Technology
›
Electronics & Hardware
›
Industrial Electronics & Power
Motion Control
Complex technical sales and manufacturing engagements across the global electronics supply chain.
Siemens
Rockwell Automation
Yaskawa
Fanuc
Inside this journey
-
Pre-Discovery
Align the room on outcomes, decision process, and constraints before deeper discovery.
-
Stakeholder Alignment
Confirm decision roles (controls, procurement, service), timeline, and must-have technical requirements like bandwidth, settling time, fieldbus interfaces, and spare parts availability.
Alignment Questions
Start with Who’s Holding the Keys
- Who on your team will be directly involved in selecting the servo platform (pick all who apply)?
- Who is the single person with final sign-off authority for this platform decision?
- Who will own on-site commissioning and day‑one tuning once hardware arrives?
- Who will be responsible for spare parts strategy and lifecycle planning for the installed base?
- How do these stakeholders usually prefer to evaluate technical tradeoffs (e.g., bench test, site trials, data sheets, reference builds)?
- Describe one past platform decision where stakeholder misalignment caused delays or rework. What happened and who pushed back?
If Production Blames You Tomorrow, What Happens Next?
- If a tightened tolerance or faster cycle time from this project fails on the production line, who in your organization will face the biggest consequences?
- What is your target decision timeline from pilot approval to production roll‑out?
- Which procurement or corporate approval gates must we clear before hardware can be ordered?
- Are there hard launch dates driven by your customer (e.g., product launch, audit windows)? If so, list the dates and consequences of missing them.
- How flexible is your timeline if a pilot needs more validation time—do you have buffer weeks or fixed ship dates?
- Who in procurement will handle supplier qualification and contract negotiation, and what is their top concern (cost, lead time, single source risk, warranty)?
The One Technical Limit That Can’t Survive
- What single technical limitation on your current servo platform would immediately disqualify it from this machine (be specific—e.g., settling time, bandwidth, repeatability)?
- Which measurable specs are non‑negotiable for the most demanding axis (enter values where possible)?
- How do you currently measure success on that critical axis (test profile, oscilloscope capture, product rejection rate, cycle time)?
- Which communications and safety interfaces must the new platform support out of the box (pick all required)?
- How tolerant is your team to tuning effort vs. pre‑tuned accuracy—are you willing to invest manual tuning for a performance gain?
What Could Break During Commissioning?
- If commissioning uncovers unexpected behavior, what is the one outcome that would force you to pause or roll back the deployment?
- What level of vendor application‑engineering support do you expect during commissioning?
- How many days of vendor support do you expect to require for initial commissioning and tuning (per pilot machine)?
- Which acceptance tests will you run during commissioning to declare success (pick all that apply)?
- Describe the worst commissioning scenario you've experienced in the past and how long it took to recover.
How Do You Think About Spares and Global Support?
- How critical is rapid spare availability to your business—could you tolerate a multi‑week lead time for a failed drive or motor?
- Which spare strategy do you currently use or prefer for critical components?
- Which parts are you most concerned about stocking—motors, drives, controllers, encoders, or power supplies?
- What is your acceptable total cost of ownership tradeoff for guaranteed spare availability (higher part cost vs. lower downtime)?
- Do you have global sites with different lead‑time tolerances or import restrictions we should know about? If yes, list locations and constraints.
If We Change Platforms, How Will Your Team Feel?
- What emotions come up internally when you think about switching the motion platform—excitement, anxiety, skepticism, relief, other?
- How much retraining do your controls and maintenance teams expect will be required (choose one)?
- Which programming environments must remain supported to preserve your current integration (select all that apply)?
- How important is reuse of existing motion profiles and programs versus rewriting for the new controller?
- What internal training or documentation formats work best for your team (onsite classroom, virtual workshops, recorded videos, step‑by‑step commissioning guides)?
What Will a Successful Pilot Actually Look Like?
- What single measurable result from a pilot would convince you to roll the platform into production?
- What scope should the pilot cover—one axis, full machine, or representative sub‑assembly?
- Which acceptance metrics will you require at completion of the pilot (pick all that apply)?
- Who will sign off the pilot results inside your organization (roles), and what documentation do they require?
- If the pilot meets technical goals but exceeds budgeted labor for commissioning, how would you likely proceed?
Hidden Rules: Commercial or Compliance Deal‑Breakers
- Are there procurement terms or compliance items that would immediately disqualify a vendor (e.g., no single‑source suppliers, specific warranty language, export restrictions)?
- What warranty length and on‑site response times do you require for drives and motors?
- Do you have a procurement preference for stocking spares via consignment, direct purchase, or vendor‑managed inventory?
