations, Procurement/purchasing, Finance, EHS/Safety, Plant leadership, Corporate sourcing
    • Do you have preferred commercial terms or logistics constraints we should design around (e.g., lead times, consignment, bilateral stock, monthly billing)?
    • How would you prefer to structure a pilot agreement administratively? Options: Supplier provides materials & analysis, Customer provides materials, supplier provides support, Cost-sharing model, Formal pilot contract with acceptance criteria, Other
    • Short of full pilot success, what evidence or early wins would accelerate your willingness to proceed?
  3. Solution Experience

    Translate the customer’s constraints into a shared path showing how specific products, analysis programs, and services deliver the desired outcomes.

    Experience Meetings

    • Solution Experience Kickoff
    • Product-Program Mapping Workshop
    • Compatibility & Risk Review
    • Pilot Design Session
    • Solution Validation & Executive Preview
    • Customer to provide sample past oil-analysis reports and access to one field asset for baseline sampling.
    • Assign operational owners and confirm logistics to ensure pilot execution on schedule.
    • Define escalation rules and contingency plans for adverse results.
    • Seller to produce a formal Pilot Statement of Work (protocol, responsibilities, timeline) for sign-off.
    • Customer to approve selected assets/sites and assign field leads.
    • Operations to schedule deliveries and provide required changeover equipment or training dates.
    • Lab to provision analysis packages and establish online reporting for the pilot.
    • Introductions & Purpose
    • Produce one validated current-state sentence agreed by stakeholders.
    • Quantify the consequence in operational and financial terms sufficient to create urgency.
    • Agree a one-line future-state (measurable outcome) that directs the solution path.
    • Identify required pre-work (data, samples, contacts) and assign owners.
    • Customer to deliver fleet inventory, recent failure/incidence logs, and current drain intervals.
    • Seller technical lead to draft one-sentence current and future state based on discussion and circulate for confirmation.
    • Finance/maintenance to provide a short consequence estimate (cost/hour, parts, downtime) within 3 business days.
    • Schedule Product-Program Mapping Workshop and attach required pre-read materials.
    • Recap Preconditions
    • Produce a draft product-program mapping for prioritized segments that ties each item to the future-state.
    • Confirm oil-analysis cadence and the specific acceptance thresholds to validate outcomes.
    • Identify proof points and existing lab/case evidence for each mapped element.
    • List outstanding gaps (samples, OEM approvals, supply windows) that must be closed before pilot design.
    • Seller to deliver a draft product-program mapping document with SKU-level recommendations and rationale.
    • Context Recap & Mappings Summary
    • Technical team to assemble relevant lab reports, OEM approval matrices, and case-study slides.
    • Agree owners to resolve each identified gap and estimate timelines.
    • Executive Summary of Problem & Proposed Future State
    • Secure executive authorization to proceed with the proposed pilot.
    • Ensure executives understand expected ROI and the commercial implications of scaling the solution.
    • Confirm who will sign the pilot SOW and the timeline to initiation.
    • Align on governance and reporting frequency during the pilot.
    • Seller to deliver a one-page executive summary with ROI, risks, pilot SOW, and proposed start date.
    • Customer executive to provide formal authorization (email/signature) to begin the pilot.
    • Commercial team to prepare preliminary pricing and consolidation proposal tied to pilot outcomes.
    • Operations & lab leads to confirm pilot start logistics and first sample shipment schedule.
    • Confirm OEM compliance for each recommended product or identify approvals required.
    • Document mixing risks with clear mitigation steps to prevent cross-contamination.
    • Validate that supply and logistics are capable of supporting pilots and scale.
    • Define any additional lab tests or OEM engagements needed before pilot start.
    • Technical team to produce a compatibility matrix showing approvals, contraindications, and required tests.
    • Customer to nominate sites/assets for lab sampling and approve sample shipment.
    • Operations to provide current inventory levels and distributor lead times for priority SKUs.
    • Schedule any required OEM engagement or written approval requests.
    • Recap Goals & Success Signals
    • Finalize a pilot protocol that directly proves (or disproves) the stated future-state.
    • Agree unambiguous acceptance criteria and reporting cadence that validate results.
    • Pilot Objectives & Success Criteria
    • Mapped Solution Path
    • OEM Spec & Approval Cross-check
    • One-sentence Current State
    • Segment Prioritization
    • Consequence Quantification
    • Mixing & Contamination Scenarios
    • Site & Asset Selection
    • Expected Outcomes & ROI
    • Product Mapping Exercise
    • Trial Protocol & Changeover Procedure
    • Pilot Ask & Decision Points
    • Failure Mode Analysis & Lab Evidence
    • Oil Analysis & Program Mapping
    • One-sentence Future State
  4. Solution Scope

    Define product selections, delivery formats, oil-analysis cadence, trial scope, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.

