Quick product and timeline snapshot

• How would you describe the product you plan to scale in one sentence, including its form factor and primary electronic function?
• Give the target production timeline and the milestone you consider the true start of volume ramp, for example first paid shipment or commercial launch Options: 10,000 units in 6 months, 10,000 in >6 months, Smaller pilot then scale, Custom timeline (describe)
• Who in your organization will own production acceptance at pilot and volume stages and have final sign-off authority for release to customer shipments? Options: VP Operations / Supply Chain, VP Engineering, Director of Quality, Product Manager, Other, will describe
• Provide your target volume and the acceptable variance, for example 10,000 units in six months plus or minus 10 percent Options: 10,000 units in 6 months, 5,000 units in 6 months, 10,000 units in 12 months, Custom (describe)
• State the primary regulatory market for this product, for example medical devices, aerospace, defense, industrial, or consumer Options: Medical devices (regulated, FDA/ISO 13485), Aerospace or defense (AS9100/ITAR), Industrial / commercial, Consumer, Other

When a supplier misses its dates, what breaks first

• If a factory returned assemblies with 5 percent of units failing final functional test, what would that cost you in revenue, recalls, or contract penalties? Options: Minor operational cost, Moderate revenue impact, Major contract penalties or recalls, Regulatory reporting and potential enforcement
• Describe the last time a vendor failure created an executive escalation, what failed and how long did it take to stabilize shipments
• Estimate how often supplier delays trigger expedited logistics or overtime in your production plan, monthly, quarterly, per launch, or rarely Options: Monthly, Quarterly, Per launch, Rarely / never
• Which operational metric do you treat as the single trigger to replace a manufacturer, for example On Time In Full, PPM, missed launches, or yield Options: On Time In Full (OTIF), PPM / defects per million, Missed launch dates, Yield, Other
• Identify the commercial consequences you face for late product delivery, including penalties, lost revenue, or customer churn Options: Financial penalties, Lost customers or contract terminations, Regulatory notices or corrective actions, Delayed product launches, Multiple of the above

Quality and regulatory reality check

• What single quality or regulatory failure would make you refuse to work with an external manufacturer, for example inability to provide traceability for regulated components Options: Traceability gaps for regulated parts, Major safety-critical failure mode, Lack of required certifications, Inability to support regulatory submissions
• List the certifications, audits, and documented procedures the factory must present before pilot and mark which are mandatory Options: ISO 13485, AS9100, FDA documentation support, ITAR/EAR compliance, Supplier quality manual / audit reports
• At what granularity do you require traceability for safety-critical parts, lot level, serial level, or both Options: Lot-level traceability, Serial-level traceability, Both lot and serial, Not required
• Name the regulatory submissions or approvals that would be impacted if a part or process change is required during ramp
• Point to the defect classes that you consider non-reworkable for this product, for example solder joint failures on safety circuits or mislabeled sterilized components Options: Safety-circuit electrical failures, Major workmanship defects (cold solder, bridging), Labeling or sterilization errors, Missing documentation or lot records, Other

Supply chain fragility and the single points of failure

• Count the number of critical parts in your BOM that are single-source, have lead times over 12 weeks, or are flagged end of life Options: 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 10, More than 10, Unsure
• List up to three components you consider highest risk by lead time or lifecycle exposure and describe the current mitigation for each
• Who is the purchasing owner for these high-risk parts and what escalation path exists when a supplier misses a delivery Options: Procurement Director, VP Supply Chain, Dedicated component buyer, Outsourced procurement partner, Other
• If a critical part is unavailable with a six to eight week delay, which contingencies would you accept: substitute component, redesign, production hold, or other Options: Substitute component, Design around the part, Redesign the impacted module, Production hold until part arrives, Use bridge stock / temporary fix
• Would you pause the pilot if approved alternates cannot be qualified for one third of top-risk parts before the first pilot build Options: Pause the pilot until alternates are qualified, Accept increased risk and proceed, Proceed with reduced pilot scope, Unsure, need more analysis