- Are there IP, software licensing, or API access constraints we should know about (e.g., closed systems, custom encryption, limited third‑party access)?
- Are there contract terms (lead times, penalties, spare‑part price caps) that procurement will insist on before approving a vendor?
-
Current State Mapping
Document the incumbent servo platform limits, recent rejection/failure modes, competitor benchmarks, and global spares/support constraints.
Current State
Start Here: A Quick Snapshot of This Machine Line
- Which machine line, model, or SKU is this discovery focused on?
- Who on your team will own the servo platform decision and who else will be involved?
- What is the expected production volume and typical duty cycle for machines using this axis?
- What's the target positioning tolerance and cycle-time goal you’ve been asked to hit?
- Who currently supplies the incumbent servo platform on these machines?
When The Machine Calls It Quits — Failure Stories That Matter
- Tell me about the most recent time a machine missed acceptance or was rejected by a customer because of motion — what happened and what did it cost?
- How often are motion-related rejections or critical faults occurring today?
- Which specific rejection/failure modes recur most frequently on your line?
- When those failures happen, what trace data do you capture (servo logs, time-synced encoder traces, PLC cycles)?
- How do you typically triage and resolve an axis-level failure in the field?
- What feelings surface internally when a repeat failure lands on a flagship customer's line?
What You Don't Want To Admit About Your Current Platform
- Which parts of your current servo stack are quietly out of margin today but you keep working around?
- What recurring tuning or stability issues consume your controls engineers' time?
- What's the worst-case positioning error you see in production for the most demanding axis?
- How much hands-on tuning does a new machine launch require per axis (engineer-hours) before you call it stable?
- Which axes or motion profiles tend to break automated autotune and force manual optimization?
- How does the controls team feel about retraining to a new programming environment—excited, cautious, or resistant?
If We Could Remove One Constraint Right Now
- If you could instantly eliminate the single biggest motion-related constraint on this product line, what would it be and why?
- Which performance metric would deliver the biggest commercial upside if improved?
- What level of retraining effort (hours per engineer) would be acceptable for switching platforms without harming throughput?
- How would a measurable improvement (example: 30% faster cycle or 50% fewer tune-hours) change a sales or renewal conversation with your flagship customers?
- Who in your organization would become an internal champion if this constraint were solved?
The Hidden Costs You're Carrying — Spares, Logistics, and Support
- Describe the last unplanned expense caused by spare shortages, long lead times, or lack of support.
- How many unique spare SKUs do you maintain worldwide for motion components?
- Typical lead time for a critical motion spare today?
- Do you maintain a centralized global spare pool or local inventory per region/site?
- How often do customers demand on-site vendor application support during commissioning?
- How would reduced spare SKUs or faster global support change your total cost of ownership or proposal competitiveness?
Who Really Decides (And How Fast) — The Human Side of Platform Change
- When a flagship customer asks for tighter tolerance or faster cycle, what internal roadblocks prevent you from switching platforms quickly?
- Which stakeholders must sign off on a platform change and what does each care most about?
- What is your typical decision timeline for adopting a new servo platform?
- Which contractual, warranty, or certification constraints are most likely to block a platform swap?
- Who typically needs to see a live demo or bench test before signing off?
Bench & Field Reality Check — Can We Reproduce Your Problem?
- If we asked for your exact motion profile and a failing part, what are you most worried a bench test would expose?
- Do you have a bench with the instrumentation needed for a realistic evaluation (torque sensor, high-rate encoder, millisecond logging)?
- Which metrics must we measure to convince you the platform will work in your context?
- How long can you realistically provide machine or bench access for vendor-led testing or commissioning?
- What fixtures, encoder types, or special mechanical interfaces are required to make testing realistic?
- Would you allow vendor application engineers to run closed-loop tests on your real motion profile, and under what conditions?
Next Steps That Actually Reduce Risk — What a Low-Risk Pilot Looks Like
- What would make a pilot so low-risk that leadership would greenlight it immediately?
- Which pilot scopes would you consider acceptable to de-risk the decision?
- What acceptance criteria do you need to see to declare a pilot successful (be specific and measurable)?
- Who must be present during pilot commissioning and who will sign the acceptance?
- What minimum commercial commitment are you comfortable with for evaluation hardware?
- Realistically, when could we schedule a pilot (weeks/months), and are there blackout dates we must avoid?
-
-
Outcome Discovery
Define target positioning and cycle-time goals, measurable success signals, retraining tolerances, and the critical axis that must be proven.
Discovery Questions
Warming Up: What's at Stake?
- Who on your team will feel the biggest impact if positioning or cycle-time targets aren’t met? (pick all that apply)
- Can you briefly describe the customer rejection, product spec change, or competitor demo that triggered this evaluation?
