CustomerNode™

Theme: Light
Technology › Electronics & Hardware › Electronics Manufacturing Services

New Product Introduction

Complex technical sales and manufacturing engagements across the global electronics supply chain.

Jabil Flex Celestica Benchmark Electronics
Inside this journey

  1. Pre-Discovery

    Align decision makers, timelines, and risk tolerance before technical work.

    1. Stakeholder Alignment

      Confirm decision roles, locked launch date, risk tolerance, and escalation paths before technical work begins.

      Alignment Questions

      Quick Context — Your Launch in One Line

      • In one sentence, describe the product you want manufactured, where it sits in development (prototype / beta / validated), and the committed launch date.
      • Which best describes your current product type and complexity? Options: PCB-only (electronic board), Electromechanical assembly, Enclosed system with mechanical parts, RF/High-speed design, Other
      • Who on your team will be our primary day-to-day contact for technical decisions during NPI?
      • How visible is this program inside your company—what level of leadership is tracking the launch? Options: CEO/Founder, VP/Head of Ops, Director-level, Program Manager only, Cross-functional steering committee
      • What three outcomes would make this NPI engagement feel like a clear success for your leadership?

      Is Your Launch a Ticking Clock or a Comfortable Cushion?

      • If your committed launch date slipped by one month, how close would that come to creating serious executive or customer consequences? Options: Material damage (financial/contractual penalties), High visibility but manageable, Minor schedule slippage, No one would notice
      • Is the launch date formally locked (contractual or customer pledge), or is it internal/aspirational? Options: Contractually locked, Customer-expected (high risk if missed), Internal target (can shift), No date set
      • If a schedule risk emerged, who has authority to approve a date change and what’s the escalation path?
      • What are the downstream consequences (sales, regulatory, integration partners) if we miss that date?
      • How tolerant is your executive team of scrap, rework, or a phased ramp to protect the date? Options: Prefer strict on-time delivery even with higher scrap, Prefer lower scrap and phased ramp even if date slips, Neutral/decided case-by-case

      Where the Hidden Breaks Live

      • What’s the one part of your design you’d be most surprised to see fail at scale?
      • Describe your current validation status—which tests have been done on prototypes and which haven’t? Options: Electrical functional tests, Environmental (thermal/vibration), Burn-in/Longevity, DFM/assembly trials, Test coverage incomplete
      • Which failure modes have you already observed in lab or field prototypes? Please give examples and frequency.
      • Where do you suspect your design was optimized for lab-proof rather than production repeatability?
      • How would you rank the likelihood of late-discovered failure modes delaying ramp (1 = extremely unlikely, 5 = almost certain)? Options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

      Supply Chain Squeeze — How Fragile Is Your BOM?

      • If a single component in your BOM became unavailable, how easily could you qualify an alternate supplier or part? Options: Immediate alternate available, Alternate exists but needs qualification, No clear alternate, high risk, We'd need a design change
      • Do you have parts that are single-source, long-lead, or custom that are critical to launch? Please list the top 3 and the current lead times.
      • How complete is your BOM and ECO history (mechanical drawings, part attributes, approved alternates)? Options: BOM locked and documented, BOM mostly complete with pending items, BOM in flux with many open ECOs, No formal BOM
      • What is your tolerance for approved part substitutions during NPI? (e.g., acceptable with testing, require full sign-off, or not allowed) Options: Allowed with testing, Allowed with exec sign-off, Not allowed
      • Who owns sourcing/alternates on your side and how quickly can they support qualification of new suppliers?

      Who Really Decides When To Say ‘Go’?

      • When push comes to shove, who signs off that a pilot is acceptable to proceed to full rate—engineering, quality, operations, or commercial? Options: Engineering, Quality, Operations/Manufacturing, Commercial/PM, Cross-functional sign-off
      • Describe your preferred change-control and ECO governance—fast, centralized, consensus or staged approvals? Options: Centralized fast-track, Cross-functional committee, Staged approvals by milestone, Ad-hoc
      • What acceptance criteria (tests, yields, FAI results, supplier qualifications) would you require before we move from pilot to ramp?
      • If we propose a stop-build condition during pilot, what thresholds would you expect (e.g., yield < X, critical failure rate > Y)?
      • Who are the escalation contacts for technical, commercial, and supply issues, and what is the expected response time from each?

      What Would a Clean Handoff Actually Feel Like?

      • Imagine opening the box on day one of volume—what must be true for you to call the ramp successful?
      • Which pilot metrics would you track most closely to decide if the process is stable (select top 3)? Options: First-pass yield (FPY), Defect per million (DPM), Test coverage %, Cycle time per unit, Supplier on-time delivery, Escaped defects
      • What pilot quantity do you consider minimally meaningful to validate processes and supplier readiness? Options: <50 units, 50–200 units, 200–1,000 units, >1,000 units
      • What documentation or deliverables must be locked at handoff (work instructions, test programs, FAI report, supplier qualifications)? Options: Work instructions, Test programs & fixtures, First Article Inspection (FAI), Supplier Q-docs, Process control plans, All of the above
      • How important is preserving traceability (lot, serial, ECO history) during pilot and ramp to your post-launch support? Options: Critical, Important but not critical, Nice to have, Not required

      If Things Go Sideways, How Do You Want Us to Respond?

