Contract Management
Platform decisions with deep integration complexity, organizational change, and long-term data stakes.
This interactive experience is the shipped product itself — the same application code customers run in production, mounted read-only in your browser over a real sample journey. Not a video, not a mockup: because the demo and the product are one codebase, it can never drift from the real thing.
Inside this journey
-
Contract & Process Discovery
Map current contracting workflows, bottlenecks, stakeholders, compliance risks, and measurable success criteria for faster, auditable contract cycles.
Discovery Questions
Kickoff: the contract moment that matters
- Tell me briefly about the one contract or review that prompted this conversation.
- How often do contracts in your typical deal pipeline enter legal review?
- Walk me through the current path a new contract takes from intake to signature in your organization.
- Who usually raises the alarm when a contract is stuck or a renewal is missed?
- Which metric do you monitor most closely when the legal team flags a stuck deal?
Where the day-to-day actually breaks
- If a contract missed its deadline again today, what downstream cost would force a leadership escalation?
- Describe the last three contracts that exceeded your target review timeline and what made each one slow.
- When negotiations happen through email and Word only, which specific step creates the most rework?
- Count the number of stakeholders who are routinely included on negotiation drafts for complex commercial deals.
- Name the role that ends up owning the executed contract and its renewals after signature.
When compliance or money is on the line
- Recall a compliance or renewal failure in the past 24 months that would have been prevented if obligation and renewal alerts had worked reliably, and describe the impact.
- Give a concrete example of a missed termination or renewal notice, its financial impact, and how it was discovered.
- Identify the role or team accountable for contract compliance and how escalation is routed to leadership.
- Which categories of contract carry the highest audit or regulatory risk for you?
- If obligation extraction accuracy were limited to 70 percent, would that meet your audit objectives, and what would you do differently?
The negotiation workflow, where time disappears
- Imagine removing a single negotiation step, which change would cut your average legal review time by half?
- Describe how collaborative redlines are currently shared, consolidated, and versioned among your lawyers and counterparties.
- Count the average number of redline iterations on a representative commercial contract that reached signature in the last six months.
- Name the role that initiates final signature and the tool or method they use today.
- Under what conditions would your legal team stop redlining in Word and adopt a platform negotiation workflow?
How you are comparing options today
- List the categories of external solutions and vendors you are evaluating to address slow negotiations and missed renewals.
- Has anyone proposed an internal program to fix this without an external vendor, and who would lead it?
- Explain the measurable conditions under which you would keep your current process rather than buying a new platform.
- Point to the three capability gaps that repeatedly show up in demos or RFP responses you have seen.
- Tell me the concrete proof points or pilot results that would make you sign with a vendor quickly.
Can this actually be done here, practical readiness and constraints
- Point to the technical or organizational blocker most likely to stop a migration before it begins.
- List the internal systems that must integrate for contract intake, e-signature, and ERP posting.
- Do you have API or export access to those systems, and which team controls that access?
- Provide the person or team who can supply sample contract data and confirm their availability during a pilot.
- How mature is your contract classification and naming convention, and can you share a mapping for pilot onboarding?
- Should legal approval or data-sharing authority delay the timeline, identify the most likely gating step and an estimated resolution time.
Proof in the portfolio, the pilot that proves value
- Select three contract types that, if included in a pilot, would most clearly demonstrate measurable savings compared with your current process.
- Estimate the typical volume for those contract types over a 12-month period.
- Identify the named owner for the pilot and the decision authority they will have to approve success criteria.
- State the minimum clause and obligation extraction accuracy percentage you would require to consider the pilot successful.
- Choose the operational KPI beyond accuracy that will determine pilot success for you.
- Assuming the pilot meets the KPIs, would procurement or legal be authorized to proceed to full rollout under existing terms without a new commercial negotiation?
Who signs and how fast
- Picture the fastest possible approval timeline, what decision would make that happen?
- Provide the roles required for commercial sign-off and the legal reviewers who must approve the terms.
- Specify the procurement or budget cycles this purchase must align with to hit your desired quarter.
- Give the maximum procurement approval lead time that would force a rollout delay beyond your target quarter.
- Pinpoint the single metric that would convince procurement to sign in the same week as a successful pilot.