- What decision timeline are you working to for selecting and validating a new servo platform?
- How would you describe the emotional tone around this project inside your team? (pressure, relief, opportunity, risk—briefly)
- Which axis types are involved in the challenge we should focus on?
Are You Settling—or Fighting to Keep Up?
- What problems are you currently tolerating because they’re “good enough” — but you wouldn’t want to explain them to your flagship customer again?
- Exactly what limits are you seeing on the incumbent servo platform for the target axis? Please include numeric values where possible (position error, settling time, bandwidth, torque ripple, etc.).
- Which of these failure or rejection modes have you observed recently?
- How often do these problems occur and what is the typical business impact per event (scrap units, rework, line stoppage minutes, lost customer confidence)?
- Historically, who has owned diagnosing and fixing these issues?
The Axis That Keeps You Awake
- If you had to pick one axis to prove our platform on—the axis that, if it passes, you’d proceed to rollout—which would it be and why?
- Describe the worst-case motion profile for that axis (peak torque, peak acceleration, typical dwell time, gear ratio, reflected inertia).
- Which specific metrics must we demonstrate on that axis to convince you (select all that apply)?
- What tuning approaches have you already tried on that axis, and how long (engineer hours) did each attempt take to reach 'good enough'?
- How tolerant is the process to occasional misses—what failure rate is acceptable (e.g., <1 ppm, 1–100 ppm, etc.)?
How Much Faster Is 'Enough'?
- Competitor shows 30% faster cycle time—what would you be willing to trade (accuracy, lifecycle simplicity, spare complexity) to achieve that speed?
- What is your current baseline cycle time for the operation we’re targeting? (provide number and units)
- What minimum percent improvement in cycle time would justify a platform change for you?
- Are there downstream quality, safety, or handling constraints that prevent you from simply running faster? If so, what are they?
- Where is the actual bottleneck in your sequence today? (pick all that apply)
Success Signals—What Will Make This a Win?
- In plain terms: what would you show your customer or leadership to prove this project succeeded?
- Please list 3–5 measurable acceptance criteria for pilot sign-off (metric, numeric target, and how it will be measured).
- Which stakeholders must sign off on pilot acceptance and why? (select all that will be decision-makers)
- What test scenarios or datasets would be most convincing in the bench test (e.g., actual production profile, worst-case disturbance, thermal soak)?
- What sample size or statistical confidence do you expect for acceptance (single-run demo, 100 cycles, 1k cycles, 10k+), and why?
Retraining, Ramp, and Hidden Costs
- How much of a barrier is retraining your team on a new programming environment or tuning workflow?
- Which roles will need training and at what depth? (select roles; in next question, tell us hours or level)
- Estimate the training effort or ramp cost—hours per role or FTE-weeks—required to reach production readiness after a successful pilot.
- What hidden transition costs worry you most (parallel spares, dual-inventory, lost throughput during ramp, supplier SLAs)?
- What maximum acceptable ramp-to-production duration would you require after pilot sign-off?
Tradeoffs, Risks, and the Things You Won't Compromise
- If forced to trade one requirement for another (accuracy for speed, spare complexity for ease-of-tuning), which requirement would you absolutely refuse to compromise and why?
- Select your top two priorities for the platform decision (pick up to two).
- Which regulatory, safety, or fieldbus constraints are non-negotiable for this program (list protocols, SIL/PL requirements, or certification needs)?
- Do incumbent vendor contracts, spares agreements, or approved vendor lists limit your procurement options?
- If the pilot fails to hit targets, what rollback or contingency would you require to protect production?
Mapping The Decision — Next Steps
- What two outcomes in the next 30 days would change your willingness to commit to a pilot?
- Who needs to sit on the pilot steering committee and what decision authority should each person have? (select roles)
- Which logistics must be confirmed before we schedule a bench test (pick all that apply)?
- What format for pilot deliverables convinces you most: live bench demo, exported datasets with analysis, automated acceptance report, or on-site commissioning with customer present?
- When is the earliest window your team has for a 1–2 hour scoping session to define bench-test scripts and pass/fail criteria?
- Is there anything else—political, technical, or commercial—that would change how we scope this pilot?
-
Solution Experience
Validate outcome delivery by running bench test scenarios and commissioning workflows that measure torque accuracy, settling time, tuning effort, and PLC/fieldbus integration in the customer’s context.
Experience Meetings
- Pre-Test Alignment — Current State, Consequence & Test Plan
- Bench Test — Baseline (Incumbent) vs Candidate Runs
- Integration & Commissioning Workflow Simulation (PLC / Fieldbus)
- Tuning Optimization & Robustness Validation
- Outcome Validation & Acceptance Decision
- Capture video/logs of manual tuning steps with timestamps and rationale for future training.
