Professional Services Corporate Development & Strategy M&A & Integration

Acquisition Integration

Decisions that reshape organizational direction, structure, and partnerships.

Example organizations in this space: Accenture McKinsey BCG Kearney

This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.

Inside this journey
  1. Pre-Sales

    Qualify and diagnose the deal readiness before committing to the assessment and integration.

    1. Qualification

      Confirm deal timing, decision authority, budget window, and urgency before investing in a full discovery and assessment.

      Qualification Questions

      Primary integration requirements

      • So we can make the best use of your time, which of these integration outcomes must be delivered for this acquisition? Options: ERP migration to the buyer's platform within 90 days, CRM migration to the buyer's platform within 90 days, Full contract conversion to the buyer's standard form, Vendor consolidation and procurement rationalization, No systems migration required, Unsure / needs assessment
      • Does this engagement require ERP or CRM migration to be completed within 90 days (the standard delivery window)? Options: Yes — migration must be completed within 90 days (fits standard window), Yes — migration is required but needs longer than 90 days (outside standard window), No migration required, Unsure / need to confirm

      People and retention considerations

      • Are there specific employees or roles whose retention is critical to deal success (name roles or headcount), and are any retention commitments already in place?
      • How quickly do you need clarity on equity, comp, or reporting for key people to reduce attrition risk? Options: Immediately (before close), Within 2 weeks of engagement, Within 30–60 days post-close, Not required / no critical roles, Unsure

      Budget and scope authorization

      • Is there an allocated budget or a budget window for a paid pre-close readiness assessment plus integration execution? If allocated, select the closest range. Options: No budget allocated yet, Under $75,000, $75,000–$200,000, $200,000–$500,000, Over $500,000, Unsure / need to confirm

      Decision authority and timing

      • Who is the primary decision maker for approving an external integration partner, and who else materially influences that decision? (titles are fine)
      • What is the expected close date or the date by which integration work needs to begin? Options: Within 2 weeks, 2–6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, More than 12 weeks, No defined date / unknown
      • Which of the following documents or access can you confirm now to make a discovery productive? Select all that apply. Options: Signed purchase agreement, Target systems inventory (ERP/CRM list), Vendor contract list, Target headcount and org chart, None of the above / need time to gather, Other (please describe)
      • Are there any immediate constraints or high‑risk flags we should know before scheduling a full discovery (briefly describe)?
    2. Outcome Discovery

      Map the buyer's desired 90-day synergy targets, critical risks, stakeholder owners, and constraints that will shape the integration plan.

      Discovery Questions

      Setting the stage: your 90-day target

      • Tell me about the run-rate cost or revenue targets your team must achieve within 90 days after close.
      • How many months remain until your target close or Day One? Options: Less than 1 month, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, More than 3 months
      • Who in your organization is held accountable if the 90-day target is missed, and what authority do they have?
      • Which three metrics will you use to prove the plan is working at day 90? Options: Net run-rate cost reduction, Gross margin improvement, Customer retention rate, Invoice conversion time, Days to consolidated reporting, Other
      • Pinpoint the single decision or missing authority in the last missed 90-day push that would have changed the outcome.

      What could stop you from hitting the 90-day target?

      • If you had to name the single operational failure that would force you to miss the 90-day target, what would it be?
      • Walk me through the last acquisition where systems migration stretched beyond 90 days, from the first sign of trouble to how you addressed it.
      • Which functions have historically created the largest drag during cutover? Options: Finance/GL, IT/Infrastructure, Sales/CRM, Procurement/vendors, HR/payroll, Operations, Other
      • How does a six-week delay in financial consolidation translate into cost, forecasting error, or missed decisions for your business?
      • What single contractual or people issue would make you halt the integration until after close?

      Where people and retention create the real risk

      • Imagine the top three engineers or revenue owners resign within 60 days, what immediate revenue or delivery impact would you see?
      • Who needs a named retention plan to keep revenue intact, and which leader will own that plan?
      • List any incentives, equity treatments, or reporting changes that are promised to target staff but not yet documented.
      • Tell me about the last time a promised reporting line change led to an unexpected departure, and what you changed afterward.
      • Do you have named backup owners for each critical role during the first 90 days? Options: Yes, all critical roles covered, Partial coverage, No, not covered, Not sure yet
      • If key staff decline the buyer's standard offer, what fallback steps will you take within the first 30 days?