    Scope Configuration

    • Tanker bulk lubricant delivery
    • Drum and pail delivery with transfer pumps
    • Custom-blend lubricant production and packaging
    • Onsite lubricant drain, flush, and refill
    • Oil condition monitoring laboratory testing
    • Onsite oil sampling and shipment to lab
    • Install and service bulk dispensing systems
    • Supply OEM-approved engine and transmission oils
    • Supply industrial gear, hydraulic, and compressor oils
    • Supply NLGI-grade greases and cartridges
    • Provide NSF H1 food-grade lubricants and documentation
    • Kitted, labeled lubricant packs by equipment point
    • Returnable drum management and recycling service
    • Onsite technical lubrication training for teams

    Scope Questions

    Tanker bulk lubricant delivery

    • Do you require tanker bulk deliveries at this site? Options: Yes, No
    • Estimated average monthly bulk volume (gallons or liters)?
    • Preferred delivery frequency for tanker bulk (select one)? Options: Daily, Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, On-demand
    • Does your site have tanker unloading infrastructure (dedicated fill points, bunded area, hoses)? Options: Yes, No, Partial - needs upgrades
    • Preferred delivery windows / shift constraints (e.g., daytime, nights, weekends)?
    • Who will be responsible for receiving and offloading tanker deliveries? Options: Supplier, Site team, 3rd-party contractor, Not decided

    Drum and pail delivery with transfer pumps

    • Do you want drums and pails delivered with transfer pumps included? Options: Yes, No
    • What packaging sizes do you commonly use or prefer? Options: 1 gal / 4 L, 5 gal / 20 L, 20 L, 55 gal / 200 L, Other
    • How many SKUs (different lubricants) do you expect to receive as drums/pails? Options: 1-5, 6-20, 21-50, 50+
    • Do you have adequate storage and secondary containment for drums/pails? Options: Yes, No, Limited - needs assessment
    • Do you require supplier-installed transfer pumps and training on use? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you prefer single-use drums or a returnable drum program (if available)? Options: Single-use (disposal), Returnable/Reusable, No preference

    Custom-blend lubricant production and packaging

    • Do you require a custom-blend lubricant (unique formulation) rather than off-the-shelf products? Options: Yes, No
    • Estimated annual volume for the custom blend (gallons or liters)?
    • Are there regulatory, food-contact, or OEM constraints on the formulation (e.g., NSF H1, OEM approvals)? Options: NSF H1, OEM-specific approval required, No special constraints, Other
    • What packaging formats will you need for the custom blend? Options: Bulk tanker, 55 gal drum, 20 L pail, Cartridge/keg, Kitted packs
    • Do you require laboratory validation, shelf-life testing, or OEM co-formulation documentation? Options: Yes - full testing & docs, Yes - limited testing, No
    • Who will hold formulation/IP and approval responsibility for custom blends? Options: Supplier owns formula, Customer owns formula, Joint ownership / negotiated

    Onsite lubricant drain, flush, and refill

    • Do you want supplier-performed onsite drain, flush, and refill services? Options: Yes, No
    • Scope of service required? Options: Single machine/unit, Multiple units, Entire fleet/site
    • Are planned downtime windows available for performing drain/flush/refill work? Options: Yes - scheduled windows, Limited windows - requires coordination, No - needs 24/7 support
    • Do you require hazardous waste handling and disposal for removed fluids? Options: Yes, No
    • What acceptance criteria must be met after service (e.g., visual checks, oil-analysis pass, operational test, sign-off)? Options: Visual inspection, Oil analysis pass, Operational test, Customer sign-off
    • Are there OEM-mandated changeover procedures or compatibility checks needed? Options: Yes, No, Unknown - need assessment

    Oil condition monitoring laboratory testing

    • Will you enroll in an oil condition monitoring (oil analysis) program? Options: Yes, No
    • Which test package level do you require? Options: Basic (viscosity, wear metals), Standard (additives, contaminants), Comprehensive (full additive profile + spectrometry), Custom tests (ferrous debris, particle counts)
    • Desired sample cadence for lab testing? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Per-service event, Custom schedule
    • How many samples per month do you anticipate?
    • Do you require expedited turnaround SLAs for critical assets? Options: 24 hours, 48 hours, 5-7 days (standard), No preference
    • Do you want analysis results integrated into your CMMS/ERP or dashboard? Options: Yes - integrate, No - email reports only, Unsure

    Onsite oil sampling and shipment to lab

    • Do you want supplier personnel to perform onsite oil sampling? Options: Yes - supplier to sample, No - site will sample, Kits only (we'll ship)
    • How many sampling points and what frequency (list points and frequency)?
    • Do you require pre-built sampling kits and labeled containers? Options: Yes - kits and labels, No - we supply containers, Only labels/chain-of-custody forms
    • Is chain-of-custody documentation and sample tracking required? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you need supplier-arranged pickup and shipment to the analysis lab? Options: Yes, No
    • Are there any hazardous shipping or storage restrictions we should be aware of? Options: Yes, No, Unknown - need assessment