      • When production issues arise, do you want immediate stop-build, partial containment, or continued builds while we iterate fixes? Options: Immediate stop-build, Partial containment with limited builds, Continue builds while iterating, Decide case-by-case
      • How quickly do you expect initial root-cause analysis and a proposed mitigation after a critical pilot failure? Options: 24 hours, 48–72 hours, One week, Two+ weeks
      • What commercial remedies or flex (expedited parts, price protection, warranty posture) would make you more comfortable accepting risk during ramp?
      • Have you experienced a previous ramp failure or major ECO late in NPI? Tell us what happened and what you wish had been different.
      • How would you like progress and risk to be reported (weekly dashboard, daily standup during pilot, exception reports only)? Options: Weekly dashboard, Daily standup during pilot, Real-time dashboard access, Exception-based alerts

      Practical Evidence — Show Me the Docs

      • Which of these assets do you already have ready to share? (select all that apply) Options: Full BOM with part numbers, CAD/Mechanical drawings, Schematics & layout files, ECO/change history, Existing test plans and fixtures, Yield/field data
      • If some assets aren’t available, which ones will take the longest to produce or extract?
      • How do you prefer to grant technical access—shared drive, secure portal, or on-site review? Options: Secure portal (SFTP/Share), Shared cloud folder, On-site review only, Vendor portal with NDA
      • Who on your team owns ECO history and change documentation and can walk us through prior design iterations?
      • Are there IP, export, or data-security constraints we should know about before we request files? Options: Yes—requires NDA/controls, Some constraints—shareable with controls, No special constraints

    2. Technical Package Readiness

      Verify availability of design files, BOM, ECO history, test requirements, and target yields needed to scope NPI work.

      Readiness Checklist

      Start Line: Where Are We Starting From?

      • What is the product name, SKU(s), and the committed launch date your executive team is expecting?
      • Who is the single program owner we should coordinate with day-to-day (name, title, email)?
      • How many product variants or SKUs are included in this program? Options: 1, 2–3, 4–10, More than 10
      • How would you rate the program priority inside your company right now? Options: Critical — cannot slip, High — tolerates small delays, Medium — flexible, Low — exploratory
      • Have you attempted a production ramp of this design elsewhere before? If yes, what happened? Options: No previous ramp, Yes — minor issues only, Yes — caused schedule slips, Yes — required redesign

      What Will Blow Up If We Don’t Nail the BOM?

      • If a single critical component shipment is late or obsolete, how badly could that derail your launch? Options: Minor schedule slip (days), Weeks of delay, Launch at risk / executive escalation, Would force a design change
      • How complete is the BOM you plan to hand over to us today? Options: Complete with qualified alternates and vendor part numbers, Complete but no alternates, Partial — key items missing, Placeholder parts / reference designs only
      • Which parts are sole-source, have long lead-times, or are single-fab custom items? (select all that apply) Options: SoC / custom IC, RF modules/antennas, Custom mechanicals, Connectors/headers, Electro-mechanical assemblies, No single points
      • Do you maintain approved vendor lists (AVL) or supplier certificates for the BOM items you expect us to use? Options: Yes — AVL is provided, Partial — some suppliers only, No — we expect CM to source, Restricted — supplier info under NDA
      • How often does your BOM change in the late stages (last 3 months)? Options: Not at all, Occasionally (1–2 changes), Several (3–10), Frequent (>10)
      • If there are key shortage risks, which mitigation would you prefer us to pursue first? Options: Qualify alternates, Secure long-lead buys, Redesign around available parts, Delay launch

      Can the Files Actually Make a Product?

      • How confident are you that the files in your repository are the exact set that produced a working prototype? Options: Fully confident — single source of truth, Mostly confident — minor unknowns, Uncertain — several potential mismatches, Not confident — files need reconciliation
      • Which design and manufacturing files can you provide immediately? Options: PCB CAD (native), Gerbers, Schematic, BOM (CSV/Excel), Mechanical CAD/STEP, Assembly drawings, Test vectors/firmware, None of the above
      • Where are these files managed and how are revisions controlled? Options: PLM/PDM with versioning, Git or source control, Shared drive (manual versions), Email attachments (ad hoc), We don’t have a formal system
      • When was the last ECO applied to the design, and can you provide the ECO log or change list? Options: ECO in last 2 weeks, ECO in last 1–3 months, ECO >3 months ago, No ECO history available
      • Will you be providing golden/reference units, firmware images, or a functional acceptance unit for validation? Options: Yes — golden units and firmware, Golden units only, Firmware only, No — not available yet
      • Are there known mismatches between PCB fabrication drawings, assembly drawings, and the BOM that we should reconcile before quoting? Options: No mismatches, Minor mismatches, Significant mismatches, Unknown — needs review

      What in Your ECO History Keeps You Up at Night?

      • Have late design changes (ECOs) ever forced rework, scrapped pilot builds, or missed customer dates for this product or similar ones? Options: Never, Rarely — one-off, Several times — caused delays, Frequently — major risk
      • Roughly how many ECOs have been issued in the last six months for this program? Options: 0, 1–3, 4–10, More than 10
      • What typically triggers an ECO at your company? Options: Field failure/customer feedback, Test failure in prototype, Supplier change/obsolescence, Cost reduction, Regulatory/compliance, Other
      • Who signs off on ECOs and how quickly can approvals be obtained during an NPI sprint? Options: Single design owner — fast (<48h), Cross-functional board — days, Executive approval required — weeks, Variable — depends on change
      • Do you have a documented change-control process you want us to adopt, or should we propose one for alignment? Options: We will provide our process, We will adopt CM’s proposed process, We need a jointly agreed process, No formal process

      Could Your Test Plan Catch the Killers?

      • If a failure mode exists that will reduce long-term yield by 30%, is that failure likely to be caught by your current test plan before pilot builds? Options: Yes — covered by current tests, Maybe — partial coverage, No — not covered, Unsure — need to review
      • Which test strategies and levels are included in your current plan? (select all that apply) Options: In-Circuit Test (ICT), Boundary Scan / JTAG, Functional Test (FCT), Environmental / Stress (Thermal, Vibration), Burn-in, Automated optical inspection (AOI), Software/Firmware tests
      • Do you have existing test vectors, failure mode analyses (DFMEA), or known-defect lists we can review? Options: Yes — complete package, Partial — some documents, No — will build together, Restricted access
      • What are the pass/fail criteria for the product at functional test and what margin do you expect?
      • How do you triage test failures today and how quickly can design fixes be turned into ECOs and pushed to manufacturing? Options: Real-time triage & fast ECOs (<1 week), Standard triage (1–3 weeks), Slow — longer than a month, Ad hoc
      • Are there specific test fixtures, probes, or software licenses we must procure or that you will supply? Options: Customer supplies fixtures/software, CM procures per spec, Joint procurement, Not yet defined

      Is Your Yield Goal Real or Aspirational?