- Identify and document recovery actions for common fieldbus and device faults.
- Produce a handover checklist that the customer's controls owner can follow during on-site commissioning.
- Deliver fieldbus configuration files (PDO/TPDO mapping, I/O tables) and sample PLC code snippets for the customer to import.
- Record and share latency/jitter measurements and indicate whether they meet timing budget thresholds.
- Create a commissioning checklist with estimated times for each step and owner assignment.
- Schedule a follow-up integration test if PLC changes are required before pilot deployment.
- Tuning Strategy Recap
- Decide whether auto-tune meets acceptance criteria or quantify manual tuning required.
- Produce a documented, repeatable tuning recipe for the customer's production engineers.
- Prove robustness of the control loop under load transients and repeated cycles.
- Estimate per-axis commissioning effort to inform deployment planning and AE support commitments.
- Compile the final tuning recipe, default parameters, and a list of manual-tune triggers for production teams.
- Introductions & Meeting Objectives
- Update time estimates for commissioning per axis and communicate AE staffing needs for pilot deployment.
- Flag any control limits or hardware constraints discovered that require design changes or spares.
- Recap Current State & One-Line Future State
- Obtain explicit customer validation that the candidate solution proves the defined future state.
- Make and record a clear decision: pilot, purchase, or further test, with owners and dates.
- Agree on required commercial/support commitments tied to the acceptance decision.
- Capture residual risks and the mitigation plan if acceptance is conditional.
- Seller to produce a final validation report with attached logs, annotated waveforms, and signed acceptance criteria for customer sign-off.
- If proceeding to pilot, schedule pilot kickoff, assign AE and controls owners, and list spare parts to stage.
- If further testing required, define scope, timeline, and specific retest criteria; schedule next bench window.
- Document agreed commercial and support commitments (spares, AE hours, training) and circulate for approvals.
- Have a single clear one-line current state agreed by all participants.
- Document quantified consequence(s) of the current state so urgency is explicit.
- Agree on a one-line future state expressed exclusively as measurable outcomes.
- Approve a detailed test plan and explicit acceptance criteria that prove the future state.
- Assign roles, data handoffs, and pre-work to enable bench tests without delay.
- Customer to provide incumbent motion profile, failure logs, and recent rejection examples (one-line summary and raw data).
- Seller to produce test-plan checklist and test-script templates mapping each test to the acceptance criteria.
- Reserve bench and arrange required hardware/fixtures and fieldbus adapters for scheduled test window.
- Identify point people for data collection, safety sign-off, and PLC integration during tests.
- Setup Verification & Safety Check
- Produce baseline numeric metrics from the incumbent platform for direct comparison.
- Capture candidate solution performance using identical profiles and measurement channels.
- Quantify initial tuning effort and time required to reach baseline performance.
- Ensure all raw data and logs are captured and verified for subsequent analysis.
- Export and share raw waveform logs (position, torque, velocity) for both incumbent and candidate runs.
- Annotate and time-stamp tuning steps performed during candidate runs for auditability.
- Prepare a short comparison table showing delta-to-goal for each metric within 48 hours.
- Flag any immediate hardware/firmware mismatches that require retest and schedule follow-up bench window.
- Integration Topology & Signal Mapping Review
- Validate that the candidate solution's fieldbus messages and timing meet the customer's PLC requirements.
- Prove the full commissioning workflow in the customer's control context and measure time required per step.
- One-Sentence Current State
- Present Key Test Evidence
- Simulate PLC Commissioning Sequence
- Execute Incumbent Profile Runs
- Auto-Tune Execution & Results
- Fieldbus Determinism & Latency Tests
- Gap Analysis vs Acceptance Criteria
- Consequence Quantification
- Execute Candidate Solution Runs (Default Tuning)
- Manual Optimization on Worst-Case Axis
- Disturbance & Repeatability Tests
- One-Sentence Future State (Success Signals)
- Customer Validation (Force Confirmation)
- Error Injection & Recovery Scenarios
-
Solution Scope
Define included motors, drives, controllers, software modules, test fixtures, service levels, acceptance criteria, and responsibilities for pilot and production phases.
Scope Configuration
- Supply matched servo motors
- Deliver multi-axis servo drives
- Install and wire motion controller
- Bench-test customer's motion profile
- Perform auto-tuning of servo loops
- Perform manual tuning for demanding axes
- Configure synchronized gearing and camming
- Integrate EtherCAT/PROFINET with PLC
- Port G-code and IEC logic to controller
- Deploy robotics kinematics libraries
- Provide remote tuning support
- Supply global spare parts kit
Scope Questions
Supply matched servo motors
- Do you require vendor-supplied motors matched to our drives/controllers?