    Install and service bulk dispensing systems

    • Do you want supplier-installed bulk dispensing tanks and pumps? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you currently have bulk tanks or primary containment compatible with new dispensing systems? Options: Compatible, Not compatible, No existing tanks
    • Is flow measurement, metering, or automated dispensing accuracy required? Options: Yes - metering & logs, Basic pump only, Not sure - need recommendation
    • Do you want routine maintenance and calibration service contracts for the dispensing equipment? Options: Yes, No
    • Do you require telemetry/IoT integration for inventory monitoring and reorder triggers? Options: Yes - full integration, Basic remote alerts, No
    • Is site mechanical/permit access available for installation work (crane, confined space, hot work)? Options: Yes, Limited - requires coordination, No

    Supply OEM-approved engine and transmission oils

    • Do you require oils with specific OEM approvals or certifications? Options: Yes, No
    • Please list OEMs and models (or upload specs) that require approved fluids.
    • Are you seeking single-source consolidation for engine and transmission oils across your sites? Options: Yes, No, Partial consolidation
    • Estimated monthly volumes by product family (engine oils, transmission fluids)?
    • Do you require formal approval letters, technical data sheets, or OEM cross-reference documentation? Options: Yes - all docs, Only SDS/TDS, No
    • Are there current contract or supplier restrictions affecting which brands you can use? Options: Yes, No, Unknown

    Supply industrial gear, hydraulic, and compressor oils

    • Which industrial product families do you need supplied? Options: Gear oils, Hydraulic oils, Compressor oils, Turbine oils, Other
    • What viscosity grades or ISO VG ranges are required?
    • Are there cleanliness, ISO particle count, or filtration specs to meet? Options: ISO cleanliness spec required, No specific cleanliness spec, Unknown - need assessment
    • Do you require guarantees related to energy efficiency, anti-wear, or drain-interval performance? Options: Yes, No, Discuss options
    • Would you like onsite top-up or automatic replenishment services for these fluids? Options: Yes, No
    • Preferred delivery cadence for industrial oils (bulk vs drum/just-in-time)? Options: Bulk stock, Scheduled drum deliveries, Just-in-time deliveries, Mixed

    Supply NLGI-grade greases and cartridges

    • Which NLGI grades do you require? Options: NLGI 000, NLGI 00, NLGI 0, NLGI 1, NLGI 2, NLGI 3, Other
    • Do you prefer cartridges, kegs, or bulk grease delivery? Options: Cartridges, Keg/bulk, Both
    • Are there special performance needs (food-grade, high-temp, EP, low-temp flow)? Options: Food-grade (NSF H1), High-temp, EP (extreme pressure), Low-temp, Other
    • What is the expected number of lubrication points to be serviced?
    • Do you need help defining re-lubrication intervals and applying greasing best practices? Options: Yes - full program, Yes - partial, No
    • Are centralized lubrication systems in use that require compatible grease formulations? Options: Yes, No, Planning to implement
  5. Pilot & Technical Validation

    Plan and execute compatibility checks, small-scale trials, and lab analysis to validate OEM compliance and drain-interval gains.