      • What target first-pass yield and final assembly yield numbers are you planning to achieve at pilot and at volume? Options: First-pass ≥95%, Volume ≥98%, First-pass 90–95%, Volume 95–98%, First-pass 80–90%, Volume 90–95%, We don’t have defined targets
      • Have you captured measured yields on prototypes or small builds? If so, under what test conditions and sample size?
      • What defect rate or DPMO (defects per million opportunities) would be considered a launch failure? Options: Very low tolerance (DPMO < 1000), Moderate (1000–5000), Higher tolerance (5000–20000), Undefined
      • How much schedule or budget flexibility exists if we need additional ECO cycles to hit yield targets? Options: No flexibility — date fixed, Small buffer (weeks), Moderate buffer (1–2 months), Significant flexibility
      • What statistical confidence (sample size/CI) do you require before accepting pilot yields as representative? Options: High confidence (large sample), Medium confidence, Small sample acceptable, Undecided — need guidance

      Who's Got Skin in the Game When Things Go Sideways?

      • When a production blocker appears, who has the authority at your company to make trade-offs between scope, timeline, and budget? Options: Program Manager, VP/Director of Engineering, VP Operations/COO, Executive Sponsor/CEO, Cross-functional board
      • Who will be our day-to-day technical contacts for design, test, and supply chain questions (name + role)?
      • What escalation path and response SLAs do you expect for critical issues during NPI? Options: Immediate phone escalation (24/7), Business hours urgent response (<4h), Next-business-day, Weekly reviews only
      • How often should we provide status to your stakeholders (pilot data, ECOs, supply updates)? Options: Daily standup, Twice-weekly, Weekly, Bi-weekly, As milestones complete
      • Are there specific stakeholders or external customers we must keep informed or who require approval before production release? Options: Yes — external customers, Yes — internal executives, Both, No

      Sharing & Access: Are You Ready to Share the Goods?

      • How comfortable is your team sharing IP, golden units, and firmware with a contract manufacturer under standard NDA protections? Options: Fully comfortable, Comfortable with specific protections, Reluctant — needs custom agreement, Not comfortable
      • What legal or IP protections do you require for file transfers and physical samples? Options: Standard NDA, Custom IP addendum, Data room/controlled access, Export control / ITAR clauses
      • Will you provide firmware binaries, reference images, and secure keys for test, or do we need to validate without them? Options: Full firmware and keys provided, Firmware provided without keys, We must validate without firmware, TBD — will discuss
      • Are there export controls, ITAR, or data residency restrictions that will affect where or how the product can be manufactured? Options: Yes — ITAR/Export controlled, Yes — data residency restrictions, No restrictions, Unknown
      • In what file formats do you prefer to transfer manufacturing data (select all that apply)? Options: Gerber, ODB++, IPC-2581, Native CAD (Altium/CADENCE/OrCAD), STEP/IGES, PDF drawings

  2. Customer Discovery

    Capture current validation status, known failure modes, supply constraints, and measurable success signals for the ramp.

    Discovery Questions

    Getting Comfortable — A Quick Snapshot

    • Tell us the product name, a one-line description, and the primary market you’re targeting.
    • Who is our day-to-day contact for technical decisions and who is the executive sponsor we should know about? Options: Director of Engineering, VP of Operations, Program Manager, Product Manager, Other
    • What is your current target or committed launch date? Options: Firm / locked date, Target date with wiggle room, Flexible / no firm date, Unsure
    • How mission-critical is hitting that date to your business (reputation, revenue, customer commitments)? Options: Critical — missed date has major penalties, Very important — strong customer expectations, Important but manageable if delayed, Flexible
    • Briefly, what has your team already completed on validation and what still feels unfinished?

    Where Things Tend to Break (Tell Us the Worst-Case You’re Preparing For)

    • If this ramp failed, which single failure would you point to as the most likely root cause? Options: Low first-pass yield, Insufficient test coverage, Key component shortage, Uncontrolled ECOs, Process variability, Other
    • Which failure modes have shown up in prototypes, lab tests, or pre-production builds? Options: Intermittent failures, Thermal issues, Mechanical assembly defects, Electrical overstress, Software/firmware intermittency, None observed
    • When those failure modes appeared, what was the typical impact on schedule, cost, or customer confidence? Options: Minor rework / little schedule impact, Moderate rework / short schedule slip, Major scrap / significant delay, Program paused / executive escalation
    • Who on your team currently owns root cause analysis and long-term corrective actions? Options: Design Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering, Test Engineering, Supplier Quality, Program Management, Other
    • Share one concrete example of a past root cause and the workaround you used — what worked and what didn’t?

    The Supply Chain Tightrope (Where the Schedule Breaks First)

    • If a single component became unavailable tomorrow, how fragile would your ability to meet the launch be? Options: Severely fragile — single point of failure, Vulnerable but manageable with swaps, Resilient — alternates available, Not sure / need to audit
    • Which parts of your BOM are single-sourced or carry long lead times? Options: Custom ASIC/SoC, Specific passive values / capacitors, Connectors / cables, COTS modules (Wi‑Fi, BT), Mechanicals / tooling, We have no single-sourced items
    • Do you have qualified alternate parts or secondary suppliers for critical items? Options: Fully qualified alternates, Alternates identified but not qualified, No alternates, Unsure / need to review
    • What past supplier issues (quality, capacity, lead time) have had the biggest schedule impact for you?
    • From your perspective, which three supply risks should we prioritize together? Options: Single-source dependency, Long lead-time components, Supplier QA failures, Cost volatility, Logistics / freight disruptions, Counterfeit risk

    What Success on Ramp Actually Looks Like (Be Specific — No Vague KPIs)