Pilot scope and the acceptance bar

• Assume a 200-unit factory pilot, what measurable acceptance criteria would make you sign commercial terms that same week Options: Yes, would sign immediately, Maybe with additional conditions, No, need more data, Unsure
• Provide the exact yield threshold, allowable defect rate per 1,000, and workmanship standard you will measure during pilot Options: Yield >= 98 percent, Yield 95 to 97 percent, Yield 90 to 94 percent, Custom numeric threshold (describe)
• By which test methods will you verify functional performance, for example flying probe, ICT, boundary scan, or full system test Options: Automated ICT / AXI, Functional system test, Flying probe, Boundary scan, Destructive testing of samples, Other
• Identify who will be responsible for audit checkpoints, IP protection oversight, and final acceptance sign-off during pilot Options: Buyer quality team, Buyer engineering lead, Joint QA with seller, Seller quality lead, Third-party auditor
• Point to the single pilot outcome that would force you to delay volume release, for example failing to meet yield, traceability gaps, or regulatory hold Options: Yield failure below threshold, Traceability / documentation gaps, Regulatory submission hold, Missed delivery cadence, Other

Other options on your table

• Name every alternative you are actively weighing, including the incumbent manufacturer, internal build, and any offshore or domestic contract manufacturers Options: Incumbent manufacturer, Internal manufacturing, Offshore contract manufacturer, Domestic low-cost CM, Multiple vendor strategy, Other
• For each alternative, specify the one advantage it claims that matters most to you, for example lower cost, faster lead time, or existing certifications Options: Lower unit cost, Shorter lead-times, Existing certifications, Closer to market or customers, Higher capacity / bandwidth
• Tell us whether any internal team has proposed solving production in-house, how far that proposal has progressed, and what resources they estimate are required
• Specify the performance threshold the incumbent would need to meet to retain your business, for example 99 percent OTIF for three months or certification completion within 60 days Options: 99% OTIF for 3 months, Certifications completed within 60 days, No late deliveries for next two launches, Other measurable threshold
• Would finding no viable alternative that meets your regulatory and traceability needs accelerate your decision to switch vendors Options: Yes, accelerate immediately, Yes, but with additional checks, No change in timing, Unsure

Operational readiness and must-have constraints

• Imagine your ERP, PLM, or test data systems are not accessible to a partner within four weeks, what happens to your launch plan Options: Launch delayed, Use manual workarounds and accept extra risk, Partner builds with limited visibility and risk, Cannot proceed with pilot
• Estimate the available headcount you can dedicate to onboarding and pilot support, including engineering, quality, and supply chain liaisons Options: 0 to 2 dedicated people, 3 to 5 dedicated people, 6 to 10 dedicated people, More than 10, Unsure
• Outline any regulatory approvals, legal reviews, or export controls that could gate or delay the pilot
• State the approver for BOM revisions and the delegated reviewer who can approve late changes during pilot to minimize risk of regulatory re-submission Options: VP Engineering, VP Supply Chain, Director of Quality, Cross-functional change control board, Other
• Should named owners be unavailable within four weeks, will you designate alternates, reschedule the pilot, assign external support, or pause the program Options: Designate alternates, Reschedule the pilot, Assign external or contractor support, Pause the program

Decision triggers and next steps

• Assuming the pilot meets your stated acceptance metrics, what is the earliest week you could sign an MSA and place an initial volume order Options: Within 1 week, Within 2 to 4 weeks, Within 1 to 3 months, Longer than 3 months
• Describe the top three deal blockers that would prevent you from signing immediately after a successful pilot
• Which commercial terms are non-negotiable for you, for example lead-time guarantees, acceptance gates, or change-control rules Options: Lead-time guarantees, Pilot to volume acceptance gates, Formal change-control process, Price or margin thresholds, IP protections and escrow
• Tell us which concessions would make you sign faster, for example price concessions, committed inventory, extended warranty, or escrowed IP Options: Price concessions, Committed safety stock, Extended warranty or support, Faster delivery commitments, Escrowed IP arrangements
• Could committing to a short trial MSA or escrowed IP arrangement reduce legal friction enough to close within two weeks Options: Yes, likely, Maybe with specific terms, No, not sufficient, Unsure

• Implement DFM Changes in PCB Files
• Low-Volume Prototype PCB Assembly
• Pilot Production Run (200 units)
• Surface-Mount PCB Assembly
• Through-Hole PCB Assembly
• Subassembly and System Integration
• Develop and Deliver Functional Test Fixtures
• Automated ICT and Functional Test Execution
• Conformal Coating and Protective Finishing
• Component Procurement and Kitting with Traceability
• BOM Revision and End-of-Life Substitutions
• Serialization and Batch Traceability Records
• High-Volume Production Ramp to 10,000 Units
• Packaging, Kitting, and Fulfillment
• Repair, Rework, and Field-Warranty Services