    Validation Meetings

    • Pilot Planning & Protocol Alignment
    • Compatibility & OEM Compliance Technical Review
    • Site Readiness & Sample Point Workshop
    • Pilot Kickoff & First-Run Execution Check-in
    • Lab Analysis Review & Pilot Validation Decision
    • Confirm timing and ownership for first lab result review.
    • Schedule any bench compatibility tests and reserve lab capacity.
    • Design and share a lab data dashboard template for live tracking of key indicators.
    • Prepare and distribute sample kits and chain-of-custody forms to site technicians.
    • Confirm One-sentence Current State at Site
    • Create a verified site map with explicit sample points and signed site SOPs for changeover and sampling.
    • Ensure technicians are trained and certified on the pilot collection and changeover checklist.
    • Eliminate sampling variability by documenting chain-of-custody and storage procedures.
    • Label and photograph all sample points and upload to the shared pilot folder.
    • Conduct and document a quick on-site training for all technicians involved in the pilot.
    • Confirm waste oil pickup and disposal arrangements with site EHS and logistics.
    • Readiness Confirmation
    • Execute the first changeover per protocol and ensure baseline samples are shipped to the lab with correct labeling.
    • Document any deviations and agree on immediate mitigations to preserve pilot integrity.
    • One-sentence Current State
    • Site to dispatch baseline samples to the agreed lab within the defined chain-of-custody window.
    • Log any deviations in the pilot deviation register and notify stakeholders.
    • Schedule the first lab-results review meeting aligned with lab ETA.
    • One-sentence Recap of Pilot Objective & Acceptance Criteria
    • Validate whether the trial product met OEM compliance and the measurable drain-interval targets.
    • Make a documented mutual decision (scale/iterate/stop) with assigned owners and timelines.
    • Capture lessons learned and any protocol changes required before scaling.
    • Prepare a formal pilot validation report including raw lab data, interpreted results, TCO model, and recommended decision.
    • If approved to scale, draft supply commitments, consolidation list, and proposed contract modules for Mutual Commit.
    • If iteration is required, define the revised protocol and the additional tests or mitigations to be executed.
    • Archive all chain-of-custody, photos, and deviation logs for audit and OEM traceability.
    • Achieve a signed, unambiguous pilot protocol with measurable acceptance criteria.
    • Assign clear owners for execution, sampling, lab submission, and decision-making.
    • Schedule the pilot start date and first data checkpoint.
    • Distribute finalized pilot protocol and acceptance criteria to all stakeholders.
    • Site to provide baseline asset list, current oil drain intervals, and recent oil analysis results.
    • Supplier/distributor to reserve and label trial product, sample kits, and shipping for lab.
    • Logistics lead to confirm delivery window and on-site storage plan.
    • Inventory of OEM Specifications & Gaps
    • Set a definitive lab and bench test plan with numeric pass/fail thresholds tied to OEM limits.
    • Confirm whether existing OEM approvals cover the trial assets or if equivalence mapping and documented justification are required.
    • Define the stop/mitigation criteria and decision authority in case of adverse lab findings.
    • Submit baseline and first-run samples to the agreed lab with chain-of-custody labels.
    • Supplier to assemble OEM approval documentation and equivalence notes for each asset model.
    • Walkthrough of Asset Map & Sample Points
    • Recap Critical Steps of the Protocol
    • Consequence Statement & Urgency
    • Presentation of Lab Results vs Baseline
    • Define Lab Test Panel & Acceptance Criteria
    • Operational Observations & Site Feedback
    • Define Pilot Objective & Future State
    • Collect Baseline Samples & Record Conditions
    • Changeover & Flushing Procedure
    • Compatibility Test Plan (Bench/Component)
    • Scope, Sample Size & Duration
    • Chain-of-Custody and Data Integrity
    • Sample Collection Protocol & Chain-of-Custody
    • Quantify Drain-Interval Gains & TCO Impact
    • Immediate Post-run Observations
    • Detailed Trial Protocol
    • Technician Training Plan & Checklist
    • Consequence Scenarios
    • Plan for First Lab Results & Checkpoint
    • Decision Framework & Recommendation
    • Next Steps, Documentation & Contract Implications
  6. Mutual Commit

    Finalize pricing, supply commitments, consolidation terms, service levels, and contract modules required to proceed.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master Supply Agreement (MSA)
    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Pricing & Volume Commitment Schedule
    • Supply & Delivery Commitment (Logistics Addendum)
    • Consolidation & SKU Rationalization Agreement
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA)
    • Trial Acceptance & Pilot Closure Criteria
    • Warranty & Product Liability Addendum
    • Oil Analysis & Reporting Agreement
    • Inventory & Consignment/Managed Inventory Agreement
    • Payment & Credit Terms
    • Change Order & Scope Modification Procedure
    • Contract Term, Renewal & Termination Clause
    • Compliance & OEM Approval Appendix
    • Training & Deployment Support Statement
    • Insurance & Indemnity Schedule
    • KPI & Continuous Improvement Dashboard Agreement
    • Distribution & Channel Addendum
    • Proof of Delivery & Acceptance Record
    • Confidentiality & Data Sharing Appendix
  7. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, sequencing, and validation steps.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm inventory, delivery schedules, changeover procedures, sample points, training, and risk controls for rollout.

      Readiness Questions

      Start Here: Snapshot of Your Site

      • Which best describes your operation? Options: Manufacturing plant (assembly/process), Commercial fleet / trucking, Mining or heavy industry, Automotive service/repair, Metalworking shop, Mixed or other
      • Roughly how many powered assets or pieces of equipment are we talking about for this program? Options: 1–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–1,000, 1,000+
      • Who on your team manages day-to-day lubricant selection or hands-on oil changes? (role/title)
      • Who formally signs off on supplier pilots, product changes, or new inventory lines? Options: Maintenance Manager, Operations/Plant Manager, Procurement/Purchasing, Engineering/Technical Services, Site/Division Director, Shared approval
      • What timeframe feels realistic for you to evaluate and decide on a new lubricant program? Options: Immediately, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12+ months

      Why Keep Doing It This Way?