      Systems and contracts that will determine Day One

      • What would happen to your consolidated reporting timeline if the target's ERP cannot be migrated within 90 days?
      • Identify the core ledger, payroll, billing, and CRM systems currently live in the acquired business. Options: General ledger / ERP, Payroll, Subscription billing, CRM/Sales, Procurement/vendor systems, Other
      • Estimate how many of those systems have documented APIs, standard export utilities, or vendor-supported migration paths. Options: None, Some (25-49%), About half (50%), Most (51-75%), All (76-100%), Unknown
      • Name the person or team that controls administrative access to those systems and the typical lead time to grant access.
      • Describe any contract clauses in vendor or customer agreements that could trigger renegotiation or assignment requirements on change of control.
      • Would you pause the plan or authorize a parallel run if system access cannot be provided within your targeted cutover window? Options: Pause and delay Day One, Authorize a parallel run, Escalate for executive decision, Not sure

      Where timelines compress and decisions matter

      • Assuming the close date shifts up by two weeks, which single timeline conflict becomes infeasible for your team?
      • When do you typically lock chart-of-accounts changes, data-freeze dates, and cutover windows in past integrations? Options: 4+ weeks before cutover, 2-3 weeks before cutover, 1 week before cutover, During cutover, Not consistent
      • List the stakeholder groups that must sign Day One acceptance before consolidated reporting can occur. Options: Finance/CFO, IT/CTO, Legal/Compliance, Commercial/Sales, Operations/COO, Buyer business owner, Other
      • Estimate the number of internal full-time equivalents you can dedicate to cutover activities for the first 90 days. Options: 0-2 FTE, 3-5 FTE, 6-10 FTE, More than 10 FTE, Undecided
      • Select the factors that would force you to push the Day One target. Options: Missing system access, Key staff departures, Unresolved contract assignments, Regulatory approval delayed, Data quality issues, Other

      The alternatives you're weighing

      • Provide the alternatives you are currently considering instead of hiring an external integration partner, including internal plans and incumbents.
      • Has any internal team proposed handling this integration without outside help? Options: Yes, integration/ops team, Yes, IT team, No internal proposal, Undecided
      • Under what conditions would you stay with your current approach rather than change to an external partner?
      • Select the incumbent or competitor options you have evaluated or have existing relationships with. Options: In-house team, Current external consultant, Large integration firm, Boutique operator team, Other
      • Could you sign within a week if an external partner demonstrated the required migration and retention results in a short pilot? Options: Yes, sign within a week, Requires one executive approval, Needs Board/Investment committee approval, No, longer internal approvals needed

      What readiness looks like in practice: technical, legal, and people constraints

      • Name the critical prerequisites that must be in place for an integration to proceed on your target timeline.
      • On a scale from 1 to 5, how ready is your data for a straight migration into the buyer's systems, with 1 meaning heavily remediated is required and 5 meaning largely clean? Options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
      • Identify the owner of API keys, connectors, and service accounts required for migration, and whether they can provide them within two weeks. Options: Yes, within 2 weeks, Yes, within 4 weeks, No, longer than 4 weeks, Unknown
      • Do you have a legal or procurement gate that must approve contract assignments or vendor consolidations before Day One? Options: Yes, legal must approve, Yes, procurement must approve, Yes, both must approve, No formal gate
      • Provide a list of compliance or regulatory approvals that could block access to customer or financial data during migration.
      • Pinpoint the single missing readiness item that would make you decline to proceed before close.

      If we prove the plan, how fast can you move?

      • Assuming a pilot proves the migration timing and retention outcomes, what internal approvals remain to sign the execution SOW?
      • When you review SOWs, what commercial deviations typically cause you to walk away or insist on renegotiation?
      • Give an ordered list of the decision gates and signatories required before financing can commit to payment terms.
      • Could you commit to a paid pre-close readiness assessment within two to four weeks of receiving a proposal? Options: Yes, immediately, Yes, with one executive sign-off, Only after internal approval, No, cannot commit
      • Would an explicit Day One plus 90-day remediation plan that names owners and acceptance criteria remove your final internal objections? Options: Yes, it would, It would address most objections, No, other issues remain, Unsure
      • State the earliest cutover weekend you could approve if all prerequisites are met.
  2. Solution Experience

    Walk through the repeatable integration playbook in the buyer's context, focusing on ERP/CRM migration, contract conversion, vendor rationalization, and retention tactics.