- How many distinct motor types or axis families will be required for pilot/production?
- What are the target continuous and peak torque (Nm) and maximum speed (RPM) for each motor family?
- What encoder/resolver types are acceptable or required?
- Are there environmental or mounting constraints (IP rating, washdown, cleanroom, vacuum)?
- What spare quantity per motor type should we provision for pilot and initial production?
Deliver multi-axis servo drives
- Which drive architecture do you prefer for this machine (chassis/rack, distributed EtherCAT nodes, standalone cabinets)?
- How many axes per drive module and total axes required for pilot and production?
- What nominal bus voltage and current ratings are required (e.g., 48 VDC, 230 VAC, 400 VAC, peak current)?
- Are safety-rated functions (e.g., STO, SS1, Safe Torque Off) required in the drive?
- What cooling and environmental constraints exist for drives (forced air, liquid cooling, conformal coating)?
- Which communications interfaces must the drives support?
Install and wire motion controller
- Which controller form-factor do you prefer (standalone multi-axis controller, embedded controller in cabinet, PC-based controller)?
- How many coordinated axes and types of coordinated motion (trajectory, camming, gearing) must the controller support?
- List required I/O counts and special I/O types (high-speed capture, encoder inputs, brake outputs, safety I/O).
- Who will perform cabinet wiring and field terminations?
- Are there physical constraints for controller installation (rack units, DIN-rail, panel cutouts)?
- Do you require vendor-supplied wiring diagrams, terminal labeling, and as-built documentation?
Bench-test customer's motion profile
- Do you want the vendor to run your real motion profile on a bench setup or replicate profiles from specs?
- Can you provide motion profiles, CAM charts, or sample program files for replication?
- Which performance metrics must be captured during bench tests?
- Do you require an on-site witness, remote live-streamed test, or only recorded deliverables?
- How many distinct test scenarios or load cases should be run (e.g., no-load, worst-case inertia, step changes)?
- What test report format and level of detail do you require (raw data CSV, plots + analysis, executive summary)?
Perform auto-tuning of servo loops
- Do you want vendor-performed auto-tuning as part of the deliverable?
- Which motion profiles or routines should be used during auto-tuning (jog, step, application trajectory)?
- What tuning aggressiveness is acceptable (conservative for safety, balanced, performance-maximized)?
- Should tuned parameters be stored in revision control and delivered as part of the acceptance package?
- Do you require training or documentation on how to re-run auto-tune and interpret results?
- Are there any safety or fixture constraints to observe during tuning (soft limits, guarded operation)?
Perform manual tuning for demanding axes
- Which specific axis(es) do you anticipate will require manual tuning (list axis IDs and reason)?
- Do you want vendor application engineers on-site for manual tuning or remote collaboration?
- Are there known disturbance sources (cutting forces, process variation, flexible couplings) that tuning must mitigate?
- What is the expected time allowance per axis for manual tuning in pilot commissioning?
- Do you require written tuning procedures, step-by-step settings, and acceptance checkpoints after manual tuning?
- Should manual tuning include generation of fallback parameters for safety or low-performance modes?
Configure synchronized gearing and camming
- Will the application use electronic gearing, camming (polynomial), mechanical gearing, or a combination?
- How many axes will participate in synchronized motion groups or cams?
- Do you have gear ratios, cam tables, or motion law definitions available to import?
- Do you require simulation of synchronized motion and dry-run validation before commissioning?
- What position/phase tolerance is required between synchronized axes (e.g., microns, degrees)?
- Should cam/gearing configurations be exportable as recipes for different product SKUs?
Integrate EtherCAT/PROFINET with PLC
- Which PLC brands and controllers will the motion system need to integrate with?
- Which fieldbus or real-time Ethernet protocol is required for the integration?
- Do you require vendor-supplied GSD/EDS files, PLC function blocks, or sample code for integration?
- Who will own PDO/IO mapping and synchronization settings (vendor, customer, collaborative)?
- Is functional-safety integration (e.g., FSoE, PROFIsafe) required between drives and PLC?
- Will we have access to PLC program or test harness for end-to-end integration testing?
Port G-code and IEC logic to controller
- What programming artifacts are you migrating (G-code programs, IEC 61131-3 logic, custom macros)?
- Do you want the vendor to perform the porting/conversion or provide tools and oversight for customer-led porting?
- How many unique programs, recipes, or routines must be ported and validated?
- Are there proprietary or third-party macros/functions that will require rework during porting?
- Do you require functional validation test cases to be created and executed post-porting?
- What acceptable downtime window exists for code migration and controller cutover?