    • If this ramp is a success, name the three metrics your execs will celebrate and why.
    • Which of these metrics are most critical to lock at pilot vs which are production-only? Options: First-pass yield, Final test throughput, Defects per million (DPM), On-time deliveries, Cost per unit
    • What are the minimum acceptable targets for those critical metrics?
    • Who must formally accept pilot results and sign off on production release? Options: Director of Engineering, VP of Operations, Quality Manager, Supply Chain Lead, Customer Representative, Other
    • Are there contractual milestones, penalties, or incentives tied to those metrics we should be aware of? Options: Yes — penalties, Yes — incentives, Both penalties and incentives, No contractual ties, Unsure

    Hidden Validation & Test Gaps (The Things You Worry About in the Quiet Hours)

    • What’s one failure mode you’re worried about but haven’t been able to prove out in the lab yet?
    • Which types of test coverage do you currently have defined? Options: Functional test, Boundary condition tests, Environmental / thermal, Burn-in / soak, Production-only diagnostics, Limited / ad-hoc
    • Which tests are production-grade today and which remain conceptual or engineering-only? Options: Production-ready, Partially defined, Engineering only, Not defined
    • Do you have golden units, failure mode libraries, and pass/fail criteria documented for handover? Options: Complete and documented, Partial documentation, Not documented
    • Are there aspects of the design you believe will be difficult or impossible to test reliably on a production fixture?

    ECOs, Change Loops, and Decision Friction (How Quickly Can We Change Direction?)

    • How many ECO cycles feel like 'too many' for you — at what point does an ECO become a program risk? Options: 1–2 ECOs, 3–5 ECOs, More than 5, Depends on severity
    • Describe your current ECO governance — who approves what, and how formal is the process? Options: Formal with named approvers, Semi-formal with committee, Informal / ad-hoc, No clear governance
    • Typical turnaround time from ECO request to implemented change on the production line? Options: <1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, >4 weeks, Varies greatly
    • Do you have a frozen-BOM milestone and how often has it slipped historically? Options: Frozen and stable, Slipped occasionally, Frequently slips, No formal freeze
    • How would you like joint ECO triage to work between our team and yours (cadence and tools)? Options: Weekly triage meetings, Daily stand-ups during pilot, Shared ticketing / PLM workflow, Ad-hoc as issues arise, Other

    Escalations, Leadership & Risk Appetite (Who’s in the Room When Things Go Off-Script?)

    • If a pilot issue threatens launch, who will be in the escalation loop and how fast will they act? Options: Program Manager → Director → VP, Cross-functional steering committee, Immediate exec-level intervention, Other
    • How does your organization trade off schedule versus cost when making emergency decisions? Options: Prioritize schedule at almost any cost, Balance schedule and cost, Prioritize cost and quality over schedule, Unsure / depends on program
    • Who has final go/no-go authority at pilot completion and at production release? Options: Director of Engineering, VP of Operations, Quality Head, Customer Representative, Other
    • What lessons from past escalations should we be aware of so we avoid repeating them?
    • Would you be prepared to authorize an immediate stop-build if pilot yields or quality fall below agreed thresholds? Options: Yes — stop immediately, Conditional — after triage, No — prefer to iterate, Unsure

    If We Could Wave a Wand (The One Guarantee That Lets You Sleep)

    • If you could have one guarantee from a contract manufacturer during ramp, what would it be (yield, delivery, responsiveness, cost, or something else)? Options: Guaranteed first-pass yield, Guaranteed on-time delivery, Guaranteed qualified supply, Guaranteed ECO turnaround time, Other
    • What is the minimum pilot quantity you need to feel confident the process is repeatable? Options: <50 units, 50–200 units, 200–1,000 units, >1,000 units, Unsure
    • How long a pilot execution window do you consider necessary to validate acceptance criteria? Options: <2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 4–8 weeks, >8 weeks
    • What documentation package do you require at production handoff (work instructions, FAI, control plans, SPC data)? Options: Minimal (WIs + FAI), Standard (WIs + FAI + control plans), Comprehensive (incl SPC, process capability), Other
    • How do you want status and issues surfaced during pilot — dashboards, weekly reviews, hands-on war room? Options: Real-time dashboard + alerts, Weekly steering meetings, Daily standups during pilot, Hands-on joint war room as needed

    Practical Next Steps and Decision Signals (What Will Make You Say Yes?)

    • What would convince you to sign an NPI engagement with us within the next 30 days?
    • Which deliverables must be explicitly included in our proposal for you to move forward? Options: DFM/DFT review, Pilot build + FAI, Test fixture & program development, BOM validation & alternate sourcing, ECO governance plan, Production handoff package
    • What budget authority or procurement process do we need to align with to get started?
    • Who else must be looped into final procurement and technical approval (names or roles)? Options: Procurement, Finance, Quality, Operations, Legal, Customer representative
    • Are there any absolute deal-breakers or non-negotiable constraints we should know before we draft a statement of work?
    • When would you like a proposed plan and estimate delivered? Options: Immediately / within a week, Within 2 weeks, Within 1 month, Longer timeline ok

  3. Solution Experience

    Walk through how our NPI process (DFM/DFT, BOM lock, pilot builds, test development) mitigates the customer’s specific ramp risks.