      • If nothing about your lubricant program changed this year, what negative consequences would you expect to see?
      • How did your current supplier mix and purchasing habits come to be—habit, price, approvals, or something else? Options: Legacy habit, Best price per gallon, OEM-specified brand, Distributor relationships, Internal specification/policy, Other
      • Which part of your current procurement or stocking process causes the most friction? Options: Ordering lead time, Inventory accuracy, Receiving and storage, Invoice and payment, Product selection confusion, Other
      • When suppliers don’t meet expectations, what usually breaks first—downtime, inventory gaps, quality issues, or relationship trust? Options: Downtime/production loss, Stockouts/delivery gaps, Product quality or compatibility, Escalation overhead/time spent, Other
      • How does the current program make you feel at month-end: confident, worried, stretched, or resigned? Options: Confident, Somewhat confident, Worried, Stretched thin, Resigned

      Small Problems That Turn into Big Breakdowns

      • Which recurring lubrication-related failure keeps you awake at night and why?
      • Which failure modes do you see most often in your equipment? Options: Bearing wear/false brinelling, Gear scuffing, Hydraulic valve sticking, Engine soot/acid issues, Filter clogging, Other
      • How often do lubrication-related failures occur across your fleet/site? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, A few times per year, Rarely
      • Tell us about a recent incident where lubricant choice or handling contributed to downtime—what happened and who was impacted?
      • Quantify the typical impact when a lubrication failure happens: average hours lost, parts cost, or percentage of planned output affected.

      What If Drains Were Twice as Long?

      • If drain intervals could realistically double in your most critical assets, what would change operationally and financially?
      • Which of these outcome targets would be most valuable to you? Options: Extend drain intervals, Reduce SKUs / consolidate products, Lower total cost of ownership (TCO), Reduce downtime/repairs, Improve sustainability/less waste
      • What measurable acceptance signals would prove a new lubricant program succeeded for you? Options: X% longer drain interval, Y% fewer oil-related failures, Z% TCO reduction, Successful OEM compatibility reports, Improved oil analysis trending
      • Do you currently track any KPIs that we should align to during trials? If so, list them and how you measure them.
      • How willing are you to trade a small increase in unit price for larger gains in drain intervals or reliability? Options: Very willing, Somewhat willing, Neutral, Unwilling

      Who’s Holding the Keys (and What They Won’t Compromise On)

      • Which single non-negotiable would stop this change cold if it isn’t satisfied? Options: OEM approval/matching spec, No operational downtime, No mixing with legacy fluids, Supplier must meet delivery SLAs, Price threshold, Other
      • Which OEM approvals or industry specs are mandatory for your equipment (API categories, OEM part approvals, ISO grades, food-grade, etc.)?
      • Do insurance, warranty, or contractual obligations require specific documentation or product approvals before you can accept a new lubricant? Options: Yes—insurance/warranty stipulations, Yes—contractual customer terms, No formal requirements, Unsure
      • What internal procurement thresholds must be met for supplier selection (e.g., RFP required above $X, multi-year contracts only, preferred vendor lists)?
      • How do you prefer approvals be documented—test reports, OEM letters, lab certificates, or in-field pilot data? Options: Independent lab report, OEM approval letter, On-site pilot data, Supplier technical datasheet/MSDS, Combination

      Mixing Is Risky — Or Is It?

      • How comfortable are you with changing fluids and the risk of residual mixing in tanks or gearboxes? Options: Very comfortable with proper flush, Comfortable but cautious, Prefer zero-mix strategies, Not comfortable
      • Which brands and product families are currently dominant in your operation?
      • Have you previously switched brands or grades? If yes, what steps did you take and what issues (if any) occurred? Options: Yes—planned flush and trial, Yes—switched without full flush, No—never switched brands, Other
      • How many distinct sampling points / oil labs do you currently use per site (bearing sump, gearbox, engine, hydraulic, coolant, etc.)? Options: 1–5, 6–10, 11–20, 20+
      • What oil-analysis cadence do you use on critical assets today? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Event-driven/after failure

      Show Me the Proof — Trials, Tests, and Metrics

      • What single piece of evidence would convince you beyond doubt that a product delivers its promised drain-interval or reliability gains?
      • Which lab or field tests do you require during validation? Options: Viscosity and TBN trends, Wear metals (ICP) & particle counts, Soot/oxidation analysis, Compatibility/separation testing, FTIR or used-oil fingerprints
      • What pilot size and duration would you consider sufficient to validate performance (e.g., X machines for Y months)? Options: Small: 1–3 assets / 1–3 months, Medium: 4–20 assets / 3–6 months, Large: 20+ assets / 6–12 months, Unsure, need recommendation
      • Who on your side will own pilot execution, sample collection, data review, and sign-off?
      • What success criteria should be written into the pilot agreement (lab thresholds, uptime target, drain interval extension, cost metric)?

      Rollout Reality Check: Logistics, Storage, and Training

      • If we rolled out a consolidated lubricant program tomorrow, what operational friction would surface first?
      • What delivery formats do you need (bulk tanker, IBC, drum, pail, kegs) and which are preferred at this site? Options: Bulk tanker, IBC/tote, 55‑gal drum, 20‑L pail, Cartridges/kegs, Other
      • Describe your current on-site storage: dedicated tanks, mixed-use tanks, climate-controlled, drum racking, or limited space. Options: Dedicated tanks with segregation, Shared tanks with changeover protocols, Drum storage only, Limited/temporary storage, Other
      • What training or technician enablement would be required before first changeover? Options: Hands-on site training, Remote classroom/webinar, Written SOPs and checklists, No training needed, Combination
      • Do you require written changeover procedures, labeled sample points, or QR-traced inventory for audits? Options: Written changeover SOPs, Labeled sampling points, QR/barcode inventory, Certificates of analysis on delivery, No special documentation

      Supply & Risk Controls: Can We Keep the Line Moving?