Deploy robotics kinematics libraries
- Is robotics kinematics required on the motion controller for this application?
- Which robot configurations must be supported (Cartesian, SCARA, 6-axis articulated, Delta, custom)?
- Do you need inverse kinematics only, path planning, tool-center-point (TCP) management, or collision avoidance?
- Are there existing kinematic models or URDF files available to import?
- Do you require licensing, certification, or 3rd-party libraries to be deployed on the controller?
- Will the kinematics be integrated with external systems (vision, force/torque, PLC recipes)?
-
Mutual Commit
Finalize commercial and support terms, spare-parts commitments, application engineering support during commissioning, training scope, and acceptance milestones.
Agreement Modules
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Commercial Quote & Order Form
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Warranty & RMA Terms
- Spare Parts Commitment
- Application Engineering & Commissioning Support Agreement
- Training Scope & Delivery Agreement
- Acceptance Criteria & Test Protocol
- Firmware, Software License & Maintenance Agreement
- Change Order & Scope Management
- Escalation & Governance Plan
- Confidentiality & Data Processing Agreement (NDA/DPA)
- Export, Compliance & Certification Addendum
- Termination & Transition Plan
-
Deployment
Operationalize rollout with readiness checks, enablement, and outcome validation.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm test bench and machine access, hardware/firmware versions, spare hardware staging, and logistics for global support are in place.
Readiness Questions
Quick Snapshot: Where We Stand
- Briefly describe the primary business trigger and the deployment timeline for this pilot (e.g., customer rejects parts, speed target, new product launch).
- What is your target go-live window for the pilot or production line?
- Which specific machine(s) or line(s) are in scope for pre-deployment work? Please list model names, location, and how many units.
- Who will be the main technical points of contact we should coordinate with (name/role/email)?
- How do you prefer deployment communications and status updates during readiness work?
Who Holds the Keys? (Decision & Access Gatekeepers)
- If our team needs final sign-off at any point, who has the power to block or pause the deployment—and how quickly do they typically respond?
- Which internal teams must approve machine access, electrical lockout, firmware changes, or process-shutdowns?
- Tell us about a recent approval that took longer than expected—what caused the delay and how was it resolved?
- Who controls spare-parts purchasing and inventory at your sites, and where are spares typically stored?
- Are there contractual or customer constraints (NDAs, on-site customer reps, restricted access) that could block our engineers from performing tests or firmware updates?
Can We Touch the Machine When We Need To?
- If we requested 48–72 hours of uninterrupted machine time for benching and commissioning, how likely is that to be granted?
- What are your typical machine availability windows and preferred maintenance windows (shifts/days/times)?
- Are there on-site safety, badging, or qualification procedures our engineers must complete before touch-time (e.g., orientation, drug testing, PPE training)?
- Who schedules machine downtime and what lead time do they require?
- Do you provide remote access (VPN, secured OPC/fieldbus access, live PLC snapshots) to support pre-commissioning diagnostics?
Are Your Bench & Lab Ready for a Real Stress-Test?
- Would your controls engineers be comfortable running the actual production motion profile on a bench rig, or do you require simplified proof cycles first?
- What bench equipment and instrumentation can you make available (e.g., high-resolution torque sensor, calibrated encoder, power analyzer, PLC emulator, safety cage)?
- Can you provide CAD, electrical IO maps, PLC logic snapshots, and the motion profile files ahead of the bench tests?
- Are there wiring, mechanical, or safety constraints that limit how we instrument or run the bench (e.g., cannot bypass interlocks, cannot run above X speed)? Please describe.
- Who will own the bench setup on your side and who is the day-to-day lab contact for coordination?
Is the Hardware & Firmware Exactly the Same?
- Are the hardware and firmware versions in your staging lab identical to your production machines, or are there uncontrolled variations we should expect?
- Please list the firmware and hardware versions for motors, drives, and controllers intended for pilot (include part numbers and revision where possible).
- Do you have spare units that match production hardware so we can stage pre-loaded firmware and configs for fallback swaps?
- What is your firmware change-control process (test/stage/approve/roll back) and who authorizes rollbacks into production?
- Would you allow our engineers to pre-stage configured spare hardware on-site to accelerate cutover?
How Will We Keep You Running Globally?
- If a critical axis fails at a remote site (e.g., Singapore, Mexico) on a Friday evening, can you get the correct spare and support within 72 hours?
- List your key production sites and whether each has a local spare depot or relies on regional shipping.
- What customs, import documentation, or preferred logistics carriers should we plan around for expedited spare shipments?
- What spare-part stocking policy would make deployment low-risk from your perspective (select one)?
- Do you have preferred repair vendors, kitting formats, part-numbering, or barcoding standards we should follow for spares?