    Experience Meetings

    • Current State & Stakeholder Alignment
    • Ramp Risk Quantification Workshop
    • Solution Experience Walkthrough — NPI Process Mapped to Your Risks
    • Technical Deep Dive — Test, Pilot Execution & ECO Governance
    • Decision & Mutual Commit Workshop
    • Deliver a test coverage matrix and pilot execution plan with sample sizes and acceptance criteria.
    • Customer to provide any missing numeric inputs (historical yields, backorder costs, lead times).
    • Schedule the Solution Experience Walkthrough with the prioritized risk list as the agenda driver.
    • One‑Sentence Recap & Consequences
    • Confirm that the proposed NPI activities directly mitigate each prioritized ramp risk.
    • Demonstrate proof that the NPI approach produces measurable improvement vs current state.
    • Obtain explicit validation from the customer that the mapped mitigations and acceptance signals match their expectations.
    • Define the acceptance gates and who owns each gate for the pilot and handoff.
    • Produce a tailored NPI plan that maps actions to each prioritized risk with timeline and owners.
    • Share supporting case studies or pilot data that substantiate expected deltas for similar programs.
    • Capture any customer objections or gaps raised during validation and revise the NPI plan accordingly.
    • Test Strategy & Coverage Matrix
    • Finalize the test coverage matrix that maps tests to failure modes.
    • Agree pilot sample sizes, acceptance thresholds, and ECO iteration plan.
    • Establish fixture and test program delivery timelines and owners.
    • Define ECO governance and change-control triggers for pilot and ramp.
    • Introductions & Objectives
    • Test engineering to provide fixture build schedule and resource needs.
    • Program leads to draft ECO governance document showing review cycles and escalation path.
    • Recap Agreed Current State, Consequence & Future State
    • Obtain mutual signoff on the NPI scope, acceptance gates, and timeline.
    • Agree ECO governance, roles, and escalation for the program.
    • Identify and clear any commercial or schedule blockers required to proceed to kickoff.
    • Seller to issue draft SOW and milestone-based acceptance criteria within 2 business days.
    • Customer to confirm commercial anchors or PO intent and raise any contract issues within 3 business days.
    • Schedule formal program kickoff and pilot start dates upon mutual agreement of SOW and resources.
    • Create and record a single one-sentence current-state statement.
    • Surface and assign owners to the top 3 ramp risks.
    • Obtain quantified or directionally estimated consequences for each risk.
    • Confirm decision roles, launch date, and escalation path to enable rapid approvals.
    • Document and circulate the agreed one-sentence current-state and top risk list.
    • Customer to provide BOM, ECO history, recent yield/test data, and committed launch date within 3 business days.
    • Assign owners for each identified risk and schedule the Risk Quantification Workshop.
    • Review Inputs & Assumptions
    • Produce quantified impact estimates (cost/time/quality) for top ramp risks.
    • Agree on concrete measurement baselines and success metrics for the NPI program.
    • Prioritize the risk list to focus the Solution Experience on high-impact mitigations.
    • Create a risk register with quantified impacts and agreed metrics for each top risk.
    • One‑Sentence Current State
    • Scenario Breakdown
    • Review NPI Scope & Deliverables
    • Known Failure Modes Review
    • Risk-by-Risk Mapping
    • Top Ramp Risks Identification
    • Quantify Impact
    • Acceptance Gates & Metrics
    • Pilot Build Plan & Statistical Sampling
    • Proof & Expected Delta
    • Agree Measurement & Success Metrics
    • Tying Steps Back to the Problem
    • Fixture / Tooling / SW Requirements & Lead Times
    • Roles, Timeline & ECO Governance
    • Consequence Statements
    • ECO Governance & Change Control
    • Forced Validation
    • Decision Roles, Launch Date & Escalation
    • Commercial Anchors & Commit
    • Prioritize Mitigation Focus
    • Agreement on Acceptance Signals
    • Decision & Next Steps

  4. Solution Scope

    Define NPI deliverables, responsibilities, acceptance criteria, pilot quantities, timeline, and ECO governance.

    Scope Configuration

    • Lock down BOM and qualify alternate suppliers
    • Execute ECOs to make design production-ready
    • Develop production work instructions and control plan
    • Design and build assembly jigs and fixtures
    • Develop and deploy production test fixtures and programs
    • Run pilot production builds with controlled lots
    • Perform first-article inspection and dimensional reporting
    • Establish serialization, traceability, and lot tracking
    • Set PCB assembly process parameters and reflow profile
    • Implement procurement for long-lead components and safety stock
    • Deploy firmware programming and automated flashing stations
    • Train production operators and transfer manufacturing documentation
    • Implement ESD controls, kitting, and static-safe storage
    • Install in-line inspection and automated quality checkpoints

    Scope Questions

    Lock down BOM and qualify alternate suppliers

    • Do you require a formal BOM lock as part of the NPI scope? Options: Yes, No
    • Which BOM elements must be locked (mechanical parts, PCB assembly, firmware, packaging)? Options: PCB components, Mechanical parts, Cables/wire harnesses, Firmware/versions, Packaging, All of the above
    • Are there single-source or long-lead components that need alternate sourcing? Options: Yes, No
    • List the top 10 critical components (part number, manufacturer, current lead time) or attach BOM excerpt.
    • What supplier qualification level do you expect for alternates (approved vendor list, sample builds, PPAP/qualification run)? Options: Informal evaluation (quotes/samples), Sample builds and testing, Formal supplier qualification / audit, Use existing approved suppliers only
    • What is the target date to have the BOM locked and alternates qualified? Options: <2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, >8 weeks

    Execute ECOs to make design production-ready

    • Do you anticipate design changes (ECOs) are required before pilot builds? Options: Yes, minor (documentation/footprint), Yes, moderate (component swaps/layout tweaks), Yes, major (circuit changes/mech redesign), No
    • Who owns ECO approval and sign-off on the customer side (role/title)?
    • What turnaround time do you require for ECO implementation and verification? Options: <1 week, 1-2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, >4 weeks
    • Are ECOs limited to documentation/assembly notes or do they include PCB layout and mechanical rework? Options: Documentation only, PCB layout changes, Mechanical rework, All of the above
    • List acceptance criteria for ECOs (e.g., electrical test pass rates, dimensional tolerances, functional test results).
    • Do you require change history, ECO traceability, and rollback plans as deliverables? Options: Yes, No

    Develop production work instructions and control plan

    • Do you require step-by-step work instructions for each assembly/test operation? Options: Yes, detailed SOPs, High-level process maps only, No, we will provide
    • Which formats do you need the documentation in? Options: PDF/printable, Digital SOP (HTML/PDF), Workcell checklists, PLC/ERP routings
    • What quality control checkpoints and sampling plans should be included in the control plan? Options: 100% inspection, AQL sampling, Statistical process control (SPC), In-process checks only
    • Who will be the document approver(s) for final work instructions?
    • What is the required lead time to finalize work instructions before pilot start? Options: <1 week, 1-2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, >4 weeks
    • Are there regulatory or industry-specific requirements that must be reflected in the control plan (e.g., IPC, ISO, medical)? Options: IPC, ISO 9001, Medical (FDA/ISO 13485), Automotive (IATF), Other, None