Implement DFM Changes in PCB Files

• Provide the Gerber and ODB++ file names and revision that we should use for DFM review
• Which design-for-manufacturing constraints should we prioritize (panelization, fiducial placement, stencil apertures, thermal reliefs)? Options: Panelization, Fiducials and tooling strips, Stencil aperture adjustments, Thermal relief and copper pour changes, Other
• Specify the target IPC standard for workmanship evaluation of PCB assembly (for example IPC-A-610 Class II or Class III) Options: IPC-A-610 Class II, IPC-A-610 Class III, Customer reference workmanship standard (upload separately), No specific IPC target
• Indicate any component-level constraints from the BOM we must enforce in DFM (BGA spacing, fine-pitch pads, odd-form connectors)
• Estimate acceptable changes to board stackup and finish we may propose during DFM (e.g., surface finish changes, via-in-pad mitigation) Options: No changes without approval, Minor finish/stackup suggestions allowed, Open to engineering alternatives

Low-Volume Prototype PCB Assembly

• How many prototype assemblies do you need and what delivery date window do you require for the prototype batch? Options: 1-10 units, 11-50 units, 51-100 units, Other
• Provide the reference assembly we should compare workmanship to (describe source: hand-assembled reference with revision and key defect tolerances)
• Which inspection methods do you require on prototypes (manual optical inspection, automated optical inspection AOI, X-ray for BGAs)? Options: Manual visual inspection, AOI, X-ray / CT, Cross-sectioning on sample, None specified
• Identify any prototype-only processes we should apply (tapered reflow profile, selective soldering parameters, hand-soldered connectors)
• Do you require material certificates and lot traceability delivered with prototype units (RoHS declarations, MSL handling certificates)? Options: Yes, No, Only for critical components

Pilot Production Run (200 units)

• When should the 200-unit pilot be scheduled relative to tooling and test fixture delivery (dates for first build and second validation build)?
• Which pilot scope applies: full functional assemblies, partial builds for test program validation, or a mix? Options: Full functional assemblies, Partial assemblies for test validation, Mixed approach
• What acceptance metrics will confirm pilot success (specify target pilot yield percentage, allowable IPC-A-610 defect rates, and functional pass rate)?
• Identify the acceptance owner and sign-off evidence you require for pilot completion (e.g., signed inspection report, test logs, reference-unit comparison photos) Options: Signed inspection report, Captured AOI/X-ray images, Functional test logs, Reference-unit side-by-side report
• Describe any audit checkpoints during the pilot (process review, first-article inspection FAI, material lot verification) Options: Process review, First-article inspection (FAI), Material lot verification, On-site audit by your team

Surface-Mount PCB Assembly

• Specify the highest component density areas and any fine-pitch or BGAs that require special handling or X-ray inspection
• Do you require solder paste process control and paste inspection (SPI) with specified percent paste coverage and aperture tooling notes? Options: Yes, SPI required, No SPI required, Only on pilot and ramp
• Which reflow profile or thermal window must we follow for the assemblies (attach recommended profile or enter peak temperature and time above liquidus)
• Indicate required ESD and electrostatic discharge controls linked to component MSL (moisture sensitivity level) handling Options: Standard ESD controls, Enhanced ESD controls (ionizers, wrist straps, grounded fixtures), Customer-specified ESD procedure
• List any surface-mount-only acceptance tests you require before through-hole insertion (e.g., AOI pass rate, solder joint inspection criteria)

Through-Hole PCB Assembly

• How many through-hole components require selective soldering versus wave soldering (attach BOM callout or count) Options: Selective soldering, Wave soldering, Combination
• Provide the lead-free wave profile or solder alloy specification we must use (e.g., SnAgCu composition, peak temperature)
• Which inspectors or acceptance criteria should govern through-hole joints (IPC-A-610 class, visual solder fillet requirements)? Options: IPC-A-610 Class II, IPC-A-610 Class III, Customer-defined visual criteria
• Identify any mechanical assembly constraints that affect through-hole placement (connector torque requirements, board bow limits)
• Specify post-solder cleaning requirements and acceptable residue thresholds (no-clean flux vs. aqueous cleaning) Options: No-clean flux acceptable, Aqueous cleaning required, Solvent cleaning required