    Solution Experience

    • Solution Experience: Integration Playbook Walkthrough
    • Confirm the current state and what it is costing
    • Deliver a tailored 90-day cutover timeline with named owners and RACI based on inputs from this session.
    • You confirm the described current state and accept the quantified cost if unaddressed.
    • You confirm the ERP/CRM playbook removes the need for a six-month parallel run in your scenario.
    • Walk the ERP/CRM migration playbook in your context
    • Provide the target's system inventory and a list of vendor contracts with change-of-control clauses for contract flags review.
    • You agree the contract conversion and vendor rationalization approach protects projected procurement savings and that the retention plan addresses the top attrition risk.
    • Show the contract conversion and vendor rationalization proof
    • Share an org chart and identify the top five revenue-driving engineers plus current equity and reporting status.
    • Run the retention tactics and Day 1 communications plan
    • Draft sample contract amendment language and a vendor consolidation recommendation for your review.
    • You agree on the remaining evidence required to move to mutual commit and a paid pre-close readiness assessment.
    • Validate the future state with a direct confirmation
    • Confirm the decision gate and single SOW scope needed to proceed with the paid pre-close readiness assessment.
    • Solution Experience: Integration Playbook Walkthrough
    • Solution Experience Deck
    • Solution Brief — Integration Playbook
    • meeting
    • slides
    • document
  3. Integration Scope

    Define deliverables, timeline, responsibilities, modules (systems, procurement, people), acceptance criteria, and explicit out-of-scope items for assessment plus implementation.

    Scope Configuration

    • Execute ERP Go-Live Cutover
    • Migrate General Ledger and Chart of Accounts
    • Migrate Accounts Payable and Vendor Balances
    • Migrate Accounts Receivable and Open Invoices
    • Migrate CRM Records and Opportunity Pipeline
    • Convert Customer Contracts to Buyer Paper
    • Novate or Consolidate Vendor Contracts
    • Replatform Inventory and Warehouse Records
    • Consolidate Pricing, SKUs, and Product Catalog
    • Migrate Recurring Billing and Payment Gateways
    • Migrate Payroll and Employee Records
    • Execute Equity and Retention Communications
    • Provision User Access and Role Permissions
    • Establish Intercompany Accounting and Eliminations

    Scope Questions

    Execute ERP Go-Live Cutover

    • How many legal entities and GL (general ledger) ledgers must be cut over during the same weekend? Options: 1, 2, 3+, Unsure
    • Estimate the number of distinct cutover tasks (data migration, FX rates, open PO/PO confirmations, tax codes, intercompany clearing) you expect on Day One Options: Less than 25, 25-75, More than 75
    • Provide the list of system endpoints that must be switched at cutover (ERP instance, payroll system endpoint, billing engine merchant ID, tax engine)
    • Which cutover window do you prefer for the ERP go-live (national holiday weekend, weekend, weekday overnight)? Options: Holiday weekend, Weekend overnight, Weekday overnight, Phased multi-day
    • Confirm the data-freeze date you can commit to for source systems prior to cutover (date or number of hours before cutover)
    • How will you verify the ERP go-live is successful (example: GL trial balance matches source within tolerance, sales orders flowing, customer invoices generated)?

    Migrate General Ledger and Chart of Accounts

    • Provide sample mapping artifacts you have for chart-of-accounts (mapping spreadsheet, COA crosswalk, segment mapping)
    • Describe the mapping complexity for COA (one-to-one, many-to-one, segment concatenation required) Options: One-to-one, Many-to-one, Concatenation/derivation required, Unsure
    • Indicate timing for trial-balance reconciliation deliverables (pre-close mock, Day One trial balance, Day 30 reconciliation) Options: Pre-close mock, Day One, Day 30, Other
    • Which reports must reconcile post-migration (GL trial balance, A/P aging by vendor, A/R aging by customer, inventory valuation) Options: GL trial balance, A/P aging, A/R aging, Inventory valuation, Other
    • What acceptance criteria will validate GL migration accuracy (example: trial balance variance <0.25% and no missing account balances)
    • Specify ownership for COA cutover tasks (who provides mappings, who validates mapping load)