Who Owns It After We Leave? (Training, Handover & Acceptance)
- Who on your team will own axis tuning and first-line support after commissioning—and are they experienced with the platform class we're deploying?
- What format of knowledge transfer makes the most sense for your team (hands-on co-tune, runbooks, recorded walkthroughs, train-the-trainer)?
- What are your non-negotiable acceptance metrics at handover for an axis (please include numeric targets if possible: e.g., positioning error in µm, settling time ms, velocity bandwidth Hz)?
- Who is authorized to sign production acceptance and what evidence do they require (witnessed run, signed test protocol, automated logs)?
- If the pilot misses targets, what corrective window, resources, and escalation path do you expect before you consider pausing rollout?
-
Deployment Enablement
Schedule commissioning tasks, assign application engineering and controls owners, run training sessions, and stage spare parts and firmware updates.
-
Validation Checklist
Verify axis-level metrics (positioning error, settling time, velocity bandwidth), document tuning steps, and obtain production acceptance sign-off.
Validation Questions
Start Here: The Axis You're Betting On
- Which machine line and specific axis (or subsystem) should we focus on for this evaluation?
- Who on your team owns the technical decision for the servo platform for this machine?
- Roughly how many machines of this type are currently in production (or planned) over the next 12–24 months?
- When did this axis first start to show limits or generate customer complaints?
- Who else should we include in this conversation (controls, mechanical, service, procurement)? Please list names/roles.
What If Your Best Axis Isn't Good Enough?
- If your most critical axis could not meet the next customer spec, what would be the real consequence for the machine or your relationship with that customer?
- Describe the specific limits you've observed on the incumbent servo platform (e.g., steady-state position error, settling time, torque ripple, velocity bandwidth). Please be specific with numbers where possible.
- Which failure or rejection modes have you seen most frequently on this axis?
- Compared to competitors you've tested or seen demonstrated, where does the incumbent most often lose ground?
- How often do these limits cause you to redesign the mechanical or process approach to meet customer specs?
Where Do You Lose Confidence — Parts, People, or Support?
- When a servo-related issue happens in the field, what typically causes the longest delay to resolution?
- How well are global spares and logistics organized for this machine family today?
- Quantify the service impact: average MTTR (mean time to repair) and typical downtime per incident for the axis in question.
- Tell us about a recent field incident where servo hardware or firmware was the root cause—what happened and how did it feel to customers/operators?
- Which support model would make you most confident going forward?
If Cycle Time Was 30% Faster, What Would Change?
- What specific performance targets are you aiming to hit for this axis? (Pick the metrics that matter most and provide target values where possible.)
- How do you plan to measure success in pilot and production—what test signals, sample sizes, or acceptance thresholds will you require?
- Which outcome would represent an unequivocal win on day one of production?
- Who ultimately signs off production acceptance for this machine, and what evidence do they require?
- If we proved the motion metrics in a bench test but you still had reservations, what would those reservations be?
What’s the Human Cost of Tuning and Retraining?
- How much of your controls team's time is currently spent tuning motion loops and troubleshooting axis behavior (per project or per machine)?
- What has been the hardest part about switching programming environments or controllers in the past?
- How comfortable is your team with advanced tuning workflows (manual optimization beyond auto-tune)?
- Tell us about a time your team learned a new motion platform—how long did it take to reach production competence and what helped most?
- Which training formats work best for your engineers during commissioning?
How Much Risk Can You Tolerate for a Switch?
- If adopting a new servo platform could introduce a short-term throughput dip, how much production risk are you willing to accept to gain long-term performance?
- What procurement or qualification milestones must be cleared before a new platform is approved (e.g., vendor audits, certifications, spare-part agreements)?
- Which integration constraints are absolute must-haves for any replacement (pick all that apply)?
- What timeline are you targeting for a pilot and for full production rollout?
- Who in procurement or supply chain will need to be engaged early to commit to spare parts and logistics?
Let’s Make the Test Irrefutable
- If you had to name the single most critical axis-level metric we must prove on bench and on-machine to remove doubt, what would it be and why?
- Which test scenarios would you insist on running during evaluate-on-bench (pick all that apply)?
- What acceptance thresholds (numeric) should we use for those scenarios? Please supply values or ranges.
- Who from your team will run or witness the bench tests (controls engineer, metrology, application engineer), and do they require remote access or onsite presence?
- How will you validate that bench results translate to production—what on-machine checks are non-negotiable?
What Would Make This Feel Like a Safe, Smart Switch?
- What specific commercial or support commitments would move you from curiosity to a formal pilot (e.g., spare-part guarantees, AE time, trial hardware loan)?
- How important is a staged approach (pilot → limited production → full rollout) versus a single-swap strategy for you?