Subassembly and System Integration

• Describe the subassemblies to be integrated and provide mechanical drawings or interface checklists
• Which mechanical tolerances and fastening torque specs must we follow during integration (provide torque values, threadlocker requirements)
• Do you require electrical bonding, shielding, or specific wiring harness routing documented in assembly work instructions? Options: Yes, bonding/shielding required, No special bonding, Wiring harness routing provided by you
• Indicate required integration tests at the subsystem level (e.g., power-up verification, inrush current limits, RF sweep)
• List cable and connector part numbers that require harnessing and crimp quality inspection

Develop and Deliver Functional Test Fixtures

• What functional test coverage do you require for the fixture (power-up, full I/O exercise, firmware programming, fault injection)? Options: Power-up and basic I/O, Full I/O and performance, Firmware programming and validation, Custom fault injection tests
• Provide mechanical mating details and CAD models for the fixture interface and connector seating
• Which instruments or bench equipment must be included in the fixture bill of materials (supply part numbers if known)
• Identify firmware or test vectors we must load during first article validation and where the source files are stored
• Do you require calibration certificates and periodic calibration schedules for the delivered fixtures? Options: Yes, calibration certificates required, No calibration needed, Calibration upon request

Automated ICT and Functional Test Execution

• Which in-circuit test (ICT) netlist or boundary-scan files will you supply (fixture pin map, JTAG BSDL files)?
• Do you require ICT coverage percentage targets or specific stuck-at/short test thresholds? Options: >80% coverage, >90% coverage, No target specified
• Which test result formats do you require for gateway ingestion (CSV log, XML test report, binary log)? Options: CSV, XML, PDF summary, Other
• Identify allowable failure handling for automated test (rework, scrap, quarantine) and the decision owner for disposition Options: Rework allowed, Scrap only, Quarantine for review
• Specify peak automated test cycle time target per unit to meet throughput during ramp Options: <2 minutes, 2-5 minutes, >5 minutes, No target

Conformal Coating and Protective Finishing

• Which conformal coating material and spec do you require (acrylic, silicone, urethane, MIL-I-46058C, IPC-CC-830)? Options: Acrylic, Silicone, Urethane, Customer-specified standard (attach)
• Provide the masking list and areas that must remain coating-free (component-level keep-out zones)
• Do you require coating thickness measurements or cross-section validation on samples? Options: Yes, thickness measurements, No thickness checks, Sample cross-section only
• Identify cure profile constraints and solvent handling restrictions tied to your product's regulatory class
• Are rework and recoat limits defined for coated assemblies (number of reworks before scrap)? Options: Yes, limit defined, No limit defined, Decide per part

Component Procurement and Kitting with Traceability

• Which components are single-source or subject to long lead times that we must prioritize in procurement?
• Specify the required traceability level for each component class (lot-level, date code, serial-numbered) Options: Lot-level traceability, Date code only, Full serial-level traceability
• Do you require certificates of conformity, RoHS declarations, and material declarations with each component lot? Options: All certificates required, Only for critical components, Not required
• Identify preferred component distributors or authorized channel restrictions we must follow Options: Authorized suppliers only, Open-market acceptable, Your procurement team will provide sources
• Indicate kitting preferences for production (per-unit kitting, panel-level kitting, kanban bins) Options: Per-unit kitting, Panel-level kitting, Kanban/box-level

BOM Revision and End-of-Life Substitutions

• Provide the current BOM revision and indicate any components already flagged as end-of-life (EOL) in your component lifecycle notes
• Which approval process must be used for form/fit/function substitutions (engineering change order ECO, controlled change board)? Options: ECO with sign-off, Controlled change board review, Informational only
• How should we document and present substitution options (alternate part numbers, ancestor/descendant cross-reference, impact to regulatory filings)?
• Do you require lifecycle risk scoring for BOM components (single-supplier risk, obsolescence probability)? Options: Yes, risk scoring required, No risk scoring, Only for critical parts
• Identify any components that require qualification testing after substitution (electrical param verification, environmental stress screening)