      • What minimum inventory buffer do you require to accept a new supplier (days of supply or # of shipments)? Options: 3–7 days, 8–14 days, 2–4 weeks, 1+ months, Unsure
      • How do you evaluate supplier risk—lead time variability, single-source exposure, credit terms, or geographic supply continuity? Options: Lead time variability, Single-source exposure, Credit/payment terms, Geographic/distribution risk, Quality consistency
      • Would you accept staged supply (pilot volumes locally, scaled after validation) or require full-scale readiness before deploying? Options: Staged supply for pilot, Full-scale readiness only, Hybrid approach, Undecided
      • Which logistics or distribution constraints should we know about (dock hours, hazardous-material rules, multiple delivery sites, limited forklift access)?
      • Do you require safety data sheets, transportation paperwork, and special labeling to be in a particular format for site acceptance? Options: Standard SDS & labels, Customer-specific paperwork, Electronic only, No special requirements

      What Would Make You Say Yes?

      • What is the single most important commercial or technical condition that would move you from evaluation to commitment?
      • Are you open to consolidating multiple product SKUs under one supplier if it demonstrably reduces complexity and TCO? Options: Yes—strongly open, Yes—open with trials, Maybe—depends on product fit, No—we prefer multiple suppliers
      • What contract term and pricing model do you prefer (annual fixed, consumption-based, tiered pricing, consignment/bulk)? Options: Annual fixed, Consumption-based, Tiered volume discounts, Consignment/bulk model, Other
      • Realistically, what is your internal decision timeline once a satisfactory pilot is complete? Options: Immediate (days), 1–4 weeks, 1–3 months, 3+ months, Depends on procurement cycle
      • What reporting cadence and format would make you comfortable to move from pilot to scale (weekly dashboard, monthly review, raw lab data access)? Options: Weekly dashboard, Bi-weekly summary, Monthly review, Direct lab data access, Ad-hoc as needed

      Open Floor: Stories, Exceptions, and Final Notes

      • What overlooked constraint, exception, or local rule should we not ignore when designing your program?
      • Do you have any site-specific stories, past supplier experiences, or technician feedback that could help us avoid predictable issues?
      • Would you like to attach or reference any documents (asset lists, OEM specs, current inventory manifest, prior lab reports)? Options: Yes—asset list/inventory, Yes—OEM specifications, Yes—used-oil reports, No attachments, Will provide on request
      • Who should be our single point of contact to run a pilot and coordinate logistics (name, role, email, phone)?
      • How would you like us to follow up—proposal, technical workshop, on-site visit, or pilot plan? Options: Proposal & pricing, Technical workshop, On-site visit, Pilot plan with scope, Other
    2. Deployment Enablement

      Coordinate deliveries, site changeovers, technician enablement, and sequencing to implement the lubricant program.

    3. Validation Checklist

      Verify installation, sample collection, initial analysis results, and acceptance criteria to confirm successful rollout.

      Validation Questions

      Quick Introduction — Help Us Understand Your World

      • Which facilities, fleets, or equipment classes should this evaluation cover?
      • Which title best describes your role in lubricant decisions? Options: Fleet/Maintenance Manager, Plant/Shift Engineer, Reliability Engineer, Shop Supervisor/Foreman, Procurement Manager/Buyer, Operations Manager, Other
      • Approximately how many machines or vehicles are in the scope for this program? Options: Under 25, 25–100, 101–500, 501–2,000, More than 2,000, Unsure
      • Which purchasing model do you primarily use for lubricants today? Options: Direct from manufacturer, Distributor/wholesale network, Mixed channels, Corporate national contract, Local procurement per site, Other
      • Who else on your team should be included in technical conversations (names/titles or roles)?

      Are We Just Living With It?

      • What maintenance headaches do you find yourselves tolerating because fixing them feels too big, risky, or expensive?
      • Which recurring lubrication-related issues cost you the most time or money? Options: Unplanned downtime, Frequent scheduled oil changes, Contamination events, Unexpected component failures, High lubricant inventory carrying cost, Compatibility or cross‑mix problems, Disposal/used-oil costs, Other
      • How often do lubrication-related problems impact critical assets? Options: Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Annually, Rarely, Unknown
      • Tell the story of the last lubrication-related failure—what happened and what was the downstream impact beyond repair cost?
      • When these issues recur, how does it affect the team's morale and the conversation with operations or procurement? Options: Increased frustration and blame, Consistent firefighting mode, Pressure from operations, Procurement questions on price, Minimal visible effect, Other

      Where It Actually Hurts — Cost, Time, and Risk

      • If lubricants were causing the single largest controllable cost or reliability problem, where would you point first?
      • Which line item represents the biggest ongoing expense tied to lubricants for you? Options: Purchase cost per gallon, Disposal or environmental fees, Downtime/production loss, Labor for changeovers, Oil analysis program fees, Excess SKUs and inventory, Emergency procurement premium, Other
      • Do you currently track lubricant Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by category or asset? Options: Yes — formal TCO model, Yes — informal estimates, Not currently but planning to, No
      • What are your typical drain intervals today for engines, gearboxes, and hydraulics (give ranges or examples)?
      • When supply issues occur, which fallback actions do you usually take? Options: Switch brands/alternate grade, Delay maintenance/change, Emergency local buy (higher cost), Borrow inventory from other sites, Operate with lower stock levels, Other

      Are You Sure the Specs Tell the Whole Story?