Final acceptance criteria and next steps
- Assuming the pilot proves extraction accuracy and cycle-time improvements, what would still stop you from signing?
- Detail the specific acceptance criteria you will use to evaluate extraction accuracy, redline efficiency, and renewal coverage.
- State the executive sponsor and their decision authority for buy or no-buy if the pilot meets criteria.
- Declare the timeline you need to see from pilot completion to signature to meet your fiscal or project goals.
- Explain the decision process and the people who will sign off if the pilot misses KPIs, including whether you would iterate, pause, or cancel.
- Choose your preferred next step after a successful pilot.
-
Solution Experience
Walk through how the platform handles the buyer's real contract scenarios—authoring, collaborative redlines, clause library use, obligation extraction, and renewal alerts—anchored to the customer's outcomes.
Solution Experience
- Solution Experience Session
- Confirm the current state and cost to your team
- You confirm the demonstrated authoring and clause selection eliminates the manual rework you described.
- Run sample extraction on the provided contracts and deliver an extraction accuracy comparison before the follow-up session.
- Provide 25 to 100 representative executed contracts and the current manual tracking spreadsheet for obligation and renewal comparison.
- Authoring and clause library proof using your scenario
- You validate that collaborative redlines reduce the legal review cycle toward your target days-to-sign metric.
- Collaborative redline walkthrough with multi-lawyer thread
- You accept the extraction output as representative and agree on acceptance thresholds for extraction accuracy and on the next evidence to gather.
- Define target acceptance criteria for extraction accuracy and desired legal review cycle time for formal evaluation.
- Obligation and clause extraction proof on a sample document
- Renewal and termination alert simulation
- Validation checkpoint
- Solution Experience Session
- Solution Experience Deck
- Solution Brief
- meeting
- slides
- document
-
Solution Evaluation
Hands-on evaluation: load a representative contract portfolio, run AI clause and obligation extraction, test authoring/redline workflows, and measure extraction accuracy and cycle-time improvement against acceptance criteria.
- success_criteria
- gaps
- current_state
- stakeholders
- decision_readiness
- desired_state
- gaps
- success_criteria
- decision_readiness
- stakeholders
- desired_state
- current_state
- stakeholders
- decision_readiness
- current_state
- desired_state
- success_criteria
- gaps
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
- decision_readiness
-
Solution Scope
Define modules, migration volumes, integrations, responsibilities, timelines, and measurable acceptance criteria for extraction accuracy and workflow performance.
Scope Configuration
- Migrate Contract Repository
- Import PDFs with OCR and Indexing
- Classify and Tag Legacy Contracts
- Extract Clauses and Obligations (AI)
- Configure Authoring Templates and Clause Library
- Deploy Collaborative Redlining with Versioning
- Enable Electronic Signature Workflows
- Set Up Searchable Repository and Full-Text Search
- Configure Renewal and Obligation Alerts
- Automate Intake-to-Signature Workflow
- Deploy One Contract Workflow Pilot
- Train Legal and Procurement Users on Platform
Scope Questions
Migrate Contract Repository
- Which repositories contain your executed contracts (choose all that apply)?
- How many contract documents need to be migrated (approximate count)?
- What percentage migration completeness will you accept for go-live (for example 95%)?
- Who will be the named owner for migration decisions and approvals (name and role)?
- What retention or legal hold policies apply to the contracts being migrated (e.g., 7-year regulatory retention, active litigation holds)?
- Are there encrypted files or access-restricted contracts that require special extraction or credentials?
Import PDFs with OCR and Indexing
- What share of your contract portfolio are scanned image PDFs versus native text PDFs?
- Which OCR language sets must be supported to index contract text accurately?
- Are there handwritten annotations, embedded stamps, or red pen marks that OCR must preserve or flag for manual review?
- Do you require automated redaction of sensitive elements during import (for example tax identifiers, bank account numbers)?
- Which contract metadata fields must be extracted and indexed at import (for example counterparty name, effective date, termination date, contract value)?
- How should files with failed OCR or poor image quality be handled?
Classify and Tag Legacy Contracts
- What primary contract types should be auto-classified in the pilot (for example Master Agreement, Statement of Work, NDA, Purchase Order)?