    Migrate Accounts Payable and Vendor Balances

    • How many active vendor master records need migration and deduplication? Options: Less than 500, 500-2,000, More than 2,000, Unknown
    • Detail the vendor master attributes required in target ERP (payment terms, remit-to address, tax ID, bank ACH details)
    • Indicate the invoice aging buckets that must be preserved (30/60/90, disputed vs undisputed) Options: 30/60/90, Current/30/60/90, Disputed flag required, Other
    • Which vendor contracts contain change-of-control or assignment clauses requiring legal review before migrating payables? Options: All vendor contracts, High-value vendors only, Vendor list to be provided, None
    • Name the person or team that will approve vendor master merges and payment-method changes
    • Describe the reconciliation threshold for migrated AP balances (e.g., tolerance per vendor or percentage) Options: Per-vendor tolerance, Total variance %, Zero tolerance, Custom

    Migrate Accounts Receivable and Open Invoices

    • Estimate the volume of open AR invoices by count and total value at cutover
    • Which aging segments and dispute flags must be preserved for collections (e.g., 0-30/31-60/61-90, credits, unapplied cash)
    • Which billing templates or formats must generate identical invoices post-migration (PDF header/footer, tax calculation method)
    • Provide the list of top customers by AR balance that require account-level reconciliation before Day One
    • Who will own unapplied cash resolution and customer statement sign-off during the first 30 days?
    • Specify cutover rules for partially billed projects or subscriptions (carry-forward, pro-rate, or close and re-bill) Options: Carry-forward balances, Close and re-bill, Prorate into new system, Custom

    Migrate CRM Records and Opportunity Pipeline

    • How many contact and account records must be migrated from the source CRM? Options: Less than 5,000, 5,000-25,000, More than 25,000, Unknown
    • Which opportunity stages must be preserved and how should stage mapping align to the buyer pipeline?
    • Provide the fields that are mandatory in the target CRM for closed-won conversion (close date, ACV, product SKU, contract reference)
    • Which custom objects or integrations must remain live on Day One (billing connector, support ticket sync, marketing automation)
    • Identify SLA targets for opportunity data accuracy post-migration (e.g., pipeline variance <10% by value) Options: <5%, <10%, <20%, No SLA
    • Do you require preservation of activity history and attachments for migrated CRM records? Options: Yes - full history, Yes - last 12 months, Only notes/no attachments, No

    Convert Customer Contracts to Buyer Paper

    • Provide the number of customer contracts and the count of contracts with assignment or change-of-control clauses
    • Which contract elements must be migrated unchanged (pricing schedules, SLAs, renewal terms, service-level credits)? Options: Pricing schedules, SLAs, Renewal terms, Service credits, All
    • Clarify the contract redlines you will accept during conversion (title changes only, full renegotiation permitted, novation with notice) Options: Title/party changes only, Minor redlines, Full renegotiation allowed, Other
    • Which contracts require customer consent before assignment and therefore need a consent campaign before Day One? Options: All contracts with consent clause, High-value contracts only, None, To be identified
    • Who will provide legal sign-off for converted customer contracts and who is the authorized signer for the converted paper?

    Novate or Consolidate Vendor Contracts

    • Detail the count of vendor contracts and highlight those with termination-for-change-of-control or assignment fees
    • Which vendors are strategic and require an account continuity plan rather than immediate novation?
    • Provide the vendor consolidation rule set you want applied (by spend threshold, by service type, by geography) Options: Spend threshold, Service type, Geography, No consolidation
    • Identify the procurement approvals required to change vendor payment terms or bank details at cutover
    • Specify the fallback plan if a vendor refuses assignment (maintain separate vendor record, renegotiate, or transition to alternative) Options: Maintain separate record, Renegotiate, Transition to alternative, Other
    • Who will own vendor novation communications and supply the executed novation/assignment documents?