    Design and build assembly jigs and fixtures

    • Are custom assembly jigs or fixtures required for any build steps? Options: Yes, No, Unsure — need assessment
    • Provide expected quantities or cycles those fixtures must support (pilot qty and projected volume). Options: Pilot only (<500 units), Low volume (500-5,000), Medium (5,000-50,000), High (>50,000)
    • Do fixtures require precision alignment, kinematic locators, or specialized materials (ESD-safe, chemical resistance)? Options: Precision alignment, Kinematic locators, ESD-safe materials, Chemical resistance, None
    • What is the expected timeline to design, prototype, and qualify fixtures before pilot? Options: <2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, >8 weeks
    • Who will own fixture validation and maintenance after handoff (customer, CM, shared)? Options: Customer, Manufacturer/CM, Shared ownership
    • Are 3D CAD files, tolerances, and assembly drawings available for fixture design? Options: Yes, full CAD & tolerances, Partial CAD, No — need to capture measurements

    Develop and deploy production test fixtures and programs

    • What types of tests must production fixtures support (functional, ICT, in-circuit, boundary-scan, environmental)? Options: Functional test, ICT, Boundary-scan/JTAG, Programming/validation, Environmental/stress
    • Do you have test specs, test vectors, and failure mode descriptions available? Options: Complete test spec & vectors, Partial, No — test development required
    • Are there time-per-unit or cycle-time targets for the test cell? Options: <30s/unit, 30-120s/unit, 2-5 minutes, >5 minutes
    • Will test fixtures need to program firmware or calibrate devices during test? Options: Yes — programming required, Yes — calibration required, Both, No
    • What pass/fail criteria and data logging requirements (test logs, serial number linkage) are required?
    • Do you require on-site validation and tuning of test programs during pilot? Options: Yes, No

    Run pilot production builds with controlled lots

    • What is the planned pilot quantity and any lot segmentation (e.g., lots of 50 units)? Options: <50 units, 50-200 units, 200-1,000 units, >1,000 units
    • What specific metrics must be collected during pilot (yield, MTBF estimates, test fail rates)? Options: Yield %, Test fail types, MTBF/early life data, Rework rates, All of the above
    • Do you require controlled material lots and serialized tracking for pilot units? Options: Yes — full serialization, Yes — lot tracking only, No
    • What are the acceptance thresholds for pilot success (target yield, acceptable defect rate)?
    • Who will be involved in pilot reviews and sign-off (roles/titles)?
    • Is there a requirement for pilot units to be shipped to customers or retained for further testing? Options: Shipped to customers, Kept for internal test, Mixed

    Perform first-article inspection and dimensional reporting

    • Do you require a formal first-article inspection (FAI) with dimensional reports? Options: Yes — formal FAI, Yes — simplified inspection, No
    • Which reference drawings or tolerances should be used for dimensional checks? Options: Customer drawings, Design CAD models, Specified tolerance table, Not available — need capture
    • How many units should be sampled for FAI and what reporting format is required? Options: 1 unit (typical FAI), 3 units, 5+ units, AQL-specified sample size
    • Do you need measurement data in digital formats (CSV/AS9102/3D scan outputs)? Options: Yes — digital data required, PDF report only, Both
    • Are there critical-to-function dimensions or interfaces that require CPK/SPC tracking post-FAI? Options: Yes — list critical dimensions, No
    • Who will approve the FAI results and what is the expected turnaround for rework and reinspection? Options: Customer engineering, Quality manager (CM), Shared approval

    Establish serialization, traceability, and lot tracking

    • Do you require unit-level serialization or lot-level tracking? Options: Unit-level serialization (UID), Lot-level tracking only, Both, None
    • Which data points must be linked to each serial/lot (BOM revision, test results, operator, date)? Options: BOM revision, Test results, Operator ID, Supplier lot, Build location, All of the above
    • Do you have an existing traceability format or database to integrate with (ERP/MES)? Options: Yes — ERP/MES details provided, No — need CM to host, Unsure
    • Are there labeling or marking requirements (barcode, 2D code, human-readable) and any regulatory constraints? Options: 1D barcode, 2D DataMatrix, Human-readable only, Tamper-evident labels, None
    • What retention period and export/reporting requirements exist for traceability records? Options: 1 year, 3 years, 7 years, Custom/other
    • Do you require real-time traceability and recalls support as part of the scope? Options: Yes — real-time and recall-ready, No — periodic reporting, Unsure

    Set PCB assembly process parameters and reflow profile

    • Are PCB gerbers, assembly drawings, and thermal profiles available? Options: All available, Partial available, No — need profiling
    • Do you require CM to perform reflow profiling and thermal validation? Options: Yes — profiling required, No — we will supply profile, Unsure
    • What process windows and IPC class requirements apply (IPC Class 2, 3, etc.)? Options: IPC Class 1, IPC Class 2, IPC Class 3, Customer-defined
    • Are there special materials (lead-free, conformal coating, high-temperature parts) affecting profile? Options: RoHS/lead-free, Conformal coating, High-temp components, None
    • What acceptance criteria for solder quality and assembly defects should be used (e.g., X-ray, IPC-A-610)? Options: IPC-A-610, Visual only, X-ray BGA inspection, Customer-specific criteria
    • Do you require SPC collection of process parameters (tombstone temp, conveyor speed, peak temp)? Options: Yes, No

    Implement procurement for long-lead components and safety stock

    • Which components are considered long-lead and must be procured early?
    • Do you want CM to manage purchase orders and safety stock on your behalf? Options: Yes — CM-managed PO & stock, No — customer-managed, Hybrid — CM holds critical items
    • What safety stock policy do you prefer (days of cover, % of monthly usage, fixed qty)? Options: Days of cover, Percentage of monthly usage, Fixed quantity, No safety stock
    • Are there sourcing restrictions or approved manufacturer/authorized distributor lists we must follow? Options: Yes — AML only, Preferred suppliers, Open market allowed with approval, No restrictions
    • What lead-time alerts or reorder thresholds should be configured for procurement? Options: Email alerts, Dashboard alerts, Automatic reorder, Manual review
    • Do you require alternate part qualification and substitution rules documented in procurement scope? Options: Yes — documented substitution rules, No — no substitutions allowed

  5. Mutual Commit

    Agree commercial terms, milestones, acceptance tests, change control, and supply commitments for the NPI program.