- Which clause- or topic-level tags do you require (for example auto-renewal, termination-for-convenience, price escalation, indemnity)?
- Who will own final validation of automated classifications and tags (role or team)?
- What manual review workflow should be triggered for low-confidence classifications (for example assign to reviewer queue, batch review windows)?
- Are there jurisdictional or regulatory contract types needing special tags (for example GDPR Data Processing Addendum, local statutory terms)?
- Do you want to preserve original folder structure as tags or map documents into a new taxonomy during migration?
Extract Clauses and Obligations (AI)
- Which clause categories should be prioritized for extraction in the pilot (for example termination, renewal, indemnity, confidentiality, payment terms)?
- What extraction accuracy percentage for clauses and obligations do you require for production acceptance (for example 90% recall on renewal dates)?
- Which obligation attributes must be captured for each obligation (for example responsible party, action, due date, recurrence, notification window)?
- Do extracted obligations need a direct link back to the original contract page and surrounding clause text?
- Do you have an annotated gold-standard sample set or examples we can use to validate extraction accuracy?
- How should ambiguous or conditional obligations be surfaced to reviewers (for example flagged and assigned to legal reviewer)?
Configure Authoring Templates and Clause Library
- Which contract templates must be created or migrated first (for example MSA, SOW, NDA, Order Form)?
- Which preferred clause versions or fallback language must be included in the clause library to enforce negotiation guardrails?
- Who will be the custodian of the clause library and who approves library updates (role or team)?
- Do you require role-based templates with different pre-approved clauses for functions such as procurement versus sales?
- What metadata and attributes should be associated with library clauses (for example risk level, owner, last-reviewed date)?
- Would you like automatic substitution of negotiated commercial items such as a pricing matrix or service levels into templates?
Deploy Collaborative Redlining with Versioning
- Which negotiation editing experience do your users prefer (in-platform editor, tracked changes in Word, comment-only workflows)?
- How many collaborators typically work on a single negotiating document concurrently?
- Do you require a deterministic version history with the ability to roll back to any prior signed draft?
- Which integrations must support redline notifications and attachments (for example email routing, matter management, ticketing)?
- What approvals or gating steps must occur before a negotiated draft is sent for signature (for example legal sign-off, finance approval)?
- Do you need automated change reports that compare executed contracts to the negotiated redline history?
Enable Electronic Signature Workflows
- Which signature flows do you require for standard documents (single signee, parallel signing, sequential signing)?
- Will you continue using an existing e-signature provider, use the platform's built-in signing, or evaluate alternatives?
- Do signature audit trails and certificates need to be archived alongside the executed PDF in the repository?
- Are there contract types that require witnessed or notarized signatures under regulation or policy?
- Which signer authentication methods must be supported (for example email OTP, SMS OTP, single sign-on via SAML)?
- Do you require automatic post-signature routing of executed contracts to downstream systems such as ERP or vendor master?
Set Up Searchable Repository and Full-Text Search
- Which metadata fields must be visible in search results and used as filters (for example counterparty, effective date, renewal date, contract value)?
- Which access model is required for repository search results (departmental, contract-level access control lists, enterprise-wide)?
- Do you require faceted search by clause type and by extracted obligation attributes?
- What archival and retention rules should apply to searchable records and index artifacts?
- How quickly must a newly uploaded or migrated contract be discoverable in search (index latency target)?
- Do you want semantic or AI-powered meaning-based search in addition to keyword/full-text search?
Configure Renewal and Obligation Alerts
- Which obligation types require automated alerting (for example renewal notice, payment due, SLA milestone)?
- Which notification channels must be supported for alerts (email, in-app notification, collaboration channel, SMS)?
- What lookahead windows do you require for renewal reminders (for example 90 days, 30 days)?
- Who should receive renewal and obligation alerts and who approves the renewal action (roles or teams)?
- What escalation rules should trigger when a renewal or obligation is not acknowledged (for example escalate to manager after 7 days)?
- Do alerts need to include spend or budget coding that syncs to procurement or ERP systems?
Automate Intake-to-Signature Workflow
- Which intake channels receive new contract documents (for example dedicated email inbox, procurement portal upload, CRM attachments)?