    Replatform Inventory and Warehouse Records

    • Estimate transactional volume for inventory movements during the first 90 days post-migration (pick/pack counts, receipts) Options: Low, Medium, High
    • Which warehouse locations and bin structures must be migrated (site codes, bins, shelf locations)?
    • Describe the item master attributes that must survive replatforming (unit of measure, lot/serial control, lead time, reorder point)
    • Which inventory valuation method must be preserved post-migration (FIFO, LIFO, weighted average, standard cost)? Options: FIFO, LIFO, Weighted average, Standard cost
    • Do you require physical cycle counts or full physical inventory before cutover to validate balances? Options: Full physical count, Cycle counts for key SKUs, No physical count, Other
    • Indicate required reconciliation tolerances for inventory value at Day One (currency variance or percentage) Options: <0.5%, <1%, <2%, Custom

    Consolidate Pricing, SKUs, and Product Catalog

    • How many SKUs and pricing records exist across the acquired entity that need consolidation? Options: Less than 1,000, 1,000-10,000, More than 10,000, Unknown
    • Which pricing components must be preserved (list price, discounts, contract-specific prices, tier pricing) Options: List price, Discount schedules, Contract-specific, Tier pricing
    • Describe the SKU deduplication rule you want applied (match by UPC, description similarity, manufacturer part number) Options: UPC, Manufacturer part number, Description similarity, Custom
    • List channel-specific pricing that must remain separate (marketplace channels, reseller agreements, direct sales)
    • Identify who will approve price-list changes and the governance process for price overrides post-consolidation
    • Provide example product bundles or kits that require BOM (bill of materials) migration or recreation

    Migrate Recurring Billing and Payment Gateways

    • Which recurring billing models must be migrated (subscription, usage-based, milestone, retainers)? Options: Subscription, Usage-based, Milestone, Retainer, Other
    • Provide the list of payment gateway merchant IDs and payment providers currently in use
    • Which customers have stored payment instruments that require token migration and PCI compliance validation? Options: All with stored cards, High-value customers only, None, To be identified
    • Indicate the re-billing approach for active subscriptions at cutover (resume on new platform, invoice manually, pro-rate) Options: Resume on new platform, Manual invoice, Prorate, Other
    • Do you require settlement and reconciliation of gateway payouts for the prior period before cutover? Options: Yes - full settlement, Yes - top customers, No
    • Identify expected chargeback or dispute volumes during first 90 days that need monitoring Options: Low, Medium, High, Unknown

    Migrate Payroll and Employee Records

    • Which payroll elements must be migrated (year-to-date earnings, tax withholding status, benefit deductions, direct deposit information)? Options: YTD earnings, Tax status, Benefits, Direct deposit
  4. Mutual Commit

    Finalize commercial terms, data-access authorizations, decision gates, and the single SOW that covers the pre-close assessment and the integration execution.

    Agreement Modules

    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Single Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Order Form & Commercial Terms
    • Data Access & Security Authorization
    • Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
    • Decision Gates & Acceptance Criteria Addendum
    • Payment Schedule Agreement
    • Change Order Agreement
    • Confidentiality & Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
  5. Pre-Close Readiness Assessment

    Deliver the paid pre-close diagnostic: systems inventory, contract-change flags, retention risk map, and a specific Day One + 90-day remediation plan.

    • current_state
    • decision_readiness
    • success_criteria
    • desired_state
    • gaps
    • stakeholders
    • gaps
    • stakeholders
    • desired_state
    • success_criteria
    • decision_readiness
    • current_state
    • gaps
    • current_state
    • desired_state
    • success_criteria
    • stakeholders
    • decision_readiness
    • decision_readiness
    • decision_readiness
    • decision_readiness
    • decision_readiness
  6. Deployment

    Lock readiness facts and configuration values before execution begins.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm concrete readiness facts — owners, cutover windows, data-freeze dates, access approvals, and contingency plans required before execution.

      Pre-Deployment Questions

      Environment and access

      • Which system categories are in scope for this cutover? (select all that apply) Options: ERP (general ledger / AR / AP), CRM (customer records / opportunities), Payroll / HCM, Procurement / PO systems, Billing / subscription / invoicing, Custom on‑prem applications, Data warehouse / BI, Other
      • Are the production environments for the in‑scope systems approved for cutover? (this confirms we can schedule a live window) Options: Yes — all approved, Partially approved (some systems pending), No — approvals pending
      • If approvals are partial or pending, list the systems and the expected approval date for each (so we can lock the cutover sequence)