      • How often do OEM specs feel like a necessary constraint rather than a helpful guide when choosing lubricants? Options: Always a constraint, Often limits options, Sometimes restrictive, Rarely restrictive, Unsure
      • Which OEM approvals or specifications are absolute requirements for your assets? Options: API (CK‑4/CJ‑4, etc.), ACEA/ILSAC, OEM‑specific approvals (Cummins/Cat/GM/etc.), SAE/ISO viscosity grades, ZF/Allison/Other transmission specs, None — flexible, Other
      • Have you ever been blocked from adopting a better product due to compatibility or warranty concerns? Describe the situation.
      • What non‑spec evidence do you trust most when deciding to switch (select up to three)? Options: Oil analysis trend data, Independent lab compatibility tests, Field trial performance, OEM written confirmation, Peer customer case studies, Distributor reassurance, Other
      • How comfortable would your team be running a controlled flush or phased cross‑over to validate compatibility? Options: Very comfortable — we’ve done it, Somewhat comfortable — need vendor plan, Not comfortable — avoid risk, No experience

      What Would Winning Actually Look Like?

      • If lubrication problems were solved, how would daily operations and KPIs feel different?
      • Which outcomes would you prioritize from a new lubricant program? Options: Longer drain intervals, Fewer unplanned failures, Lower overall lubricant spend, SKU consolidation, Simplified vendor management, Improved oil-analysis insights, Reduced environmental/disposal costs, Improved energy efficiency, Other
      • What specific numeric targets would make you call a new program successful (e.g., % drain interval increase, $ saved, MTBF improvement)?
      • Which stakeholders would notice the biggest improvement and how do you think they'd describe the change?
      • How quickly would you expect to see measurable benefits in a successful pilot? Options: Immediate (weeks), 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Longer than 12 months, Unsure

      What’s Keeping You From Changing Course?

      • What’s the single biggest reason your team hesitates to consolidate or switch lubricant suppliers?
      • Which internal barriers are most likely to stall a decision? Options: Procurement compliance/rules, OEM warranty concerns, Operations resistance, Maintenance bandwidth, Budget cycle timing, Existing distributor relationships, Inventory/warehouse constraints, Regulatory/compliance issues, Other
      • Have you attempted supplier consolidation before? If yes, what specifically caused it to fail or stall?
      • How much does price negotiation vs. technical validation influence the final decision here? Options: Price dominates, Technical validation dominates, Both equally, Depends on the category, Unsure
      • What contractual or commercial terms would most reduce your perceived risk (select up to three)? Options: OEM approval/warranty protection, Trial acceptance criteria, Flexible term/exit clauses, Guaranteed supply lead times, Price protection, Consignment stock, Performance-based pricing, Other

      Are You Ready to Validate at Scale?

      • Would you prefer validation through lab‑controlled testing, live fleet trials, or a blend of both? Options: Lab only, Live fleet only, Blend of lab + fleet, Undecided
      • Which pilot formats would you consider for initial validation? Options: Single-asset engine trial, Small fleet/route trial, Gearbox/hydraulic system pilot, Bench compatibility/bench tests, Third-party lab study, Full-site phased rollout, Other
      • Do you have in-house oil analysis capability or do you rely on third‑party labs? Options: In-house lab, Third-party lab, Vendor lab, No oil analysis capability
      • What sample cadence is realistic during a pilot to prove results? Options: Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, At every change, Event-driven (failure/concern), Other
      • What acceptance criteria would a pilot need to meet for you to greenlight a wider rollout?

      Who Must Be Convinced — and Who Holds the Signatures?