- Which automatic validation steps must run at intake (for example duplicate detection, counterparty validation, template matching)?
- What measurable workflow performance improvement (for example median cycle-time reduction percentage) will define success for the intake-to-signature flow?
- Who approves exceptions to automated intake routing and who is notified when exceptions occur?
- Do you require integration to a CRM or ERP to populate commercial fields before signature?
- What validation rules should block signature (for example missing signer, unsigned annex, unresolved obligation)?
-
Mutual Commit
Agree commercial and legal terms, data-access authorizations for portfolio processing, timelines, and formal acceptance criteria for go/no-go decisions.
Agreement Modules
- Subscription Order Form
- Master Services Agreement (MSA)
- Statement of Work (SOW)
- Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
- Data Access Authorization
- Acceptance Test Plan & Go/No-Go Criteria
- Change Order Agreement
- Industry Compliance Addendum (conditional)
-
Deployment
Lock readiness facts and configuration values before execution begins.
-
Pre-Deployment Readiness
Confirm concrete readiness facts—environments, sample data access, named owners, legal approvals, and migration sequencing—required before execution begins.
Pre-Deployment Questions
Environment and access
- Is the production contract repository nominated for migration available for access, or what date will it be available? (so we can schedule credential handoff and the first extraction window)
- Are sandbox or staging environments provisioned for the platform and for the buyer's test systems (identity, CRM/ERP test orgs) required for end-to-end validation?
- Are target integration endpoints identified and authorized for test processing (by system category: CRM, ERP, identity provider, document repository)? If partially authorized, indicate which categories remain.
Data and configuration
- Has a representative sample contract portfolio been approved for test processing and legal review (redacted if required)? (this enables accuracy measurement and training data use)
- Has the clause taxonomy and field-mapping approach for the pilot been decided, and who is the named owner responsible for approving mappings? (provide owner name and role in the next field)
- Named owner for clause taxonomy / field mapping (name and role). (deployment team needs a single approver to finalize mapping rules)
People, ownership, and approvals
- Have named owners been assigned for these workstreams: migration execution, integrations, legal/data approvals, and pilot operations? (if partially assigned, list which are missing in the next question)
- If any workstream lacks a named owner, list the workstream(s) and the proposed owner or 'TBD'. (this prevents hold-ups during cutover)
- Who is authorized to approve the pilot go/no‑go decision (name and role)? (this authorizer will be the escalation point for the pilot acceptance criteria)
Timing, sequencing, and constraints
- Are there blackout windows, regulatory freeze periods, or fiscal close dates that will block migration/cutover? If yes, indicate whether dates are confirmed or pending. (so we can avoid scheduling conflicts)
- What is the agreed first migration batch scope and sequencing for the pilot (select the approach so we can create the pilot plan)?
- Has legal/data-protection returned required approvals for sample processing and migration (DPA or equivalent)? (select current state)
-
Configuration Details
Capture exact configuration values the deployment team will use—repository mappings, integration credentials, clause taxonomy settings, user roles, and notification rules.
Configuration Details
ENVIRONMENTS & ENDPOINTS
- Enter the production instance name to provision (format: short hostname, e.g., 'production' or 'prod'). Default: 'production'. This exact value will be used by the deployment build.
- Enter the production instance base URL (format: https://your-subdomain.example). This value is consumed verbatim by the deployment build for callback and link generation.
- Select the deployment region for the production instance (Default: US-East)
IDENTITY & ACCESS
- Choose the primary SSO method to enable for users (Default: SAML-based IdP). The deployment build uses this to configure the identity connector.
- Enter your IdP issuer/entity ID or OIDC issuer URL (format: https://...). Provide the non-secret identifier only; the secret/certificate will be exchanged securely at kickoff. Leave blank if 'None' selected.
- Select the user provisioning method (Default: SCIM (automated provisioning)). The platform's user lifecycle configuration will use this value.
REPOSITORY, TAXONOMY & NOTIFICATIONS
- Select the primary source repository type for migration (Default: Cloud file storage)
- Enter the primary source repository root identifier or path (format: bucket name, share path, or DMS root ID). Provide the non-secret identifier only; access credentials are exchanged securely.