      Data and configuration

      • Has a data‑freeze date been scheduled for each migration source system? If yes, provide the freeze date per system or write 'Not set' (we need the freeze to plan final extracts)
      • Is the source→target field mapping and conversion approach finalized and assigned an owner? Options: Yes — mapping finalized and owner assigned, Mapping finalized; owner TBD, Mapping draft, No mapping plan
      • Are the conversion acceptance criteria and verification (post‑cutover) tests signed off? Options: Yes — acceptance criteria signed, Pending review, No — not defined

      People and ownership

      • Has an operational owner been named for each workstream (ERP, CRM, Contracts, Procurement, People)? Options: All workstream owners named, Some owners named, No owners named
      • If any owners are missing or provisional, list the missing workstreams and the expected owner (name + role) so we can assign tasks immediately
      • Who is the single Day‑One go/no‑go decision owner (name and role)? This person must have authority to stop or proceed during cutover.

      Timing, constraints, and contingency

      • What cutover windows are approved (dates and time zones or weekend designation) for each system/site? (we use this to schedule sequenced tasks)
      • Are contingency / rollback plans and escalation contacts documented and approved for each in‑scope system? Options: Yes — plan and contacts approved, Plan documented, approvals pending, No — plan not created
      • Are there known regulatory, financial‑close, customer contractual, or site blackout periods in the next 90 days that would block cutover? Options: Yes — constraints exist (describe next), No known constraints, Unsure
      • If you answered 'Yes' or 'Unsure' above, briefly describe the constraint(s), the affected system/site, the date ranges, and the owner who can resolve them (so we can deconflict schedule risks)
    2. Configuration Details

      Lock exact migration mappings, system credentials, chart-of-accounts conversions, vendor consolidation rules, and runbook steps the team will execute.

      Configuration Details

      ENVIRONMENTS & ENDPOINTS — Exact targets the migration will call

      • Production ERP instance identifier (enter the exact system name/ID used in your ERP; consumed by the migration engine). Default: "prod"
      • Production ERP API base URL (format: https://<host>/api/ ; exact base URL the migration will call; consumed by connectors)

      AUTH & CREDENTIALS — Non-secret identifiers and how secrets will be exchanged

      • Integration service account identifier for source ERP (non-secret username or service principal name; the secret itself will be delivered via your secrets manager)
      • Credentials handoff method (select one; this determines how the implementation retrieves secrets — we do NOT collect secrets in this sheet) Options: Your secrets manager (recommended), Secure support portal transfer, Encrypted file via SFTP arranged at kickoff, Other — coordinate at kickoff

      MAPPINGS & VENDOR RULES — Files, fallback rules, and vendor consolidation keys

      • Chart-of-accounts conversion mapping file location (enter exact URL or file path where the mapping CSV/XLSX will be uploaded; format examples: https://..., s3://bucket/path, file:///path/to/file)
      • Default G/L mapping fallback rule (select one; used during automated validation and staging) Options: Use buyer default chart account when unmapped (default), Map to closest segment/account by matching dimensions, Flag unmapped accounts and fail validation
      • Primary vendor consolidation key (select one; applied by vendor-consolidation step) Options: Tax ID (TIN/VAT) — default, Normalized legal name, Vendor site address, Do not consolidate vendors (keep separate)

      RUNBOOK, CUTOVER & ACCEPTANCE — Timers, owners, and runbook references

      • Cutover data-freeze lead time in hours (numeric). Default: 72
      • Post-cutover rollback window in hours (numeric). Default: 6
      • Primary cutover owner role (enter exact role title used in your org, e.g., "ERP lead"; this is the role we will escalate to during cutover)
      • Acceptance checklist / runbook location (enter exact URL or file path the automation and runbook will reference; format: https://... or file path)
    3. Integration Execution

      Execute the cutover and functional playbooks with sequenced tasks, named owners, escalation paths, and live progress tracking.

    4. Go-Live Acceptance

      Formal go/no-go gate: verify financial consolidation, data integrity, contract assignments, and key-person retention criteria before declaring the rollout complete.