Serialization and Batch Traceability Records

• Which serialization schema must we apply (serial per unit, lot+sequence, hierarchical multi-level identifiers)? Options: Serial per unit, Lot + sequence, Hierarchical schema
• Specify the data elements required in a traceability record (component lot numbers, operator ID, process step timestamps, AOI results)
• What evidence will validate traceability completeness for a production lot (exportable CSV of lot genealogy, scanned shipment manifest, signed lot certificate)?
• Do you require tamper-evident labels, QR codes, or serialized 2D barcodes for each unit and packaging level? Options: 2D barcode per unit, QR code on box level, Tamper-evident label required, No serialization required
• Indicate retention period for traceability records to meet regulatory requirements (e.g., ISO 13485, FDA 21 CFR Part 820) Options: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, As required by your regulator

• desired_state
• success_criteria
• decision_readiness
• gaps
• stakeholders
• current_state
• decision_readiness
• gaps
• success_criteria
• desired_state
• current_state
• stakeholders
• stakeholders
• desired_state
• decision_readiness
• current_state
• success_criteria
• gaps
• decision_readiness
• decision_readiness
• decision_readiness
• decision_readiness

• Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
• Master Manufacturing Agreement (MMA)
• Statement of Work (SOW) — Pilot & Ramp
• Purchase Order Terms & Order Flow
• Lead-Time Guarantee & Remedies
• Acceptance Test Protocol & Gate Criteria
• Change Control Agreement
• Intellectual Property & Confidentiality Addendum
• Regulatory & Quality Addendum (conditional)
• Workmanship Warranty & Remedies

• Go-live Health Check
• First Measurement Review
• 90-Day Acceptance Gate
• Quarterly Production Performance Review

• Update the component lifecycle and BOM fallback register to reduce supply risk for the next quarter.
• Confirm component sourcing fallbacks and update the BOM revision control log.
• Schedule a targeted line observation or in-process audit to verify remediation effectiveness.
• Re-state numeric acceptance criteria recorded in Production Scope & Pilot Plan
• Produce a documented acceptance decision with pass or fail recorded per criterion and a named signatory where applicable.
• For any failed criterion, agree remediation steps, verification method, and target completion dates.
• Confirm incumbent decommissioning or retention mode and the status of data migration or archiving.
• Publish the acceptance record and signatory documentation within 48 hours.
• Open remediation tickets for any failed criteria with verification steps and target close dates.
• Complete the incumbent decommissioning checklist or confirm retained-read-only status and archive completion.
• Trend review for assembly yield rate and on-time delivery rate
• Confirm whether assembly yield rate (%) and on-time delivery rate (%) meet targets and identify the top three priority issues.
• Agree timelines and owners for closing high-priority issues identified in the review.
• Ensure traceability completeness processes and records remain audit-ready between reviews.
• Publish the quarterly performance summary with trend charts and open-issue roster.
• Prioritize and schedule remediation work for the top three issues with target completion dates.
• Re-confirm success criteria and owners
• Deployment checklist items validated and owners for each critical area confirmed.
• All critical blockers identified with remediation steps and target resolution dates.
• Publish deployment validation checklist status and outstanding actions to the shared channel.
• Open remediation tickets for critical blockers with target resolution dates.
• Verify tooling and test fixtures availability for the next scheduled build window.
• Present measured assembly first-pass yield and on-time delivery rate
• Determine whether assembly first-pass yield (%) and on-time delivery rate (%) are trending to targets and document reasons for any gaps.
• Agree owners and completion dates for corrective actions required to meet the acceptance targets recorded in Production Scope & Pilot Plan.
• Confirm the timeline to the 90-day acceptance gate and the verification steps to be used there.
• Produce a corrective action plan for yield issues with milestones and verification steps.
• Deployment and tooling validation
• Quality trends and corrective action effectiveness
• Present outcome data against each criterion
• Root cause analysis for metric gaps
• Early production signals and anomalies
• Document acceptance decision and capture signatory
• Supply chain and capacity forecast
• Quality exception review
• Open issue backlog and enhancement request triage
• Open issues and immediate remediation
• Supply chain and component risk check
• Agree remediation plan for any failed criteria
• Communication and escalation path review
• Action roll-up and next quarter commitments
• Update remediation plan and timeline to acceptance gate
• Incumbent decommissioning and data archive status