    Agreement Modules

    • Statement of Work (SOW)
    • Master Services Agreement (MSA)
    • Commercial Terms & Pricing Schedule
    • Purchase Order / Supply Agreement
    • Payment Schedule & Milestone Payments
    • Acceptance Test Plan (ATP) & Acceptance Criteria
    • Change Control & ECO Governance
    • Pilot Build Order & Pilot Acceptance
    • Capacity Reservation & Supply Commitments
    • Quality, Warranty & Remedies
    • Escalation & Governance (Steering Committee)
    • Intellectual Property, Tooling & Asset Ownership
    • Performance & Delivery Remedies
    • Data Security & Confidentiality Addendum
    • Termination, Transition & Exit Plan

  6. Deployment

    Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, pilot execution, and production validation.

    1. Pre-Deployment Readiness

      Confirm fixtures, test software, qualified suppliers, materials on hand, and owners for pilot execution.

      Readiness Questions

      Quick Check‑In: Who Are We Helping and When?

      • Tell us in one sentence what product is entering pilot and the committed launch date you’re reporting to leadership.
      • Who will be our primary day‑to‑day contact for pilot execution and one alternate if they’re unavailable?
      • What is the target pilot quantity (units) and the expected cadence of builds during the pilot window? Options: < 50 units, 50–200 units, 201–1,000 units, > 1,000 units
      • Which business stakeholders have a firm say in the launch date (e.g., Product, Ops, Sales, Customer) — list their roles.
      • How would you describe your emotional state about this launch right now—confident, cautiously optimistic, stressed, or other? Options: Confident, Cautiously optimistic, Stressed, Overwhelmed, Other

      Are We About to Trust a Guess with Your Launch?

      • What single assumption about this product or process, if wrong, would derail the pilot most quickly?
      • Which of these areas do you think contains the riskiest assumption right now? Options: Design yields at scale, Component availability, Test coverage effectiveness, Assembly/process capability, Supplier readiness
      • Has a Design of Experiments or process capability study been run for the most critical steps? If so, summarize key findings. Options: Yes — DOE completed, Partial/limited DOE, Planned but not started, No DOE
      • Tell us about a previous ramp or pilot you ran that had unexpected outcomes—what surprised you and how long did recovery take?
      • How flexible is your committed launch date if we discover a serious, fixable problem during pilot? Options: Not flexible — fixed deadline, Some flexibility with stakeholder approval, Open to shifting, Unsure

      Do You Actually Have The Parts When We Need Them?

      • If a critical long‑lead component were delayed 2–4 weeks, what impact would that have on the pilot schedule? Options: Minor delay (<1 week), Moderate delay (1–2 weeks), Major delay (2–4+ weeks), Pilot would be blocked, Unsure
      • Which components are single‑source, custom, or have limited alternate suppliers?
      • For the top five critical parts, what is current on‑hand coverage measured in weeks? Options: <1 week, 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 5–8 weeks, >8 weeks
      • Do you have approved second‑source suppliers or qualified alternates for any constrained items? Options: Yes — multiple alternates, Yes — single alternate, No alternates, Working on qualification
      • If we need to authorize expedited buys or airfreight, who has signoff authority and what budget is pre‑approved?

      Can We Detect the Next Production Failure Before It Ships?

      • Which failure modes from prototype testing are most likely to recur during pilot and why?
      • Are production test fixtures and jigs built and validated, or are they still in design/procurement? Options: Built and validated, Built but not validated, In production, In design/procurement, Not started
      • Is the test software finalized, version controlled, and ready to run unattended cycles? Options: Yes — validated, Mostly complete, Planned but not started, No
      • What percentage of known failure modes are covered by existing tests (rough estimate)? Options: >90%, 70–90%, 50–70%, <50%, Unknown
      • Who will maintain fixtures and handle on‑site debugging during pilot—list names/roles and escalation contact.

      Who’s Driving This Train If Things Go Off‑Road?

      • If a pilot run exposes a recurring defect, who is the accountable owner for root cause and corrective action?
      • Are escalation paths and decision authorities documented, including SLA for critical decisions (e.g., ECO approval, emergency buys)? Options: Fully documented with SLAs, Documented without SLAs, Informal/known contacts, Not documented
      • Who has final authority to approve ECOs during pilot (role and backup)?
      • What cadence and format do you want for production status updates during pilot (e.g., daily standup, dashboard, email)? Options: Daily standup, Twice weekly review, Weekly review, Shared dashboard (real‑time), Email summaries, Other
      • If a cross‑functional dispute arises (e.g., test vs. design), what is the pre‑agreed arbitration path?

      Is the Floor, Schedule, and Logistics Ready to Carry the Load?

      • Is dedicated floor space and the required equipment reserved for pilot runs on the dates we’ve discussed? Options: Yes — reserved, Tentatively reserved, No reservation yet, Need to confirm
      • Have ESD, cleanroom, environmental, and safety requirements been reviewed and satisfied for pilot production? Options: All satisfied, Partially satisfied, Planned but not complete, Not applicable
      • Are we expecting any planned shutdowns, holidays, or supplier blackouts during the pilot window? Options: Yes — list dates, No, Unsure
      • Who will handle inbound inspection, material staging, and kitting for pilot builds?
      • Do you require controlled build windows for the customer or external auditors to witness pilot runs? Options: Yes — customer witnessing, Yes — auditor witnessing, No, Maybe — to be scheduled

      If This Starts to Go Sideways, What’s Our Safety Net?