      • Who would push back if we proposed a consolidated lubricant program, and what would their main concern be?
      • List the decision-makers who must approve a new supplier or program (names/titles) and the one thing each cares about most.
      • Which stakeholders require quantitative technical evidence versus commercial terms to sign off? Options: Maintenance/Reliability (technical), Operations (operational impact), Procurement (commercial), Finance (ROI), Health & Safety/Environmental, Plant Manager/GM, OEM/Manufacturers rep, Other
      • What is your realistic internal timeline for vendor evaluation, pilot, and contracting? Options: Under 1 month, 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, Longer/undefined
      • Are there procurement windows, budget freezes, or audit events we should align with? Options: Yes — there are fixed procurement windows, Yes — budget cycle constraints, No — flexible timing, Unsure

      Let's Make This Easy to Decide

      • What single piece of evidence would remove the last bit of doubt and make you comfortable moving forward?
      • Would a tailored proposal that includes pilot design, acceptance criteria, sample cadence, pricing, and supply timeline help accelerate approval? Options: Yes, Maybe, No
      • Which proposal elements are non‑negotiable for your team? Options: OEM approvals/written notice, Clear pilot acceptance criteria, Guaranteed supply lead times, Competitive pricing, Technical training for techs, Oil analysis & reporting plan, Warranty or liability terms, Consolidation plan, Other
      • How do you prefer to receive technical evidence and updates during evaluation—detailed lab reports, executive summaries, onsite demos, or live dashboards? Options: Detailed lab reports, Executive summaries, Onsite demos/observations, Customer case studies, Live dashboard access, Vendor technical workshops, Other
      • If we prepared a 90‑day pilot plan tailored to your assets, who would need to review it and who would operate it day‑to‑day?
      • What would be a comfortable next step right now? Options: Schedule technical workshop, Receive tailored proposal and pricing, Send product samples and test kits, Arrange a pilot/trial, No next step at this time, Other
  8. Success

    Review outcomes against success signals, capture learnings, and maintain a shared channel for ongoing issues and enhancements.

    Success Reviews

    • Success Review & Outcomes Validation
    • Technical Lessons Learned & Root‑Cause Workshop
    • Operations, Support & Shared Channel Setup
    • Consolidation, Renewal & Scale Planning

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Opening & One‑Sentence Current State
    • Create a prioritized, owner‑assigned technical action list with target dates.
    • Define and commit to required SOP and sampling changes to be implemented at site level.
    • Document root-cause findings and required verification tests; assign owners and dates.
    • Update SOPs for changeover and sampling; circulate to site teams and technical sales.
    • Schedule targeted re-tests or follow-up lab analyses to confirm remedial actions are effective.
    • Define Shared Communication Channel & Access
    • Put a shared, accessible channel and document location into production with clear access rules.
    • Agree SLAs and escalation paths so operational issues are triaged and resolved predictably.
    • Confirm inventory and delivery processes that prevent stockouts and support consolidation goals.
    • Establish monitoring/reporting cadence that surfaces regressions before they become business-impacting.
    • Provision the agreed shared channel and grant access to named participants; post an onboarding message with SOPs.
    • Publish SLA table and escalation contacts in the channel and in the contract annex.
    • Set up automated dashboard reports and scheduled distribution for oil-analysis trends and KPIs.
    • Schedule the first operational training session and circulate the agenda and attendees.
    • Review Consolidation Opportunities & SKU Rationalization
    • Reach a commercial decision to renew and/or scale, or list conditions required to do so.
    • Agree an actionable rollout timeline and responsible owners for scaling to additional sites.
    • Finalize the required contract modules and prepare a draft proposal for sign-off.
    • Produce a commercial proposal with SKU consolidation plan, pricing, and supply commitments for executive review.
    • Draft required contract modules and circulate for legal and procurement review.
    • Create a phased rollout project plan with milestones, resources, and risk mitigations.
    • Confirm which success signals were met, which were not, and obtain customer acceptance or remediation decisions.
    • Produce one concise statement of current state, one concise statement of consequence, and one concise future-state statement agreed by both parties.
    • Establish a concrete list of remediation tasks (if any), owners, and dates to close remaining gaps.
    • Agree on formal sign-off criteria or next review cadence if additional validation is required.
    • Prepare a formal Outcomes Validation Report with data annexes and a one-paragraph current/future-state summary.
    • Assign remediation owners for any failed acceptance criteria and schedule required technical follow-up activities.
    • If accepted, issue a signed acceptance/transition memo and propose timeline to move to operational support.
    • Set Workshop Objectives & Pre‑Work Review
    • Agree on validated root causes for each exception and the tests required to confirm hypotheses.
    • Recap Success Signals & Acceptance Criteria
    • Commercial Terms & Pricing Review
    • Set Issue Triage & Escalation SLAs
    • Review Pilot Configuration vs. Protocol
    • Inventory, Reordering & Delivery Cadence
    • Quantified Consequences & Context
    • Detailed Failure Mode / Exception Review
    • Scale & Rollout Plan
    • Root‑Cause Analysis & Hypothesis Testing
    • Monitoring, Reporting & Alerting Cadence
    • Contract Modules & Acceptance Criteria
    • Data Walkthrough — Oil Analysis & Operational Metrics
    • TCO / ROI Comparison
    • Training & Technician Enablement Plan
    • Decision & Executive Next Steps
    • Process & SOP Changes
    • Prioritize Technical Action Backlog
    • Confirm Contact Roster & Ownership
    • Exception Review & Root Causes
    • Validation Questions & Customer Confirmation
    • Decisions, Next Steps & Timeline
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.