- What acceptance sign-off artifacts do you require after commissioning (logs, tuning steps, metrology reports, run-book for service)?
- Which communication channel and cadence do you prefer during pilot and deployment (weekly calls, shared channel, ticketing system)?
- Who needs to be on the final production acceptance call, and who has authority to sign the acceptance?
-
-
Success
Confirm production performance against success signals, capture tuning learnings, and maintain a shared channel for field issues and spare-part enhancements.
Success Reviews
- Production Performance Review
- Tuning Retrospective (Engineering Deep-Dive)
- Field Issues & Spares Triage
- Enhancements & Spare-Part Roadmap Planning
- Executive Acceptance & Handoff
Issues & Enhancements
- Open engineering and logistics tickets for agreed pilots and assign resource leads.
- Create the shared channel, add named members (OEM controls, machine-owner ops, vendor AE, logistics), and publish channel rules.
- Produce a spares reorder table with minimum/maximum thresholds and recommended regional stock locations.
- Document triage workflow, severity definitions, and SLA targets and publish in the shared repo.
- Schedule a quarterly field-issues review cadence to monitor trends and spare consumption.
- Prioritized Backlog Review
- Agree a prioritized roadmap with pilots defined for high-impact changes.
- Secure resource commitments and timelines for pilots and implementation phases.
- Identify commercial or contract amendments required to support spare-part changes and obtain agreement to pursue them.
- Assign owners and create measurable acceptance criteria for each roadmap item.
- Publish the prioritized roadmap with owners, expected dates, and pilot acceptance criteria.
- Current State Summary
- Prepare any required commercial amendment or PO request for spare-part staging.
- Schedule pilot kickoff meetings and define measurement plan and reporting cadence.
- Executive Summary: Outcomes vs Success Signals
- Obtain formal production acceptance or capture conditional acceptance with explicit remediations.
- Finalize warranty, spare-part commitments, and SLAs in writing.
- Complete handoff to BAU support with named SPOC(s) and an agreed escalation path.
- Establish a continuous improvement cadence and owners to monitor field performance and spare usage.
- Circulate the signed acceptance document and upload it to the shared repository and CRM.
- Confirm warranty and spare commitments in a contract amendment or statement of work and obtain signatures.
- Handoff all operational documents, runbooks, and channel membership to the global support team.
- Set the recurring review meeting (monthly or quarterly) and invite stakeholders for continuous improvement tracking.
- Confirm which success signals are met and which are not with traceable evidence.
- Make consequences explicit for each unmet signal to create urgency for remediation.
- Obtain a customer decision: accept production performance as-is, accept with minor concessions, or move to remediation plan.
- Agree immediate next steps and owners for any remediation or additional validation.
- Publish a performance report mapping each success signal to measured results and attach supporting logs to the shared repo.
- If gaps exist, generate a prioritized remediation ticket list with owners and target dates.
- Schedule the Tuning Retrospective deep-dive within 7 business days when remediation or further tuning is required.
- Open the shared field-issues channel (per Field Issues meeting) if not already created.
- Recap of Tuning Actions Applied
- Produce a validated tuning runbook that captures parameter sets and step-by-step procedures for each critical axis.
- Decide whether controller firmware or algorithm changes are required and create engineering tickets if so.
- Assign owners for documentation updates and for delivering training to on-site engineers.
- Reduce variance in future tuning by defining preconditions and testing checks for auto-tune success.
- Deliver the tuning runbook and attach oscilloscope/tracelog examples for each recipe.
- Create engineering change request(s) for any required firmware or algorithm updates with acceptance criteria.
- Schedule a hands-on training session for the customer's controls team and record it for future reference.
- Update the Solution Scope documentation with the final accepted tuning parameters and constraints.
- Open Issues Inventory
- Put an operational triage process in place with clear severities, owners, and SLAs.
- Agree spare-part stocking levels and regional staging plans to meet target RFT (right-first-time) goals.
- Create a persistent shared channel for rapid issue reporting and cross-org visibility.
- Document RMA and logistics flows so field teams know where to escalate and how to requisition parts.
- Triage & Severity Assignment
- Acceptance Criteria Confirmation & Sign-off
- Success Signal Audit
- Cost/Benefit & Risk Assessment
- Axis Case Studies
- Warranty, Spare Commitments & SLAs
- Gap & Consequence Assessment
- Spares Consumption & Threshold Review
- Root Cause & Residual Risk Analysis
- Pilot Scope & Acceptance Criteria
- Logistics & RMA Process
- Support Handoff & Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
- Tuning Recipes & Runbook Draft
- Proof Data Walkthrough
- Timeline, Resources & Commercial Impact