- Choose the clause taxonomy variant to apply during extraction (Default: Standard taxonomy)
- Extraction confidence threshold percentage for auto-accepting extracted obligations (numeric). Default: 80
- Select notification delivery channels to enable for eventing and deadline alerts (multi-select). The platform will configure outbound connectors for selected channels; non-secret identifiers are requested here.
-
Migration & Rollout
Execute repository migration, enable templates and clause library, onboard pilot users, and run go-live sequencing with owners and rollback plans.
-
-
Success
Validate outcomes against success criteria, review extraction accuracy versus manual tracking, operationalize obligation and renewal alerts, and track issues and enhancement requests.
Success Reviews
- Go-live Health Check (weeks 1-4)
- First Measurement Review (weeks 4-10)
- Acceptance Gate Decision (around day 90)
- Quarterly Success Review (ongoing quarterly)
- Annual Outcomes Review (annual)
Issues & Enhancements
- Publish the prioritized enhancement list for the next quarter with estimated delivery dates.
- Record the formal acceptance decision with the named signatory and attach the evidence package to the project record.
- If any criteria failed, create a remediation tracker with tasks, due dates, and verification steps, then schedule the retest meeting.
- Execute the incumbent decommission or formal read-only archive and confirm deletion or retention records are stored.
- Trend review of outcome metrics
- Confirm extraction accuracy and renewal alert performance trends and identify any regressions requiring action.
- Prioritize the top enhancement requests and assign target delivery windows.
- Agree any necessary training or process changes to improve adoption of redline and obligation workflows.
- Re-confirm success criteria and named owners
- Close or escalate any critical support tickets older than the agreed SLA threshold.
- Schedule targeted training sessions to address specific adoption gaps identified in the review.
- Present annual outcomes versus targets
- Validate annual realized value against targets and document any material gaps with their causes.
- Agree a schedule of systemic improvements and monitoring cadence for the next 12 months.
- Ensure the obligation and renewal alerting processes are operationalized and resourced for the year ahead.
- Publish the annual outcomes report including baseline, current values, and variance explanations.
- Create a 12-month operational improvement plan with milestones for extraction model updates and workflow automation.
- Schedule quarterly checkpoints to monitor the execution of the agreed improvement plan.
- Deployment verification checklist completed and evidence captured in the project record.
- All critical open issues logged with named owners and target resolution dates.
- Early adoption signals (activated pilot users, initial redline transactions, sample extraction runs) observed and summarized.
- Publish the deployment verification checklist and attach evidence from migration and integration tests.
- Log each critical blocker in the issue tracker with a resolution target and owner assigned.
- Schedule the first measurement review once two weeks of production-like usage data are available.
- Present first metrics versus targets
- Determine whether average legal review cycle time and clause extraction accuracy are trending toward the Solution Evaluation targets.
- Document root causes for each off-target metric and agree corrective actions with target dates.
- Confirm the evidence package required for the acceptance gate and the date to present it.
- Produce a root-cause analysis for each metric gap including supporting samples and logs.
- Create a remediation plan for extraction accuracy improvements, listing datasets for retraining and target completion dates.
- Deliver an evidence package for the acceptance gate that maps each measurement to the acceptance criterion recorded in the Solution Evaluation.
- Restate acceptance criteria and targets from the Solution Evaluation
- Document pass/fail outcome for each acceptance criterion recorded in the Solution Evaluation and capture the formal acceptance decision.
- If accepted, record the named buyer signatory and archive the acceptance evidence; if not, agree remediation actions and retest date.
- Confirm the incumbent system has been decommissioned or formally retained read-only and archived as required.
- Operationalize obligation and renewal alerts
- Quantify realized value and any variance
- Present outcome data against each criterion
- Root-cause diagnosis for any gaps
- Deployment and migration validation
- Issue and enhancement backlog triage
- Document pass/fail per criterion and formal acceptance decision
- Outstanding issues and systemic improvements
- Agree specific corrective actions and timelines
- Early adoption signals and usage patterns
- Agree an operational plan for the next 12 months
- Open issues and blockers
- Confirm timeline to the acceptance gate
- Adoption and training items
- Incumbent system wind-down status
- Agree immediate remediation actions
- Agree remediation plan for failed items