      Checklist items

      • Obtain written finance consolidation sign-off
      • Confirm data integrity reconciliation completed for all migrated domains
      • Verify rollback point created and rollback test executed for irreversible cutovers
      • Receive legal sign-off on contract assignment and novation status
      • Validate user acceptance sign-off for core financial and customer-facing processes
      • Confirm all required system access and data-authorizations provisioned
      • Secure documented retention commitments for key personnel meeting retention criteria
      • Confirm vendor transition actions completed or approved exceptions logged
      • Close or formally accept critical open issues required for go-live
      • Publish and distribute 90‑day post-go-live monitoring and escalation runbook
  7. Sustain & Run

    Track realized synergies, conduct recurring reviews, capture lessons, and maintain an issues/enhancements channel during handoff to internal operations.

    Success Reviews

    • Go-Live Health Check (weeks 1-4)
    • First Measurement Review (weeks 4-10)
    • 90-Day Realization Review (around day 90)
    • Quarterly Business Review, Sustain & Run
    • Annual Realization & Lessons Learned

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Publish the quarter's metric dashboard and the prioritized enhancement backlog with expected delivery quarters.
    • Create a run-team dashboard spec showing month-end close cycle time, hypercare ticket burn-down, and user proficiency to drive quarterly reviews.
    • Circulate the final transition checklist confirming run-team ownership and escalation contacts.
    • Quarterly metrics review
    • Confirm whether month-end close cycle time and hypercare ticket burn-down continue on a positive trajectory or require corrective investment.
    • Prioritize enhancement backlog items that materially affect realized synergies and set delivery quarters.
    • Ensure at-risk critical roles have mitigation or knowledge-transfer plans documented.
    • Re-confirm deliverables and owners from Integration Scope
    • Open mitigation workstreams for any persistent high-impact tickets and document escalation steps.
    • Create a knowledge-transfer plan for any critical-role attrition risk with timelines for completion.
    • Year-to-date realized synergies summary
    • Record the final realization position against Integration Scope targets and identify any residual remediation with owners and timelines.
    • Agree a set of lasting process changes and documentation updates to prevent recurrence of major issues.
    • Hand off the monitoring dashboard and escalation contacts to internal operations for ongoing governance.
    • Publish the annual realization report, including metric trends, financial reconciliations, and outstanding remediation items.
    • Deliver updated run-books and post-mortem documentation capturing lessons learned and permanent process changes.
    • Transition the monitoring dashboard and escalation contacts to internal operations and confirm the first quarterly check-in under run-team ownership.
    • Confirm the cutover completed with no unresolved high-severity data-loss or connector outages.
    • Establish owners and target resolution dates for all critical open issues.
    • Produce a short go-live health snapshot for distribution to the run team.
    • Publish the go-live health snapshot with open-ticket list and owner names for run-team visibility.
    • Schedule the first hotfix window for critical defects and document rollback criteria.
    • Collect and circulate logs and data-load verification artifacts needed for sign-off of resolved items.
    • Present first measurement data
    • Determine whether month-end close cycle time and data migration completeness percentage are trending acceptably toward Integration Scope targets.
    • Own and document the legacy system wind-down checklist with dates for contract closure or retention-as-read-only.
    • Agree a remediation plan with clear verification steps and target dates to close the largest metric gaps.
    • Publish the first-measurement dashboard with metric definitions, baselines, and variance commentary for stakeholder review.
    • Create a remediation plan for data migration completeness with specific data reconciliations and a verification script.
    • Finalize the legacy system decommission timeline, contract handover notes, and archive schedule.
    • Restate Integration Scope acceptance criteria
    • Establish the current realization position for each Integration Scope criterion and record any unmet items as open remediation with target close dates.
    • Agree the steady-state reporting cadence and the run-team acceptance of monitoring responsibilities.
    • Ensure no remaining procedural dependencies block financial consolidation or regulatory reporting.
    • Publish the 90-day realization report summarizing each Integration Scope criterion, status, and remediation owners and dates.
    • Deployment and migration validation
    • Open issue burn-down and escalation status
    • Metric detailed review
    • Present outcome data against each criterion
    • Diagnose gaps and root causes
    • Incumbent system wind-down checkpoint
    • Document remaining remediation and closure plan
    • Lessons learned and process adjustments
    • Early adoption signals and usage patterns
    • Enhancement and backlog triage
    • Open critical issues and blockers
    • People retention and role continuity
    • Finalize long-term monitoring and escalation plan
    • Agree corrective actions and timelines
    • Agree transition to steady-state reporting
    • Agree immediate remediation actions
First-Party AI

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.