      • Which of these risks would you rank as highest likelihood × highest impact: design yield, parts, test gaps, supplier failure, or process capability? Options: Design yield, Parts availability, Test coverage gaps, Supplier performance, Process capability
      • For the top two risks you selected, what immediate mitigations are in place or planned?
      • What contingency inventory or safety stock level (in weeks or units) would you accept to de‑risk early production? Options: No buffer, 1–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 5–8 weeks, >8 weeks
      • What dollar or timeline buffer has leadership pre‑approved for addressing emergent ECOs or rework during pilot? Options: <$10k or <1 week, $10–50k or 1–2 weeks, $50–200k or 2–4 weeks, >$200k or >4 weeks, None/unspecified
      • If a supplier proves unfit during pilot, how quickly can you qualify an alternate and who triggers that process?

      What Would Make You Breathe Easy After Pilot?

      • Describe the specific, measurable acceptance criteria for pilot success (e.g., target yield %, first article pass rate, test coverage metrics).
      • Which of these metrics are non‑negotiable for launch approval? Options: Yield %, First article inspection (FAI) pass, Test coverage %, Supplier on‑time delivery %, Process capability (Cp/Cpk)
      • Who will sign the pilot acceptance—name and role—and what evidence do they require (reports, raw data, FAI documentation)?
      • How would you like pilot data delivered and visualized (raw CSV, dashboards, daily summary report, real‑time queries)? Options: Raw CSVs, Automated dashboards, Daily summary report, Real‑time data access, Weekly presentations
      • What are the top three immediate next actions you commit to this week to make pilot readiness real?
      • Is there anything about your product, supply chain, or internal politics we haven’t asked that could materially affect pilot readiness?

    2. Pilot Build & Validation

      Execute pilot runs, collect yield and test data, iterate ECOs, and perform first article inspections to validate processes.

    3. Production Handoff & Ramp

      Lock work instructions, finalize QC/test programs, qualify supply for volume, and schedule controlled ramp to full rate.

  7. Success

    Confirm acceptance criteria are met, capture lessons learned, and maintain a shared channel for issues and continuous improvement.

    Success Reviews

    • Acceptance Criteria Review & Sign-off
    • Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement Workshop
    • Post‑Pilot Support & Issue Escalation Handoff
    • Supply & Capacity Confirmation
    • Executive Close‑out & Transfer Review

    Issues & Enhancements

    • Lock and publish the approved supplier list and alternate sources with qualification evidence attached.
    • Publish SLA document and escalation matrix in the shared channel and link to the issue template.
    • Schedule the recurring triage cadence and circulate calendar invites with agendas.
    • Supplier Qualification Status
    • Verify suppliers and materials are qualified and able to meet the ramp forecast or document mitigations where not.
    • Agree on safety stock levels, trigger points, and owner responsibilities for supply interruptions.
    • Produce a supply risk register with owners and timelines for mitigation.
    • One‑sentence Current State
    • Create a material shortage mitigation plan for any parts below required levels and assign owners.
    • Update forecast and capacity plan in the production scheduler to reflect agreed ramp milestones.
    • One‑line Current State & Future State
    • Secure executive-level go/no‑go decision for full production ramp or capture explicit conditional approvals.
    • Ensure commercial and financial obligations are aligned with operational readiness and documented.
    • Record any executive-level contingencies and assign accountability for delivering them.
    • Document executive decision, conditions, and required approvals; circulate final close‑out package to stakeholders.
    • If approved, trigger production ramp schedule and notify supply chain and operations to execute the transfer plan.
    • If conditional, capture required deliverables and timelines and schedule a follow‑up decision review.
    • Validate evidence shows acceptance criteria are satisfied or record explicit remediation plans for any gaps.
    • Obtain formal stakeholder sign-off (engineering, quality, supply, commercial) for production ramp or conditional approval with deadlines.
    • Ensure ownership and timelines are assigned for all remaining risks with clear escalation triggers.
    • Publish signed acceptance certificate and attach supporting evidence to the shared project channel.
    • Create and assign remediation tasks for each open gap with owner and due date in the project tracker.
    • Notify production scheduling of planned ramp date and any conditional constraints agreed during sign-off.
    • Recap of Pilot Outcomes
    • Capture a prioritized list of process and product improvements tied to measurable outcomes.
    • Assign owners, timelines, and metrics to ensure continuous improvement actions are executed and tracked.
    • Create a lessons‑learned deliverable to be shared with both customer and supplier stakeholders.
    • Publish lessons‑learned document with RCA, recommended fixes, owners, and KPIs to the shared channel.
    • Add improvement tasks to the continuous improvement backlog and schedule quarterly reviews.
    • Update NPI checklist and work instructions to incorporate accepted process changes.
    • Shared Channel & Tooling Setup
    • Put in place a single source of truth for issue reporting and status tracking accessible to both customer and manufacturer.
    • Agree on SLAs and escalation owners to ensure predictable response to production issues.
    • Establish an operational meeting cadence that balances rapid response with governance.
    • Provision the agreed shared channel and invite required stakeholders with appropriate access rights.
    • Acceptance Criteria Walkthrough
    • Material Availability vs Ramp Forecast
    • Key Metrics vs Acceptance
    • Issue Triage & SLA Definitions
    • Top Failure Modes & Root Cause Analysis
    • Process Improvement Brainstorm
    • Escalation Matrix & Owners
    • Commercial & Contractual Items
    • Consequence & Residual Risk Summary
    • Alternate Sourcing & Risk Mitigation
    • Gap Remediation Plan
    • Capacity & Contingency Plan
    • Go/No‑Go Decision and Conditions
    • Action Roadmap & Metrics
    • Recurring Operational Cadence
    • Formal Sign‑off / Next Steps
Explore more templates Use this template
First-Party AI ™

1-2 minutes please — Your AI agent is working

First-Party AI™ can make mistakes. Always check important information.